Assessment Brief: BIS2003 IS Project Management

Assessment Brief: BIS2003 IS Project Management Trimester 1, 2021

Assessment Overview

Assessment TaskTypeWeightingDueLengthULO
Assessment 1: Quiz 30 minutes test comprising of multiple-choice questionsIndividual      40%Weeks 1- 1030 minsULO-1 ULO-2 ULO-3 ULO-4 ULO-5
Assessment 2: Case Study with presentation Undertake an analysis of the case, discuss reasons for failure and propose a solution how project management techniques can solve problems.Group            30%Week 63000 wordsULO-1 ULO-2 ULO-3 ULO-4
Assessment 3: Applied Project Apply and integrate project management concepts and tools to a specific IS development project.Individual    30%Week 123500 wordsULO-2 ULO-3 ULO-4 ULO-5

Assessment 1: Quiz

Due date:Weeks 1-10
Group/individual:Individual
Word count / Time provided:30 minutes
Weighting:40%
Unit Learning Outcomes:ULO-1, ULO-2, ULO-3, ULO-4, ULO-5

Assessment Details:

The weekly quizzes will assess your knowledge and understanding of key concepts in the Project Management Knowledge Areas. For successful completion of the quiz, you are required to study the material provided (lecture slides, tutorials, and reading materials), engage in the unit’s activities, and in the discussion forums. The prescribed textbook is the main reference along with the recommended reading material. By completing this assessment successfully, you will be able to identify key aspects of the best project management practices. This will then help in achieving ULO1, this in turn will help you in achieving CLO-1, which collectively with other unit learning outcomes will help in achieving GA2.

Marking Information: The quiz will be marked out of 100 and will be weighed 40% of the total unit mark.

Assessment 2: Case Study and Presentation

Due date:Week 6
Group/individual:Group
Word count / Time provided:3000 words
Weighting:30%
Unit Learning Outcomes:ULO-1, ULO-2, ULO-3, ULO-4

SystemTech Case Study Background

SystemTech is an Australia-based travel agency that specializes in the rental of high-quality self- catering accommodation in Australia. For the summer months, it offers a wide selection of gîtes (holiday cottages) and, for the winter, apartments and chalets in various ski resorts. The company was founded by three friends who still own it, Emeka Steven, Daniel Okw and Ric Nelson, and the company has been in business since 2000. It has grown rapidly to achieve a turnover of some AU$25.75 million per annum and employs more than 170 staff at three offices, one in the Greater Sydney area, one in Melbourne and one in Melbourne. SystemTech has a website, but it is not functionally effective. SystemTech currently uses three main sales channels:

  • Direct selling to customers through mailshots of its brochures and customer support centres (60 per cent of sales).
  • Sales via high street travel agents (22 per cent of sales).
  • Sales via phone calls (18 per cent of sales)

However, the company is aware from press coverage and from surveys on its own customers that there is a growing public demand to be able to book holidays via the internet. This is particularly true as its customers are precisely the sort of people who are ‘net aware’. SystemTech does have a website, but this is just its latest brochure in electronic format, and it does not have links to up-to- date availability data or the facilities for customers to make secure bookings online. Consequently, SystemTech has decided to implement a new internet-based booking system. This will be linked to its existing computerized booking system, which contains data on the availability of properties, and to its customer database as well as having secure links over which credit card data can be received. In

addition, the company wants its management information system (MIS) enhanced so that it can trawl its databases and send targeted information to customers on properties that are likely to be of interest to them.

SystemTech organization

The current organizational structure of the company is shown in Figure 1.1. The three founders have divided the business among themselves. Emeka Steven (who has a sales background) looks after the sales and operations side, Daniel Okw, an accountant, takes care of finance and administration and Ric Nelson who is a lawyer and experience in IT takes care of the IT and company’s legal matters. The small IT department within the administration function consists of the IT manager, Peter Clay, three analyst/programmers and a computer operator/trainee programmer.

