MIS501 Principles of Programming Assignment Help

MIS501 Principles of Programming
ASSESSMENT 3 BRIEF
Subject Code and TitleMIS501 Principles of Programming
AssessmentBusiness Case Study: Final Solution
Individual/GroupGroup
Length2000 words (+/- 10%) or equivalent including source code and comments,1 UML diagram
Learning OutcomesThe Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include: Synthesise the tenets of procedural programming into the object- oriented paradigm.Design and implement solutions using unified modelling language (UML) diagrams and coding to meet business needs.Apply an integrated development environment (IDE) using project management principles to create, compile, test and run codes to address business problems.Employ object-oriented concepts to solve business problems and justify decisions.
SubmissionDue by 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday end of Module 6.1.
Weighting45%
Total Marks100 marks

Task Summary

In groups, develop a Python program using the object-orientated program paradigm. Please refer to the Task Instructions for details on how to complete this task.

Context

Object Orientated Programming (OOP) is one of the most popular programming paradigms. In contrast with procedural programming, OOP uses reusable classes as the building blocks, which are used to create individual instances of objects. OOP developers focus on the interactions and relationships between objects. In this subject, we introduced you to some core concepts of OOP, including classes, objects, instances, encapsulation and inheritance. In this assessment, you will put them together to develop a program using the OOP paradigm, through which you will demonstrate the following knowledge and skills:

  • Collaborate with other developers and using OOP to develop a program in parallel.
  • OOP design and implementation.
  • Understanding the concepts of classes and inheritance.
  • Design a program and illustrate the relations and associations through UML Diagram.

Instructions

  • Form groups of 2 – 3 students. Please read attached MIS501_Assessment 2 & 3_Group Formation, Registration and Administration Guidelines document.
    1. Please read the attached MIS501_Assessment 3_Business Case Study and complete the assessment tasks.
    • All implementations must be in Python 3 (that is NOT Python 2). Programs implemented in a different language will be marked 0. Programs implemented in Python 2 will be capped at 50% of the available marks.
  • You may only use the language features and syntax taught in Module 1.1 through to Module 6.1. You MUST not use any other language features beyond what was taught by Module 6.1. Penalties apply.
    • You may implement the programs in any IDE of your choice.
    • The program should be provided with adequate and meaning comments.
    • The program must be implemented using OOP. Programs implemented without any OOP will be capped at 30% of the available marks.
    • Your program should be robust. Check for input validity.

Hint

What would you do if user chose option 3 without entering any student information first?

  • Please follow Python Style Guide

Hint

Think about what classes you will need to implement, and which should inherit which. You should not assume that the user will choose the menu options in a sequential order, that is, the user may choose Option 1, enter some user information, then choose 2 >> 2.1 to print them, then back to Option 1 in the main menu to entre more user information.

  1. You are strongly advised to read the rubric which is an evaluation guide with criteria for grading the assignment. This will give them a clear picture of what a successful final solution looks like.

11.  Peer evaluation

  • Group participation will constitute the final 10% of the mark for Assessment 3. Participation will be determined as follows:
    1. Each student in the team will evaluate the other members’ contributions using a participation score matrix (see Group Participation Score Matrix attached)
    1. Individually, each team member will assign a “Group participation score” (from 1-5) for each member of the group using the score matrix.
    1. Each student is to assess peers’ contributions according to the Peer Evaluation Grading Scheme.
    1. The participation score matrix submitted by each individual student via the Assessment 3 link at the same time after the Group submission.
    1. The Facilitator will use the average “group participation score” for each member to determine the weighted ‘Teamwork’ criterion row in the final marking rubric for this assessment.
    1. All peer evaluation submissions are confidential not viewed by the other team members.

Submission Instructions

Graded submission- Group submission

Submit this task via the Assessment 3 link in the main navigation menu in MIS501 Principles of Programming. You should submit one or multiple Python file(s) (ending .py). The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.

Submit the following 2 files for this assessment in MIS501: Principles of Programming.

  1. Task 1 Flow Chart Diagram – task1.docx/jpeg/pdf.

b)        Python Program, demonstrating the implication of tasks 1,2 & 3 – Solution.py

DO NOT zip these files into one file, submit individual files. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.

Peer Evaluation – Individual Submission

Each individual student is to submit a completed team participation score matrix document in the Assessment 3 – Peer Evaluation submission link. Please submit a peer review correctly, as no submission may result is zero grading for this assessment criteria.

