MIS608 – Agile Project Management

ASSESSMENT 1 BRIEF
Subject Code and TitleMIS608 – Agile Project Management
AssessmentResearch Report on Agile
Individual/GroupIndividual
Length1500 words (+/- 10%)
Learning OutcomesThe Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include: a) Undertake research to demonstrate an understanding of Agile concepts, tools and techniques
SubmissionDue by 11:55pm AEST Sunday end of Module 2.2.
Weighting25%
Total Marks100 marks

Task Summary

“The Philosopher’s product is his life” – Friedrich Nietzsche

Manifestos communicate beliefs, aims, intentions and views – they are a philosophy rather than a method. The Agile Manifesto is the philosophy from which Agile methods and frameworks have emerged.

This assessment is about ensuring that we understand the thinking or the ‘what’ of Agile in

preparation for learning the methods, practices, tools, and techniques associated with the ‘how’ of

Agile.

You will be required to prepare a report covering the following concepts and areas of knowledge:

  1. VUCA
  2. The Agile Manifesto
  3. The Case for Agile
  4. Agile vs. Waterfall
  5. A Comparison of Scrum and Kanban
  6. The influence of Lean on the Agile philosophy and practices

Context

Because careers in the world of Information Systems require being able to ‘do’, we focus on techniques which engender capability building. Agile is a complex and multi-facetted discipline. Because we are preparing you for professional practice in your future workplace – the assessment pathway takes a laddered approach to your learning to embed theoretical knowledge through active practice:

  1. Assessment 1 Prepare – Understand theoretical foundations of Agile.
  2. Assessment 2 Reflect – Develop your Agile Mindset and capability to work in an Agile team.
  3. Assessment 3 – Perform – An authentic assessment where you will apply the knowledge and skills you progressively develop in the subject to a business problem using Agile Project Management.
 Wk1Wk2Wk3Wk4Wk5Wk6Wk7Wk8Wk9Wk10Wk11Wk12
A1Theoretical foundations of AgileA1 Due        
A2 Developing your Agile Mindset and reflecting onA2 Due     
A3Form TeamWorking AgreementScrum vs. KanbanLead the TeamSetting up Team BoardBacklogPlanning and estimatingRetrospectivesReviewsRelease PlanningA3 Due 

Due attention needs to be paid to format, visual presentation and citation discipline (referencing) as this would be required in leading companies and consultancies which you would apply to in your future career.

Incorrect referencing demonstrates your capability as a researcher – it is evidence that you know how to find information from appropriate sources and can interpret and synthesise that information with skill at a Masters level.

Task Instructions

Your report will require 6 boxes, each one devoted to covering a specific knowledge area. There is no requirement for an introduction of conclusion using this method – your word count can be better used in the boxes:

1.     Box 1 – VUCA.

To answer this question, you will need this article: Bennett, N., & Lemoine, G. J. (2014).

What a difference a word makes: understanding threats to performance in a VUCA world. Business Horizons, 57(3), 311–311. Which can be accessed via the Torrens online library

  1. According to this article which dimension is best addressed by ‘Agility’ and with

what techniques?

  • For companies who only use Traditional (waterfall) project management – what options do they have to address complexity within their operating model?
    • The term ‘Fail fast and fail cheap’ is commonly heard in Design Thinking. Which dimension of VUCA does this align to – and how does this mitigate the risk of this dimension?
    • VUCA seems to capture many events that could be considered disaster or chaos – what counter position do the authors take and what are four strategies shared by the business leaders that Bennet & Lemoine interviewed?

None of these answers are ‘one word’ answers – we expect to see an explanation and reasoning backed by evidence as to why you have made your specific selection.

2.     Box 2 – Authors of the Agile Manifesto.

  1. Select one of the following Agile methodologies:
    1. Scrum
    1. XP
    1. Crystal
    1. To which author of the Agile Manifesto is this methodology aligned?
    1. Briefly describe the framework in 2-3 sentences.
    1. Share a diagram which is a high-level representation of the selected framework.
    1. What do you believe the framework to which they are aligned is best suited?

3.     Box 3 – Agile vs Waterfall.

What, in your opinion is the biggest similarity between Agile and Waterfall? Include evidence from two sources to back your claim. Why do you believe this would be the case?