Diagram Description automatically generated

Figure 1.1 Organization of SystemTech

The project

Because of the small size of its IT department, and since the department lacks skills in the design of e- commerce applications, SystemTech has decided to entrust the development of its internet service to a consultancy company, Eagles iTechnology. This firm has tendered for the following services:

  • Analysis of the requirements.
  • Production of a detailed requirements specification.
  • Design, development and implementation of the internet systems, including a new website and secure communications links.
  • Training SystemTech staff in the use of the new systems.
  • Specification of the interfaces required from SystemTech’s existing customer database and booking system (the development of the links at the SystemTech end to be done by its own IT department).
  • Specification of the additional hardware required to support the new system (to be obtained from SystemTech’s usual suppliers, the procurement to be managed by the IT department).
  • ‘Skills transfer’ to SystemTech’s IT department, so that ongoing maintenance and development of the new system can be handled in-house. The development of the MIS aspects of the new system will be dealt with by SystemTech’s IT department.

The date now is 1 November 2020 and SystemTech wants to have the new system up and running for

the start of the winter season’s bookings at the end of June 2021.

The internet booking project is a result of a recent strategic review of SystemTech undertaken by its senior managers – the three directors and their direct reports.

The SWOT analysis showed that SystemTech has a good reputation in its marketplace and a lot of ‘brand recognition’ by its target market. However, this target market (reasonably affluent professionals) does make extensive use of the internet and it was felt that being unable to offer this service would increasingly become a weakness. At least one of SystemTech’s competitors already has an internet booking service (albeit not a very good one) and others are sure to follow soon. Applying the internet to SystemTech’s position using Porter’s five forces model also produced some interesting results. The internet tends to increase the power of buyers (as they can shop around more easily) and lowers the cost of entry for new competitors. In addition, the suppliers (the owners of the gîtes and chalets) can also set up their own websites, thereby cutting out brokers like SystemTech and increasing their own relative power. The conclusion of the strategy review was, therefore, that not setting up an internet service was not a viable option. Also, since the competitors’ sites were not very good at present, it was felt that creating a very good and user-friendly site would provide a source of competitive advantage (at least in the short to medium term).

The SWOT analysis conducted by SystemTech has already shown that not having an internet service is not a viable scenario, since so many of the company’s customers now regularly use the internet. However, the issue still arises as to how much it would be worth investing in the project, and this means that the company has had to develop a business case for undertaking the internet development. Ric Nelson, as the accountant, has undertaken production of the business case and he has identified three main business options that could be considered:

  1. Building an internet booking system for SystemTech and interfacing that with the company’s

existing systems.

  • Building a standalone internet system and operating the internet booking as, in effect, a separate subsidiary business.
  • Finding a partner organization with an internet booking system and interfacing SystemTech’s system with that.

The third option is unattractive as the customers of the booking system would not be SystemTech’s own and this is considered very important. Daniel also rejected the second option as it is likely that the company’s customers would sometimes use the internet and sometimes book over the telephone and having two sales channels would go against the principle of being a ‘one-stop shop’ for all the customers’ requirements.

Consequently, the business case has been built around the first option, adding a web-based booking front-end to the existing booking system.

Daniel has used SystemTech’s salesforce to conduct a telephone survey of existing customers, and that has suggested that an additional AU$80,000 of business might be secured each year via the internet. Assessing the likely amount of additional business (from new customers) is more difficult but a recent travel industry survey concluded that firms could attract 10–15 per cent new customers through e-commerce. If true, this would mean that SystemTech could obtain between AU$78,000 and AU$120,000 per annum more business through web bookings, but the directors, wishing to be cautious, have opted for the lower figure. In total, then, it seems as if the internet booking system should secure an additional AU$178,000 worth of business annually. The directors want to break even on their investment in three years and so this suggests a maximum cost for the internet development of AU$384,000. Initial discussions with various potential software vendors, including their preferred partner Eagles iTechnology, suggest that a system could be developed for AU$376,000. On that basis, the directors approve the business case.

Eagles iTechnology, the consultancy firm engaged by SystemTech to develop its internet-based system, has recommended the use of a PRINCE2®-type structure to manage the project.

The project board will be made up of:

  • Emeka Steven, one of SystemTech’s directors, as executive
  • James Vic SystemTech’s customer services manager, as senior user
  • Grace Moore, Eagles iTechnology’s account manager, as senior supplier.

The project board will meet on a Thursday afternoon every two weeks during the project.

