ASSESSMENT 3 BRIEF
Subject Code and Title	MIS501 Principles of Programming
Assessment	Business Case Study: Final Solution
Individual/Group	Group
Length	2000 words (+/- 10%) or equivalent including source code and comments,1 UML diagram
Learning Outcomes	The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include: Synthesise the tenets of procedural programming into the object- oriented paradigm.Design and implement solutions using unified modelling language (UML) diagrams and coding to meet business needs.Apply an integrated development environment (IDE) using project management principles to create, compile, test and run codes to address business problems.Employ object-oriented concepts to solve business problems and justify decisions.
Submission	Due by 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday end of Module 6.1.
Weighting	45%
Total Marks	100 marks

Task Summary

In groups, develop a Python program using the object-orientated program paradigm. Please refer to the Task Instructions for details on how to complete this task.

Context

Object Orientated Programming (OOP) is one of the most popular programming paradigms. In contrast with procedural programming, OOP uses reusable classes as the building blocks, which are used to create individual instances of objects. OOP developers focus on the interactions and relationships between objects. In this subject, we introduced you to some core concepts of OOP, including classes, objects, instances, encapsulation and inheritance. In this assessment, you will put them together to develop a program using the OOP paradigm, through which you will demonstrate the following knowledge and skills:

• Collaborate with other developers and using OOP to develop a program in parallel.
• OOP design and implementation.
• Understanding the concepts of classes and inheritance.
• Design a program and illustrate the relations and associations through UML Diagram.

Instructions

• Form groups of 2 – 3 students. Please read attached MIS501_Assessment 2 & 3_Group Formation, Registration and Administration Guidelines document.
  1. Please read the attached MIS501_Assessment 3_Business Case Study and complete the assessment tasks.
  • All implementations must be in Python 3 (that is NOT Python 2). Programs implemented in a different language will be marked 0. Programs implemented in Python 2 will be capped at 50% of the available marks.

• You may only use the language features and syntax taught in Module 1.1 through to Module 6.1. You MUST not use any other language features beyond what was taught by Module 6.1. Penalties apply.
  • You may implement the programs in any IDE of your choice.
  • The program should be provided with adequate and meaning comments.
  • The program must be implemented using OOP. Programs implemented without any OOP will be capped at 30% of the available marks.
  • Your program should be robust. Check for input validity.

Hint

What would you do if user chose option 3 without entering any student information first?

• Please follow Python Style Guide

Hint

Think about what classes you will need to implement, and which should inherit which. You should not assume that the user will choose the menu options in a sequential order, that is, the user may choose Option 1, enter some user information, then choose 2 >> 2.1 to print them, then back to Option 1 in the main menu to entre more user information.

1. You are strongly advised to read the rubric which is an evaluation guide with criteria for grading the assignment. This will give them a clear picture of what a successful final solution looks like.

11.  Peer evaluation

• Group participation will constitute the final 10% of the mark for Assessment 3. Participation will be determined as follows:
  1. Each student in the team will evaluate the other members’ contributions using a participation score matrix (see Group Participation Score Matrix attached)
  1. Individually, each team member will assign a “Group participation score” (from 1-5) for each member of the group using the score matrix.
  1. Each student is to assess peers’ contributions according to the Peer Evaluation Grading Scheme.
  1. The participation score matrix submitted by each individual student via the Assessment 3 link at the same time after the Group submission.
  1. The Facilitator will use the average “group participation score” for each member to determine the weighted ‘Teamwork’ criterion row in the final marking rubric for this assessment.
  1. All peer evaluation submissions are confidential not viewed by the other team members.

Submission Instructions

Graded submission- Group submission

Submit this task via the Assessment 3 link in the main navigation menu in MIS501 Principles of Programming. You should submit one or multiple Python file(s) (ending .py). The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.

Submit the following 2 files for this assessment in MIS501: Principles of Programming.

1. Task 1 Flow Chart Diagram – task1.docx/jpeg/pdf.

b)        Python Program, demonstrating the implication of tasks 1,2 & 3 – Solution.py

DO NOT zip these files into one file, submit individual files. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.

