MIS301 Cybersecurity

ASSESSMENT 2 PART A BRIEF
Subject Code and TitleMIS301 Cybersecurity
AssessmentCase Study Report and Presentation: Identification of the issues
Individual/GroupGroup
LengthPart A: 1500 words (+/- 10%).
Learning OutcomesThe Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include: Investigate and analyse the tenets of cybersecurity.Identify and communicate a range of threats and vulnerabilities to informational assets.Recommend and justify robust solutions to identified threats and vulnerabilities to cybersecurity.Develop own professional practice and ethical standards around security issues and implementation of solutions.
SubmissionDue by 11:55pm AEST Sunday of Module 3.2
Weighting25%
Total Marks100 marks

Context

As a cybersecurity specialist, a significant part of your time is spent on identifying vulnerabilities to informational assets in an organisation and making recommendations to mitigate those identified vulnerabilities and threats. In real-world contexts, you may also encounter ethical dilemmas in cybersecurity practices.

This assessment, through three parts and submissions, develops your skills in identifying and communicating threats and vulnerabilities to informational assets, making recommendations to the identified threats and vulnerabilities to cybersecurity and understanding the ethical ‘best practices’ to address ethically difficult issues in cybersecurity practice.

Instructions:

Assessment 2 consists of three parts. All three parts are based on the attached case study and is a group assessment For Part A:

  1. Form groups of 2 to 3 members. Please read the attached MIS301_Assessment 2_Group Work Guide document for information on group formation, registration and administration.
  2. Read the attached case study.
  3. Based on the case study, you, as a group, are required to submit a 1500-word report to the managers, who do not have a technical background. The report must address the following tasks:
    • identifying the informational assets that need to be protected and build a business case for management to justify investment in cybersecurity
    • identifying and discussing at least five (5) vulnerabilities that exist in the company’s IT infrastructure and operation
    • for each vulnerability, discuss potential threats, possible attacks and the consequence for the business.
  4. Your report must be related to the case study and not a general report on cybersecurity.
  5. Report structure:
    • Title page: Subject code and name, assessment number, report title, assessment due date, word count (actual), student names, student IDs, Torrens email addresses, learning facilitator, and subject coordinator.
    • Table of Contents (ToC): It should list the report topics using decimal notation. It needs to include the main headings and subheadings with corresponding page numbers, using a format that makes the hierarchy of topics clear. Because you are including a ToC, the report pages should be numbered in the footer as follows: title page has no page number; and the main text should have Arabic numerals commencing at 1. Create the ToC using Microsoft Word’s ToC auto-generator rather than manually typing out the ToC. Instructions can be found here https://support.office.com/en-gb/article/Create- a-table-of-contents-or-update-a- table-of-contents-eb275189-b93e-4559-8dd9-c279457bfd72# create_a_table.
    • Introduction (90-110 words): It needs to provide a concise overview of the problem you have been asked to research, the main aims/purpose of the report, the objectives to be achieved by writing the report and how you investigated the problem. Provide an outline of the sections of the report.
    • Body of the report (use appropriate headings in the body of the report) (1170-1430 words): Ensure that you address the tasks listed above. Do NOT use generic words such as ‘Body, Body of the Report, Tasks’ as section headings. Create meaningful headings and subheadings that reflect the topic and content of your report.
    • Conclusion (90-110 words): Restate the purpose of the report and key issues investigated and the related findings based on your research and analysis.

f.       Reference list

  • Appendices if necessary.
  • Before submitting your assessment, check it against the assessment criteria and the marking rubric included in this brief to ensure that you have satisfactorily addressed all the criteria that will be used to mark your submission.
  • Download the Group Participation Matrix from Assessment 2 Part A section. Use this document to review your group members’ performance in this assessment and to specify their specific contribution made to group work. This Group Participation Matrix document needs to be submitted individually through the Assessment 2 Part A submission link.

Referencing

It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing here https://library.torrens.edu.au/academicskills/apa/tool

Submission Instructions

Group submission

  1. Each team will submit ONE Microsoft Word document (.doc or .docx) via the Assessment link in the main navigation menu in Blackboard. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.

Peer evaluation – Individual Submission

  • Each individual student is to submit a completed Group Participation Matrix document in the Peer Evaluation submission link. Please submit a peer review correctly, as no submission may result in zero grading for this assessment criteria.

