ENG-7007B Concept Design and Performance Assessment Portfolio, Task 1

This is an individual exercise aimed at assessing your ability to use mathematical analysis and computational tools to arrive at a preliminary aerodynamic design of a wind turbine rotor.

Overview of the assignment

You will be allocated a rated wind speed, power output and tip speed ratio for a single 3-bladed wind turbine. The objective is to use the theory covered in the Maths lectures, along with the XFLR5 computational tool, to develop a wing turbine rotor geometry which will deliver your assigned power output for your assigned wind speed and tip speed ratio. You will then evaluate that rotor using the slightly more complete aerodynamic theory which includes wake swirl effects.

Learning outcomes

This exercise will contribute to the two module learning outcomes listed below:

  • Apply the science of fluid dynamics to model the effectiveness of wind, marine and hydro energy extraction using fluidic devices.
  • Evaluate the factors influencing the design and operation of fluid energy devices, including energy policy, the planning process, economic considerations and the data required to support these.

Analysis and reporting

You must submit a short report, including equations and graphical results as necessary, outlining your progress through the following steps of a rotor design process. The report should not exceed 4500 words (excluding captions, equations, references, title pages, etc) and should contain no more than 20 figures. You may expect the main body of your report to be around 20 pages (excluding title pages and references). Pay attention to the specification below in respect of section headings, figures and tables.

  1. Your report should commence with a one-page introduction to the wind turbine market in your segment. To prepare for this, you need to research existing (or planned) wind turbines with rated wind speed and power outputs which are within 25% of your allocated parameters. Hopefully you can find 2-3 competitors within this range, but don’t dig into detail for more than 5-6. These competitors should be summarised in a table. In the process of acquiring this data, you should also try to get a feeling for the market opportunities for a new turbine of your specified rating. Extensive data from the US Wind Turbine Database1 and wind turbine and power curve data from TheWindPower.net2 are available on Blackboard to help with this initial task.
  2. The next section involves getting a ‘feel’ for the important but unknown dimensionless parameters by extracting the following data on your competitor turbines, so far as it is available:
    1. the efficiency 𝜂 of a typical wind turbine power transmission (gearbox and generator)
    1. the power curve, 𝑃 = 𝑓(𝑈), which can be used to determine the power coefficient of the rotor, 𝐶P = 𝑓(𝑈), using the rated wind speed, the rotor disk area and – don’t forget – the transmission efficiency above
    1. approximate chord width, 𝑐, of the turbine blades at 20% and 90% of rotor disk radius, 𝑅, expressed in dimensionless form, 𝑐⁄𝑅

The use of dimensionless parameters stops you from simply copying an existing design: they characterise how the physical parameters of a wind turbine scale with the available power density and required output power. This section should include explanation of your values of transmission efficiency, plots of power curves and power coefficient with one or two supporting equations explaining how you derived 𝐶P, and some figures justifying your dimensionless chord widths.

  • Based on the preceding analysis, and your understanding of the limiting Betz efficiency for a rotor, decide upon a credible, but improved, design power coefficient which will be the performance objective for your design. With this value of power coefficient, and a representative transmission efficiency, you can then determine your required rotor disk area. This will be a very short section with one or two supporting equations.

1 Data | USWTDB (usgs.gov)

2 Wind energy database (thewindpower.net)

Having predicted an expected value of power coefficient, from this point on you can assume that your rotor will actually operate at the Betz limit of 𝐶P = 16⁄27 (so 𝑎 = 1⁄3 as per the Sasha’s notes).

