LAWS8421, Income Tax Assignment

LAWS8421, Income Tax

Group Collaboration and Seminar Participation ASSESSMENT TASK 3

JUDGMENT

Weighting: 40% of the final mark for the course

Due: Wednesday, 10 August 2022, at 5pm (ACT time)

WordLimit: 2,500 including all headings, text and citations

Referencing: ‘In-text’ citations of cases and statutes should conform with generally accepted legal conventions

Task: Write a judgment on the matter set out below as if you were a judge sitting at first instance in the Federal Court of Australia

AsstCriteria: Students will be evaluated on their ability to:

  • Summarise the facts and identify the relevant tax law issues
  • Analyse the relevant legal principles, citing statutory provisions and case law, as appropriate
  • Apply the legal principles to the factual situation, highlighting any indeterminacy in the law or policy anomalies
  • Explain and justify the decision reached
  • Communicate effectively in writing

XXXXXXXXXXX

Following the negotiations undertaken during the intensive, Murgatroyd and the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) reached agreement as to the basis upon which Murgatroyd should be assessed to tax in each of the years of income ending 30 June 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016,

2017, 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022.

Unfortunately, they were unable to resolve their differences in relation to the year of income ending 30 June 2018. That is because the ATO has taken the view that Murgatroyd was carrying on a business of land development in those years or, in the alternative, that he was engaged in an isolated profit-making venture. Murgatroyd, however, holds to the view that he had not acquired the land for the purposes of profit-making by sale and that in subdividing the land he was doing no more than realising it to its best advantage.

The ATO has amended Murgatroyd’s original income tax assessment for the year ending 30 June 2018, under s 170 Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) (ITAA 1936),1 to increase Murgatroyd’s assessable income: first, by excluding the net capital gain of $922,159 returned by Murgatroyd pursuant to s 102-5 Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) (ITAA 1997) and, second, by including an amount of $1,840,000 being that part of the proceeds received by Murgatroyd from the sale of the four lots which the Commissioner contends was ordinary income in Murgatroyd’s hands, assessable under s 6-5 of the ITAA 1997. The amount included by the Commissioner equals the net profit realised by Murgatroyd when he completed the sales of the four lots.2

Murgatroyd agrees that he realised a profit from selling the four lots but has objected, in accordance with s14ZU of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) (TAA), against the Commissioner’s notice of amended assessment. Murgatroyd’s objection is based on the ground that the profit did not constitute an amount of ordinary income in his hands, assessable under s 6-5 ITAA 1997.

Unfortunately for Murgatroyd, the Commissioner has decided to disallow Murgatroyd’s objection. Murgatroyd has appealed to the Federal Court, under s 14ZZ of the TAA, against the Commissioner’s decision to disallow Murgatroyd’s objection. The matter is now before the Court. You are the judge who must decide the matter.

Murgatroyd is contending that the Commissioner’s assessment is excessive on the basis that the profit did not constitute ordinary income in his hands. More specifically, Murgatroyd has advanced three contentions.

  1. He held the land on capital account and the sale of the lots was no more than the mere realisation of a capital asset or assets, albeit in an enterprising way. Murgatroyd relies on the statement of principle to this effect, enunciated by the Lord Justice Clerk in CalifornianCopper Syndicate v Harris (1904) 5 TC 159 and cited with approval by the High Court of Australia in Commissioner of Taxation v Myer Emporium (1987) 163 CLR 199 (MyerEmporium).
  1. He did not acquire or venture the land in a ‘business operation or commercial transaction’ for the purpose of profit-making by the means which gave rise to his profit, such as would cause the profit to be ordinary income under the principles stated by the High Court in MyerEmporium.
  1. At no time did he carry on a business of land development, or a business in the nature of land development, such as would attract the character of ordinary income to his profit in accordance with the principles stated by the High Court in Myer Emporium.

The Commissioner, on the other hand, is contending that the profit was ordinary income in Murgatroyd’s hands. Specifically, the Commissioner asserts that Murgatroyd:

1 Note, as mentioned previously, we have taken some liberties with the way we are applying s 170 ITAA 1936. On a strict application of the provision the amendment period for an individual assessment is limited to either two or four years, from the date of assessment, depending on the complexity of the taxpayer’s affairs (unless there is a question of fraud or evasion).

2 You do not need to concern yourself with the details of the net profit calculation. You can assume it is correct and undisputed by Murgatroyd.