4.     Box 4 – The Case for Agile.

Several cases and examples have been included in the essential resources for this subject which illustrate how Agile can be beneficial for projects. Select one of these cases – ensuring that you clearly identify the case to which you are referring in your response with

appropriate referencing techniques. Consider the ‘triple constraint’ of Project Management,

also known as the ‘Iron Triangle’:

  1. In the case that you have selected – which of the triple constraints showed the greatest benefit from the move to Agile? Indicate why you say this and back your position with evidence from the case.
    1. What was the specific impact on quality? Include specific figures to back your position and explain why you believe this quality outcome was achieved.

5.     Box 5 – A comparison of Scrum and Kanban.

  1. Kanban and Scrum are compatible Agile techniques which have both similarities and differences. Identify what you believe to be the most important differences are between the two techniques and explain why you think that this is the case. Ensure that you back your position with evidence from quality sources.
    1. Give three challenges that you could anticipate in using Kanban as a technique for managing your project for assessment 3, and what countermeasures you could put in place to mitigate these challenges.

6.     Box 6 – The Influence of Lean on Agile philosophy and practice.

Kaizen is a very well-known Lean philosophy which originated in Lean manufacturing.

  1. Define what Kaizen means
    1. Review the 12 principles of the Agile Manifesto and identify 4 principles which demonstrate a close alignment to the principles of Kaizen.
    1. Explain why you have selected these four principles and what it is about that principle that you believe reflects the alignment.

Visual Appeal and Format

  1. Your report will need to be designed and completed in Word format – alternative package solutions (e.g. Canva) may not be used as they do not meet the university’s submission criteria.
  2. A cover page will be required which must include the following information:
    1. Subject Code
    1. Subject name
    1. Assessment number
    1. Assessment title
    1. Class CRN
    1. Learning Facilitator’s name
    1. Student name
    1. Student number (‘A’ number)
  3. The report must use font Arial or Calibri 11 point and be line spaced at 1.15 for ease of reading.
  4. You may use a tables or text boxes to create your six boxes based on what best meets your needs. You must pay careful attention to layout and how items fit on the pages.
  5. When diagrams or tables are used, due attention should be given to placement.
  6. Diagrams or tables must carry the appropriate captioning.
  7. A reference list is to be included on a separate page which meets the format requirements of the APA 7th Edition Referencing Guide.

Referencing

There are requirements for referencing this report using APA referencing style. It is expected that you reference any appropriate resources that were used in class and that you include five additional resources in the relevant subject areas based on readings and further research.

You are required to use DOIs, URLs and page and para numbers to reflect your capability and standing as a Masters level researcher.

It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing here http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing

Submission Instructions

Submit Assessment 1 via the Assessment link in the main navigation menu in MIS608 Agile Project Management. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.

Academic Integrity Declaration

It is required that the below statement must be adhered to and added to your cover page:

I declare that except where I have referenced, the work I am submitting for this assessment task is my own work. I have read and am aware of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure viewable online at http://www.torrens.edu.au/policies-and-forms

I am aware that I need to keep a copy of all submitted material and their drafts, and I will do so accordingly.

Signed by:                                                                                      Date:

