Written Assignment Task 3 – Coroner’s case study

universal

7102NRS Trimester 3, 2022

Written Assignment Task 3 – Coroner’s case study Essay: 2000 words

Weighting: 40%

Due Date: Monday 6th February 2023.

Aim:

The aim of this essay is for you to demonstrate critical evaluation of a patient deterioration event that ended in death. Patients who deteriorate and die when accessing health services are rarely simple cases and all members of the team usually have a part to play in the events that occur. You will develop an applied understanding of how to identify factors that lead to poor outcomes and suggest ways to avoid these outcomes in the future. Safe patient care is often determined by the vigilance of staff caring for them and this essay will assist you to identify where vigilance is necessary for patient safety in a complex situation.

This assessment addresses learning outcomes 1, 2, and 4

  1. Apply critical thinking and problem-solving skills to design comprehensive situational assessment for complex clients.
  2. Interpret evidence to identify and manage deteriorating clients and support their families.

4. Apply advanced knowledge and judgement to manage ethical and legal issues in high-risk situations to promote best health outcomes

Task description:

For this task you need to write a 2000 word essay in which you critically evaluate a case study of a patient who has died, related to your clinical specialty.

You must structure your essay using the following headings and inclusions:

  • Introduction: Introduce the topic                                                                                                                   [100 words]
  • Recognition and response to deterioration in complex clients: Discuss and justify how recognition and response to deteriorating clients influences patient outcomes.                                                                                                       [200 words]
  • Case study evaluation: Review the case study.
    • Research the condition and management recommendations for the patient in the case study.
    • Critically evaluate the case study and identify the situational factors and most important points of time during the care where incorrect decisions or missed opportunities to intervene influenced the deterioration of the client.
    • Identify patient-related complexities that contributed to the outcome.
    • Outline legal and ethical issues if they exist as well as best practice requirements that were missed or not well applied.
    • Support your evaluation with reference to the literature.                                                                                                         [800 words]
  • Recommendations: Provide recommendations/strategies for improvement related to the trigger points you identified to reduce the risk of future errors or poor patient outcomes.
    • Explain how applying leadership approaches to the situation may promote alternate outcomes.
  • Align your recommendations with the quality health standards pertinent to your practice (In Australia these are the National Safety and Quality Health Service (NSQHS) Standards).
    • Support your recommendations/strategies with rationales underpinned with research evidence.                                                                                          [800 words]
  • Conclusion: Conclude with a summary statement about the priority areas of discussion for this case study related to the effective management of complex clients                                                                                                        [100 words]

Other elements:

  • Always refer to the Health Writing and Referencing Guide.
  • Use APA 7th edition referencing style.
  • Ensure that you use scholarly literature1 (digitised readings, research articles, relevant Government reports and text books) that has been published within the last five years; you may use seminal literature as relevant.
  • Use academic language2 throughout.
  • The use of headings in this essay is appropriate.
  • Word limit of 2000 words needs to be strictly adhered to. The word limit for an assessment item includes in-text citations, tables and quotations. The word limit DOES NOT include the reference list and headings. Please note the marker will cease marking your submitted work once they have reached the allocated word limit.
  • Refer to the marking guidelines when writing your assignment. This will assist you in calculating the weightings of the sections for your assignment.

