LAWS8421, Income Tax Assignment

LAWS8421, Income Tax

Group Collaboration and Seminar Participation ASSESSMENT TASK 3

JUDGMENT

Weighting: 40% of the final mark for the course

Due: Wednesday, 10 August 2022, at 5pm (ACT time)

WordLimit: 2,500 including all headings, text and citations

Referencing: ‘In-text’ citations of cases and statutes should conform with generally accepted legal conventions

Task: Write a judgment on the matter set out below as if you were a judge sitting at first instance in the Federal Court of Australia

AsstCriteria: Students will be evaluated on their ability to:

  • Summarise the facts and identify the relevant tax law issues
  • Analyse the relevant legal principles, citing statutory provisions and case law, as appropriate
  • Apply the legal principles to the factual situation, highlighting any indeterminacy in the law or policy anomalies
  • Explain and justify the decision reached
  • Communicate effectively in writing

XXXXXXXXXXX

Following the negotiations undertaken during the intensive, Murgatroyd and the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) reached agreement as to the basis upon which Murgatroyd should be assessed to tax in each of the years of income ending 30 June 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016,

2017, 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022.

Unfortunately, they were unable to resolve their differences in relation to the year of income ending 30 June 2018. That is because the ATO has taken the view that Murgatroyd was carrying on a business of land development in those years or, in the alternative, that he was engaged in an isolated profit-making venture. Murgatroyd, however, holds to the view that he had not acquired the land for the purposes of profit-making by sale and that in subdividing the land he was doing no more than realising it to its best advantage.

The ATO has amended Murgatroyd’s original income tax assessment for the year ending 30 June 2018, under s 170 Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) (ITAA 1936),1 to increase Murgatroyd’s assessable income: first, by excluding the net capital gain of $922,159 returned by Murgatroyd pursuant to s 102-5 Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) (ITAA 1997) and, second, by including an amount of $1,840,000 being that part of the proceeds received by Murgatroyd from the sale of the four lots which the Commissioner contends was ordinary income in Murgatroyd’s hands, assessable under s 6-5 of the ITAA 1997. The amount included by the Commissioner equals the net profit realised by Murgatroyd when he completed the sales of the four lots.2

Murgatroyd agrees that he realised a profit from selling the four lots but has objected, in accordance with s14ZU of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) (TAA), against the Commissioner’s notice of amended assessment. Murgatroyd’s objection is based on the ground that the profit did not constitute an amount of ordinary income in his hands, assessable under s 6-5 ITAA 1997.

Unfortunately for Murgatroyd, the Commissioner has decided to disallow Murgatroyd’s objection. Murgatroyd has appealed to the Federal Court, under s 14ZZ of the TAA, against the Commissioner’s decision to disallow Murgatroyd’s objection. The matter is now before the Court. You are the judge who must decide the matter.

Murgatroyd is contending that the Commissioner’s assessment is excessive on the basis that the profit did not constitute ordinary income in his hands. More specifically, Murgatroyd has advanced three contentions.

  1. He held the land on capital account and the sale of the lots was no more than the mere realisation of a capital asset or assets, albeit in an enterprising way. Murgatroyd relies on the statement of principle to this effect, enunciated by the Lord Justice Clerk in CalifornianCopper Syndicate v Harris (1904) 5 TC 159 and cited with approval by the High Court of Australia in Commissioner of Taxation v Myer Emporium (1987) 163 CLR 199 (MyerEmporium).
  1. He did not acquire or venture the land in a ‘business operation or commercial transaction’ for the purpose of profit-making by the means which gave rise to his profit, such as would cause the profit to be ordinary income under the principles stated by the High Court in MyerEmporium.
  1. At no time did he carry on a business of land development, or a business in the nature of land development, such as would attract the character of ordinary income to his profit in accordance with the principles stated by the High Court in Myer Emporium.

The Commissioner, on the other hand, is contending that the profit was ordinary income in Murgatroyd’s hands. Specifically, the Commissioner asserts that Murgatroyd:

1 Note, as mentioned previously, we have taken some liberties with the way we are applying s 170 ITAA 1936. On a strict application of the provision the amendment period for an individual assessment is limited to either two or four years, from the date of assessment, depending on the complexity of the taxpayer’s affairs (unless there is a question of fraud or evasion).