Referencing

It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing

Academic Integrity Declaration

We declare that except where we have referenced, the work we are submitting for this assessment task is our own work. We have read and are aware of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure viewable online

We are aware that we need to keep a copy of all submitted material and their drafts, and we will do so accordingly.

All students are responsible for ensuring that all work submitted is their own and is appropriately referenced and academically written according to the Academic Writing Guide. Students also need to have read and be aware of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure and subsequent penalties for academic misconduct. These are viewable online.

Students also must keep a copy of all submitted material and any assessment drafts.

Special Consideration

To apply for special consideration for a modification to an assessment or exam due to unexpected or extenuating circumstances, please consult the Assessment Policy for Higher Education Coursework and ELICOS and, if applicable to your circumstance, submit a completed Application for Assessment Special Consideration Form to your Learning Facilitator.

Assessment Rubric

  Assessment AttributesFail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0-49%  Pass (Functional) 50-64%  Credit (Proficient) 65-74%  Distinction (Advanced) 75-84%  High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100%
Object Oriented Programming                   Percentage for this criterion = 30%The program is not implemented with the Object-Oriented Programming paradigm.   No implementations of classes.The program demonstrates basic understanding of Object-Oriented Programming.   There are classes with instance variables and methods implemented.   The design of classes has much room for improvement.   Does not implement inheritance between classes.The program demonstrates proficient understanding of Object- Oriented Programming.   The design of classes is generally sound, including their instance/class variables and methods.   Inheritance between classes implemented.   There is some room for improvement in the implementation of the inheritance relationship between classes.The program demonstrates advanced understanding of Object-Oriented Programming.   The design of classes is sound, including their instance/class variables and methods.   Inheritance between classes implemented.   The inheritance relationship is reasonable and correctly implemented.The program demonstrates exceptional understanding of OOP through the design of classes.   Classes including their initiation, instance/class variables and methods are expertly designed and implemented.   The inheritance relationship between classes is sound and expertly implemented.
UML Diagram       Percentage for this criterion = 10%The Diagram is completely unrelated to Assignment tasks.The diagram is relevant to Assignment tasks but does not use conventional notations or the flow is not logically sound.   The actors, relationships and associations as depicted in the diagram may not be consistent with that in the program.The diagram is relevant to Assignment tasks, largely follows the conventional notations and the flow is largely correct.   The actors, relationships and associations as depicted in the diagram is largely consistent with that in the program.The diagram is relevant to Assignment tasks, follows the conventional notations, and the flow is complete and correct.   The actors, relationships and associations as depicted in the diagram is consistent with that in the program.The diagram is relevant to Assignment tasks, follows the conventional notations, and the flow is complete and correct.   The actors, relationships and associations as depicted in the diagram is consistent with that in the program.   Not missing any actors, associations, and relationships.
Task 1   Sign up and Sign in       Percentage for this criterion = 20%The program is not implemented in Python3.   Does not run and contain syntax errors. Completely unrelated to the Task 1 requirements.   No Python script file (.py) is submitted (e.g., submission of a .txt or .doc file)The program demonstrates a working understanding of Python programming.   Implemented in Python 3 and runs. Does not contain any syntax errors. Generally, satisfies major functional requirements in Task 1.   Contains some logical errors. Does not conform to Python programming style guide.The program demonstrates proficient skills in Python programming.   Implemented in Python 3 and runs. Does not contain any syntax errors.   Satisfies almost all functional requirements in Task 1, but few minor functional requirements in Task 1 may not have been implemented.   In general, the program is logically sound but may contain very minor logical errors.   Conforms to Python programming style guide.The program demonstrates advanced skills in Python programming. Implemented in Python 3 and runs.   Does not contain any syntax errors. All functional requirements in Task 1 are implemented.   Logically sound and does not contain any logical errors.   Strictly conforms to Python programming style guide.The program demonstrates exceptional Python programming skills.   Expertly designed and is robust, concise, and efficient. Demonstrates advanced skills in Python programming.   Implemented in Python 3 and runs. Does not contain any syntax errors. All functional requirements in Task 1 are implemented.   Logically sound and does not contain any logical errors. Strictly conforms to Python programming style guide.