  1. realised the profit in the ordinary course of carrying on a business of land development, or as a normal incident of that business, with the consequence that the profit was stamped with the character of ordinary income in accordance with the principles stated by the High Court MyerEmporium; or
  1. realised the profit by selling a portion of land which he had committed, in July 2015, to a ‘business operation or commercial transaction’ entered into with the purpose of profit-making by the means by which the profit was in fact realised; as such, it was ordinary income within the principles stated by the High Court in Myer Emporium.

In the alternative, the Commissioner has contended that if he is wrong that the profit on the sale of the lots was ordinary income, then it must follow that Murgatroyd made a capital gain on the disposal of each of the lots resulting in net capital gains assessable as statutory income, under s 102-5 ITAA 1997, in each of the years ending 30 June 2017 and 2018. On that basis, the Commissioner contends that the marketing, rates and interest expenses, incurred by Murgatroyd in each of the years of income ending 30 June 2016, 2017, and 2018, an otherwise deductible under s 8-1 ITAA 1997, would not be deductible by operation of s51AAA ITAA 1936.

Murgatroyd has responded to the Commissioner’s alternative argument in the following way:

  1. he accepts that if he did not hold the land on revenue account then s 51AAA ITAA 1936 would operate to deny him an allowable deduction for the rates in each of the 2016, 2017 and 2018 income years and for the marketing expenses in the 2018 income year; and
  1. he rejects the proposition that the whole of his interest expense would be denied a deduction by the operation of s 51AAA ITAA 1936. Murgatroyd argues that his interest expense is deductible to the extent it is attributable to monies borrowed to purchase the 7 ha block of land which he used in carrying on a glamping business for the purpose of gaining or producing assessable income. Murgatroyd submits that the fact that the glamping business has ceased does not disturb the ongoing nexus between the interest expense and that business; he relies upon the principles established in Commissioner of Taxation v Brown (1999) 43 ATR 1 and Ronpibon Tin NLvFCT(1949) 78 CLR 47.

In closing submissions, both parties agreed that if the Court were to allow the appeal on the basis that the profit on the sale of the four lots was not ordinary income then the matter should be remitted3 to the Commissioner to give effect to that determination and to deal with any outstanding matters, including by:

  1. quantifying the amount of any net capital gains that should be included in Murgatroyd’s assessable income pursuant to s 102-5 ITAA 1997, and with respect to which years of income;

3 This means you do not have to deal with these matters in the judgment. For example, you do not have to try and calculate the net capital gains nor do you have to decide the time of any CGT events. Further, you do not need to put a $ amount on any interest expenses which you think might be deductible (ie. deductible at a level of principle).

  1. quantifying the amount of interest, if any, allowable as a deduction to Murgatroyd based on the application of any principles stated by the court, and in which years of income; and
  1. amending Murgatroyd’s assessments in the relevant years, in the relevant particulars, to give effect to the court’s orders.

In considering the matter before you, you should assume that the facts set out in the document titled ‘Practical Scenario’ have been established in evidence before you and, further, that the arguments you heard put during the course of intensive were oral submissions made to you by the parties during the hearing.

The list of authorities relied upon by Mugatroyd’s counsel are:

Californian Copper Syndicate v Harris (1904) 5 TC 159, FCT v Myer Emporium(1987) 163 CLR 199 , Commissioner ofTaxationvWhitfords Beach(1982) 150 CLR 355, Scottish Australia Mining Co v FCT (1950) 81 CLR 188, Ruhama Property CoLtd v FCT (1928) 41 CLR 148, McClelland v Commissioner of Taxation (1970) 120 CLR 487, Statham v FCT (1988) 20 ATR 228, Westfield Ltd v Commissioner ofTaxation(1991) 28 FLR 333, CasimatyvCommissioner ofTaxation(1997) 37 ATR

358, FCT vMunro(1926) 38 CLR 153, SteelevFCT(1999) 197 CLR 459,

Commissioner of Taxation v Brown (1999) 43 ATR 1, Ronpibon Tin NL v FCT (1949) 78 CLR 47

The authorities relied upon by the Commissioner’s counsel are:

Californian Copper Syndicate v Harris (1904) 5 TC 159, FCT v Myer Emporium(1987) 163 CLR 199 Commissioner of Taxation v Whitfords Beach (1982) 150 CLR 355, WhitfordsBeachvCommissionerofTaxation(1979) 10 ATR 549 (per Deane J), Official Receiver in Bankruptcy v FCT (Fox’s Case) (1956) 96 CLR 370, McClellandv Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1969) 118 CLR 353, Steinberg v FCT (1975) 134 CLR 640, Moana Sand Pty Ltd v FCT (1988)19 ATR 1853, Stevenson vCommissioner of Taxation (1991) 29 FCR 282, Greig v Commissioner of Taxation(2020) 275 FCR 445, FletchervFCT(1991) 173 CLR 1, FCT vRiversideRoad

(1990) 21 ATR 499, RonpibonTin NL vFCT(1949) 78 CLR 47

Technical Notes

When formulating your views, please disregard the possible operation of the following provisions: Division 70 ITAA 1997 (trading stock); Division 35 ITAA 1997 (non- commercial losses); and s 26-102 ITAA 1997 (losses or outgoings relating to holding vacant land).

You should be able to locate the authorities relied upon by the parties in any one of the following databases (accessible through the ANU Law Library or the internet): Westlaw AU, LexisNexis Advance, AustLII.

Order Now

Get expert help for LAWS8421, Income Tax and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!

Universal Assignment (June 16, 2024) LAWS8421, Income Tax Assignment. Retrieved from https://universalassignment.com/laws8421-income-tax-assignment/.
"LAWS8421, Income Tax Assignment." Universal Assignment - June 16, 2024, https://universalassignment.com/laws8421-income-tax-assignment/
Universal Assignment August 14, 2022 LAWS8421, Income Tax Assignment., viewed June 16, 2024,<https://universalassignment.com/laws8421-income-tax-assignment/>
Universal Assignment - LAWS8421, Income Tax Assignment. [Internet]. [Accessed June 16, 2024]. Available from: https://universalassignment.com/laws8421-income-tax-assignment/
"LAWS8421, Income Tax Assignment." Universal Assignment - Accessed June 16, 2024. https://universalassignment.com/laws8421-income-tax-assignment/
"LAWS8421, Income Tax Assignment." Universal Assignment [Online]. Available: https://universalassignment.com/laws8421-income-tax-assignment/. [Accessed: June 16, 2024]

Please note along with our service, we will provide you with the following deliverables:

Please do not hesitate to put forward any queries regarding the service provision.

We look forward to having you on board with us.

Categories

Get 90%* Discount on Assignment Help

Most Frequent Questions & Answers

Universal Assignment Services is the best place to get help in your all kind of assignment help. We have 172+ experts available, who can help you to get HD+ grades. We also provide Free Plag report, Free Revisions,Best Price in the industry guaranteed.

We provide all kinds of assignmednt help, Report writing, Essay Writing, Dissertations, Thesis writing, Research Proposal, Research Report, Home work help, Question Answers help, Case studies, mathematical and Statistical tasks, Website development, Android application, Resume/CV writing, SOP(Statement of Purpose) Writing, Blog/Article, Poster making and so on.

We are available round the clock, 24X7, 365 days. You can appach us to our Whatsapp number +1 (613)778 8542 or email to info@universalassignment.com . We provide Free revision policy, if you need and revisions to be done on the task, we will do the same for you as soon as possible.

We provide services mainly to all major institutes and Universities in Australia, Canada, China, Malaysia, India, South Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

We provide lucrative discounts from 28% to 70% as per the wordcount, Technicality, Deadline and the number of your previous assignments done with us.

After your assignment request our team will check and update you the best suitable service for you alongwith the charges for the task. After confirmation and payment team will start the work and provide the task as per the deadline.

Yes, we will provide Plagirism free task and a free turnitin report along with the task without any extra cost.

No, if the main requirement is same, you don’t have to pay any additional amount. But it there is a additional requirement, then you have to pay the balance amount in order to get the revised solution.

The Fees are as minimum as $10 per page(1 page=250 words) and in case of a big task, we provide huge discounts.

We accept all the major Credit and Debit Cards for the payment. We do accept Paypal also.