2 You do not need to concern yourself with the details of the net profit calculation. You can assume it is correct and undisputed by Murgatroyd.

  1. realised the profit in the ordinary course of carrying on a business of land development, or as a normal incident of that business, with the consequence that the profit was stamped with the character of ordinary income in accordance with the principles stated by the High Court MyerEmporium; or
  1. realised the profit by selling a portion of land which he had committed, in July 2015, to a ‘business operation or commercial transaction’ entered into with the purpose of profit-making by the means by which the profit was in fact realised; as such, it was ordinary income within the principles stated by the High Court in Myer Emporium.

In the alternative, the Commissioner has contended that if he is wrong that the profit on the sale of the lots was ordinary income, then it must follow that Murgatroyd made a capital gain on the disposal of each of the lots resulting in net capital gains assessable as statutory income, under s 102-5 ITAA 1997, in each of the years ending 30 June 2017 and 2018. On that basis, the Commissioner contends that the marketing, rates and interest expenses, incurred by Murgatroyd in each of the years of income ending 30 June 2016, 2017, and 2018, an otherwise deductible under s 8-1 ITAA 1997, would not be deductible by operation of s51AAA ITAA 1936.

Murgatroyd has responded to the Commissioner’s alternative argument in the following way:

  1. he accepts that if he did not hold the land on revenue account then s 51AAA ITAA 1936 would operate to deny him an allowable deduction for the rates in each of the 2016, 2017 and 2018 income years and for the marketing expenses in the 2018 income year; and
  1. he rejects the proposition that the whole of his interest expense would be denied a deduction by the operation of s 51AAA ITAA 1936. Murgatroyd argues that his interest expense is deductible to the extent it is attributable to monies borrowed to purchase the 7 ha block of land which he used in carrying on a glamping business for the purpose of gaining or producing assessable income. Murgatroyd submits that the fact that the glamping business has ceased does not disturb the ongoing nexus between the interest expense and that business; he relies upon the principles established in Commissioner of Taxation v Brown (1999) 43 ATR 1 and Ronpibon Tin NLvFCT(1949) 78 CLR 47.

In closing submissions, both parties agreed that if the Court were to allow the appeal on the basis that the profit on the sale of the four lots was not ordinary income then the matter should be remitted3 to the Commissioner to give effect to that determination and to deal with any outstanding matters, including by:

  1. quantifying the amount of any net capital gains that should be included in Murgatroyd’s assessable income pursuant to s 102-5 ITAA 1997, and with respect to which years of income;

3 This means you do not have to deal with these matters in the judgment. For example, you do not have to try and calculate the net capital gains nor do you have to decide the time of any CGT events. Further, you do not need to put a $ amount on any interest expenses which you think might be deductible (ie. deductible at a level of principle).

  1. quantifying the amount of interest, if any, allowable as a deduction to Murgatroyd based on the application of any principles stated by the court, and in which years of income; and
  1. amending Murgatroyd’s assessments in the relevant years, in the relevant particulars, to give effect to the court’s orders.

In considering the matter before you, you should assume that the facts set out in the document titled ‘Practical Scenario’ have been established in evidence before you and, further, that the arguments you heard put during the course of intensive were oral submissions made to you by the parties during the hearing.

The list of authorities relied upon by Mugatroyd’s counsel are:

Californian Copper Syndicate v Harris (1904) 5 TC 159, FCT v Myer Emporium(1987) 163 CLR 199 , Commissioner ofTaxationvWhitfords Beach(1982) 150 CLR 355, Scottish Australia Mining Co v FCT (1950) 81 CLR 188, Ruhama Property CoLtd v FCT (1928) 41 CLR 148, McClelland v Commissioner of Taxation (1970) 120 CLR 487, Statham v FCT (1988) 20 ATR 228, Westfield Ltd v Commissioner ofTaxation(1991) 28 FLR 333, CasimatyvCommissioner ofTaxation(1997) 37 ATR

358, FCT vMunro(1926) 38 CLR 153, SteelevFCT(1999) 197 CLR 459,

Commissioner of Taxation v Brown (1999) 43 ATR 1, Ronpibon Tin NL v FCT (1949) 78 CLR 47

The authorities relied upon by the Commissioner’s counsel are:

Californian Copper Syndicate v Harris (1904) 5 TC 159, FCT v Myer Emporium(1987) 163 CLR 199 Commissioner of Taxation v Whitfords Beach (1982) 150 CLR 355, WhitfordsBeachvCommissionerofTaxation(1979) 10 ATR 549 (per Deane J), Official Receiver in Bankruptcy v FCT (Fox’s Case) (1956) 96 CLR 370, McClellandv Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1969) 118 CLR 353, Steinberg v FCT (1975) 134 CLR 640, Moana Sand Pty Ltd v FCT (1988)19 ATR 1853, Stevenson vCommissioner of Taxation (1991) 29 FCR 282, Greig v Commissioner of Taxation(2020) 275 FCR 445, FletchervFCT(1991) 173 CLR 1, FCT vRiversideRoad

(1990) 21 ATR 499, RonpibonTin NL vFCT(1949) 78 CLR 47

Technical Notes

When formulating your views, please disregard the possible operation of the following provisions: Division 70 ITAA 1997 (trading stock); Division 35 ITAA 1997 (non- commercial losses); and s 26-102 ITAA 1997 (losses or outgoings relating to holding vacant land).

You should be able to locate the authorities relied upon by the parties in any one of the following databases (accessible through the ANU Law Library or the internet): Westlaw AU, LexisNexis Advance, AustLII.

Order Now

Get expert help for LAWS8421, Income Tax and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!

Universal Assignment (February 1, 2023) LAWS8421, Income Tax Assignment. Retrieved from https://universalassignment.com/laws8421-income-tax-assignment/.
"LAWS8421, Income Tax Assignment." Universal Assignment - February 1, 2023, https://universalassignment.com/laws8421-income-tax-assignment/
Universal Assignment August 14, 2022 LAWS8421, Income Tax Assignment., viewed February 1, 2023,<https://universalassignment.com/laws8421-income-tax-assignment/>
Universal Assignment - LAWS8421, Income Tax Assignment. [Internet]. [Accessed February 1, 2023]. Available from: https://universalassignment.com/laws8421-income-tax-assignment/
"LAWS8421, Income Tax Assignment." Universal Assignment - Accessed February 1, 2023. https://universalassignment.com/laws8421-income-tax-assignment/
"LAWS8421, Income Tax Assignment." Universal Assignment [Online]. Available: https://universalassignment.com/laws8421-income-tax-assignment/. [Accessed: February 1, 2023]

Please note along with our service, we will provide you with the following deliverables:

Please do not hesitate to put forward any queries regarding the service provision.

We look forward to having you on board with us.

Get 90%* Discount on Assignment Help

Most Frequent Questions & Answers

Universal Assignment Services is the best place to get help in your all kind of assignment help. We have 172+ experts available, who can help you to get HD+ grades. We also provide Free Plag report, Free Revisions,Best Price in the industry guaranteed.

We provide all kinds of assignmednt help, Report writing, Essay Writing, Dissertations, Thesis writing, Research Proposal, Research Report, Home work help, Question Answers help, Case studies, mathematical and Statistical tasks, Website development, Android application, Resume/CV writing, SOP(Statement of Purpose) Writing, Blog/Article, Poster making and so on.

We are available round the clock, 24X7, 365 days. You can appach us to our Whatsapp number +1 (613)778 8542 or email to info@universalassignment.com . We provide Free revision policy, if you need and revisions to be done on the task, we will do the same for you as soon as possible.

We provide services mainly to all major institutes and Universities in Australia, Canada, China, Malaysia, India, South Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

We provide lucrative discounts from 28% to 70% as per the wordcount, Technicality, Deadline and the number of your previous assignments done with us.

After your assignment request our team will check and update you the best suitable service for you alongwith the charges for the task. After confirmation and payment team will start the work and provide the task as per the deadline.

Yes, we will provide Plagirism free task and a free turnitin report along with the task without any extra cost.

No, if the main requirement is same, you don’t have to pay any additional amount. But it there is a additional requirement, then you have to pay the balance amount in order to get the revised solution.

The Fees are as minimum as $10 per page(1 page=250 words) and in case of a big task, we provide huge discounts.

We accept all the major Credit and Debit Cards for the payment. We do accept Paypal also.