Task 2 Ordering     Percentage for this criterion = 20%The program is not implemented in Python 3.   Does not run and contain syntax errors.   Completely unrelated to the Task 2 requirements.   No Python script file (.py) is submitted (e.g., submission of a .txt or .doc file)The program demonstrates a working understanding of Python programming.   Implemented in Python 3 and runs.   Does not contain any syntax errors.   Generally, satisfies major functional requirements in Task 2.   Contain some logical errors. May not conform to Python programming style guide.The program demonstrates proficient skills in Python programming.   Implemented in Python 3 and runs. Does not contain any syntax errors.   Satisfies almost all functional requirements in Task 2, but few minor functional requirements in Task 2 may not have been implemented.   Logically sound but may contain very minor logical errors.   Largely conforms to Python programming style guide.The program demonstrates advanced skills in Python programming.   Implemented in Python 3 and runs.   Does not contain any syntax errors.   All functional requirements in Task 2.   Logically sound and does not contain any logical errors.   Strictly conforms to Python programming style guide.The program demonstrates exceptional Python programming skills.   Expertly designed and is robust, concise, and efficient. Demonstrates advanced skills in Python programming.   Implemented in Python 3 and runs. Does not contain any syntax errors.   All functional requirements in Task 2 are implemented   Logically sound and does not contain any logical errors. Strictly conforms to Python programming style guide.
Task 3   Summary of Transactions   Percentage for this criterion = 10%The program is not implemented in Python3.   Does not run and contain syntax errors.   Completely unrelated to the Task 3 requirements.   No Python script file (.py) is submitted (e.g., submission of a .txt or .doc file). The program used the “set” structure.The program demonstrates a working understanding of Python programming.   Implemented in Python 3 and runs.   Does not contain any syntax errors.   Satisfies major functional requirements in Task 3.   Contain some logical errors. Does not conform to Python programming style guideThe program demonstrates proficient skills in Python programming.   Implemented in Python 3 and runs. Does not contain any syntax errors. Satisfies almost all functional requirements in Task 3, but few minor functional requirements in Task 3 may not have been implemented.   Logically sound but may contain very minor logical errors.   Conforms to Python programming style guide.The program demonstrates advanced skills in Python programming.   Implemented in Python 3 and runs.   Does not contain any syntax errors.   All functional requirements in Task 3 are implemented.   Logically sound and does not contain any logical errors.   Strictly conforms to Python programming style guide.The program demonstrates exceptional Python programming skills.   Expertly designed and is robust, concise, and efficient.   Demonstrates advanced skills in Python programming. Implemented in Python 3 and runs. Does not   contain any syntax errors. All functional requirements in Task 3 are implemented.   Logically sound and does not contain any logical errors Strictly conforms to Python programming style guide.
Teamwork       Percentage for this criterion = 10%Does not participate effectively in a team environment.   Places individual goals ahead of the group responsibility.   Hinders the group process and upsets the schedule.Participates effectively in teams. Identifies team and individual goals, tasks, responsibilities, and schedules.   Contributes to group processes. Supports the team.Contributes to small group discussions to reach agreement on issues.   Works together with others towards shared goals.   Renegotiates responsibilities to meet needed change.Understands group dynamics and team roles. Facilitates team development.   Renegotiates responsibilities, tasks, and schedules to meet needed change.Builds team’s identity and commitment. Leads teams.   Evaluates teams’ outcomes.   Implements strategies for enhancing team effectiveness.
Order Now