Academic Integrity Declaration

We declare that except where we have referenced, the work we are submitting for this assessment task is our own work. We have read and are aware of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure viewable online at http://www.torrens.edu.au/policies-and-forms

We are aware that we need to keep a copy of all submitted material and their drafts, and we will do so accordingly.

Assessment Rubric

  Assessment attributesFail (Unacceptable) 0-49%Pass (Functional) 50-64%Credit (Proficient) 65-74%Distinction (Advanced) 75 -84%High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100%
  Knowledge and understanding of vulnerability and potential threats   30%  Limited understanding of required concepts and knowledge in vulnerability and potential threats in cybersecurity.   Key components of the assignment are not addressed.  Adequate knowledge or understanding of vulnerability and potential threats in cybersecurity.   Some of the key components of the assessment are not addressed.  Thorough knowledge or understanding of vulnerability and potential threats in cybersecurity.   Supports personal opinion and information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials.   All key components of the assessment are addressed with an adequate capacity to explain and apply relevant key concepts.  Highly developed understanding of vulnerability and potential threats in cybersecurity.   All of the key components are addressed. Well demonstrated capacity to explain and apply relevant key concepts.  A sophisticated understanding of vulnerability and potential threats in cybersecurity.   All of the key components are addressed. Demonstrates mastery and application of key concepts.
  Content, audience and purpose   10%  Demonstrates no awareness of context and/or purpose of the assignment.  Demonstrates limited awareness of context and/or purpose of the assignment.  Demonstrates consistent awareness of context and/or purpose of the assignment.  Demonstrates an advanced and integrated understanding of context and/or purpose of the assignment.  Consistently demonstrates a systematic and critical understanding of context and purpose of the assignment.
  Assessment attributesFail (Unacceptable) 0-49%Pass (Functional) 50-64%Credit (Proficient) 65-74%Distinction (Advanced) 75 -84%High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100%
  Evaluation of information selected to support the case study       30%  Limited understanding of key concepts required to support the case study.   Confuses logic and emotion. Information taken from reliable sources but without a coherent analysis or synthesis.   Viewpoints of experts are taken as fact with little questioning.  Resembles a recall or summary of key ideas.   Often conflates/confuses assertion of personal opinion with information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials.   Analysis and evaluation do not reflect expert judgement, intellectual independence, rigour and adaptability.  Supports personal opinion and information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials.   Demonstrates a capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts.   Identifies logical flaws.   Questions viewpoints of experts.  Discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading.   Well demonstrated capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts.   Viewpoints of experts are subject to questioning.   Analysis and evaluation reflect growing judgement, intellectual independence, rigour and adaptability.  Systematically and critically discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading.   Information is taken from sources with a high level of interpretation/evaluation to develop a comprehensive critical analysis or synthesis.   Identifies gaps in knowledge.   Exhibits intellectual independence, rigour, good judgement and adaptability.
  Assessment attributesFail (Unacceptable) 0-49%Pass (Functional) 50-64%Credit (Proficient) 65-74%Distinction (Advanced) 75 -84%High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100%
Teamwork     10%Does not participate effectively in a team environment.   Places individual goals ahead of group responsibility.   Hinders the group process and upsets the schedule.Participates effectively in teams.   Identifies team and individual goals, tasks, responsibilities and schedules.   Contributes to group processes.   Supports the team.Contributes to small group discussions to reach agreement on issues.   Works together with others towards shared goals.   Renegotiates responsibilities to meet needed change.Understands group dynamics and team roles.   Facilitates team development.   Renegotiates responsibilities, tasks and schedules to meet needed change.Builds team’s identity and commitment.   Leads teams.   Evaluates teams’ outcomes.   Implements strategies for enhancing team effectiveness.
Use of academic and discipline conventions Spelling, grammar, sentence construction, appropriate use of credible resources. Correct citation of key resources using APA style of referencing.   20%Poorly written with errors in spelling and grammar.   It demonstrates inconsistent use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas.   There are mistakes in using the APA style.Written according to academic genre and has accurate spelling, grammar, sentence and paragraph construction.   Demonstrates consistent use of credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas, but these are not always explicit or well developed.   There are some mistakes in using APA style.Written according to the academic genre.   Demonstrates consistent use of credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas.   There are no mistakes in using the APA style.Well written, and adheres to the academic genre.   Consistently demonstrates expert use of good quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop appropriate arguments and statements.   Shows evidence of reading beyond the key resources.Expertly written, and adheres to the academic genre.   Demonstrates expert use of high-quality credible and relevant research sources to support and develop arguments and position statements.   Shows extensive evidence of reading beyond the key resources   There are no mistakes in using the APA style.
  Assessment attributesFail (Unacceptable) 0-49%Pass (Functional) 50-64%Credit (Proficient) 65-74%Distinction (Advanced) 75 -84%High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100%
    There are no mistakes in using the APA style. 
The following Subject Learning Outcomes are addressed in this assessment
SLO a)Investigate and analyse the tenets of cybersecurity.
SLO b)Identify and communicate a range of threats and vulnerabilities to informational assets.
SLO c)Recommend and justify robust solutions to identified threats and vulnerabilities to cybersecurity.
SLO d)Develop own professional practice and ethical standards around security issues and implementation of solutions.
Order Now
No Fields Found.
Universal Assignment (December 5, 2024) MIS301 Cybersecurity. Retrieved from https://universalassignment.com/mis301-cybersecurity/.
"MIS301 Cybersecurity." Universal Assignment - December 5, 2024, https://universalassignment.com/mis301-cybersecurity/
Universal Assignment July 6, 2022 MIS301 Cybersecurity., viewed December 5, 2024,<https://universalassignment.com/mis301-cybersecurity/>
Universal Assignment - MIS301 Cybersecurity. [Internet]. [Accessed December 5, 2024]. Available from: https://universalassignment.com/mis301-cybersecurity/
"MIS301 Cybersecurity." Universal Assignment - Accessed December 5, 2024. https://universalassignment.com/mis301-cybersecurity/
"MIS301 Cybersecurity." Universal Assignment [Online]. Available: https://universalassignment.com/mis301-cybersecurity/. [Accessed: December 5, 2024]