There was some argument about how the role of project manager should be filled. Simon Nick, SystemTech’s IT manager, thought that he should take this position, with the Eagles iTechnology project manager being a team manager. However, Eagles iTechnology argued that, as it was doing most of the development work, it would make more sense for Eagles iTechnology to provide the project manager. In the end, Emeka Steven agreed with Eagles iTechnology and so the project manager will be Paul Johnson, an Eagles iTechnology principal consultant. He will manage two teams, one led by Simon Nick which will develop the MIS aspects of the new system and the other led by Eagles iTechnology’s Tim Cook which will develop the internet software.

Eagles iTechnology will also provide the project support functions, as it has a project support office that works with all its projects.

The project assurance functions will be discharged by a small team comprising:

  • James Vic, one of Jean Hunt’s sales supervisors
  • Tim Jones, one of the IT managers
  • Rage Munde, SystemTech’ management accountant
  • Jack Lukas, Eagles iTechnology’s quality assurance manager.

Assessment Details:

As a project management student at APIC, you are required to perform tasks and answer the following questions:

  1. Draw the SystemTech’s IT project organizational chart that will be implementing the project?
  2. What is the IT Project Management structure (functional, project and matrix)? Explain.
  3. What is the Project Proposal Life Cycle? Who is involved and how in the Cycle?
  4. Who are the stakeholders involved in the Information System Development project?
  5. How you would you describe the Initiating and Planning Information System Project Management Process Groups in relation to the Project Management Knowledge Areas?
  6. Provide a SWOT analysis of the Information System Development project.

Two documents should be submitted:

  1. MS Word document. You must follow the Harvard style sources references.
  2. MS Power Point presentation (up to 20 slides), One submission for each group

In your work on the assignment you need to use the following sources:

  • SBM4305 Lecture Notes

·        The prescribed textbook (Schwalbe 2018)

Please remember that this is a practical assessment and you are NOT required to write any general information, definitions and references to another books and articles. These items will not be marked.

Marking Criteria and Rubric: The assessment will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 30% of the total unit mark

Marking CriteriaNot satisfactory (0-49%) of the criterion mark)Satisfactory (50-64%) of the criterion markGood (65-74%) of the criterion markVery Good (75-84%) of the criterion markExcellent (85-100%) of the criterion mark
Analysis of the FV (SystemTech) profile and business processes (5%)Inadequate analysis of the FV profile and business processesBasic understanding of FV profile and business processesExhibits breadth and depth of understanding of FV profile and business processesExhibits accurate and detailed breadth and depth of understanding of the FV profile and business processesDisplays exceptional understanding of the FV profile and business processes
Analysis of FV Project management structure (10%)Inadequate understanding of FV Project management structureBasic understanding only of FV Project management structureExhibits breadth and depth of understanding of FV Project management structureExhibits accurate and detailed breadth and depth of understanding of FV Project management structureDisplays exceptional understanding of FV Project management structure
Demonstrate understanding of What is the ProjectInadequate understanding of Project ProposalBasic understanding of Project Proposal Life Cycle andExhibits breadth and depth of understanding ofExhibits accurate and detailed breadth and depthDisplays exceptional understanding of Project Proposal Life
Proposal Life Cycle? Who is involved and how in the Cycle and stakeholder requirements (20%)Life Cycle and Stakeholder AnalysisStakeholder AnalysisProject Proposal Life Cycle and Stakeholder Analysisof understanding of Project Proposal Life Cycle and Stakeholder AnalysisCycle and Stakeholder Analysis
Demonstrate understanding of mapping of FV PM Process Groups on to Project Management Knowledge Areas(30%)Inadequate understanding of mapping of PM Process Groups on to Project Management Knowledge AreasBasic understanding of mapping of PM Process Groups on to Project Management Knowledge AreasExhibits breadth and depth of understanding of mapping of PM Process Groups on to Project Management Knowledge AreasExhibits accurate and detailed breadth and depth of understanding of mapping of PM Process Groups on to Project Management Knowledge AreasDisplays exceptional understanding of mapping of PM Process Groups on to Project Management Knowledge Areas
Demonstrate understanding of SWOT analysis and reasons of the project failure. (15%)Inadequate understanding of SWOT analysis and reasons of the project failure.Inadequate understanding of SWOT analysis and reasons of the project failure.Exhibits breadth and depth of understanding of SWOT analysis and reasons of the project failure.Exhibits accurate and detailed understanding of SWOT analysis and reasons of the project failure.Displays exceptional understanding of SWOT analysis and reasons of the project failure.
Presentation Content. Understanding of the selected project case and of the project scope components (10%)Lack of evidence of adequate understanding of the selected project case. Majority of information irrelevant and significant points left outEvidence of basic knowledge and skills of developing project scope statement.Has given a factual and/or conceptual knowledge and skills base in developing project scope statement and give a brief about the project backgroundReasonable knowledge and skills of developing project scope statement.Has excellent skills in developing project scope statement. The presentation was a concise summary of the selected project. All questions answered. Comprehensive and complete coverage of information
Presentation visual appeal. Presentation slides, clarity, grammar, spelling and engaging (10%)Lack of evidence of written presentation skills (no visual appeal). The slides were difficult to read and too much information had been copied onto them. There are many errors in spelling, grammar and punctuationEvidence of basic skills of communicating (writing) in project environment. Minimal effort made to make slides appealingHas given a factual and/or conceptual skill base in communication (writing) in project environment. There are some errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation. In some slides, too much information on two or more slides. good visual appeal.Has very good skills in communicating (writing) a project report There are few errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation. very visual appeal.Has excellent skills in communicating (writing) in project environment There are no errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation. Information is clear and concise on each slide. Excellent visually appeal that is engaging.