Get expert help for MIS501 Principles of Programming and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!

Universal Assignment (March 12, 2026) MIS501 Principles of Programming Assignment Help. Retrieved from https://universalassignment.com/mis501-principles-of-programming-assignment-help/.
"MIS501 Principles of Programming Assignment Help." Universal Assignment - March 12, 2026, https://universalassignment.com/mis501-principles-of-programming-assignment-help/
Universal Assignment April 29, 2023 MIS501 Principles of Programming Assignment Help., viewed March 12, 2026,<https://universalassignment.com/mis501-principles-of-programming-assignment-help/>
Universal Assignment - MIS501 Principles of Programming Assignment Help. [Internet]. [Accessed March 12, 2026]. Available from: https://universalassignment.com/mis501-principles-of-programming-assignment-help/
"MIS501 Principles of Programming Assignment Help." Universal Assignment - Accessed March 12, 2026. https://universalassignment.com/mis501-principles-of-programming-assignment-help/
"MIS501 Principles of Programming Assignment Help." Universal Assignment [Online]. Available: https://universalassignment.com/mis501-principles-of-programming-assignment-help/. [Accessed: March 12, 2026]

Please note along with our service, we will provide you with the following deliverables:

Please do not hesitate to put forward any queries regarding the service provision.

We look forward to having you on board with us.

Most Frequent Questions & Answers

Universal Assignment Services is the best place to get help in your all kind of assignment help. We have 172+ experts available, who can help you to get HD+ grades. We also provide Free Plag report, Free Revisions,Best Price in the industry guaranteed.

We provide all kinds of assignmednt help, Report writing, Essay Writing, Dissertations, Thesis writing, Research Proposal, Research Report, Home work help, Question Answers help, Case studies, mathematical and Statistical tasks, Website development, Android application, Resume/CV writing, SOP(Statement of Purpose) Writing, Blog/Article, Poster making and so on.

We are available round the clock, 24X7, 365 days. You can appach us to our Whatsapp number +1 (613)778 8542 or email to info@universalassignment.com . We provide Free revision policy, if you need and revisions to be done on the task, we will do the same for you as soon as possible.

We provide services mainly to all major institutes and Universities in Australia, Canada, China, Malaysia, India, South Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

We provide lucrative discounts from 28% to 70% as per the wordcount, Technicality, Deadline and the number of your previous assignments done with us.

After your assignment request our team will check and update you the best suitable service for you alongwith the charges for the task. After confirmation and payment team will start the work and provide the task as per the deadline.

Yes, we will provide Plagirism free task and a free turnitin report along with the task without any extra cost.

No, if the main requirement is same, you don’t have to pay any additional amount. But it there is a additional requirement, then you have to pay the balance amount in order to get the revised solution.

The Fees are as minimum as $10 per page(1 page=250 words) and in case of a big task, we provide huge discounts.

We accept all the major Credit and Debit Cards for the payment. We do accept Paypal also.

Popular Assignments

Assignment Quantitative CASP RCT Checklist

CASP Randomised Controlled Trial Standard Checklist:11 questions to help you make sense of a randomised controlled trial (RCT)Main issues for consideration: Several aspects need to be considered when appraising arandomised controlled trial:Is the basic study design valid for a randomisedcontrolled trial? (Section A)Was the study methodologically sound? (Section B)What are

Read More »

Assignment Qualitative CASP Qualitative Checklist

CASP Checklist: 10 questions to help you make sense of a Qualitative researchHow to use this appraisal tool: Three broad issues need to be considered when appraising a qualitative study:Are the results of the study valid? (Section A)What are the results? (Section B)Will the results help locally? (Section C) The

Read More »

Assignment Topics

PS3002 Assignment TopicsDear studentsPlease choose one of the topics below. Please note that if you are repeating this subject, you cannot choose the same topic that you did previously in this subject.patellar tendinopathyinstability of the lumbar spinehamstring strainperoneal tendinopathyhip – labral tear.hip osteoarthritispatellofemoral instabilityankylosing spondylitisanterior cruciate ligament rupture (conservative management)quadriceps

Read More »

Assessment 2 – Report

Assessment 2 – Report (1200 words, 30%)PurposeTo demonstrate an understanding of the purpose and application of evidence-based dietary advice and guidelinesLearning objectives1.Review and analyse the role and function of macronutrients, micronutrients and functional components of food in maintaining health2.Understand digestion, absorption and metabolism of food in the human body and

Read More »

Assessment 2 – Individual Case Study Analysis Report

Southern Cross Institute,Level 2, 1-3 Fitzwilliam Street, PARRAMATTA NSW 2150 & Level 1, 37 George Street PARRAMATTA NSW 2150Tel: +61 2 9066 6902 Website: www.sci.edu.auTEQSA Provider No: PRV14353 CRICOS Provider No: 04078ªPage 1 of 16HRM201 Human Resources ManagementSemester 1, 2026Assessment 2 – Individual Case Study Analysis ReportSubmission Deadline: This Week,

Read More »

ASSESSMENT 2 BRIEF HPSYSD101 The Evolution of Psychology

HPSYSD101_Assessment 2_20240603 Page 1 of 7ASSESSMENT 2 BRIEFSubject Code and TitleHPSYSD101 The Evolution of PsychologyAssessment TaskAnnotated BibliographyIndividual/GroupIndividualLength2,000 words (+/- 10%)Learning OutcomesThe Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include:b) Examine the significant figures, events and ideas present in the history of psychology.c) Identify and relate the

Read More »

Assessment 1 – Individual Case Study Analysis Report

HOS203 Contemporary Accommodation ManagementSemester 1, 2026Assessment 1 – Individual Case Study Analysis Report (10%)Submission Deadline: This Week, at 11:59 pm (Week 4)Overview of this AssignmentFor this assessment, students are required to analyse an assigned case study about hospitality industry relevant regulations and/or operational and accreditation failures of a hospitality organisation.