Peer Evaluation – Individual Submission

Each individual student is to submit a completed team participation score matrix document in the Assessment 3 – Peer Evaluation submission link. Please submit a peer review correctly, as no submission may result is zero grading for this assessment criteria.

Referencing

It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing

Academic Integrity Declaration

We declare that except where we have referenced, the work we are submitting for this assessment task is our own work. We have read and are aware of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure viewable online

We are aware that we need to keep a copy of all submitted material and their drafts, and we will do so accordingly.

All students are responsible for ensuring that all work submitted is their own and is appropriately referenced and academically written according to the Academic Writing Guide. Students also need to have read and be aware of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure and subsequent penalties for academic misconduct. These are viewable online.

Students also must keep a copy of all submitted material and any assessment drafts.

Special Consideration

To apply for special consideration for a modification to an assessment or exam due to unexpected or extenuating circumstances, please consult the Assessment Policy for Higher Education Coursework and ELICOS and, if applicable to your circumstance, submit a completed Application for Assessment Special Consideration Form to your Learning Facilitator.

Assessment Rubric

Assessment Attributes	Fail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0-49%	Pass (Functional) 50-64%	Credit (Proficient) 65-74%	Distinction (Advanced) 75-84%	High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100%
Object Oriented Programming                   Percentage for this criterion = 30%	The program is not implemented with the Object-Oriented Programming paradigm.   No implementations of classes.	The program demonstrates basic understanding of Object-Oriented Programming.   There are classes with instance variables and methods implemented.   The design of classes has much room for improvement.   Does not implement inheritance between classes.	The program demonstrates proficient understanding of Object- Oriented Programming.   The design of classes is generally sound, including their instance/class variables and methods.   Inheritance between classes implemented.   There is some room for improvement in the implementation of the inheritance relationship between classes.	The program demonstrates advanced understanding of Object-Oriented Programming.   The design of classes is sound, including their instance/class variables and methods.   Inheritance between classes implemented.   The inheritance relationship is reasonable and correctly implemented.	The program demonstrates exceptional understanding of OOP through the design of classes.   Classes including their initiation, instance/class variables and methods are expertly designed and implemented.   The inheritance relationship between classes is sound and expertly implemented.
UML Diagram       Percentage for this criterion = 10%	The Diagram is completely unrelated to Assignment tasks.	The diagram is relevant to Assignment tasks but does not use conventional notations or the flow is not logically sound.   The actors, relationships and associations as depicted in the diagram may not be consistent with that in the program.	The diagram is relevant to Assignment tasks, largely follows the conventional notations and the flow is largely correct.   The actors, relationships and associations as depicted in the diagram is largely consistent with that in the program.	The diagram is relevant to Assignment tasks, follows the conventional notations, and the flow is complete and correct.   The actors, relationships and associations as depicted in the diagram is consistent with that in the program.	The diagram is relevant to Assignment tasks, follows the conventional notations, and the flow is complete and correct.   The actors, relationships and associations as depicted in the diagram is consistent with that in the program.   Not missing any actors, associations, and relationships.

Task 1   Sign up and Sign in       Percentage for this criterion = 20%

The program is not implemented in Python3.   Does not run and contain syntax errors. Completely unrelated to the Task 1 requirements.   No Python script file (.py) is submitted (e.g., submission of a .txt or .doc file)

The program demonstrates a working understanding of Python programming.   Implemented in Python 3 and runs. Does not contain any syntax errors. Generally, satisfies major functional requirements in Task 1.   Contains some logical errors. Does not conform to Python programming style guide.

The program demonstrates proficient skills in Python programming.   Implemented in Python 3 and runs. Does not contain any syntax errors.   Satisfies almost all functional requirements in Task 1, but few minor functional requirements in Task 1 may not have been implemented.   In general, the program is logically sound but may contain very minor logical errors.   Conforms to Python programming style guide.

