PSYC 2111: Introduction to Research Methods in Psychology

Assignment 4:

Research Report (21%, 100 marks)

Introduction

Assignment 4, based on all five units, is graded out of 100 marks, and is worth 21% of your course grade.

Prior to completing your research report, you are strongly encouraged to consult with your Open Learning Faculty Member regarding any concerns and difficulties you may have with this assignment. Even very experienced researchers do not write their articles in isolation—they discuss their ideas with their colleagues. Therefore, it is strongly to your benefit that you discuss your report with your Open Learning Faculty Member prior to submitting it for evaluation. However, note that drafts, other than what you have already submitted in prior assignments, should not be submitted for preliminary marking. The paper you submit here should be your final paper for marking.

Instructions

Your task here is to write a report of your now-completed nonexperimental research project, building on your work in Assignment 3. Your report should include a Title Page, Abstract, Introduction, Method, Results (including any tables and/or graphs), Discussion, and References. For a brief overview of what goes into these sections along with some useful advice please refer to the section for “Empirical Paper or Research Proposal” in Harvard College’s “A Brief Guide to Writing the Psychology Paper.” For a more detailed account and an example of the structure and format of an APA style research report, please read through the American Psychological Association’s (APA) “Writing the Empirical Social Science Research Paper: A Guide for the Perplexed.”

Note that in your results section, you should state how the results relate to your hypotheses (for example, state whether or not your hypothesis was supported). However, this is a course on research methods in psychology, not a course on statistics. Therefore, although a Results section would normally include the inferential statistical analyses that support your summary of the findings, you are only required to use descriptive statistics (e.g., Means and Standard Deviations) for your results and present them in an informative way. This should include presenting the results in tables and/or graphs. These tables and/or graphs should be included at the end of your report (following the references), as illustrated in the APA guide referenced above. If you would like, you may certainly calculate inferential statistics and your Open Learning Faculty Member can help you with this.

Students often want to know how long their research report should be and how many references they should include. Unlike many papers for university courses, it is difficult to specify these values. The length will depend on many factors including the complexity of your research project and the number of articles that you cite and relate to your study. The number of references that you cite will also depend on the extent to which your research topic has been studied. You should include at least the three references that you reviewed in Assignment 3.While it is difficult to specify the number of pages and references, past experience has shown that good reports usually include around eight to ten pages of writing, not including the references page, and at least five references.

Grading for Assignment 4 (100 marks)

Please refer to the following rubric for information about how your assignment will be graded.

Assignment 4 is marked out of 100 marks, in accordance with the following grading rubric:

  Topic  Exceeds Expectations  Meets Expectations  Almost Meets ExpectationsDoes Not Yet Meet Expectations
Title/AbstractTitle includes variables and some articulation of relations (e.g., “difference between…”; “effects of x on y”). Running head appropriate. All relevant parts of title page are included. APA style is completely correct. Abstract includes research question, variables, number and type of participants, major results, and implications/limita tions of those results stated clearly and concisely within the word limit. ( 5 marks)All relevant parts of title page are included. Title/running head is appropriate. APA style is close to or completely correct Abstract includes all essential information but may lack concise sentence structure, or there may be some information missing (4 marks)Title/running head does not effectively convey all the variables in the study. Some title page elements may be missing. Abstract is missing essential information from two paper sections or is significantly over/under the word limit. (3 marks)Title/running head is not appropriate for a scientific paper. Title page does not follow APA style. Abstract has some incorrect information or does not accurately portray the experiment. Three or more important elements are missing. (0, 1 or 2 marks)
  Topic  Exceeds Expectations  Meets Expectations  Almost Meets ExpectationsDoes Not Yet Meet Expectations
Introduction (Topic & Context)Paper (i.e., first paragraph or two) begins in a broad manner and clearly explains the problem to be investigated. (7 or 8 marks)Paper starts somewhat broadly, and provides some theoretical or real world context for the main concept in the study. An explanation of the key concept or question is provided, but it could be clearer. (5 or 6 marks)More clarity in the opening may be needed or the paper may begin with a definition of the topic but provide very little context for the idea (e.g., may begin immediately with review of previous research). (3 or 4 marks)Paper focuses immediately on the method, or no context for the topic is provided. (0, 1 or 2 marks)
  Topic  Exceeds Expectations  Meets Expectations  Almost Meets ExpectationsDoes Not Yet Meet Expectations
Introduction (Previous studies)Studies are described in enough detail so that their relation to the present study and to the relevant theoretical and methodological issues is clear. The introduction is in the author’s own words, and the focus is on the research, rather than the researchers. Limitations of previous research are presented. (9 or 10 marks)Studies are generally described in enough detail so that their relation to the present study and to the relevant theoretical and methodological issues is clear (although some sections could be more specific). The introduction may include unnecessary quotations or poor paraphrases of the original articles. (6, 7 or 8 marks)Some of the reviewed literature seems to be inappropriate or not well- linked to the topic. Literature may not be reviewed in enough detail regarding its relation to the present study or to the relevant theoretical or methodologica l issues or it may be one- sided, omitting contrasting viewpoints. The introduction may include too many quotations. (3, 4 or 5 marks)Too few citations or too few details are included for the reader to be confident that that research topic has been adequately investigated. Definition or discussion of key concepts may be incomplete or improperly paraphrased. (0, 1 or 2 marks)
  Topic  Exceeds Expectations  Meets Expectations  Almost Meets ExpectationsDoes Not Yet Meet Expectations
Introduction (Hypothesis)Hypothesis is clearly stated and justified. It is clear what will be measured. (7 or 8 marks)Hypothesis is stated clearly and directional predictions are made, but it is somewhat unclear what will be measured. (5 or 6 marks)Hypothesis is stated, but no directional prediction about the relation between the variables is specifically stated or it is unclear what will be measured. (3 or 4 marks)Hypothesis is given but unclearly or with no justification. (0, 1 or 2 marks)
  Topic  Exceeds Expectations  Meets Expectations  Almost Meets ExpectationsDoes Not Yet Meet Expectations
DesignThe design of the study is clear, complete and appropriate. Variables are appropriate and operationalized properly. Demonstrates clearly and accurately the affordances and constraints of either naturalistic observation or archival research designs. (5 marks)Design is complete and appropriate but not clearly described. Variables are appropriately operationalized but may be simplistic. Demonstrates accurately some affordances and constraints of either naturalistic observation or archival research designs. (4 marks)Design is incomplete or the operationaliza tion of variables is not clear. Measured variables may be simplistic or lack content validity (i.e., not appropriate). Does not demonstrate clearly or accurately the affordances and constraints of either naturalistic observation or archival research designs. (3 marks)Design is not appropriate for the hypothesis; variables are not operationalize d or not valid, or too many details are lacking. Does not demonstrate clearly and accurately the affordances and constraints of either naturalistic observation or archival research designs. (0, 1 or 2 marks)
  Topic  Exceeds Expectations  Meets Expectations  Almost Meets ExpectationsDoes Not Yet Meet Expectations