Assessment 3: Applied Project

Due date:Week 12
Group/individual:Individual
Word count / Time provided:3500 words
Weighting:30%
Unit Learning Outcomes:ULO-2, ULO-3, ULO-4, ULO-5

In this assignment, you will continue working on the SystemTech project. The Applied Project assignment includes the following tasks:

  1. Based on case study provided, explain phases of the Project Life Cycle (PLC)
  2. Create a Stakeholder Register (SR) and Communication Management Plan (CMP)
  3. Create a Project Charter (PC) that would approved/signed
  4. Create a Project Network Diagram (PND)
  5. Calculate the project cost and the Net Present Value (NPV) – download the project costs and examples from Canvas
  6. Create the Project Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)

The submission should include 2 files:

  • MS Word file that includes items 1 – 4, 6
  • MS Excel file with the calculations of the project cost and NPV

Please remember that this is a practical assessment and you are NOT required to insert any general information, definitions and references to books and articles. These items will not be marked.

Marking Criteria and Rubric: The assessment will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 30% of the total unit mark.

Marking CriteriaNot satisfactory (0-49%) of the criterion mark)Satisfactory (50-64%) of the criterion markGood (65-74%) of the criterion markVery Good (75-84%) of the criterion markExcellent (85-100%) of the criterion mark
Demonstrate an understanding of project life cycle (10%)Inadequate understanding of the life cycleBasic knowledge only of the understanding of project life cycleExhibits breadth and depth of understanding of the project life cycleExhibits accurate and detailed breadth and depth of understanding of project life cycleDisplays exceptional understanding of project life cycle
Produce a Cost analysis document and NPV using Excel spreadsheet (30%)Inadequate understanding of cost calculation and NPV; cannot use Excel for producing NPVBasic understanding of cost calculation, NPV and Excel featuresExhibits breadth and depth of understanding of cost calculations, NPV and Excel featuresExhibits accurate and detailed breadth and depth of understanding of cost calculations, NPV and Excel featuresDisplays exceptional understanding of cost calculations, NPV and its practical application. Produces exceptional knowledge of Excel features to calculate NPV.
Demonstrate understanding of communication management and ability to create PC, PS and CMP (40%)Inadequate understanding of appropriate techniques and tools for creating Project Charter, Project Stakeholder and Communication AnalysisBasic knowledge only of appropriate techniques and tools for creating Project Charter, Project Stakeholder and Communication AnalysisExhibits breadth and depth of understanding of appropriate techniques and tools for creating Project Charter, Project Stakeholder and Communication AnalysisExhibits accurate and detailed breadth and depth of understanding of appropriate techniques and tools for creating Project Charter, Project Stakeholder and Communication AnalysisDisplays exceptional understanding of concepts and their practical application of appropriate techniques and tools for creating Project Charter, Project Stakeholder and Communication Analysis
Produce a PND and WBS (20%)Inadequate understanding of PND diagram cannot discuss concepts in own wordsBasic knowledge only of PND diagram; limited depth of basic conceptsExhibits breadth and depth of understanding of MND diagramExhibits accurate and detailed breadth and depth of MND diagramDisplays exceptional understanding of concepts and their practical application of PND diagram

Order Now

Get expert help for Assessment Brief: BIS2003 IS Project Management and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!