Assessment Rubric

  Assessment AttributesFail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0-49%Pass (Functional) 50-64%Credit (Proficient) 65-74%Distinction (Advanced) 75-84%High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100%
Visual Appeal and Format     
Cover Page   3%No cover page is included.Cover page is included but is missing most information.Cover page is included but is missing key information.Cover page is included with most required information.Cover page is included with all required information.
Format 4%Incorrect font and size is used with poor line spacing and large gaps in pagination or tables, or diagrams run over onto the next page unnecessarily. Reference list does not start on a new pageEither incorrect font and size is used or poor line spacing and large gaps in pagination. Reference list does not start on a new page.Some errors in font use and line spacing. Some pagination problems. Reference list starts on a new pageMinor errors in font, spacing and format. Reference list starts on a new pageFont, spacing and format are in accordance with the requirements of the assignment brief. Reference list starts on a new page and applies the appropriate hanging indent technique
Spelling & Grammar   4%Many errors in spelling or grammar obscure meaning of what student has written.Spelling or grammar has errors but meaning remains clear.Minor spelling or grammar errors.No errors in spelling or grammar.No errors in spelling or grammar.
Word Count   3 %Does not adhere to the word count requirement of 1500 words (greater than +/- 20%)Does not adhere to the word count requirement of 1500 words (+/- 20%)Adheres to the word count requirement of 1500 words (+/- 10%)Adheres to the word count requirement of 1500 words (+/- 10%)Adheres to the word count requirement of 1500 words (+/- 5%)
VUCA     
Knowledge & understanding   4%Demonstrates a poorly developed understanding of VUCA – cannot identify an aligned VUCADemonstrates a functional knowledge of VUCA – selects inappropriate perspectives with low relevance, theDemonstrates proficient knowledge of VUCA by selecting an appropriate perspective , the correctDemonstrates advanced knowledge of VUCA by selecting and, identifying the correct VUCADemonstrates exceptional knowledge of VUCA by selecting and identifying the most appropriate
 dimension and appropriate recommended approach.incorrect VUCA dimension and/or approach is selectedVUCA dimension and approachdimension with good reasons and explains the link between the recommended approach and Agile.dimension for the selected challenge and identifying the correct approach to address the challenge and how Agile contribute to addressing the dimension.
Analysis and application with synthesis of new knowledge   3%Limited synthesis and analysis.Demonstrated analysis and synthesis of new knowledge with application.Well-developed analysis and synthesis with application of recommendations linked to analysis/synthesis.Thoroughly developed and creative analysis and synthesis with application of the VUCA model and justified recommendations linked to analysis/synthesis.Highly sophisticated and creative analysis, synthesis of new with existing knowledge.
Evaluation of information selected to support the presented argument.   3%Limited understanding of VUCA and AGILE required to support the presented argument.Resembles a recall or summary of key ideas of VUCA and AGILE.Demonstrates a capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts of VUCA and AGILE.Well demonstrated capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts of VUCA and AGILE.Excellent capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts of VUCA and AGILE.
The Agile Manifesto     
Knowledge & understanding   4%Demonstrates a partially developed understanding of the Agile Manifesto by attempting to identify the correct framework/founderDemonstrates a functional knowledge of the Agile Manifesto by identifying the correct framework/founderDemonstrates proficient knowledge of the Agile Manifesto by identifying and describing the framework/founderDemonstrates proficient knowledge of the Agile Manifesto by identifying and describing the correct framework/founder, describing it proficiently and explaining the best suitability of the framework.Demonstrates exceptional knowledge of the Agile Manifesto by identifying the correct framework/founder, providing and excellent description of the framework and clearly describing the best context within which the framework would offer maximum value.
Evaluation of information selected to support the presented argument.   3%Limited understanding of key concepts required to support the discussion.   Information taken from reliable sources but without a coherent analysis or synthesis.Resembles a recall or summary of key ideas.   Often conflates/confuses assertion of personal opinion with information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials.Demonstrates a capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts.   Identifies logical flaws.Well demonstrated capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts.   Viewpoint of experts are subject to questioning.Excellent capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts.   Compares and contrasts different viewpoints of experts to demonstrate an advanced evaluation of different arguments.
Agile vs. Waterfall     
Knowledge & understanding   4%Demonstrates a partially developed understanding of differences between Agile and WaterfallDemonstrates a functional knowledge of differences between Agile and WaterfallDemonstrates proficient knowledge of differences between Agile and WaterfallDemonstrates proficient knowledge of one difference between Agile and WaterfallDemonstrates exceptional knowledge of differences between Agile and Waterfall
Analysis and application of new knowledge   3%Limited synthesis and analysis of Agile and Waterfall.Demonstrated analysis and synthesis of Agile and Waterfall.Well-developed analysis and synthesis of Agile and Waterfall.Thoroughly analysis and synthesis of Agile and Waterfall.Highly sophisticated analysis, synthesis of Agile and Waterfall.
The Case for Agile     
Knowledge & understanding   4%Demonstrates a partially developed understanding of the ‘triple constraint’ and the benefits of Agile.Demonstrates a functional knowledge of of the ‘triple constraint’ and the benefits of Agile.Demonstrates proficient knowledge of the ‘triple constraint’ and the benefits of Agile.Demonstrates proficient knowledge of the ‘triple constraint’ and the benefits of Agile.Demonstrates exceptional knowledge of the ‘triple constraint’ and the benefits of Agile.