Method (Participants/S ource of Data)Sample is appropriate given hypotheses. Data sources are clearly identified for archival studies. Participant characteristics in naturalistic observation studies are thoroughly described. (9 or 10 marks)Sample is appropriate given hypotheses. Data sources are mostly clearly identified for archival studies. Participant characteristics in naturalistic observation studies are mostly described. There may be 1 or 2 missing pieces of information. (6, 7 or 8 marks)Sample may not be the best given hypotheses. Data sources are not clearly identified for archival studies. Participant characteristics in naturalistic observation studies are not fully described (3, 4 or 5 marks)Sample may not be the best given hypotheses. Data sources are not identified for archival studies. Participant characteristics in naturalistic observation studies are not described (0, 1 or 2 marks)
  Topic  Exceeds Expectations  Meets Expectations  Almost Meets ExpectationsDoes Not Yet Meet Expectations
Method (Procedure)Procedure is appropriate and ethical. It is described, in order, with enough detail that a reader could replicate the study; instructions and protocol are included. (9 or 10 marks)Procedure is appropriate and ethical. The description is primarily complete but some minor details may be missing, or some procedural aspects could be explained more clearly. (6, 7 or 8 marks)Procedure is appropriate and ethical. The description is not in order or is difficult to follow, or a few major details are absent. (3, 4 or 5 marks)Procedure is not appropriate or not ethical, or the description is unclear, or many major details are absent. (0, 1 or 2 marks)
Results (Descriptive Statistics)Accurate descriptive statistics are provided. Tables and/or figures are, clear, labelled accurately and referred to in text. (10, 11 or 12 marks)Accurate descriptive statistics are provided. Tables and/or figures are mostly clear, labelled accurately and referred to in text. (7, 8 or 9 marks)Descriptive statistics are provided but may have some missing information. Tables and/or figures are mostly clear, labelled accurately and referred to in text. (4, 5 or 6 marks)Descriptive statistics are incomplete. Tables and/or figures are not clear, labelled accurately and/or referred to in text. (0, 1, 2 or 3 marks)
  Topic  Exceeds Expectations  Meets Expectations  Almost Meets ExpectationsDoes Not Yet Meet Expectations
DiscussionDiscussion includes a restatement of the findings. Patterns in the data and relations among the variables are explained and conclusions do not go beyond the data. The explanation/ interpretation is well connected to the hypothesis and to the broader psychological problem as represented in the introduction. The take-home message is clearly summarized at the end. Potential confounds or limitations are discussed, and future research is suggested. (10, 11 or 12 marks)Discussion includes a restatement of the findings, but the analysis of their meaning may be not fully explored. Potential confounds or limitations are discussed, and future research is suggested. (7, 8 or 9 marks)The restatement of the results is not clear or is misleading. Only some results are explained (esp. only positive), and the links to previous literature simply restate the introduction. The author may inappropriatel y generalize beyond the data. Potential confounds or limitations are incompletely discussed, and future research is not clearly or comprehensiv ely suggested. (4, 5 or 6 marks)Discussion incorrectly states the results or is a rehash of the introduction without clearly presenting the current study. The take-home message of the study is not clear. Potential confounds or limitations are not discussed, and future research is not suggested. (0, 1, 2 or 3 marks)
  Topic  Exceeds Expectations  Meets Expectations  Almost Meets ExpectationsDoes Not Yet Meet Expectations
Scientific Writing StyleThere is a clear organization to the paper, and transitions are smooth and effective. Tone is appropriately formal. Topic sentences are appropriate for paragraphs, and key ideas are explained/describe d as needed. Punctuation and grammar are almost completely correct, including proper tenses and voice. Sentences are concise and word choice is precise, with nonbiased language. Proper paraphrases are usually used, but quotation marks are used appropriately if necessary. (9 or 10 marks)           TROrganization is effective although improvements could be made. Transitions are generally there, but are occasionally not smooth, and paragraphs may stray from the central idea. Tone is appropriately formal. Punctuation and grammar are almost completely correct. Sentences are generally concise and word choice is usually precise. Paraphrases are usually used, and quotation marks are used appropriately if necessary. (6, 7 or 8 marks)   U Open LearningOrganization is less adequate, making the paper difficult to follow. Transitions are sometimes there, and those that are there could be improved. Tone is occasionally colloquial. Punctuation and grammar are usually correct, but there are consistent mistakes. Sentences are not always concise and word choice is sometimes vague. The author includes many quotes or improper “paraphrases” that may constitute unintentional plagiarism. (3, 4 or 5 marks)Organization is confusing. Transitions are missing or are very weak. Tone is consistently too informal. Punctuation and grammar mistakes throughout the paper. Sentences are not concise and word choice is vague. The author strings together quotations without enough original input. (0, 1 or 2 marks)
  Topic  Exceeds Expectations  Meets Expectations  Almost Meets ExpectationsDoes Not Yet Meet Expectations
APA StyleAll parts of the paper are in accurate APA style, including citations and references (9 or 10 marks)Almost all parts of the paper are in accurate APA style, including citations and references (6, 7 or 8 marks)Several areas of the paper have errors in APA style. (3, 4 or 5 marks)There are APA style errors consistently throughout the paper. (0, 1 or 2 marks)

