ASSESSMENT 1 BRIEF | |
Subject Code and Title | MIS100 Foundations of Information Systems |
Assessment | Poster: Audit of Personal Information Systems Use |
Individual/Group | Individual |
Length | 500 words (+/- 10% and graphics) |
Learning Outcomes | The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include: a) Identify and describe the key concepts and technologies of information systems. |
Submission | Due by 11:55 pm AEST/AEDT Sunday end of Module 2.2 (Week 2 or Week 4) |
Weighting | 25% |
Total Marks | 100 marks |
Assessment Task
In this assessment, you will complete an audit of your own use of Information Systems and present your finding visually using a poster.
Context
“The advance of technology is based on making it fit in so that you don’t really even notice it, so it’s part of everyday life.”
Bill Gates, Co-founder of Microsoft
In this assessment, you will identify the information systems that you use in your everyday, and how much time you spend on them. As Bill Gates suggests: as technology becomes more ubiquitous, it becomes invisible. This activity will ask you to stop and reflect on your own usage of Information Systems (IS). To understand the way that a business uses IS (or Information Technology Systems), it is good to reflect on your own use of it.
Instructions
In this assessment, you will audit your own use of information systems and think about what that means. You will keep a diary for seven days to record your IS use. Start the week by thinking about all
the systems and technologies you use. Based on this information, you will then create a poster (500 words).
Start by keeping a diary.
The first step is to keep a diary for seven days. This includes: date, time, duration, what technologies were used and the actions. Many students choose to keep their diary in the form of a table. For example:
Date | Time | Technology | App | Action | Duration | Where | device |
Thurs 4 July | 6:30am | Blog | Huffington Post | Read Shared one article | 22 minutes | Bed | iPhone |
6:52am | Microblog | Read feed Retweeted 2 posts Wrote a post about TV show | 18 minutes | Bed | iPhone | ||
7:45am | Game | Hay Day | Played game | 5 minutes | Kitchen | iPad | |
8:35am | Microblog | Read feed | 8 minutes | Tram stop | iPhone |
NB: You may choose different headings.
Your poster should reflect the following information:
1. Summarise what happened:
You should now be able to comment on your own IS use. While this exercise is not a statistical analysis, it is a good way to start by looking at the what, when, how, where and why of what you have used in the week. You may comment on your experiences beyond the week of you diary. The point of the diary is a place to start the discussion, as often individuals do not know how much they use (or how little) until they have to write it down. You should be able to see themes develop from what you use.
2. Analyse what this means:
The next part is to analyse what you have found. Reflective practice is a process of thinking about new experiences with a view to learn. It is a form of personal response to new experiences, situations, events or information. What new knowledge do you have in response to this exercise? And what does this information mean? Were you surprised by any of the information?
- The poster
In your poster, explain your usage; explain what it means and then reflect on any changes you might make to your habits. Thinking about what you have learned about your usage, in what ways might that information be helpful to a business?
Additional guidelines on creating an academic poster can be found in the document MIS100 Creating an Academic Poster located in the Assessment 1 folder.
The formal citation of sources is minimal, but specific reference to your own experiences must be made.
You are strongly advised to read the rubric, which is an evaluation guide with criteria for grading yourassignment. This will give you a clear picture of what a successful report looks like.
Referencing
It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing in the Academic Skills webpage. It is expected that you reference any lecture notes used and five additional sources in the relevant subject area based on sources and further research.
As this is a personal poster for your own use, only two references are required.
Submission Instructions
Submit this assessment via the Assessment 1 link in the main navigation menu in MIS100 Foundations of Information Systems. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal.Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.
Academic Integrity
All students are responsible for ensuring that all work submitted is their own and is appropriately referenced and academically written according to the Academic Writing Guide. Students also need to have read and be aware of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure and subsequent penalties for academic misconduct. These are viewable online.
Students also must keep a copy of all submitted material and any assessment drafts.