Universal Assignment (February 12, 2025) Assessment Brief: BIS2003 IS Project Management. Retrieved from https://universalassignment.com/assessment-brief-bis2003-is-project-management/.
"Assessment Brief: BIS2003 IS Project Management." Universal Assignment - February 12, 2025, https://universalassignment.com/assessment-brief-bis2003-is-project-management/
Universal Assignment September 7, 2022 Assessment Brief: BIS2003 IS Project Management., viewed February 12, 2025,<https://universalassignment.com/assessment-brief-bis2003-is-project-management/>
Universal Assignment - Assessment Brief: BIS2003 IS Project Management. [Internet]. [Accessed February 12, 2025]. Available from: https://universalassignment.com/assessment-brief-bis2003-is-project-management/
"Assessment Brief: BIS2003 IS Project Management." Universal Assignment - Accessed February 12, 2025. https://universalassignment.com/assessment-brief-bis2003-is-project-management/
"Assessment Brief: BIS2003 IS Project Management." Universal Assignment [Online]. Available: https://universalassignment.com/assessment-brief-bis2003-is-project-management/. [Accessed: February 12, 2025]

Please note along with our service, we will provide you with the following deliverables:

Please do not hesitate to put forward any queries regarding the service provision.

We look forward to having you on board with us.

Most Frequent Questions & Answers

Universal Assignment Services is the best place to get help in your all kind of assignment help. We have 172+ experts available, who can help you to get HD+ grades. We also provide Free Plag report, Free Revisions,Best Price in the industry guaranteed.

We provide all kinds of assignmednt help, Report writing, Essay Writing, Dissertations, Thesis writing, Research Proposal, Research Report, Home work help, Question Answers help, Case studies, mathematical and Statistical tasks, Website development, Android application, Resume/CV writing, SOP(Statement of Purpose) Writing, Blog/Article, Poster making and so on.

We are available round the clock, 24X7, 365 days. You can appach us to our Whatsapp number +1 (613)778 8542 or email to info@universalassignment.com . We provide Free revision policy, if you need and revisions to be done on the task, we will do the same for you as soon as possible.

We provide services mainly to all major institutes and Universities in Australia, Canada, China, Malaysia, India, South Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

We provide lucrative discounts from 28% to 70% as per the wordcount, Technicality, Deadline and the number of your previous assignments done with us.

After your assignment request our team will check and update you the best suitable service for you alongwith the charges for the task. After confirmation and payment team will start the work and provide the task as per the deadline.

Yes, we will provide Plagirism free task and a free turnitin report along with the task without any extra cost.

No, if the main requirement is same, you don’t have to pay any additional amount. But it there is a additional requirement, then you have to pay the balance amount in order to get the revised solution.

The Fees are as minimum as $10 per page(1 page=250 words) and in case of a big task, we provide huge discounts.

We accept all the major Credit and Debit Cards for the payment. We do accept Paypal also.

Popular Assignments

STM1001: Assignment 3 for Science/Health Stream Students

STM1001: Assignment 3 Science/Health Stream Students Only Academic Integrity Information In submitting your work, you are consenting that it may be copied and transmitted by the University for the detection of plagiarism. If you are unsure of your academic integrity responsibilities, please check the information provided in the Assessment Overview

Read More »

ACCG1000 Accounting for Decision Making Xero Assignment

1ACCG1000Accounting for Decision MakingXero AssignmentInformation packSession 2 2024Due Date: Friday 18th October 2024 at 11.55pm2Xero AssignmentIntroductionThe Xero assignment is designed to provide introductory accounting students with an overview of the Xero Accounting Software by completing a one-month accounting cycle for a fictional business. This is an online assignment worth 20%

Read More »

WRIT1001 Assessment Notification 2

6Final Essay: Rhetorical analysisDue: Friday 18 October 2024 at 23:59 (Sydney time)Length: 1500 words, worth 40% of the overall grade for the unitSubmit: as a Word document or PDF, via Canvas AssignmentMain question:● Present a scholarly essay that analyses the rhetoric used in arguments about thecontentious topic you have been