The marking guide for Assignment 4 has been adapted from:

Gottfried, G. M., Johnson, K. E., & Vosmik, J. R. (2009). Assessing student learning: A collection of evaluation tools. Society for the Teaching of Psychology (STP) Office of Teaching Resources in Psychology.

Order Now

Get expert help for PSYC 2111: Introduction to Research Methods in Psychology and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!

Universal Assignment (February 12, 2025) PSYC 2111: Introduction to Research Methods in Psychology. Retrieved from https://universalassignment.com/psyc-2111-introduction-to-research-methods-in-psychology/.
"PSYC 2111: Introduction to Research Methods in Psychology." Universal Assignment - February 12, 2025, https://universalassignment.com/psyc-2111-introduction-to-research-methods-in-psychology/
Universal Assignment September 12, 2022 PSYC 2111: Introduction to Research Methods in Psychology., viewed February 12, 2025,<https://universalassignment.com/psyc-2111-introduction-to-research-methods-in-psychology/>
Universal Assignment - PSYC 2111: Introduction to Research Methods in Psychology. [Internet]. [Accessed February 12, 2025]. Available from: https://universalassignment.com/psyc-2111-introduction-to-research-methods-in-psychology/
"PSYC 2111: Introduction to Research Methods in Psychology." Universal Assignment - Accessed February 12, 2025. https://universalassignment.com/psyc-2111-introduction-to-research-methods-in-psychology/
"PSYC 2111: Introduction to Research Methods in Psychology." Universal Assignment [Online]. Available: https://universalassignment.com/psyc-2111-introduction-to-research-methods-in-psychology/. [Accessed: February 12, 2025]

Please note along with our service, we will provide you with the following deliverables:

Please do not hesitate to put forward any queries regarding the service provision.

We look forward to having you on board with us.

Most Frequent Questions & Answers

Universal Assignment Services is the best place to get help in your all kind of assignment help. We have 172+ experts available, who can help you to get HD+ grades. We also provide Free Plag report, Free Revisions,Best Price in the industry guaranteed.

We provide all kinds of assignmednt help, Report writing, Essay Writing, Dissertations, Thesis writing, Research Proposal, Research Report, Home work help, Question Answers help, Case studies, mathematical and Statistical tasks, Website development, Android application, Resume/CV writing, SOP(Statement of Purpose) Writing, Blog/Article, Poster making and so on.

We are available round the clock, 24X7, 365 days. You can appach us to our Whatsapp number +1 (613)778 8542 or email to info@universalassignment.com . We provide Free revision policy, if you need and revisions to be done on the task, we will do the same for you as soon as possible.

We provide services mainly to all major institutes and Universities in Australia, Canada, China, Malaysia, India, South Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

We provide lucrative discounts from 28% to 70% as per the wordcount, Technicality, Deadline and the number of your previous assignments done with us.

After your assignment request our team will check and update you the best suitable service for you alongwith the charges for the task. After confirmation and payment team will start the work and provide the task as per the deadline.

Yes, we will provide Plagirism free task and a free turnitin report along with the task without any extra cost.

No, if the main requirement is same, you don’t have to pay any additional amount. But it there is a additional requirement, then you have to pay the balance amount in order to get the revised solution.

The Fees are as minimum as $10 per page(1 page=250 words) and in case of a big task, we provide huge discounts.

We accept all the major Credit and Debit Cards for the payment. We do accept Paypal also.

Popular Assignments

STM1001: Assignment 3 for Science/Health Stream Students

STM1001: Assignment 3 Science/Health Stream Students Only Academic Integrity Information In submitting your work, you are consenting that it may be copied and transmitted by the University for the detection of plagiarism. If you are unsure of your academic integrity responsibilities, please check the information provided in the Assessment Overview

Read More »

ACCG1000 Accounting for Decision Making Xero Assignment

1ACCG1000Accounting for Decision MakingXero AssignmentInformation packSession 2 2024Due Date: Friday 18th October 2024 at 11.55pm2Xero AssignmentIntroductionThe Xero assignment is designed to provide introductory accounting students with an overview of the Xero Accounting Software by completing a one-month accounting cycle for a fictional business. This is an online assignment worth 20%

Read More »

WRIT1001 Assessment Notification 2

6Final Essay: Rhetorical analysisDue: Friday 18 October 2024 at 23:59 (Sydney time)Length: 1500 words, worth 40% of the overall grade for the unitSubmit: as a Word document or PDF, via Canvas AssignmentMain question:● Present a scholarly essay that analyses the rhetoric used in arguments about thecontentious topic you have been

Read More »