Special Consideration
To apply for special consideration for a modification to an assessment or exam due to unexpected or extenuating circumstances, please consult the Assessment Policy for Higher Education Coursework and ELICOS and, if applicable to your circumstance, submit a completed Application for Assessment Special Consideration Form to your Learning Facilitator
Assessment Rubric
Assessment Attributes | Fail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0-49% | Pass (Functional) 50-64% | Credit (Proficient) 65-74% | Distinction (Advanced) 75-84% | High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100% |
Visual appeal and presentation of content Use of colour Layout Clarity and neatness Organisation of content Flow of information Percentage for this criterion = 35% | The poster requires significant improvementin design, colour choice,layout, neatness, organisation and flow ofinformation. | Few of the required elements are organised and well placed. However, most content requires clarity and improvement in design, layout and neatness. | Most of the required elements are presented andwell placed. The poster demonstrates an acceptable level of design and layout that supports the flow of information. | All of the required elements are presented andwell placed. The poster has a good design and layout that supports the flow of information. | The poster has an excellentdesign and layout which supports the flow of information, and all of the required elements are wellplaced and clearly defined. |
Knowledge and understanding Understanding of the key concepts Addressing the key components of the assessment Application and analysis of information Percentage for this criterion = 30% | Lack of understanding of the required concepts and knowledge. Key components of the assignment are not addressed. Lack of application and analysis of information. | Limited understanding of required concepts and knowledge. Some of the keycomponents of the assignment are not addressed. Limited application and analysis of information. | Adequate knowledge or understanding of the required concepts. A reasonable capacity to explain and apply relevantkey concepts. Supports opinion and information substantiated by evidence from research. Adequate application and analysis of information. | Thorough understanding ofthe key concepts. Discriminates between assertion of opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading. Well- demonstratedcapacity to apply and analyse relevant information to provide clear recommendations. | Highly developed understanding of the fieldor discipline/s. Systematically and criticallydiscriminates between assertion of opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading. Recommendations are clearly justified based on the application and analysis of information. |
Assessment Attributes | Fail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0-49% | Pass (Functional) 50-64% | Credit (Proficient) 65-74% | Distinction (Advanced) 75-84% | High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100% |
Effective communication through clear and logical structure Flow of information Awareness of the context Percentage for this criterion = 20% | Lack of logical and clear structure. Poor flow of information and arguments lack supporting evidence. Demonstrates little or no awareness of the context. | Information, arguments and evidence are presented in a way that is not always clear and logical. Demonstrates limited awareness of the context. | Information and evidence are adequately presented with a mostly clear flow of ideas and arguments. Demonstrates a reasonable awareness of the context. | Information and evidence are well presented with clear and logical flow of ideas and arguments. Demonstrates a good awareness of the context. | Expertly presented with a clear and logical flow of ideas, arguments and evidence. Demonstrates a thorough awareness of the context. |
Use of academic and discipline conventions Spelling, grammar, sentence construction, appropriate use of credible resources Correct citation of key resources using APA style of referencing Percentage for this criterion = 15% | Poorly written with errorsin spelling and grammar. Lacks traditional and evidence-based sources. Demonstrates inconsistent use of good sources to support ideas. There are mistakes in using the APA style. | Written according to academic genre and has accurate spelling, grammar,sentence and paragraph construction. Demonstrates little use of traditional and evidence- based literature. Consistent use of credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas, but these are not always explicit or welldeveloped. There are some mistakes in using APA style. | Written according toacademic genre. Demonstrates some use of traditional and evidence-based literature. Consistentuse of credible and relevant research sources to supportand develop ideas. There are no mistakes in using theAPA style. | Well-written and adheres tothe academic genre. Consistently demonstrates use of traditional and evidence- based literature. Expert use of credible and relevant research sources to support and develop appropriate arguments and statements. Shows evidence of reading beyondthe key reading. There are no mistakes in using the APA style. | Expertly written and adheres to the academic genre. Demonstrates expert use of traditional and evidence-based literature. Use of high- quality credible and relevant research sourcesto support and develop arguments and position statements. Shows extensive evidence of reading beyond the key reading. There are no mistakes in using the APAstyle. |
Get expert help for MIS100 Foundations of Information Systems and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!