NUR3300: Essay Task overview
|Brief taskdescription||You are to respond to the assessment task by writing an essay addressing concepts in evidence-based practice.|
|Rationale forassessmenttask||Individuals have a right to effective, efficient, and safe care. Contemporary healthcare practice requires the use of evidence to improve health outcomes for individuals, families, and populations. It is important for healthcare students to understand the relationship between the generation of research evidence and the delivery of safe and effective care based on evidence. Knowledge and skills in evidence-based practice (EBP) is therefore critical to practicing healthcare professionals.|
|DueDate||August16th,2022by 11:59pm (23:59hrs) AEST|
The available mark is reducedby 5% (of the original available mark) for each Calendar Day or part day that the Assessment is late (https://policy.usq.edu.au/documents/14749PL). An Assessment submitted more than one (1) week after the submission deadline will have a mark of zerorecorded. A zeromark will be awarded for the Assessment if it is submitted after an approved extension date.
|Length||1000 words +/-10% Introduction and conclusion section required. Word count includes in-text referencing but excludesyour reference list. Noappendices or title pages required.|
|Marks out of:Weighting:||Marksoutof:40 Weighting: 40%|
|Course Objectivesmeasured||Identify the notion of evidence and evidence-based practice, the evolution of the evidence-based practice movement, and strengths and weaknesses of evidence-based practice. Explain the research process and the links between research, clinical expertise, patient preferences and evidence-based practice. Define, compare and choose common and appropriate research methodologies, designs and methods to generate evidence and answer specific research questions. Assess and justify the strengths and weaknesses of a published paper, and its relevance to clinical practice. Apply key principles and elements in the evidence-based practice process to make and communicate safe, effective, and efficient clinical decisions for selected client or context problems.|
|Exemplar||No.Information of a general nature will be posted to StudyDesk to facilitate an informed response.|
|Taskdetail||Provide a response to the following statement “Explainwhythebestavailableevidencegeneratedfromresearchis importanttobeinganEvidence-Based Practioner?”|
The following mustbe included in your response:
DefineEvidence-Based Practice (EBP) and explainthe difference between EBP and research. Explain the importance of assessing the quality of evidence generated from research.
|3. Describethe benefits of using research as part of EBP to deliver safe and effective clinical outcomes, using atleastthreehigh quality examples of EBP from the scientific literature.|
In this essay, it is crucial that your response demonstrates that you have engaged effectively with the scientific literature. This means citing the evidence base appropriately and extensively to support your response.
|WritingStyle||Your response for this assessment mustbe written in the form of an essay. Your response must be written in sentence and paragraph form. Bullet points or lists are NOT to be included in your response. Headings may be used and are encouragedas a means of structuring your response.|
|Referencing/citations||Referencingstyle:APA 7th referencing style. Sources: You are expected to justify every statement of fact with a valid, peer-reviewed reference. Intextcitations: You mustinclude in-text citations in the body of your work. Each new point or piece of evidence must be attributed (via in-text citation) to the source.|
Referencing(https://www.usq.edu.au/library/referencing) USQ Academic writing and proofreading (https://www.unisq.edu.au/library/study- support/assignments) Academic Integrity (https://www.usq.edu.au/library/study-support/academic-integrity)
|FormattingStyle||Times New Roman, Size 12, 1.5 spaced. Headings are permitted and encouraged. No graphics, coloured text, tables or title pages.|
|Resources availabletocompletetask||Refer to the NUR3300 StudyDesk. Smartthinking (https://usqstudydesk.usq.edu.au/m2/course/view.php?id=3446) USQ Library Study Support (https://www.unisq.edu.au/library/study-support/assignments) Course Assessment Forum (https://usqstudydesk.usq.edu.au/m2/mod/forum/view.php?f=211682)|
|What you need tosubmit||One file with your assignment response in one of the following accepted formats: .doc, .docx, .rtf|
|Submissionrequirements||This assessment is to be submitted electronically via the “Essay” Submission link on the NUR3300 Study Desk (located within the Assessment tab). It must be submitted in electronic format as a Microsoft document via Turnitin. The Turnitin process may take up to 24 hours to produce a report. Therefore, allow adequate time to do this and addressany issues of plagiarism detected by Turnitin before final submission.|