Assessment 3 7102NRS GRADING RUBRIC

Task-specific criteria20-1716.5-1514.5-1312.5-109.5-0
Recognition and response to deterioration   (Total possible marks 20)Clearly and concisely evaluates the situational factors generally related to patient deterioration.Use of the literature demonstrated evidence of wide reading.Able to discriminate high quality evidence-based literature that is highly relevant to the issues identified.Concise and excellent justification and application of evidence presented.Clearly evaluates the situational factors generally related to patient deterioration.Use of the literature demonstrated evidence of wide reading.Able to discriminate high quality evidence-based literature that is mostly relevant to the issues identified.Detailed justification and application of evidence presented.Evaluates most of the situational factors generally related to patient deterioration.Use of the literature demonstrated evidence of wide reading.Mostly able to discriminate high quality evidence-based literature generally relevant to the issues identified.Sound justification and application of evidence presented.Evaluates the essential situational factors generally related to patient deterioration.Use of the literature demonstrated evidence of adequate reading.Generally able to discriminate evidence- based literature relevant to the issues identified.Basic justification and application of evidence presented.Discussion provided only, evaluation not undertaken, of the essential situational factors generally related to patient deterioration.Use of the literature demonstrated limited scope of reading.Literature cited often not relevant to chosen patient case presented or not from valid academic sources (e.g., websites) OR parts of your assignment were not supported by appropriate references.Poor justification of evidence presented. Links to the chosen patient case are unclear.
 40-3433-3029-2625-2019-0
Case study critical evaluation   (Total possible marks 40)Clearly and concisely evaluates the situational factors related to the patient’s deterioration in the chosen case study.Includes strong justification for evaluation of case study with reference to best practice guidelines and a wide range of scholarly literatureClearly and concisely discusses patient factors that created complexity in the chosen case.Comprehensive, concise and relevant discussion of all/any legal or ethical issues identified in the chosen case study.Able to discriminate high quality evidence-based literature that is highly relevant to the issues identified.Clearly evaluates the situational factors related to the patient’s deterioration in the chosen case study.Able to justify evaluation of case study with reference to best practice guidelines and a wide range of scholarly literatureClearly discusses patient factors that created complexity in the chosen case.Comprehensive and relevant discussion of all/any legal or ethical issues identified in the chosen case study.Able to discriminate high quality evidence-based literature that is mostly relevant to the chosen patient case.Evaluates most of the situational factors related to the patient’s deterioration in the chosen case study.Most often able to justify evaluation of case study with reference to best practice guidelines and a range of scholarly literatureDetailed discussion of many patient factors that created complexity in the chosen case.Detailed and relevant discussion of most/any legal or ethical issues identified in the chosen case study.Mostly able to discriminate high quality evidence-based literature generally relevant to the chosen patient case.Evaluates the essential situational factors related to the patient’s deterioration in the chosen case study.Able to justify essential elements of evaluation of case study with reference to best practice guidelines and a range of scholarly literatureDiscusses main patient factors that created complexity in the chosen case. Relevant discussion of many/any legal or ethical issues identified in the chosen case study.Generally able to discriminate evidence- based literature relevant to the chosen patient case.Discussion provided only, evaluation not undertaken, or situational factors discussed not relevant to the patient as described.Inadequate justification of evaluation of case study OR does not regularly reference best practice guidelines using a range of scholarly literatureUnclear or inadequate discussion of many patient factors that created complexity in the chosen case.Inadequate discussion of many/any legal or ethical issues identified in the chosen case study.Literature cited often not relevant to chosen patient case presented or not from valid academic sources (e.g., lay websites).
 30-25.525-22.522-19.519-1514.5-0
Recommendations for improvement to reduce risk of future errors (Total possible marks 30)Excellent, comprehensive and relevant recommendations developed supported by concise and thorough justification and application of evidence presented.All recommendations showed strong links to quality standards, ethical and legal principles (where appropriate) and how this could impact positively on patient outcomes.Detailed and relevant recommendations developed supported by concise and excellent justification and application of evidence presented.All recommendations showed direct links to quality standards, ethical and legal principles (where appropriate) and how this could impact positively on patient outcomes.Credible and relevant recommendations developed supported by sound justification and application of evidence presented.Most recommendations showed links to quality standards, ethical and legal principles (where appropriate) and how this could impact positively on patient outcomes.Recommendations developed were mostly relevant and supported by justification and application of evidence presented.Some recommendations showed some links to quality standards, ethical and legal principles (where appropriate) and how this could impact positively on patient outcomes.Inadequate recommendations developed. Links to the chosen patient case may be unclear.Recommendations were poorly linked to quality standards, ethical and legal principles (where appropriate) or how this could impact positively on patient outcomes.
 10-8.58-7.57-6.56-55-0
Referencing style and essay presentation (Total possible marks 10)References cited using APA 7th edition in-text and reference list, consistent with very few if any, minor errors.References are predominantly sourced from a range of peer- reviewed research. There are 20 or more references.100% correct spelling, grammar and punctuationExcellent organisation of ideas / logical sequenceKey points clear and relevant to topicReferences cited using APA 7 in-text and reference list, consistent with few minor errors.At least half of the references are sourced from peer-reviewed research. There are 18-20 or more references provided.100% correct spelling, grammar and punctuationVery good organisation of ideas / logical sequenceKey points clear and relevant to topic.References cited using APA 7 in-text and reference list, consistent with some minor errors.At least half of the references are sourced from peer-reviewed articles. There are 16-20 references provided.Mostly correct spelling, grammar and punctuation (1-2 minor errors)Good organisation of ideas / logical sequence Key points clear and relevant to topic.References cited using APA 7 in-text and reference list; may be some major or minor errors.The references are predominantly from websites or grey literature. There are less than 12 references provided.Mostly correct spelling, grammar, punctuation (4-6 minor errorsOrganisation of ideas / logical sequenceKey points clear and relevant to topicReferences not consistently cited using APA 7 in-text and reference list; major errors in applying APA 7 style.The references are from non-peer reviewed sources. There are less than 12 references provided.Multiple errors in spelling, grammar, punctuationOrganisation of ideas / sequence lack logical arrangementKey points clear and relevant to topic
Order Now