Read More »

Assessment Brief PBHL1003FOUNDATIONS OF HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS

Assessment BriefPBHL1003FOUNDATIONS OF HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE SYSTEMSTitleAssessment 2 TypeEssay Due DateWeek 6 Monday 14 April 2025, 11:59pm AEST Length1000 words Weighting60% Academic IntegrityNO AI SubmissionUse Word Document – submit to Blackboard / Assessments Tasks & Submission / Assessment 2 Unit Learning OutcomesThis assessment task maps to the following Unit

Read More »

Assignment 4 – Intersection Upgrades and Interchange Station Design

CIVL5550: Civil Infrastructure DesignAssignment 4 – Intersection Upgrades and Interchange Station DesignDue: This WeekSubmission Instructions:1.Submit a report of approximately 10 pages, covering the following:Part 1: Intersection Upgrade Design•Propose upgrade schemes for two sign-controlled intersections and one signalized intersection•Use SIDRA to evaluate the performance of both the original and upgraded intersections•Use

Read More »

Assessment Brief 1

1 of 14Assessment Brief 1Assessment DetailsUnit Code Title NURS2018 Building Healthy Communities through Impactful PartnershipsAssessment Title A1: Foundations of Community Health Promotions ProjectAssessment Type ProjectDue Date Week 4, Monday, 22nd of September 2025, 11:59pm AESTWeight 40%Length / Duration 1200 wordsIndividual / Group IndividualUnit Learning Outcomes(ULOS)This assessment evaluates your achievement of

Read More »

Assignment 1 – Digital Stopwatch

Assignment 1 – Digital StopwatchThis assessment is an individual assignment. For this assignment, you are going to implement the functionality for a simple stopwatch interface as shown above. The interface itself is already provided as a Logisim file named main.circ . Your assignment must be built using this file as

Read More »

Assessment Background Country Profile

BackgroundCountry ProfileKiribati is an island nation situated in the central Pacific Ocean, consisting of 33 atolls2 and reef islands spread out over an area roughly the size of India (see Figure 1).i Yet, Kiribati is also one of the world’s smallest and most isolated country. A summary of Kiribati’s key

Read More »

Assessment 3: PHAR2001 INTRODUCTORY PHARMACOLOGY

PHAR2001 INTRODUCTORY PHARMACOLOGYAssessment 3: Case StudyASSESSMENT 1 BRIEFAssessment Summary Assessment titleAssessment 3: Case study Due DateThursday Week 6, 17 April at 11:59 Length•The suggested number of words (not a word limit) for the individual questions within the case study is as indicated at the end of each individual question. Weighting50%

Read More »

Assessment Module 1 Healthcare Systems Handout

Module 1Healthcare Systems HandoutGroup AgendasHealth Professionals: You got into health to help people. However, as an owner and operator of a multidisciplinary practice, you need to see many patients to cover the cost of equipment, technology, office and consumables, and pay your staff. The Medicare benefit doesn’t cover the rising

Read More »

Assessment 2 – Case study analysis 

Assessment 2 – Case study analysis  Description  Case study analysis  Value  40%  Length  1000 words  Learning Outcomes  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Due Date  Sunday Week 9 by 23:59 (ACST)  Task Overview  In this assessment, you will choose ONE case study presenting a patient’s medical history, symptoms, and relevant test

Read More »

Assessment NURS2018: BUILDING HEALTH COMMUNITIES

NURS2018: BUILDING HEALTHCOMMUNITIES THROUGH IMPACTFULPARTNERSHIPSAssessment 1 Template: Foundation of Community Health Promotion projectOverall word count excluding the template wording (63 words) and reference list:Introduction to health issue:The case study, increase breast screening in Muslim women living in Broadmeadows,Melbourne, focuses on addressing the low participation rates in breast cancer screening amongMuslim

Read More »

Assessment EGB272: Traffic and Transport Engineering (2025-s1)

