|Assessment Type||Case report|
|Aim||The main aim of this assessment is to conduct an analysis on an organisational case study and present solutions for their workplace challenges. This is an opportunity to apply your knowledge and skills in various HRD areas to solve real organisational problems.|
|Word Limit||2000 words + reference list|
|Format||Double-line spacing, size 12 font (Times New Romans or Arial)|
|Reference Style||Harvard Referencing Style|
|Due||Refer to the due date for Assessment 3 published on Canvas|
|Submission||Via submission point on Canvas|
Case Study: HRD at SunTech
SunTech is a start-up company that specialises in providing computer servers to medium and large corporates. They were founded 5 years ago by the owner Mathew Horton. Mathew has a background in selling IT solutions and is very technically focused. He acknowledges that his leadership and people skills could be enhanced. SunTech is bracing for expansion and they have recently increased the HR team to include a new Learning & Development (L&D) manager.
Last financial year SunTech recorded revenue of $15 million and profit of $8 million. There is a projected figure of 20 new hires over the next 12 months. Most projects completed by SunTech are usually delivered at high quality, on time and on budget. There are a few projects which go over budget and time and this could be due to managers with limited people management skills.
SunTech initially started as a team of 7 staff and has been through immense growth over the last 3 years. They have 60 staff all based in Victoria. Turnover of staff is very low at 4%. The industry average is 12%. SunTech is made up of the following departments: Finance, Marketing, Operations (HR, Facilities & IT), Sales and Network Engineering. The two key departments are the Sales department (total 15 staff) and Network Engineering department (total 25 staff). Both teams have a flat structure with only a few senior managers for each department. The Sales team are client facing and are good at managing stakeholder relationships but at times lack a basic understanding of the technical specifications of the
products. The Network engineering department is technically focused and highly skilled in IT knowledge but are not confident in communicating clearly between themselves and with other departments. Sometimes there is miscommunication between departments which can cause stress.
Managers in the organisation have mainly been promoted on their technical abilities and not their people management skills. There is no training provided for new managers or staff wanting to enhance their management and leadership skills.
SunTech’s culture is described as one of working hard, achieving goals, and celebrating successes. They value teamwork and providing quality products. The senior management team would like to further boost the culture to include knowledge sharing amongst departments and better communication between team members and managers.
There are eight members of the Senior Executive team. Two of which understand the importance of lifelong learning and developing staff to perform and grow. The remaining six members understand the Tech sector well but not necessarily the importance of developing staff and having good HRD practices.
Due to the growth of the organisation, SunTech staff has not have much formal training. Training has been at best ad hoc and when training is provided there is no evaluation that takes place. The organisation does not know if the training is suitable or if it meets the needs of their staff. One staff member who attended training commented that “The workshop was fun, and I enjoyed meeting and connecting with new team members across the organisation. But I don’t know if I will remember all this content and how I can apply it effectively in my work for the long term.”
You have noticed that training activities are inconsistent across the organisation. Some departments (i.e. Sales) have development opportunities such as workshops and online courses, while others (e.g. Network engineering and Operations) do not have any training provided.
Staff survey results indicated that staff would like more development opportunities for both their technical skills and soft skills such as communication, influencing and leadership skills.
There is a generous budget allocation ($50,000) for training and development and over the last 12 months only a quarter of the budget has been utilised. This is largely due to major projects taking up significant time so staff are unable to attend or complete any training.
As the new L&D manager you have been asked to provide a report which includes your analysis of current L&D activities, a proposed plan moving forward and example learning activities to the SunTech Senior Executive team.
Your report/submission will include the following elements:
- Explain the importance of HRD for the organisation
- Analyse and explain the HRD issues that you have identified – this is your overall analysis based on the information provided
- Explain and present a solution in the form of an HRD design and implementation plan that includes the following elements:
- Needs assessment (i.e. how will you carry this out to provide more detailed information on the key areas you have identified)
- Design & Implementation (i.e. possible learning programs/activities based on the issues you have identified)
- Evaluation (i.e. how you will evaluate the HRD program you have proposed)
- Provide a conclusion and recommendations
You are asked to keep the report within 2000 words (+/- 10% allowed). However, you are welcome to use appendix to provide supplementary materials and the appendix will not be included in word count.
In general, your report/submission should fulfil these needs:
- Your report must focus on the case study provided. Your report should be written for your target audience (the Senior executive team)
- Your report must reference the topics covered in this course
- Your report should include applied knowledge from the Human Resource Development course and demonstrate your ability to use such knowledge in making sound business judgment appropriate for the organisational context
- Your report should generate solid recommendations for the organisation
- Your report should be presented and structured in a way that is easy for the target audience to read and digest.
- You must include a minimum of 10 references (excluding those provided for the case studies)
- Executive Summary & Introduction: Provides a robust and logical executive summary (4 marks)
- Coverage: Provides a comprehensive yet succinct overview of the topic areas (10 marks)
- Content: The content of the report addresses the elements listed and provides quality analysis and key academic perspectives/views, along with clear arguments. (10 marks)
- Conclusion and recommendations: The conclusion and recommendations closely relate to the discussions from the literature and critical analysis as developed in the main body of the report. The conclusion finishes with a clear take-away message for the readers (4 marks)
- Clarity of writing: Clear, logical, and engaging writing in delivering your message; Free from typos and grammatical mistakes; Clear structure; Ideas presented are coherent throughout the report (6 marks)
- Supporting materials and referencing: The information and analysis was gathered from many diverse, high-quality sources. Referencing style following Harvard reference styles for in-text and list of references (6 marks)
Referencing Easycite: Please use the EasyCite Referencing Tool. When referencing please use Harvard style. To learn more about Harvard style please refer to this website below: http://www1.rmit.edu.au/library/referencing.
Below are some policies that are relevant for you to consider in preparing your report Please note below is only a subset of the assessment policies. To have a comprehensive understanding of RMIT policies please check Canvas (Assessment Tasks – Additional Information: Assessment Guides and Policies).
Submissions must be made through Canvas site electronically. All submissions will be parsed through Turnitin to check academic integrity (the allowed score in Turnitin is no more than 20% similarities). It is highly recommended that you submit your work a few days earlier to Turnitin to check for similarities, before submitting your final work.
Late submission and over word limits
Any late assignment, unless granted an extension by the course coordinator or the Special Consideration Unit, will be penalised. Late submissions will be penalised 10% per day.
Assignments submitted more than seven (7) calendar days late will NOT be marked. Please check Canvas and RMIT website about how to apply for special consideration.
When submitting assessment tasks online it is a student’s responsibility to submit their final document. The document that is lodged is what will be assessed on its merits. Re- submissions of assessment tasks beyond the specified date will NOT be accepted. Cases such as submitting a draft by error instead of the final version, or “I lost my laptop”, or “a computer malfunction caused me to lose all my work”, are not acceptable reasons to be granted an extension or re-submission.
You are asked to stay within word limit in the final word count on your report (2000 words including everything except reference). Usually we allow 10% above or below of the word limit. Going beyond word limit by over 10% will incur a penalty to your mark. Please remember, good reports (either academic or general writings) are always concise and focused, and the aim of our report assessment is to help you develop such writing skills.
Get expert help for BUSM1137 Human Resource Development and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!