The program demonstrates advanced skills in Python programming. Implemented in Python 3 and runs.   Does not contain any syntax errors. All functional requirements in Task 1 are implemented.   Logically sound and does not contain any logical errors.   Strictly conforms to Python programming style guide.

The program demonstrates exceptional Python programming skills.   Expertly designed and is robust, concise, and efficient. Demonstrates advanced skills in Python programming.   Implemented in Python 3 and runs. Does not contain any syntax errors. All functional requirements in Task 1 are implemented.   Logically sound and does not contain any logical errors. Strictly conforms to Python programming style guide.

Task 2 Ordering     Percentage for this criterion = 20%

The program is not implemented in Python 3.   Does not run and contain syntax errors.   Completely unrelated to the Task 2 requirements.   No Python script file (.py) is submitted (e.g., submission of a .txt or .doc file)

The program demonstrates a working understanding of Python programming.   Implemented in Python 3 and runs.   Does not contain any syntax errors.   Generally, satisfies major functional requirements in Task 2.   Contain some logical errors. May not conform to Python programming style guide.

The program demonstrates proficient skills in Python programming.   Implemented in Python 3 and runs. Does not contain any syntax errors.   Satisfies almost all functional requirements in Task 2, but few minor functional requirements in Task 2 may not have been implemented.   Logically sound but may contain very minor logical errors.   Largely conforms to Python programming style guide.

The program demonstrates advanced skills in Python programming.   Implemented in Python 3 and runs.   Does not contain any syntax errors.   All functional requirements in Task 2.   Logically sound and does not contain any logical errors.   Strictly conforms to Python programming style guide.

The program demonstrates exceptional Python programming skills.   Expertly designed and is robust, concise, and efficient. Demonstrates advanced skills in Python programming.   Implemented in Python 3 and runs. Does not contain any syntax errors.   All functional requirements in Task 2 are implemented   Logically sound and does not contain any logical errors. Strictly conforms to Python programming style guide.

Task 3   Summary of Transactions   Percentage for this criterion = 10%	The program is not implemented in Python3.   Does not run and contain syntax errors.   Completely unrelated to the Task 3 requirements.   No Python script file (.py) is submitted (e.g., submission of a .txt or .doc file). The program used the “set” structure.	The program demonstrates a working understanding of Python programming.   Implemented in Python 3 and runs.   Does not contain any syntax errors.   Satisfies major functional requirements in Task 3.   Contain some logical errors. Does not conform to Python programming style guide	The program demonstrates proficient skills in Python programming.   Implemented in Python 3 and runs. Does not contain any syntax errors. Satisfies almost all functional requirements in Task 3, but few minor functional requirements in Task 3 may not have been implemented.   Logically sound but may contain very minor logical errors.   Conforms to Python programming style guide.	The program demonstrates advanced skills in Python programming.   Implemented in Python 3 and runs.   Does not contain any syntax errors.   All functional requirements in Task 3 are implemented.   Logically sound and does not contain any logical errors.   Strictly conforms to Python programming style guide.	The program demonstrates exceptional Python programming skills.   Expertly designed and is robust, concise, and efficient.   Demonstrates advanced skills in Python programming. Implemented in Python 3 and runs. Does not   contain any syntax errors. All functional requirements in Task 3 are implemented.   Logically sound and does not contain any logical errors Strictly conforms to Python programming style guide.
Teamwork       Percentage for this criterion = 10%	Does not participate effectively in a team environment.   Places individual goals ahead of the group responsibility.   Hinders the group process and upsets the schedule.	Participates effectively in teams. Identifies team and individual goals, tasks, responsibilities, and schedules.   Contributes to group processes. Supports the team.	Contributes to small group discussions to reach agreement on issues.   Works together with others towards shared goals.   Renegotiates responsibilities to meet needed change.	Understands group dynamics and team roles. Facilitates team development.   Renegotiates responsibilities, tasks, and schedules to meet needed change.	Builds team’s identity and commitment. Leads teams.   Evaluates teams’ outcomes.   Implements strategies for enhancing team effectiveness.

Get expert help for MIS501 Principles of Programming and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!