EGB272: Traffic and Transport Engineering (2025-s1)ashish.bhaskar@qut.edu.auPage 1 of 8Assessment 1A (15%) Cover PageIndividual component: 5%Group component: 10%You are expected to submit two separate submissions:Individual Submission (5%): Each student must submit their own individual report. Details of the individual report are provided in Section 3.1, and the marking rubric is in

Read More »

Assessment 3 – Essay: Assessment 3 Essay rubric

Unit: NUR5327 – Management and leadership in healthcare practice – S1 2025 | 27 May 2025Assessment 3 – Essay: Assessment 3 Essay rubricLearning Objective 5:Differentiate drivers forchange and proactively leadhealth professionalresponses to changing anddynamic environmentsFails toidentify aclear plannedchange ordoes not linkit to thestrategic plan.0 to 7 pointsIdentifies aplannedchange, butthe link

Read More »

Assessment 2 – Case study analysis 

Assessment 2 – Case study analysis  Description  Case study analysis  Value  40%  Length  1000 words  Learning Outcomes  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Due Date  Sunday Week 9 by 23:59 (ACST)  Task Overview  In this assessment, you will choose ONE case study presenting a patient’s medical history, symptoms, and relevant test

Read More »

Assessment 1 PPMP20009 (Leading Lean Projects)

Term 1, 2025PPMP20009 (Leading Lean Projects)1Assessment 1 – DescriptionAssessment title Case study reportAssessment weight 40% of the unit marksReport length 3000 wordsMaximum 8 pages excluding references and appendicesReport format MS Word or PDFSubmission type IndividualSubmission due by Friday, Week 6Assessment objectiveThe purpose of this assessment item is to help you

Read More »

Assignment Maternity – Paramedic Management

Title-Maternity – Paramedic ManagementCase Study – Home Birth Learning outcomes1. Understand the pathophysiology and prehospital management of a specific obstetric condition.2. Develop a management plan for a maternity patient.3. Examine models of care available for maternity patients.4. interpret evidence that supports paramedic care of the maternity patient and neonate.5. Demonstrate

Read More »

Assignment Guidelines for Cabinet Submissions

Guidelines for Cabinet SubmissionsGENERALThe purpose of a Cabinet submission is to obtain Cabinet’s approval for a course of action. Ministers may not have extensive technical knowledge of the subject matter -and may have competing calls on their time. It is, therefore, important that Cabinet submissions are presented in a consistent

Read More »

Assignment Secondary research structure

Dissertation – Secondary Research – Possible Structure and Content GuideA front cover stating: student name, module title, module code, Title of project moduleleader, supervising tutor and word count.Abstract (optional and does not contribute to your word count)This should be an overview of the aim of the critical review, the methodology

Read More »

Assignment E-Business and E-Marketing

Module HandbookFaculty of Business, Computing and DigitalIndustriesSchool of Business(On-campus)E-Business and E-MarketingModule.2025-26􀀀Contents Module Handbook 1Contents 2Module Introduction 3Module Leader Welcome 3Module Guide 5Module Code and Title 5Module Leader Contact Details and Availability 5Module Team Tutors Contact Details and Availability 5Module Teaching 5Module Intended Learning Outcomes 5Summary of Content 6Assessment and Deadlines

Read More »

Assignment II: Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Analysis of

CRICOS Provider 00025B • TEQSA PRV12080 1MECH3780: Computational MechanicsAssignment II: Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Analysis ofGeneralised Cardiovascular Medical DevicesIntroduction:In this assignment, you will develop your CFD capability by analysing a benchmark casefrom a validation study sponsored by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) and fundedby the FDA’s Critical Path

Read More »

LCRM301 Researching criminology

LCRM301 Researching criminology Worksheet 1 This worksheet will be disseminated to students in Week 3 and will assist them in the planning and development of the second assessment task: literature review. PART 1: Refining your topic The topic I am interested in is: I am interested in this topic because:

Read More »

ASSESSMENT TASK 2 – COURT APPLICATION

APPENDIX B: ASSESSMENT TASK 2 – COURT APPLICATION (30% OF FINAL MARK)General informationThis Assessment task is worth 30 marks of your final mark.The task is either making (Applicant) or opposing (Respondent) an application before the Supreme Court in your respective state based on a fact scenario, which will be uploaded

Read More »

Can't Find Your Assignment?