Please note along with our service, we will provide you with the following deliverables:

Please do not hesitate to put forward any queries regarding the service provision.

We look forward to having you on board with us.

Most Frequent Questions & Answers

Universal Assignment Services is the best place to get help in your all kind of assignment help. We have 172+ experts available, who can help you to get HD+ grades. We also provide Free Plag report, Free Revisions,Best Price in the industry guaranteed.

We provide all kinds of assignmednt help, Report writing, Essay Writing, Dissertations, Thesis writing, Research Proposal, Research Report, Home work help, Question Answers help, Case studies, mathematical and Statistical tasks, Website development, Android application, Resume/CV writing, SOP(Statement of Purpose) Writing, Blog/Article, Poster making and so on.

We are available round the clock, 24X7, 365 days. You can appach us to our Whatsapp number +1 (613)778 8542 or email to info@universalassignment.com . We provide Free revision policy, if you need and revisions to be done on the task, we will do the same for you as soon as possible.

We provide services mainly to all major institutes and Universities in Australia, Canada, China, Malaysia, India, South Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

We provide lucrative discounts from 28% to 70% as per the wordcount, Technicality, Deadline and the number of your previous assignments done with us.

After your assignment request our team will check and update you the best suitable service for you alongwith the charges for the task. After confirmation and payment team will start the work and provide the task as per the deadline.

Yes, we will provide Plagirism free task and a free turnitin report along with the task without any extra cost.

No, if the main requirement is same, you don’t have to pay any additional amount. But it there is a additional requirement, then you have to pay the balance amount in order to get the revised solution.

The Fees are as minimum as $10 per page(1 page=250 words) and in case of a big task, we provide huge discounts.

We accept all the major Credit and Debit Cards for the payment. We do accept Paypal also.

Popular Assignments

ECON20001 Assignment #2

Assignment #2 Due Monday September 30th 2pm AEST The assignment is marked out of 25 points. The weight for each part is indicated following the question text. Style requirements: This assignment requires the submission of a spreadsheet. Please keep THREE decimal places in your answers and include your spreadsheet as

Read More »

RES800 Assessment 1 – Research Question and Literature Review

Subject Title Business Research Subject Code RES800 Assessment Title Assessment 1 – Research Question and Literature Review Learning Outcome/s     Utilise critical thinking to analyse managerial problems and formulate relevant research questions and a research design   Apply research theories and methodologies to assist in developing a business research

Read More »

Assessment Task 2 Health advocacy and communication plan

Assessment Task 2 Health advocacy and communication plan Rationale and multimedia plan presentation Submission requirements Due date and time:         Rationale: 8pm AEST Monday 23 September 2024 (Week 11) Multimedia plan presentation: 8pm AEST Monday 30 September 2024 (Study Period) % of final grade:         50% of overall grade Word limit: Time