WRIT1000 Assessment Four

Title: Self-ReflectionDue: Friday October 18 by 11:59PM.Length: 500 words (+/- 10%)Weight: 10% of the total gradeFormat: Times New Roman, double-spaced, 12pt. Your project should have the title“WRIT1000 Assessment Four – Self Reflection for xxxxxxx” where “xxxxxxxx” is yourstudent number. Please only submit Word documents (.doc or .docx). Turnitin doesnot recognise

Read More »

Written Assessment – Psychosocial Research Perspectives

Written Assessment – Psychosocial Research Perspectives TRIGGER WARNING: This is a case study of a real person. Katherine Knight was the first woman in Australia to receive a life sentence without parole after she decapitated and cooked her lover. If you think that you will have problems reading about this

Read More »

RES800 Assessment 1 – Research Question and Literature Review

Subject Title Business Research Subject Code RES800 Assessment Title Assessment 1 – Research Question and Literature Review Learning Outcome/s     Utilise critical thinking to analyse managerial problems and formulate relevant research questions and a research design   Apply research theories and methodologies to assist in developing a business research

Read More »

Assessment Task 2 Health advocacy and communication plan

Assessment Task 2 Health advocacy and communication plan Rationale and multimedia plan presentation Submission requirements Due date and time:         Rationale: 8pm AEST Monday 23 September 2024 (Week 11) Multimedia plan presentation: 8pm AEST Monday 30 September 2024 (Study Period) % of final grade:         50% of overall grade Word limit: Time

Read More »

MLI500 Leadership and innovation Assessment 1

Subject Title Leadership and innovation Subject Code MLI500 Assessment Assessment 1: Leadership development plan Individual/Group Individual Length 1500 words Learning Outcomes LO1 Examine the role of leaders in fostering creativity and innovation LO5 Reflect on and take responsibility for their own learning and leadership development processes Submission   Weighting 30%

Read More »

FPC006 Taxation for Financial Planning

Assignment 2 Instructions Assignment marks: 95 | Referencing and presentation: 5 Total marks: 100 Total word limit: 3,000 words Weighting: 40% Download and use the Assignment 2 Answer Template provided in KapLearn to complete your assignment. Your assignment should be loaded into KapLearn by 11.30 pm AEST/AEDT on the wdue

Read More »

TCHR5001 Assessment Brief 1

TCHR5001 Assessment Brief 1 Assessment Details Item Assessment 1: Pitch your pedagogy Type Digital Presentation (Recorded) Due Monday, 16th September 2024, 11:59 pm AEST (start of Week 4) Group type Individual Length 10 minutes (equivalent to 1500 words) Weight 50% Gen AI use Permitted, restrictions apply Aligned ULOS ULO1, ULO2,

Read More »

HSH725 Assessment Task 2

turquoise By changing the Heading 3 above with the following teal, turquoise, orange or pink you can change the colour theme of your CloudFirst CloudDeakin template page. When this page is published the Heading 3 above will be removed, but it will still be here in edit mode if you wish to change the colour theme.

Read More »

Evidence in Health Assessment 2: Evidence Selection

Evidence in Health Assessment 2: Evidence Selection Student name:                                                                    Student ID: Section 1: PICO and search strategy Evidence Question: Insert evidence question from chosen scenario here including all key PICO terms.       PICO Search Terms                                                                                                                                                                                                          Complete the following table.   Subject headings Keywords Synonyms Population  

Read More »

Assessment 1 – Lesson Plan and annotation

ASSESSMENT TASK INFORMATION: XNB390 Assessment 1 – Lesson Plan and annotation This document provides you with information about the requirements for your assessment. Detailed instructions and resources are included for completing the task. The Criterion Reference Assessment (CRA) Marking Matrix that XNB390 markers will use to grade the assessment task

Read More »

XNB390 Task 1 – Professional Lesson Plan

XNB390 Template for Task 1 – Professional Lesson Plan CONTEXT FOR LESSON: SOCIAL JUSTICE CONSIDERATIONS: Equity Diversity Supportive Environment UNIT TITLE:    TERM WEEK DAY TIME 1   5           YEAR/CLASS STUDENT NUMBERS/CONTEXT LOCATION LESSON DURATION         28 Children (chl): 16 boys; 12

Read More »