Get expert help for Written Assignment Task 3 – Coroner’s case study and many more. 24X7 help, plag-free solution. Order online now!

Universal Assignment (December 5, 2024) Written Assignment Task 3 – Coroner’s case study. Retrieved from https://universalassignment.com/written-assignment-task-3-coroners-case-study/.
"Written Assignment Task 3 – Coroner’s case study." Universal Assignment - December 5, 2024, https://universalassignment.com/written-assignment-task-3-coroners-case-study/
Universal Assignment December 11, 2022 Written Assignment Task 3 – Coroner’s case study., viewed December 5, 2024,<https://universalassignment.com/written-assignment-task-3-coroners-case-study/>
Universal Assignment - Written Assignment Task 3 – Coroner’s case study. [Internet]. [Accessed December 5, 2024]. Available from: https://universalassignment.com/written-assignment-task-3-coroners-case-study/
"Written Assignment Task 3 – Coroner’s case study." Universal Assignment - Accessed December 5, 2024. https://universalassignment.com/written-assignment-task-3-coroners-case-study/
"Written Assignment Task 3 – Coroner’s case study." Universal Assignment [Online]. Available: https://universalassignment.com/written-assignment-task-3-coroners-case-study/. [Accessed: December 5, 2024]

Please note along with our service, we will provide you with the following deliverables:

Please do not hesitate to put forward any queries regarding the service provision.

We look forward to having you on board with us.

Most Frequent Questions & Answers

Universal Assignment Services is the best place to get help in your all kind of assignment help. We have 172+ experts available, who can help you to get HD+ grades. We also provide Free Plag report, Free Revisions,Best Price in the industry guaranteed.

We provide all kinds of assignmednt help, Report writing, Essay Writing, Dissertations, Thesis writing, Research Proposal, Research Report, Home work help, Question Answers help, Case studies, mathematical and Statistical tasks, Website development, Android application, Resume/CV writing, SOP(Statement of Purpose) Writing, Blog/Article, Poster making and so on.

We are available round the clock, 24X7, 365 days. You can appach us to our Whatsapp number +1 (613)778 8542 or email to info@universalassignment.com . We provide Free revision policy, if you need and revisions to be done on the task, we will do the same for you as soon as possible.

We provide services mainly to all major institutes and Universities in Australia, Canada, China, Malaysia, India, South Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

We provide lucrative discounts from 28% to 70% as per the wordcount, Technicality, Deadline and the number of your previous assignments done with us.

After your assignment request our team will check and update you the best suitable service for you alongwith the charges for the task. After confirmation and payment team will start the work and provide the task as per the deadline.

Yes, we will provide Plagirism free task and a free turnitin report along with the task without any extra cost.

No, if the main requirement is same, you don’t have to pay any additional amount. But it there is a additional requirement, then you have to pay the balance amount in order to get the revised solution.

The Fees are as minimum as $10 per page(1 page=250 words) and in case of a big task, we provide huge discounts.

We accept all the major Credit and Debit Cards for the payment. We do accept Paypal also.

Popular Assignments

ECON20001 Assignment #2

Assignment #2 Due Monday September 30th 2pm AEST The assignment is marked out of 25 points. The weight for each part is indicated following the question text. Style requirements: This assignment requires the submission of a spreadsheet. Please keep THREE decimal places in your answers and include your spreadsheet as

Read More »

RES800 Assessment 1 – Research Question and Literature Review

Subject Title Business Research Subject Code RES800 Assessment Title Assessment 1 – Research Question and Literature Review Learning Outcome/s     Utilise critical thinking to analyse managerial problems and formulate relevant research questions and a research design   Apply research theories and methodologies to assist in developing a business research

Read More »