  • From disk area you can obtain the rotor radius (blade length) and, again referring to preceding analysis, estimate the likely chord lengths at 20% and 90% of rotor disk radius. Use these two locations on the blade, along with your design tip speed ratio, rated wind speed and a velocity triangle analysis, to estimate the range of blade chord Reynolds numbers for which you will need to analyse the performance of the blade aerofoil sections. Remember to assume Betz flow angles for this calculation. Again, a brief section with supporting diagrams and equations.
  • Visiting the UIUC aerofoil database, sources if you wish, select a range (10-15) of candidate wind turbine aerofoil shapes for 2D aerodynamic analysis. Some example geometry image (GIF) files, available from this source, are shown at Appendix A. Download the geometry co-ordinate files (ideally in a format compatible with XFLR5 – see notes at Appendix B) and, following the process outlined on the XFLR5 worksheet, analyse each section over suitable ranges of incidence (0° to 20° should be plenty) and Reynolds number, as determined earlier. You are particularly interested in the best L/D ratio and the angle of incidence at which it occurs. Care is required in reporting this work: do not overload the report with figures but do make sure that the important aspects of aerofoil performance are presented graphically.
  • Down-select a set of different aerofoil sections for different parts of the blade. Bear in mind the following points:
    • Different aerofoils may perform better at different Reynolds numbers, but the aerofoil shape should not change abruptly as you move from hub to tip.
    • You will require thicker sections nearer the hub, for structural reasons.

You can exercise the option (see marks below) to define your own aerofoil sections. Typically, you would decompose each geometry into camber (centreline) and thickness (distance between surface and centreline) distributions and ‘blend’ these independently of each other. The actual performance should be tested before adoption of your new aerofoil section.

This section must contain an explanation of your decision-making and a summary of the chosen sections.

  • Apply the 1D (no swirl) theory covered in sections 7-8 of Sasha’s lectures, equations 62 and 63, to determine the ‘optimum’ chord width and pitch angle (defined in section 9) for your chosen blade sections at each of

0.2  r/R  1.0 in steps of 0.1 r/R. This analysis is at your design conditions (rated power output, wind speed, tip speed ratio) and you can again assume that you are operating at the Betz limit when calculating your flow angles. Notes:

  1. Don’t worry about radii r less than 20% of tip radius R (but you should explain why).
  2. There is no need to force a linear trend to either chord or twist.

You should present sufficient equations to demonstrate the main steps in the analysis without overloading this section with equations. At the end you should tabulate the section, chord width, blade pitch and resulting angle of incidence for 0.2  r/R  1.0 in r/R steps of 0.1, leaving space for later additions to this table.

  • Next, analyse the predicted performance your design including the effects of swirl downstream of the rotor and the effects of tip loss, sections 10-11 of Sasha’s lectures. This is best done numerically using e.g. Excel.
    • First you need to determine the effect of the rotor wake on the flow angles at the blades. The relevant equation in Sasha’s notes is 72, which relates the lift generated by the blades to the swirl in the wake. This equation, with different coefficients at each r/R, must be consistent with the lift curve 𝑐L(𝛼) calculated by XFLR5 at the same radius: effectively you are looking for the intersection point between the wake condition, equation 72, and the aerofoil performance 𝑐L(𝛼): it is recommended that you first carry out an additional XFLR5 analysis for your selected aerofoils with a finer resolution of angle of incidence (say 0.1°) but only in the vicinity of maximum L/D.

Then, for each section, plot the curve defined by equation 72 on the same axes as the lift curve from XFLR5 to determine where they intersect: this defines the actual operating angle of attack and section lift coefficient at each radius.

(8a continued)

Your graphs can be put in an appendix, but your operating angle of attack and section lift coefficient at each radius should be added to the rotor geometry table presented at the end of section 7. The values should correspond clearly to the intersection points shown in your graphs.

  • Once you have tabulated the actual lift coefficient distribution across the blade, integrate this numerically (using equations 74 – 76 in Sasha’s notes and the trapezium rule) to determine the predicted power coefficient, 𝐶P, of your rotor design.

Section 8 should demonstrate that you understand the analysis, again without overloading the report with equations, while presenting (in the main report and the appendix) sufficient results to validate your analysis. Comment on the predicted 𝐶P and the values you determined for your competitor turbines.

  • Conclude your report with a reflective discussion on the design process and what you imagine the next steps might be, before your design is committed to production.
  • Make sure your report has a notation section and a list of references.