Popular Assignments

Assessment 4: Tableau Dashboard and Report

Issued:                Monday of Week 4 Due:                     11:59PM (local Time) Wednesday of Week 7 Weight:                60% Report Length: 1500 – 4000 words + Tableau *.twbx file Overview During this assessment you will produce an interactive Tableau Dashboard and an accompanying report detailing the planning of the Tableau Dashboard. Background Tableau dashboards

Read More »

Assessment 3: Critical Review of a Tableau Dashboard

Issued:                Monday of Week 1 Due:                     11:59PM (local Time) Sunday of Week 5 Weight:                20% Length:               5-10 minutes (approx. 500-3000 words) Overview During this assessment you will produce a video presentation critically reviewing a Tableau dashboard from a design planning and communication perspective. Background Tableau dashboards are used extensively for

Read More »

Wireless Communication Engineering Assignment Help

Looking for Wireless Communication Engineering Assignment Help? If you are looking for wireless communication engineering assignment help, just get it quickly online! The good news is that you no longer need to chase your professors around with confusion about assignments. Nor do you have to stress out as chase that

Read More »

Assessment 2: Planning and Creating Static Visualisations

Due:                     11:59PM (local Time) Sunday of Week 3 Weight:                20% Length:                1000-2500 words Overview During this assessment you will produce written report detailing the planning and creation of three static visualisations derived from a data table. In this assessment, the quality of the presented visualisations is not assessed, only the

Read More »

Nursing Healthcare Case Study Assignment Help

ASSESSMENT ITEM 2: DESCRIPTION Shared decision-making is a model for clinical practice which includes patients’/clients’ values and preferences and supports them to make decisions about their own care and treatment options in collaboration with their healthcare team (Geddis-Regan et al., 2020). A patient’s/client’s culture affects the way they understand health

Read More »

BSBCRT311 Apply Critical Thinking Skills in a Team Environment

Table of Contents Table of Contents…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 3 About the Business Services Training Package…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 4 About this Unit of Competency……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 6 Chapter 1: Prepare to Address Workplace Problem…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 7 ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 8 Key Points: Chapter 1…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 30 Chapter 1 – ‘True’ or ‘False’ Quiz……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 31 Chapter 2: Evaluate Solutions for Workplace Problem…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Read More »

BSBCRT311 Apply critical thinking skills in a team environment

WORKPLACE PROJECT TASK   Student details  Student name  Student email address  Assessment Details  About this task  This workplace project requires you to use critical thinking to resolve two typical problems in the workplace.   This assessment includes the following tasks:  Task 1: Workplace Problems  Task 2: Self-reflection  You will need 2 participants who

Read More »

BSBCRT512 Originate and Develop Concepts

Contents Section 1: Scoping a relevant issue. 5 Section 2: Generating and evaluating solutions. 8 Section 3: Concept finalisation. 11 Student name:   Assessor:   Date:   Business or Community/Social group this assessment is based on:   Documentation reviewed as preparation:   Job role assumed for this assessment:   Section

Read More »

EMS5RCE – Risk Engineering (2022)

Assignment 2 Due Date: 13th February 2023, 23:59PM 1        Outline You have been tasked to evaluate the risks associated with moving from a traditional construction method for constructing concrete formwork (such as precast), to an advanced method that will be designed to take advantage of additive and/or automated and digital

Read More »

NIT3171 ICT Business Analysis & Data Visualization

Individual Assignment – Business Analysis Case Study (Stage II – 35 marks weighing 35%) Report Submission Date (through the dropbox): (10% will be deducted for each day of delay) Presentation (5 minutes each) 10 Marks: In this assignment, a Melbourne housing dataset is given to you to apply data mining

Read More »

HSC ECONOMICS The Global Economy

HSC ECONOMICS  Assessment Notification: Task 1 Subject: Economics Topic The Global Economy Nature of Assessment Task Oral presentation with a written component Weighting 25% Teacher Ms R Ali Date of Notification Term :4 Week 5A  (2022) Due Date Term 1 (2022), Week 7A,Friday (written component) and Week 8B(Oral component)  

Read More »

Behaviour & Environment Case Study

Section 1: Overview of Issue of Human-Environment Relations & Proposed Intervention (Delete this and enter your text for this section here) Section 2: Identify all key stakeholders: (Delete this and enter your text for this section here) Section 3: Explain how the Intervention Strategy should be implemented (Delete this and