Assessment Task 2 Health advocacy and communication plan

Assessment Task 2 Health advocacy and communication plan Rationale and multimedia plan presentation Submission requirements Due date and time:         Rationale: 8pm AEST Monday 23 September 2024 (Week 11) Multimedia plan presentation: 8pm AEST Monday 30 September 2024 (Study Period) % of final grade:         50% of overall grade Word limit: Time

Read More »

MLI500 Leadership and innovation Assessment 1

Subject Title Leadership and innovation Subject Code MLI500 Assessment Assessment 1: Leadership development plan Individual/Group Individual Length 1500 words Learning Outcomes LO1 Examine the role of leaders in fostering creativity and innovation LO5 Reflect on and take responsibility for their own learning and leadership development processes Submission   Weighting 30%

Read More »

FPC006 Taxation for Financial Planning

Assignment 2 Instructions Assignment marks: 95 | Referencing and presentation: 5 Total marks: 100 Total word limit: 3,000 words Weighting: 40% Download and use the Assignment 2 Answer Template provided in KapLearn to complete your assignment. Your assignment should be loaded into KapLearn by 11.30 pm AEST/AEDT on the wdue

Read More »

TCHR5001 Assessment Brief 1

TCHR5001 Assessment Brief 1 Assessment Details Item Assessment 1: Pitch your pedagogy Type Digital Presentation (Recorded) Due Monday, 16th September 2024, 11:59 pm AEST (start of Week 4) Group type Individual Length 10 minutes (equivalent to 1500 words) Weight 50% Gen AI use Permitted, restrictions apply Aligned ULOS ULO1, ULO2,

Read More »

HSH725 Assessment Task 2

turquoise By changing the Heading 3 above with the following teal, turquoise, orange or pink you can change the colour theme of your CloudFirst CloudDeakin template page. When this page is published the Heading 3 above will be removed, but it will still be here in edit mode if you wish to change the colour theme.

Read More »

Evidence in Health Assessment 2: Evidence Selection

Evidence in Health Assessment 2: Evidence Selection Student name:                                                                    Student ID: Section 1: PICO and search strategy Evidence Question: Insert evidence question from chosen scenario here including all key PICO terms.       PICO Search Terms                                                                                                                                                                                                          Complete the following table.   Subject headings Keywords Synonyms Population  

Read More »

Assessment 1 – Lesson Plan and annotation

ASSESSMENT TASK INFORMATION: XNB390 Assessment 1 – Lesson Plan and annotation This document provides you with information about the requirements for your assessment. Detailed instructions and resources are included for completing the task. The Criterion Reference Assessment (CRA) Marking Matrix that XNB390 markers will use to grade the assessment task

Read More »

XNB390 Task 1 – Professional Lesson Plan

XNB390 Template for Task 1 – Professional Lesson Plan CONTEXT FOR LESSON: SOCIAL JUSTICE CONSIDERATIONS: Equity Diversity Supportive Environment UNIT TITLE:    TERM WEEK DAY TIME 1   5           YEAR/CLASS STUDENT NUMBERS/CONTEXT LOCATION LESSON DURATION         28 Children (chl): 16 boys; 12

Read More »

A2 Critical Review Assignment

YouthSolutions Summary The summary should summarise the key points of the critical review. It should state the aims/purpose of the program and give an overview of the program or strategy you have chosen. This should be 200 words – included in the word count. Critical analysis and evaluation Your critical

Read More »

PUN364 – Workplace activity Assignment

Assessment 1 – DetailsOverviewFor those of you attending the on-campus workshop, you will prepare a report on the simulated simulated inspection below. For those of you who are not attending, you will be required to carry out your own food business inspection under the supervision of a suitably qualified Environmental

Read More »

FPC006 Taxation for Financial Planning

Assignment 1 Instructions Assignment marks: 95 | Referencing and presentation: 5 Total marks: 100 Total word limit: 3,600 words Weighting: 40% Download and use the Assignment 1 Answer Template provided in KapLearn to complete your assignment. Your assignment should be loaded into KapLearn by 11.30 pm AEST/AEDT on the due

Read More »

Mental health Nursing assignment

Due Aug 31 This is based on a Mental health Nursing assignment Used Microsoft word The family genogram is a useful tool for the assessment of individuals, couples, and families.  It can yield significant data and lead to important, new patient understandings and insights as multigenerational patterns take shape and

Read More »

Assessment 2: Research and Policy Review

Length: 2000 words +/- 10% (excluding references)For this assessment, you must choose eight sources (academic readings and policy documents) as the basis of your Research and Policy Review. You must choose your set of sources from the ‘REFERENCES MENU’ on the moodle site, noting the minimum number of sources required