Effort and mark breakdown

This assessment is worth 35% of the module mark and should require typically 30-40 hours of effort. The indicative mark breakdown, across the mandatory components (not italicised) above, is as follows:

  • Up to 10% for the introduction (section 1)
  • Up to 15% for the research and analysis of competitor turbine(s) (2 – 4)
  • Up to 20% for the aerofoil analysis and down-selection (5 & 6)
  • Up to 10% for the blade design using 1D theory (7)
  • Up to 15% for the rotor performance verification (8)
  • Up to 10% for the reflective discussion (9). Additional marks are available for:
  • The scope of your competitor dataset, i.e. number of turbines (1) considered in (2): up to 5%
  • The scope of your aerofoil analysis and discussion (5): up to 5%
  • Any aerofoil ‘design’ work (6): up to 10%

Untidy or badly laid-out reports, poorly resolved figures, and any deficiencies in item 10 will be penalised by up to 15%.

Submission arrangements

The report must be submitted as a PDF via Blackboard using the link provided on the module page. Learning support needs

Please make sure that the Module Organiser is aware of any agreed support needs relevant to this assessment.

Appendix A: example wing sections from the UIUC aerofoil database.

Appendix B: important points when downloading geometries for analysis by XFLR5:

  • XFLR5 only accepts one layout for co-ordinate data: the file must have an initial title line, followed by two columns of co-ordinates starting and finishing at the trailing edge of the aerofoil (so: 1.00 0.00). The file should have a .dat extension.
    • The UIUC database contains files in two different formats, intermingled (shocker). The above format (great), and the old XFOIL format which is
      • title line
      • two integers (number of upper surface points, number of lower surface points) sometimes entered as reals (ugh)
      • blank line
      • two columns of upper surface co-ordinates starting at the leading edge (0.00 0.00) and finishing at the trailing edge (1.00 0.00) of the aerofoil
      • another blank line
      • two columns of lower surface co-ordinates starting at the leading edge (0.00 0.00) and finishing at the trailing edge (1.00 0.00) of the aerofoil
    • If your data is in format (2), you need to:
      • import into Excel and shuffle stuff around so that the co-ordinates are in adjacent columns
      • select the upper-surface co-ordinates (both x and y) and sort them by x co-ordinate in reverse order (so the list starts with 1.00 0.00)
      • delete the blank rows and the row containing the numbers of co-ordinates
      • format the columns so that there is a clear space between the co-ordinates and the LH margin of the cells containing them
      • re-export in text format with a .dat extension
      • open in something like WordPad to check that it looks OK
    • To import into XFLR5, open the programe, select File -> Open and locate your saved geometry file (with a .dat extension). Select the File -> Direct Foil Design menu option and have a look at your aerofoil geometry – there should be no line down the middle, and no weird lines heading off to (48 48) or (61 61). You can then Save your Project, which will result in a file with the .xfl extension.
  • Any problems or weird-looking results from XFLR5, contact Chris.
Order Now

Get expert help for ENG-7007B Concept Design and Performance Assessment Portfolio and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!

Universal Assignment (October 2, 2023) ENG-7007B Concept Design and Performance Assessment Portfolio, Task 1. Retrieved from https://universalassignment.com/eng-7007b-concept-design-and-performance-assessment-portfolio-task-1/.
"ENG-7007B Concept Design and Performance Assessment Portfolio, Task 1." Universal Assignment - October 2, 2023, https://universalassignment.com/eng-7007b-concept-design-and-performance-assessment-portfolio-task-1/
Universal Assignment September 16, 2022 ENG-7007B Concept Design and Performance Assessment Portfolio, Task 1., viewed October 2, 2023,<https://universalassignment.com/eng-7007b-concept-design-and-performance-assessment-portfolio-task-1/>
Universal Assignment - ENG-7007B Concept Design and Performance Assessment Portfolio, Task 1. [Internet]. [Accessed October 2, 2023]. Available from: https://universalassignment.com/eng-7007b-concept-design-and-performance-assessment-portfolio-task-1/
"ENG-7007B Concept Design and Performance Assessment Portfolio, Task 1." Universal Assignment - Accessed October 2, 2023. https://universalassignment.com/eng-7007b-concept-design-and-performance-assessment-portfolio-task-1/
"ENG-7007B Concept Design and Performance Assessment Portfolio, Task 1." Universal Assignment [Online]. Available: https://universalassignment.com/eng-7007b-concept-design-and-performance-assessment-portfolio-task-1/. [Accessed: October 2, 2023]

Please note along with our service, we will provide you with the following deliverables:

Please do not hesitate to put forward any queries regarding the service provision.