Read More »

Assignment BMSC Pharmacology Breakdown

  Section Word Limit Marks Research Time Writing Time Description Clarity N/A 5 10 mins 1 hr sentence structure; typographical errors; scientific style Reference N/A 5 20 mins 40 mins correct use of referencing style and in text citations; typically 5-10 references depending on the topic/experimental platform and drugs used

Read More »

Assessment Task 3: Portfolio Output 3

This task requires you to create a blog post and a 3-4 minute edited video that critically and creatively responds to one of the Digital Media Contexts from weeks 7-10 (this must be a different topic from what you chose for Portfolio Output 2). Your video is to be embedded

Read More »

Formulae Sheet

Formulae Sheet Current ratio Current assets Current liabilities     Quick ratio or acid test Cash + marketable securities + net receivables Current liabilities     Current cash debt coverage Net cash provided by operating activities Average current liabilities     Receivables turnover Net sales Average net trade receivables  

Read More »

Cashflow and Financial Analysis

Assessment Task: 20% Cashflow and Financial Analysis – Template IMPORTANT:  Preparing the cashflow statement and financial analysis template. The template is prepared to satisfy all the assignment business’s so there may be extra line items in the template. To submit the cash flow statement, you need to use the template

Read More »

Cashflow and Financial Analysis – Ship’em In&Out

Assessment Task: 20% Cashflow and Financial Analysis – Ship’em In&Out IMPORTANT:  Preparing the cashflow statement and Financial analysis To submit the cash flow statement, you need to use the template document in CANVAS. The template is prepared to satisfy all the assignment business’s so there may be extra line items

Read More »

Pros and Cons of Chat GPT Assignment Help

How great is Chat GPT Assignment Help? Chat GPT Assignment help is definitely an incredible possibility for students. It is a technological advancement that can generate essays and articles on a massive range of topics. Moreover, you can just ask any question, and you will get your answer right away.

Read More »

Question 10 – REPORTS

Complete the table below, by listing three types of financial reports that are produced in your workplace. Type of Report Content of Report Frequently of Report                  

Read More »

Question 9 – BUSINESS RECORDS

Work through the following table and indicate whether each record should be kept or destroyed. Detail the reason for your answer and how long the record should be kept (for example, legislation requirement – retain for five years). Record Keep – Yes or No Reasons Suppliers Invoices     Employee

Read More »

Question 6 – BUSINESS ACTIVITY STATEMENT

Using the following information, complete the Business Activity Statement, you may need to refer to the ATO website to help you complete. Download and complete the Business Activity Statement (BAS). It can be found separately on the course page.

Read More »

Question No 5 – BREAKEVEN ANALYSIS & MOVING

AVERAGE Activity 5.1 – Break-even Answers A. B.   Manage 8 Buildings Manage 10 Buildings Manage 15 Buildings Manage 20 Buildings Manage 25 Buildings Income           Less Variable Costs           Less Fixed Costs           Total Cost    

Read More »

Question 3 – Depreciation

You are the Licensee-In-Charge of Hope & Murphy Real Estate and wish to purchase computers for your new office in the CBD. Using the information below: Office fit out                      $120,000 Assets effective Life          4 years Purchase Date                  1st July STRAIGHT-LINE METHOD CALCULATION Years 1 to 4 – JOURNAL ENTRIES DEPRECIATION                                               

Read More »

Question 1 – PROFIT & LOSS AND BALANCE SHEET

Please note: Editing has been restricted in this document. From the information provided below, complete the following table: Account Name Classification Profit & Loss or Balance Sheet Amount Pay Superannuation Expense Profit & Loss $117,325 Pay Mobile Phone     $7,500 Pay Office Rent     $65,000 Land & Buildings

Read More »

Case Study – WORLDUCATION

Worlducation is a social startup that manufactures tablet computers for primary school students. They not only focus on the hardware, but they also have a competitive team creating software, content and activities to better engage and educate the students. Worlducation aims to change the way children learn at school by

Read More »

Can't Find Your Assignment?

Open chat
1
Free Assistance
Universal Assignment
Hello 👋
How can we help you?