Read More »

MLI500 Leadership and innovation Assessment 1

Subject Title Leadership and innovation Subject Code MLI500 Assessment Assessment 1: Leadership development plan Individual/Group Individual Length 1500 words Learning Outcomes LO1 Examine the role of leaders in fostering creativity and innovation LO5 Reflect on and take responsibility for their own learning and leadership development processes Submission   Weighting 30%

Read More »

FPC006 Taxation for Financial Planning

Assignment 2 Instructions Assignment marks: 95 | Referencing and presentation: 5 Total marks: 100 Total word limit: 3,000 words Weighting: 40% Download and use the Assignment 2 Answer Template provided in KapLearn to complete your assignment. Your assignment should be loaded into KapLearn by 11.30 pm AEST/AEDT on the wdue

Read More »

TCHR5001 Assessment Brief 1

TCHR5001 Assessment Brief 1 Assessment Details Item Assessment 1: Pitch your pedagogy Type Digital Presentation (Recorded) Due Monday, 16th September 2024, 11:59 pm AEST (start of Week 4) Group type Individual Length 10 minutes (equivalent to 1500 words) Weight 50% Gen AI use Permitted, restrictions apply Aligned ULOS ULO1, ULO2,

Read More »

HSH725 Assessment Task 2

turquoise By changing the Heading 3 above with the following teal, turquoise, orange or pink you can change the colour theme of your CloudFirst CloudDeakin template page. When this page is published the Heading 3 above will be removed, but it will still be here in edit mode if you wish to change the colour theme.

Read More »

Evidence in Health Assessment 2: Evidence Selection

Evidence in Health Assessment 2: Evidence Selection Student name:                                                                    Student ID: Section 1: PICO and search strategy Evidence Question: Insert evidence question from chosen scenario here including all key PICO terms.       PICO Search Terms                                                                                                                                                                                                          Complete the following table.   Subject headings Keywords Synonyms Population  

Read More »

Assessment 1 – Lesson Plan and annotation

ASSESSMENT TASK INFORMATION: XNB390 Assessment 1 – Lesson Plan and annotation This document provides you with information about the requirements for your assessment. Detailed instructions and resources are included for completing the task. The Criterion Reference Assessment (CRA) Marking Matrix that XNB390 markers will use to grade the assessment task

Read More »

XNB390 Task 1 – Professional Lesson Plan

XNB390 Template for Task 1 – Professional Lesson Plan CONTEXT FOR LESSON: SOCIAL JUSTICE CONSIDERATIONS: Equity Diversity Supportive Environment UNIT TITLE:    TERM WEEK DAY TIME 1   5           YEAR/CLASS STUDENT NUMBERS/CONTEXT LOCATION LESSON DURATION         28 Children (chl): 16 boys; 12

Read More »

A2 Critical Review Assignment

YouthSolutions Summary The summary should summarise the key points of the critical review. It should state the aims/purpose of the program and give an overview of the program or strategy you have chosen. This should be 200 words – included in the word count. Critical analysis and evaluation Your critical

Read More »

PUN364 – Workplace activity Assignment

Assessment 1 – DetailsOverviewFor those of you attending the on-campus workshop, you will prepare a report on the simulated simulated inspection below. For those of you who are not attending, you will be required to carry out your own food business inspection under the supervision of a suitably qualified Environmental

Read More »

FPC006 Taxation for Financial Planning

Assignment 1 Instructions Assignment marks: 95 | Referencing and presentation: 5 Total marks: 100 Total word limit: 3,600 words Weighting: 40% Download and use the Assignment 1 Answer Template provided in KapLearn to complete your assignment. Your assignment should be loaded into KapLearn by 11.30 pm AEST/AEDT on the due

Read More »

Mental health Nursing assignment

Due Aug 31 This is based on a Mental health Nursing assignment Used Microsoft word The family genogram is a useful tool for the assessment of individuals, couples, and families.  It can yield significant data and lead to important, new patient understandings and insights as multigenerational patterns take shape and

Read More »

Assessment 2: Research and Policy Review

Length: 2000 words +/- 10% (excluding references)For this assessment, you must choose eight sources (academic readings and policy documents) as the basis of your Research and Policy Review. You must choose your set of sources from the ‘REFERENCES MENU’ on the moodle site, noting the minimum number of sources required