Popular Assignments

ARCH7004: Planning and Development Control Assessment 3

Assessment 3: Choose a particular type of commercial, industrial or high-rise development (Class 2-9 building) or subdivision that is currently being considered by a Consent Authority such as a Local Council (court or tribunal) or a State or Federal Government Agency (this may be the site from Assessment 2). Once

Read More »

Promote Person-Centred Approaches in Care Settings:

Remember when you are answering the questions to look at the command words and here is what each of these mean within the questions, below is a table with the meanings of some of the operative words you will see in this unit. Describe Give a clear description that includes

Read More »

Promote equality and inclusion in Care settings:

Remember when you are answering the questions to look at the command words and here is what each of these mean within the questions, below is a table with the meanings of some of the operative words you will see in this unit. Describe Give a clear description that includes

Read More »

Physical Activity, Health and Wellbeing Assignment

 Bsc Public Health and Health Promotion (Top up) June 23 Intake,  LONDON          Physical Activity, Health and Wellbeing Assignment Brief.                  Assessment 1: Poster Design and written presentation of a physical activity intervention (weighted at 20%). 800 words Your aim is to create an intervention that ‘nudges’ students and staff

Read More »

Innovation Proposal | Part 2 – Execution and Change Plan

Instructions:  Part 2 Research indicates that the execution and implementation of innovation is the greatest challenge for leaders. Generating ideas is deemed exciting while implementing change is considered the biggest challenge, which often results in organizational resistance. REQUIREMENTS Top of Form Bottom of Form Submission status Grading criteria Implementation Schedule,

Read More »

Innovation Proposal | Part 3 – Leadership Reflection and Application

Instructions  Part 3  REQUIREMENTS Top of Form Bottom of Form Submission status Grading criteria Analysis (see rubric in syllabus for evaluation guidelines) Beginning (0-55); Developing (56-63); Accomplished (64-71); Exemplary (72-80) Fully developed introspective analysis of how innovation impacts personal leadership. Thoroughly examines the influence of personal faith worldview on pursuing

Read More »

EDUCATORS INQUIRING ABOUT THE WORLD

EDUCATORS INQUIRING ABOUT THE WORLD     ASSESSMENT 1 PROPOSAL PLAN (FORMATIVE) TEMPLATE (20 marks)  Complete the proposal under the following headings as they provide guidelines for the overall format and contents of the proposal.   DECLARATION: By submitting this assessment I declare the following  Remove ALL Blue Writing before submission. Leave

Read More »

Introduction to Sociology

Measurable Objectives Week 7 Materials The materials for the week address the issue of Crime & Deviance. Crime and Deviance are not the same!                                                                                      Crime is a violation of law (local, State, or federal laws).                                                                      Crime is a social construct. Crime is a product of someone’s reality. Deviance Deviance is

Read More »

MBA623 Healthcare Management: Technology Analysis

Assessment 3 Information Subject Code: MBA623 Subject Name: Healthcare Management Assessment Title Technology Analysis Assessment Type: Length: Individual video recording 10 minutes maximum Weighting: 30% Total Marks: Submission: 100 Online Due Date: Week 13 Your task Individually, you are required to record a 10-minute webinar discussing My Health Record’s role

Read More »

ARCH7004: Planning and Development Control Assessment 4

Assessment 4: Due on: 14 June 2024 NSW Students: The NSW Coast is considered of great importance in terms of its protection, conservation and development opportunities for the State. Describe the elements on the NSW Coastal Management Framework and the key aspects for development control within the State? What is

Read More »

EDM9780M CEEL Summative Assignment 2023-2024

Below you will find instructions on completing each of the four parts of your final summative assignment. Part 1 – Personal/professional area of interest in education (1000 – 1,500 words max) For this part of the assignment, you will need to: How to complete this part (Part 1): 1. Choose

Read More »

AT1 PREPARATION REFLECTION TEMPLATE

Weighting: 5 marks (10%) of the assignment. COMPLETE & SUBMIT INDIVIDUALLY. This is the second of THREE documents required for submission for the assignment. Complete the following, describing and reflecting upon your involvement with the preparation for the Group Presentation, including your interaction with other members of your team in

Read More »

SUMMATIVE ASSIGNMENT – Mathematics for Science

IMPORTANT INFORMATION 1 Electric power is widely used in industrial, commercial and consumer applications. The latter include laboratory equipment for example water baths, spectrophotometers, and chromatographs. If you have 17.3 kA and 5.5 MV, what is the power? Give the appropriate unit.                                                                                                               (3 marks) 2 Oil immersion objective lenses

Read More »