Read More »

HSN702 – Lifespan Nutrition

Assessment Task: 2 Assignment title: Population Nutrition Report and Reflection Assignment task type: Written report, reflection, and short oral presentation Task details The primary focus of this assignment is on population nutrition. Nutritionists play an important role in promoting population health through optimal nutritional intake. You will be asked to

Read More »

Written Assessment 1: Case Study

Billy a 32-year-old male was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with a suspected overdose of tricyclic antidepressants. He is obese (weight 160kg, height 172cm) and has a history of depression and chronic back pain for which he takes oxycodone. On admission to the emergency department, Paramedics were maintaining

Read More »

Assessment Task 8 – Plan and prepare to assess competence

Assessment Task 8 – Plan and prepare to assess competence Assessment Task 8 consists of the following sections: Section 1:      Short answer questions Section 2:      Analyse an assessment tool Section 3:      Determine reasonable adjustment and customisation of assessment process Section 4:      Develop an assessment plan Student Instructions To complete this

Read More »

Nutrition Reviews Assignment 2 – Part A and Part B

This assignment provides you with the opportunity to determine an important research question that is crucial to address based on your reading of one of the two systematic reviews below (Part A). You will then develop a research proposal outlining the study design and methodology needed to answer that question

Read More »

NUR332 – TASK 3 – WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT

NUR332 – TASK 3 – WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT for S2 2024. DESCRIPTION (For this Task 3, the word ‘Indigenous Australians’, refers to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples of Australia) NUR332 Task 3 – Written Assignment – Due – WEEK 12 – via CANVAS on Wednesday, Midday (1200hrs) 16/10/2024. The

Read More »

NUR100 Task 3 – Case study

NUR100 Task 3 – Case study To identify a key child health issue and discuss this issue in the Australian context. You will demonstrate understanding of contemporary families in Australia. You will discuss the role of the family and reflect on how the family can influence the overall health outcomes

Read More »

NUR 100 Task 2 Health Promotion Poster

NUR 100 Task 2 Health Promotion Poster The weighting for this assessment is 40%. Task instructions You are not permitted to use generative AI tools in this task. Use of AI in this task constitutes student misconduct and is considered contract cheating. This assessment requires you to develop scholarship and

Read More »

BMS 291 Pathophysiology and Pharmacology CASE STUDY

BMS 291 Pathophysiology and Pharmacology CASE STUDY Assessment No: 1 Weighting: 40% Due date Part A: midnight Friday 2nd August 2024 Due date Part B: midnight Sunday 29th September 2024 General information In this assessment, you will develop your skills for analysing, integrating and presenting information for effective evidence-based communication.

Read More »

Assessment Task: Health service delivery

Assessment Task Health service delivery is inherently unpredictable. This unpredictability can arise from, for example, the assortment of patient presentations, environmental factors, changing technologies, shifts in health policy and changes in division leadership. It can also arise from changes in policy within an organisation and/or associated health services that impact

Read More »

LNDN08002 Business Cultures Resit Assessment

LNDN08002 Business Cultures Resit Assessment Briefing 2023–2024 (Resit for Term 1) Contents Before starting this resit, please: 1 Assessment Element 1: Individual Report 1 Case Report Marking Criteria. 3 Assessment Element 2: Continuing Personal Development (CPD) 4 Guidance for Assessment 2: Reflection and Reflective Practice. 5 Student Marking Criteria –

Read More »

Assessment Task 2 – NAPLAN Exercise

Assessment Task 2 (35%) – Evaluation and discussion of test items Assessment Task 2 (35%) – Evaluation and discussion of test items AITSL Standards: This assessmeAITSL Standards: This assessment provides the opportunity to develop evidence that demonstrates these Standards: 1.2        Understand how students learn 1.5        Differentiate teaching to meet with

Read More »

EBY014 Degree Tutor Group 2 Assignment

  Assignment Brief Module Degree Tutor Group 2 Module Code EBY014 Programme BA (Hons) Business and Management with   Foundation Year Academic Year 2024/2025 Issue Date 6th May 2024 Semester Component Magnitude Weighting Deadline Learning outcomes assessed 2 1 2000 words Capstone Assessment 100% 26th July, 2024 1/2/3/4 Module Curriculum

Read More »

Can't Find Your Assignment?

Open chat
1
Free Assistance
Universal Assignment
Hello 👋
How can we help you?