|File NameConventions||Save and submit your document with the following naming convention: surname_initialORstudentnumber_coursecode_assignmentdescription. E.g.Smith_J_NUR3300_Essay|
|Moderation||All staff who are assessing your work meet to discuss and compare grading decisions before marks or grades are finalised as part of an assessment moderation process Feedback and Marks are returned to Students assoonaspracticableto ensure that feedback is received before subsequent or related Assessments are due.|
|Academic IntegrityStatement||Please review the USQ policy for Academic Integrity (https://policy.usq.edu.au/documents/13752PL). Study Support Academic Integrity (https://www.unisq.edu.au/current-students/academic/academic- integrity) Turnitin has been enabledso that students can check for similarity matching within their assessment and make amendments prior to the due date to demonstrateacademic integrity.|
|COMPREHENSIONOFTASK||Comprehensively addresses all aspects of the assessment task. Thorough comprehension of relevance of content clearly evident.||Extensively addresses all aspects of the assessment task and effectively comprehends relevance of content.||Broadly addresses all aspects of the assessment task. Generally demonstrates comprehension of how content is relevant.||Content basically addresses all aspects of the assessment task. Demonstrates basic comprehension of how content is relevant.||Content does not address all aspects of the assessment task. Inadequate comprehension of required content.||/10|
|SYNTHESIS OFEVIDENCE||A comprehensively synthesised range of relevant, contemporary material drawn from various sources that strongly supports the response. No errors in the citation of reference material.||A wide range of relevant contemporary evidence is synthesised to effectively support the response. Minimal errors in the citation of reference material.||Mostly relevant contemporary evidence is synthesised to adequately support the response. Few errors in the citation of reference material.||Some relevant contemporary evidence synthesised to basically support the response. Several errors in the citation of reference material.||Poor or absent synthesis of evidence. Numerous errors in the citation of reference material.||/10|
|CRITICALTHINKING||Clear, coherent and convincing critical thought that follows a strong, distinctive analytical path from a starting to a concluding point. Comprehensively inclusive of concepts and evidence.||Clear, coherent critical thought that is well developed and logically builds each point on the last. Mostly comprehensive and inclusive of both concepts and evidence.||Clear, critical and logically developed thought presented. Generally inclusive of concepts and evidence.||Some critical thought evident. Generally demonstrates logical flow although some reliance on descriptive discussion.||Response is poorly developed or absent. No or minimal evidence of critical thought. Paper is largely descriptive.||/10|
|ACADEMICPRESENTATION||Well-constructed response with an effective introduction and conclusion that contributes to the overall structure of the paper. Strong construction of paragraphs and points with each succinctly discussing a distinct issue. No critical typographical, spelling or grammatical errors. Adheres to prescribed length.||Well-constructed, effective introduction and conclusion. Effective construction of paragraphs with each discussing a distinct point. Minimal critical typographical, spelling or grammatical errors.|
Adheres to prescribed length.
|Introductory and concluding paragraphs used to set context. Construction of paragraphs that aids the flow of the paper. Few critical typographical, spelling or grammatical errors.|
Adheres to prescribed length.
|Introductory and concluding paragraphs adequate. Basic paragraph construction. Several critical typographical, spelling or grammatical errors.|
Adheres to prescribed length.
|Inadequate introduction and conclusion. Poor paragraph construction. Many critical typographical, spelling or grammatical errors. Deviates significantly from prescribed length.||/10|
|Thepenaltyforlatesubmissionwithoutapre-approvedextensionisareductionby5%ofthemaximumMarkapplicablefortheAssignment,foreachCalendarDayorpartCalendarDaythat the Assignmentislate (https://policy.usq.edu.au/documents/14749PL). An Assessment submitted more than one (1) week after the submission deadline will have a Mark of zero recorded.AzeroMarkwillbeawardedfor an Assessmentifit issubmittedafteran approvedextension date.|
Get expert help for NUR3300: Essay Task and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!