Read More »

HSN702 – Lifespan Nutrition

Assessment Task: 2 Assignment title: Population Nutrition Report and Reflection Assignment task type: Written report, reflection, and short oral presentation Task details The primary focus of this assignment is on population nutrition. Nutritionists play an important role in promoting population health through optimal nutritional intake. You will be asked to

Read More »

Written Assessment 1: Case Study

Billy a 32-year-old male was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with a suspected overdose of tricyclic antidepressants. He is obese (weight 160kg, height 172cm) and has a history of depression and chronic back pain for which he takes oxycodone. On admission to the emergency department, Paramedics were maintaining

Read More »

Assessment Task 8 – Plan and prepare to assess competence

Assessment Task 8 – Plan and prepare to assess competence Assessment Task 8 consists of the following sections: Section 1:      Short answer questions Section 2:      Analyse an assessment tool Section 3:      Determine reasonable adjustment and customisation of assessment process Section 4:      Develop an assessment plan Student Instructions To complete this

Read More »

Nutrition Reviews Assignment 2 – Part A and Part B

This assignment provides you with the opportunity to determine an important research question that is crucial to address based on your reading of one of the two systematic reviews below (Part A). You will then develop a research proposal outlining the study design and methodology needed to answer that question

Read More »

NUR332 – TASK 3 – WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT

NUR332 – TASK 3 – WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT for S2 2024. DESCRIPTION (For this Task 3, the word ‘Indigenous Australians’, refers to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples of Australia) NUR332 Task 3 – Written Assignment – Due – WEEK 12 – via CANVAS on Wednesday, Midday (1200hrs) 16/10/2024. The

Read More »

NUR100 Task 3 – Case study

NUR100 Task 3 – Case study To identify a key child health issue and discuss this issue in the Australian context. You will demonstrate understanding of contemporary families in Australia. You will discuss the role of the family and reflect on how the family can influence the overall health outcomes

Read More »

NUR 100 Task 2 Health Promotion Poster

NUR 100 Task 2 Health Promotion Poster The weighting for this assessment is 40%. Task instructions You are not permitted to use generative AI tools in this task. Use of AI in this task constitutes student misconduct and is considered contract cheating. This assessment requires you to develop scholarship and

Read More »

BMS 291 Pathophysiology and Pharmacology CASE STUDY

BMS 291 Pathophysiology and Pharmacology CASE STUDY Assessment No: 1 Weighting: 40% Due date Part A: midnight Friday 2nd August 2024 Due date Part B: midnight Sunday 29th September 2024 General information In this assessment, you will develop your skills for analysing, integrating and presenting information for effective evidence-based communication.

Read More »

Assessment Task: Health service delivery

Assessment Task Health service delivery is inherently unpredictable. This unpredictability can arise from, for example, the assortment of patient presentations, environmental factors, changing technologies, shifts in health policy and changes in division leadership. It can also arise from changes in policy within an organisation and/or associated health services that impact

Read More »

LNDN08002 Business Cultures Resit Assessment

LNDN08002 Business Cultures Resit Assessment Briefing 2023–2024 (Resit for Term 1) Contents Before starting this resit, please: 1 Assessment Element 1: Individual Report 1 Case Report Marking Criteria. 3 Assessment Element 2: Continuing Personal Development (CPD) 4 Guidance for Assessment 2: Reflection and Reflective Practice. 5 Student Marking Criteria –

Read More »

Assessment Task 2 – NAPLAN Exercise

Assessment Task 2 (35%) – Evaluation and discussion of test items Assessment Task 2 (35%) – Evaluation and discussion of test items AITSL Standards: This assessmeAITSL Standards: This assessment provides the opportunity to develop evidence that demonstrates these Standards: 1.2        Understand how students learn 1.5        Differentiate teaching to meet with

Read More »

EBY014 Degree Tutor Group 2 Assignment

  Assignment Brief Module Degree Tutor Group 2 Module Code EBY014 Programme BA (Hons) Business and Management with   Foundation Year Academic Year 2024/2025 Issue Date 6th May 2024 Semester Component Magnitude Weighting Deadline Learning outcomes assessed 2 1 2000 words Capstone Assessment 100% 26th July, 2024 1/2/3/4 Module Curriculum

Read More »

Can't Find Your Assignment?

Open chat
1
Free Assistance
Universal Assignment
Hello 👋
How can we help you?