A2 Critical Review Assignment

YouthSolutions Summary The summary should summarise the key points of the critical review. It should state the aims/purpose of the program and give an overview of the program or strategy you have chosen. This should be 200 words – included in the word count. Critical analysis and evaluation Your critical

Read More »

PUN364 – Workplace activity Assignment

Assessment 1 – DetailsOverviewFor those of you attending the on-campus workshop, you will prepare a report on the simulated simulated inspection below. For those of you who are not attending, you will be required to carry out your own food business inspection under the supervision of a suitably qualified Environmental

Read More »

FPC006 Taxation for Financial Planning

Assignment 1 Instructions Assignment marks: 95 | Referencing and presentation: 5 Total marks: 100 Total word limit: 3,600 words Weighting: 40% Download and use the Assignment 1 Answer Template provided in KapLearn to complete your assignment. Your assignment should be loaded into KapLearn by 11.30 pm AEST/AEDT on the due

Read More »

Mental health Nursing assignment

Due Aug 31 This is based on a Mental health Nursing assignment Used Microsoft word The family genogram is a useful tool for the assessment of individuals, couples, and families.  It can yield significant data and lead to important, new patient understandings and insights as multigenerational patterns take shape and

Read More »

Assessment 2: Research and Policy Review

Length: 2000 words +/- 10% (excluding references)For this assessment, you must choose eight sources (academic readings and policy documents) as the basis of your Research and Policy Review. You must choose your set of sources from the ‘REFERENCES MENU’ on the moodle site, noting the minimum number of sources required

Read More »

HSN702 – Lifespan Nutrition

Assessment Task: 2 Assignment title: Population Nutrition Report and Reflection Assignment task type: Written report, reflection, and short oral presentation Task details The primary focus of this assignment is on population nutrition. Nutritionists play an important role in promoting population health through optimal nutritional intake. You will be asked to

Read More »

Written Assessment 1: Case Study

Billy a 32-year-old male was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with a suspected overdose of tricyclic antidepressants. He is obese (weight 160kg, height 172cm) and has a history of depression and chronic back pain for which he takes oxycodone. On admission to the emergency department, Paramedics were maintaining

Read More »

Assessment Task 8 – Plan and prepare to assess competence

Assessment Task 8 – Plan and prepare to assess competence Assessment Task 8 consists of the following sections: Section 1:      Short answer questions Section 2:      Analyse an assessment tool Section 3:      Determine reasonable adjustment and customisation of assessment process Section 4:      Develop an assessment plan Student Instructions To complete this

Read More »

Nutrition Reviews Assignment 2 – Part A and Part B

This assignment provides you with the opportunity to determine an important research question that is crucial to address based on your reading of one of the two systematic reviews below (Part A). You will then develop a research proposal outlining the study design and methodology needed to answer that question

Read More »

NUR332 – TASK 3 – WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT

NUR332 – TASK 3 – WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT for S2 2024. DESCRIPTION (For this Task 3, the word ‘Indigenous Australians’, refers to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples of Australia) NUR332 Task 3 – Written Assignment – Due – WEEK 12 – via CANVAS on Wednesday, Midday (1200hrs) 16/10/2024. The

Read More »

NUR100 Task 3 – Case study

NUR100 Task 3 – Case study To identify a key child health issue and discuss this issue in the Australian context. You will demonstrate understanding of contemporary families in Australia. You will discuss the role of the family and reflect on how the family can influence the overall health outcomes

Read More »

NUR 100 Task 2 Health Promotion Poster

NUR 100 Task 2 Health Promotion Poster The weighting for this assessment is 40%. Task instructions You are not permitted to use generative AI tools in this task. Use of AI in this task constitutes student misconduct and is considered contract cheating. This assessment requires you to develop scholarship and

Read More »

BMS 291 Pathophysiology and Pharmacology CASE STUDY

BMS 291 Pathophysiology and Pharmacology CASE STUDY Assessment No: 1 Weighting: 40% Due date Part A: midnight Friday 2nd August 2024 Due date Part B: midnight Sunday 29th September 2024 General information In this assessment, you will develop your skills for analysing, integrating and presenting information for effective evidence-based communication.

Read More »

Can't Find Your Assignment?

Open chat
1
Free Assistance
Universal Assignment
Hello 👋
How can we help you?