We look forward to having you on board with us.


Get 90%* Discount on Assignment Help

Most Frequent Questions & Answers

Universal Assignment Services is the best place to get help in your all kind of assignment help. We have 172+ experts available, who can help you to get HD+ grades. We also provide Free Plag report, Free Revisions,Best Price in the industry guaranteed.

We provide all kinds of assignmednt help, Report writing, Essay Writing, Dissertations, Thesis writing, Research Proposal, Research Report, Home work help, Question Answers help, Case studies, mathematical and Statistical tasks, Website development, Android application, Resume/CV writing, SOP(Statement of Purpose) Writing, Blog/Article, Poster making and so on.

We are available round the clock, 24X7, 365 days. You can appach us to our Whatsapp number +1 (613)778 8542 or email to info@universalassignment.com . We provide Free revision policy, if you need and revisions to be done on the task, we will do the same for you as soon as possible.

We provide services mainly to all major institutes and Universities in Australia, Canada, China, Malaysia, India, South Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

We provide lucrative discounts from 28% to 70% as per the wordcount, Technicality, Deadline and the number of your previous assignments done with us.

After your assignment request our team will check and update you the best suitable service for you alongwith the charges for the task. After confirmation and payment team will start the work and provide the task as per the deadline.

Yes, we will provide Plagirism free task and a free turnitin report along with the task without any extra cost.

No, if the main requirement is same, you don’t have to pay any additional amount. But it there is a additional requirement, then you have to pay the balance amount in order to get the revised solution.

The Fees are as minimum as $10 per page(1 page=250 words) and in case of a big task, we provide huge discounts.

We accept all the major Credit and Debit Cards for the payment. We do accept Paypal also.

Popular Assignments

Foundations of Communication Assessment 2 Instructions

Discussion task (Total grade – 10%)   Process Work (Steps to complete the task) Answer on the Assessment 2 Submission Document – Do not upload this instruction document. Requirements (important elements to include) lastname_firstname_studentID_COMS_Assess 2_semester_year. Process for Assessment discussion tasks NOTE: If you do not participate in the class discussions then

Read More »

Assessment Two Dos and Don’ts (Internal)

Do: Read the assessment instructions carefully Read the marking rubric carefully Understand the question – break it down Conduct research – record the reference details Read the topic materials about communication theories, forms and factors and refer to them Contribute to the discussions in class or no marks for the

Read More »

Unpacking the Question: Assessment Two

Studying at university requires you to become familiar with strategies to un-pack or breakdown a variety of assessment questions/tasks throughout your studies.  Task Example of integrating the discussion, research and theories. In the group discussion my group members (name them) stated that an advertisement for a beauty product would most

Read More »

MGMT0001 Introduction to Commerce Assessment

MGMT0001 Introduction to Commerce Assessment 2 (worth 30%) Due date:                  2:00pm (AWST) Friday 15th September 2023 Submission:              Via Turnitin assessment submission link (see ‘Assessment 2’ folder in ‘Assessments’ section of Blackboard). Additional Instructions: Part A (42 marks) Nathan is a well-known chef with years of experience cooking various cuisines. After

Read More »

ACCT5011: Accounting Systems in the Digital Age

Practical Assignment Guide, Semester 2, 2023 Due Date for Submission: Monday 11th September 2023 at 5.00 PM Please note that the Folio Assignment for ACCT5011 Accounting Systems in the Digital Age is an individual assessment task worth 30% of your total marks in the unit. Please refer to the online

Read More »

EC229- Review session

Assume two cities, A and B, that can’t trade between them. Each city produces its own coconuts for its local market. If suddenly trade is possible then: D) As we saw in class, the new price will be somewhere between the original price 𝑃_𝐴,𝑃_𝐵. Hence it is impossible for consumers