Assignment CW 2. Foundations of Biology

The instructions in RED are the ones which are mark-bearing and need to be answered as part of the assignment. The instructions in BLACK tell you how to carry out the simulation Diffusion simulation: Results table Use Excel to calculate the mean and standard deviation. The functions are AVERGAGE and

Read More »

MA Education Dissertation Proposal

Student Name Click here to enter text. Student ID                       Proposed title of research project Click here to enter text.       State the background references on which your research is based (ideally 4 or 5) Click here to

Read More »

Assignment: Implement five dangerous software errors

Due: Monday, 6 May 2024, 3:00 PM The requirements for assessment 1: Too many developers are prioritising functionality and performance over security. Either that, or they just don’t come from a security background, so they don’t have security in mind when they are developing the application, therefore leaving the business

Read More »

LNDN08003 DATA ANALYTICS FINAL PROJECT

Business School                                                                 London campus Session 2023-24                                                                   Trimester 2 Module Code: LNDN08003 DATA ANALYTICS FINAL PROJECT Due Date: 12th APRIL 2024 Answer ALL questions. LNDN08003–Data Analytics Group Empirical Research Project Question 2-The project (2500 maximum word limit) The datasets for this assignment should be downloaded from the World Development Indicators (WDI)

Read More »

Microprocessor Based Systems: Embedded Burglar Alarm System

ASSIGNMENT BRIEF 2023/24 Microprocessor Based Systems   Embedded Burglar Alarm System Learning Outcomes This assignment achieves the following learning outcomes:   LO 2 -Use software for developing embedded systems in ‘C’ and testing microcontroller systems including the use of design tools such as Integrated Development Environments and In Circuit Debugger.

Read More »

Imagine you are an IT professional and your manager asked you to give a presentation about various financial tools used to help with decisions for investing in IT and/or security

Part 1, scenario: Imagine you are an IT professional and your manager asked you to give a presentation about various financial tools used to help with decisions for investing in IT and/or security. The presentation will be given to entry-level IT and security employees to understand financial investing. To simulate

Read More »

DX5600 Digital Artefact and Research Report

COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, DESIGN AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES BRUNEL DESIGN SCHOOL DIGITAL MEDIA MSC DIGITAL DESIGN AND BRANDING MSC DIGITAL DESIGN (3D ANIMTION) MSC DIGITAL DESIGN (MOTION GRAPHICS) MSC DIGITAL DESIGN (IMMERSIVE MIXED REALITY) DIGITAL ARTEFACT AND RESEARCH REPORT                                                                 Module Code: DX5600 Module Title: MSc Dissertation Module Leader: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Assessment Title:

Read More »

Bsc Public Health and Health Promotion (Top up) LSC LONDON

Health and Work Assignment Brief.                 Assessment brief: A case study of 4,000 words (weighted at 100%) Students will present a series of complementary pieces of written work that:   a) analyse the key workplace issues; b) evaluate current or proposed strategies for managing them from a public health/health promotion perspective

Read More »

6HW109 Environmental Management and Sustainable Health

ASSESSMENT BRIEF MODULE CODE: 6HW109 MODULE TITLE: Environmental Management and Sustainable Health MODULE LEADER: XXXXXXXXX ACADEMIC YEAR: 2022-23 1        Demonstrate a critical awareness of the concept of Environmental Management linked to Health 2        Critically analyse climate change and health public policies. 3        Demonstrate a critical awareness of the concept of

Read More »

PROFESSIONAL SECURE NETWORKS COCS71196

PROFESSIONAL SECURE NETWORKS– Case Study Assessment Information Module Title: PROFESSIONAL SECURE NETWORKS   Module Code: COCS71196 Submission Deadline: 10th May 2024 by 3:30pm Instructions to candidates This assignment is one of two parts of the formal assessment for COCS71196 and is therefore compulsory. The assignment is weighted at 50% of

Read More »

CYBERCRIME FORENSIC ANALYSIS – COCS71193

CYBERCRIME FORENSIC ANALYSIS – COCS71193 Assignment Specification Weighted at 100% of the module mark. Learning Outcomes being assessed by this portfolio. Submission Deadline: Monday 6th May 2024, 1600Hrs. Requirements & Marking Scheme General Guidelines: This is an individual assessment comprised of four parts and is weighted at 100% of the

Read More »

Can't Find Your Assignment?

Open chat
1
Free Assistance
Universal Assignment
Hello 👋
How can we help you?