Read More »

WRIT1000 Assessment Four

Title: Self-ReflectionDue: Friday October 18 by 11:59PM.Length: 500 words (+/- 10%)Weight: 10% of the total gradeFormat: Times New Roman, double-spaced, 12pt. Your project should have the title“WRIT1000 Assessment Four – Self Reflection for xxxxxxx” where “xxxxxxxx” is yourstudent number. Please only submit Word documents (.doc or .docx). Turnitin doesnot recognise

Read More »

Written Assessment – Psychosocial Research Perspectives

Written Assessment – Psychosocial Research Perspectives TRIGGER WARNING: This is a case study of a real person. Katherine Knight was the first woman in Australia to receive a life sentence without parole after she decapitated and cooked her lover. If you think that you will have problems reading about this

Read More »

RES800 Assessment 1 – Research Question and Literature Review

Subject Title Business Research Subject Code RES800 Assessment Title Assessment 1 – Research Question and Literature Review Learning Outcome/s     Utilise critical thinking to analyse managerial problems and formulate relevant research questions and a research design   Apply research theories and methodologies to assist in developing a business research

Read More »

Assessment Task 2 Health advocacy and communication plan

Assessment Task 2 Health advocacy and communication plan Rationale and multimedia plan presentation Submission requirements Due date and time:         Rationale: 8pm AEST Monday 23 September 2024 (Week 11) Multimedia plan presentation: 8pm AEST Monday 30 September 2024 (Study Period) % of final grade:         50% of overall grade Word limit: Time

Read More »

MLI500 Leadership and innovation Assessment 1

Subject Title Leadership and innovation Subject Code MLI500 Assessment Assessment 1: Leadership development plan Individual/Group Individual Length 1500 words Learning Outcomes LO1 Examine the role of leaders in fostering creativity and innovation LO5 Reflect on and take responsibility for their own learning and leadership development processes Submission   Weighting 30%

Read More »

FPC006 Taxation for Financial Planning

Assignment 2 Instructions Assignment marks: 95 | Referencing and presentation: 5 Total marks: 100 Total word limit: 3,000 words Weighting: 40% Download and use the Assignment 2 Answer Template provided in KapLearn to complete your assignment. Your assignment should be loaded into KapLearn by 11.30 pm AEST/AEDT on the wdue

Read More »

TCHR5001 Assessment Brief 1

TCHR5001 Assessment Brief 1 Assessment Details Item Assessment 1: Pitch your pedagogy Type Digital Presentation (Recorded) Due Monday, 16th September 2024, 11:59 pm AEST (start of Week 4) Group type Individual Length 10 minutes (equivalent to 1500 words) Weight 50% Gen AI use Permitted, restrictions apply Aligned ULOS ULO1, ULO2,

Read More »

HSH725 Assessment Task 2

turquoise By changing the Heading 3 above with the following teal, turquoise, orange or pink you can change the colour theme of your CloudFirst CloudDeakin template page. When this page is published the Heading 3 above will be removed, but it will still be here in edit mode if you wish to change the colour theme.

Read More »

Evidence in Health Assessment 2: Evidence Selection

Evidence in Health Assessment 2: Evidence Selection Student name:                                                                    Student ID: Section 1: PICO and search strategy Evidence Question: Insert evidence question from chosen scenario here including all key PICO terms.       PICO Search Terms                                                                                                                                                                                                          Complete the following table.   Subject headings Keywords Synonyms Population  

Read More »

Assessment 1 – Lesson Plan and annotation

ASSESSMENT TASK INFORMATION: XNB390 Assessment 1 – Lesson Plan and annotation This document provides you with information about the requirements for your assessment. Detailed instructions and resources are included for completing the task. The Criterion Reference Assessment (CRA) Marking Matrix that XNB390 markers will use to grade the assessment task

Read More »

XNB390 Task 1 – Professional Lesson Plan

XNB390 Template for Task 1 – Professional Lesson Plan CONTEXT FOR LESSON: SOCIAL JUSTICE CONSIDERATIONS: Equity Diversity Supportive Environment UNIT TITLE:    TERM WEEK DAY TIME 1   5           YEAR/CLASS STUDENT NUMBERS/CONTEXT LOCATION LESSON DURATION         28 Children (chl): 16 boys; 12

Read More »