Read More »

Computing Theory COSC

Computing Theory COSC 1107/1105 Assignment 1: Fundamentals Assessment Type Individual assignment. Submit online via Canvas → As- signments → Assignment 1. Marks awarded for meeting re- quirements as closely as possible. Clarifications/updates may be made via announcements/relevant discussion forums. Due Date Week 6, Sunday 27th August 2023, 11:59pm Marks 125

Read More »

BE279 Applied Statistics and Forecasting

Strategy, Operations, & Entrepreneurship Group Essex Business School Module Code BE279 Module Title Applied Statistics and Forecasting Assessment Type Individual Report (2,000 word) Academic Year 2022/23, Spring Term Submission Deadline Refer to FASER Task Specific Guidance Please note that: Module Learning Outcomes On successful completion of the module, students will

Read More »

Learning Design Tool: Little Learners Level 1 sounds

Learning Design Tool: Little Learners Level 1 sounds. Prepared by Sara Hart Date 30th August, 2023 (feel free to leave this date as it is the AT2 due date) Brief description of Learning Design   Chooseit Maker: Create, edit and play personalised learning activities that can be used in your

Read More »


HUMN1041 PEOPLE, PLACE AND SOCIAL DIFFERENCE ASSIGNMENT 1 TEMPLATE This assignment is made up of three (3) parts, plus a reference list and appendix. Marks are allocated for each section, as follows: – 1 mark Please ensure that you provide your answers in this template, and provide a Reference list

Read More »

Model 3 Launch in Australia

Client Information Company Name Tesla Contact Name   Email   Phone Number   Address Level 14, 15 Blue St. North Sydney, NSW 2060 Australia Ad link & image Project Information Project Title Model 3 Launch in Australia Project Description (100 words) Highlight the uniqueness of the car. Show the superior

Read More »

MKT10009 Marketing and the Consumer Experience

School of Business, Law and Entrepreneurship Assessment Task – Assignment 2  MKT10009 Marketing and the Consumer Experience Semester 2, 2023. Assessment Type Analytical Report Associated Unit Learning Outcomes (ULO’s) 2, 3, 4 Group or Individual task Individual Value (%) 25% Due Date Monday 20th September at 10:00 AET – Enterthis

Read More »

ASSIGNMENT – 1st Evaluation

ASSIGNMENT – 1st Evaluation Date of Submission- 4TH SEP 2023 25 MARKS COMPARATIVE PUBLIC LAW Q. You are the new Central Minister for Urban Development who is keen to make major Indian cities as smart cities. You visit different countries like USA, UK, European Countries, Japan and other developed countries

Read More »

Corporate & Financial Due Diligence Report

[Name of the company] Note: Students should keep in mind that application of legal provisions (including Securities Regulations) and analysis of the same is important. Merely putting the facts and figures won’t fetch even a decent mark. Note: Students should only mention the broad area of business. This part should

Read More »

ECON1000 S2 2023 – Marking Guidance and FAQs on GTP

Students will be marked on the extent to which they specifically answer the question and provide clear, logical, well-reasoned and sufficient explanations. Here is a summary breakdown of how marks are allocated in this GTP: Part 1 [15 marks] §  Providing relevant observations from the information provided in the articles

Read More »

ECON1000 S2 2023 – GTP Brief

ECON1000 S2 2023 – GTP Brief A.  Context and Overview The Game Theory Presentation (GTP) is worth 30% of the final mark. GTP is a ‘take-home’ exercise with a set of tasks to do. The GTP is based on Lecture Topics: L1 and L2. You will have twenty (21) days

Read More »

Order #35042 Human Rights Research Essay

Draft due 26th Aug 2,500 words (excluding references and bibliography) Instructions: Structure: Title – The Tigray War: A Critical Analysis of What the Future Holds for Human Rights in the Region What can be done to ensure human rights violations will cease and be prosecuted? Expand on different actors and

Read More »

PMC1000: Applied Pathology

Assessment Task Sheet: Poster Presentation Date: Thursday 31st August 2023 | Weighting: 30% Assessment Task 2 You are required to develop a handout style resource (pamphlet or brochure) on a selected pathological condition which is aimed at first year student paramedics. You will need to use high quality peer reviewed

Read More »

Detailed Information: Reflective Assignment

Indigenous Peoples, Law and Justice Detailed Information: Reflective Assignment Due Date:                   Tuesday 5th September 2023 at 4:00 pm (AWST). Marks:                       30% of the total marks for this unit. Assignment:              The assignment will comprise two questions. Students must answer all parts of both questions. Examinable topics: The cultural immersion exercise and/or

Read More »

Indigenous Peoples, Law and Justice

Indigenous Peoples, Law and Justice Reflective Assignment Questions Instructions: The assignment comprises two questions. Students must answer all parts of both questions. Question 1: The proposed Referendum Question is asking Australians whether the Voice should be established. What is meant by the Voice? In May 2019, Professor Anne Twomey, an

Read More »

Cultural immersion activity

Context of Carrolup To support fellow Australian and truth telling. Third space = a spiritual an mental place, meeting point of many cultures all over the world to communicate and feel safe to merge thought and aspects of everyone’s individual culture to create a sense of what they want the

Read More »

High-Fidelity Mockup Design for a Employer / Company  Review Platform

Demo Task: High-Fidelity Mockup Design for a Employer / Company  Review Platform Project Overview: You are tasked with designing high-fidelity mockups for a  Employer / Company  review platform that serves both employers and employees/users. The platform’s goal is to provide a space where employees can share their experiences and opinions

Read More »


ASSESSMENT COVER SHEET (Please ensure this cover sheet is completed and attached on top of each assessment) QUALIFICATION CODE AND TITLE:  Certificate IV in Commercial Cookery UNIT CODE: BSBSUS401               TITLE: IMPLEMENT AND MONITOR ENVIRONMENTALLY SUSTAINABLE WORK PRACTICES               Student Number   Student Name   Assessor Name   Assessment Name and

Read More »

Data Analysis and Findings

Qualitative data analysis technique called thematic analysis includes reading the data collection and looking for patterns in the meaning of the data to determine the theme. Making sense of the data is an active reflexive process in which the researcher’s personal experience is important. On Instagram, though, any company can

Read More »

PHE5STL: Systems Thinking and Leadership

Assessment 2: Complex problem briefing paper instructions and submission link PHE5STL: Systems Thinking and Leadership Assessment 2: Complex, or messy, problem briefing paper Assignment type Briefing paper/policy advising paper Weighting 20% Word count / length 1,500 words Note: The word count does not included references however does include in-text citations

Read More »

Assessment 1 Week-6: UML Modelling for a shopping mall

Assessment 1(    ) Information and Rubric Subject Code  ICT505 Subject Name  Software Development Assessment Number and Title  Assessment 1 Week-6: UML Modelling for a shopping mall Assessment Type Lab Activity Length / Duration  45 Minutes Weighting %  10% Total Marks  100 Submission Online Submission Due Date Week-6 (Sunday 23:59) Mode

Read More »

The Geopolitical, Economic and Legal Environment  

Faculty of Business and Law Assignment Brief Mode E and R Regulations Module Title: The Geopolitical, Economic and Legal Environment     Assignment Number 2 Module Code: 7010SSL   Assignment Title Macro Analysis Report Module Leader: Dr. Bentil Oduro   Assignment Credits 10           Release Date:

Read More »

Paragraph Template: TEEL Structure

 With this example from the discussion board, you can see Courtney answered the question with all four elements very clearly. This gives a coherent answer using different kinds of information and academic integrity. Bias is a natural behaviour of tendency to be in favour or against something in particular. From

Read More »

Choosing the Perfect Event Theme

Choosing the Perfect Event Theme Theme selection is crucial to creating a memorable and meaningful graduation celebration for the class. This selection should reflect their accomplishments and identities. Graduation marks the end of a long period of hard work, commitment, and personal growth.  Therefore, choosing a theme that effectively captures

Read More »

Can't Find Your Assignment?

Open chat
Free Assistance
Universal Assignment
Hello 👋
How can we help you?