A2 Critical Review Assignment

YouthSolutions Summary The summary should summarise the key points of the critical review. It should state the aims/purpose of the program and give an overview of the program or strategy you have chosen. This should be 200 words – included in the word count. Critical analysis and evaluation Your critical

Read More »

PUN364 – Workplace activity Assignment

Assessment 1 – DetailsOverviewFor those of you attending the on-campus workshop, you will prepare a report on the simulated simulated inspection below. For those of you who are not attending, you will be required to carry out your own food business inspection under the supervision of a suitably qualified Environmental

Read More »

FPC006 Taxation for Financial Planning

Assignment 1 Instructions Assignment marks: 95 | Referencing and presentation: 5 Total marks: 100 Total word limit: 3,600 words Weighting: 40% Download and use the Assignment 1 Answer Template provided in KapLearn to complete your assignment. Your assignment should be loaded into KapLearn by 11.30 pm AEST/AEDT on the due

Read More »

Mental health Nursing assignment

Due Aug 31 This is based on a Mental health Nursing assignment Used Microsoft word The family genogram is a useful tool for the assessment of individuals, couples, and families.  It can yield significant data and lead to important, new patient understandings and insights as multigenerational patterns take shape and

Read More »

Assessment 2: Research and Policy Review

Length: 2000 words +/- 10% (excluding references)For this assessment, you must choose eight sources (academic readings and policy documents) as the basis of your Research and Policy Review. You must choose your set of sources from the ‘REFERENCES MENU’ on the moodle site, noting the minimum number of sources required

Read More »

HSN702 – Lifespan Nutrition

Assessment Task: 2 Assignment title: Population Nutrition Report and Reflection Assignment task type: Written report, reflection, and short oral presentation Task details The primary focus of this assignment is on population nutrition. Nutritionists play an important role in promoting population health through optimal nutritional intake. You will be asked to

Read More »

Written Assessment 1: Case Study

Billy a 32-year-old male was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with a suspected overdose of tricyclic antidepressants. He is obese (weight 160kg, height 172cm) and has a history of depression and chronic back pain for which he takes oxycodone. On admission to the emergency department, Paramedics were maintaining

Read More »

Assessment Task 8 – Plan and prepare to assess competence

Assessment Task 8 – Plan and prepare to assess competence Assessment Task 8 consists of the following sections: Section 1:      Short answer questions Section 2:      Analyse an assessment tool Section 3:      Determine reasonable adjustment and customisation of assessment process Section 4:      Develop an assessment plan Student Instructions To complete this

Read More »

Nutrition Reviews Assignment 2 – Part A and Part B

This assignment provides you with the opportunity to determine an important research question that is crucial to address based on your reading of one of the two systematic reviews below (Part A). You will then develop a research proposal outlining the study design and methodology needed to answer that question

Read More »

NUR332 – TASK 3 – WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT

NUR332 – TASK 3 – WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT for S2 2024. DESCRIPTION (For this Task 3, the word ‘Indigenous Australians’, refers to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples of Australia) NUR332 Task 3 – Written Assignment – Due – WEEK 12 – via CANVAS on Wednesday, Midday (1200hrs) 16/10/2024. The

Read More »

NUR100 Task 3 – Case study

NUR100 Task 3 – Case study To identify a key child health issue and discuss this issue in the Australian context. You will demonstrate understanding of contemporary families in Australia. You will discuss the role of the family and reflect on how the family can influence the overall health outcomes

Read More »

NUR 100 Task 2 Health Promotion Poster

NUR 100 Task 2 Health Promotion Poster The weighting for this assessment is 40%. Task instructions You are not permitted to use generative AI tools in this task. Use of AI in this task constitutes student misconduct and is considered contract cheating. This assessment requires you to develop scholarship and

Read More »

BMS 291 Pathophysiology and Pharmacology CASE STUDY

BMS 291 Pathophysiology and Pharmacology CASE STUDY Assessment No: 1 Weighting: 40% Due date Part A: midnight Friday 2nd August 2024 Due date Part B: midnight Sunday 29th September 2024 General information In this assessment, you will develop your skills for analysing, integrating and presenting information for effective evidence-based communication.

Read More »

Can't Find Your Assignment?

Open chat
1
Free Assistance
Universal Assignment
Hello 👋
How can we help you?