Evaluation of information selected to support the presented argument   3%Limited understanding of key concepts required to select a representative the case study leading to no case study being selected.Resembles a recall or summary of key ideas from case studies in general, but inappropriate case study selected.Demonstrates a capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts by selecting appropriate case study.Well demonstrated capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts.to a well- selected representative case study.Excellent capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts by selecting the most appropriate triple constraint in relation to the selected case study.
Analysis and synthesis of new knowledge   3%Limited synthesis and analysis.Demonstrated analysis and synthesis of a case and project management concepts.Well-developed analysis and synthesis of a case and project management conceptsThoroughly developed and creative analysis and synthesis of a case and project management concepts within a carefulHighly sophisticated and creative analysis, synthesis of new with existing knowledge.
    consideration of the triple constraint. 
Comparison of Scrum and Kanban     
Knowledge & understanding   4%Demonstrates a poorly developed understanding of Scrum and Kanban and cannot articulate any difference between the approaches.Demonstrates a functional knowledge and understanding of Scrum and Kanban and can articulate the difference between the approachesDemonstrates proficient knowledge and understanding of Scrum and Kanban and can articulate the difference between the approachesDemonstrates advanced knowledge and understanding of the difference between Scrum and Kanban and selects an appropriate difference based on their group assessment.Demonstrates advanced knowledge and understanding of the difference between Scrum and Kanban and selects a well-considered difference based on their group assessment
Analysis and application with synthesis of new knowledge   3%Limited synthesis and analysis.Demonstrated analysis and synthesis of new knowledge with application.Well-developed analysis and synthesis with application of recommendations linked to analysis/synthesis.Thoroughly developed and creative analysis and synthesis with application of the scrum/Kanban models and justified recommendations linked to analysis/synthesis.Highly sophisticated and creative analysis, synthesis of new knowledge about Scrum and Kanban with existing knowledge based on prior group assessment activity.
Evaluation of information selected to support the presented argument   3%Limited understanding of Scrum and Kanban and cannot make discerning choice between method.Resembles a recall or summary of key ideas of Scrum and Kanban and struggles to articulate reason for choice.Demonstrates a capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts of Scrum and Kanban but does not adequately back choice with reasonsWell demonstrated capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts of Scrum and Kanban and can back choice of method with reasons.Excellent capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts of Scrum and Kanban with excellent demonstration of reasoning in selection of method.
The Influence of Lean on Agile philosophy and practice.     
Knowledge & understanding   2%Demonstrates a poorly- developed understanding of Lean and Agile and cannot articulate any difference between the approaches.Demonstrates a functional knowledge and understanding of Lean and Agile and can articulate the difference between the approachesDemonstrates proficient knowledge and understanding of Lean and Agile and can articulate the difference between the approachesDemonstrates advanced knowledge and understanding of the difference between Lean and Agile and selects an appropriate difference based on their group assessment.Demonstrates advanced knowledge and understanding of the difference between Lean Agile and selects a well- considered difference based on their group assessment
Use of academic and discipline conventions.     
Formal tone& use of first party perspective   4%Poorly written with informal tone, using first person pronouns (I, my, we, me, us) and does not adhere to the assignment brief of the requirements for a short business report.Written according to academic genre as per the assignment brief. Minor errors in the use of first- person pronouns (I, my, we, me, us).Written according to academic genre as per the assignment brief.Well-written and adheres to the academic genre as per the assignment brief.Expertly written and adheres to the academic genre as per the assignment brief.
Effective Communication   10%Presents information. Specialised language and terminology is rarely or inaccurately employed.Communicates in a readable manner that largely adheres to the given format. Generally employs specialised language and terminology with accuracy.Communicates in a coherent and readable manner that adheres to the given format. Accurately employs specialised language and terminology.Communicates coherently and concisely in a manner that adheres to the given format. Accurately employs a wide range of specialised language and terminology.Communicates eloquently. Expresses meaning coherently, concisely and creatively within the given format. Discerningly selects and precisely employs a wide range of specialised language and terminology.
Referencing 10%Some unresolved Safe Assign flags in the body of the assessment < 15%   References include sources not publicly available, foreign language references.Some unresolved Safe Assign flags in the body of the section < 10%   References used sparsely and poorly related to concept where they are serving as evidence.Some unresolved Safe Assign flags in the body of the section < 5%   References used intermittently and inappropriately and appear to be used to support the requirement for referencing rather than evidence of research.No unresolved Safe Assign flags in the body of the section   Sound use of appropriate references which demonstrate evidence of research and integrative practiceNo unresolved Safe Assign flags in the body of the assessment.   Excellent use of appropriate references which demonstrate evidence of research and integrative practice.
Appropriate use of credible resources   10%Demonstrates inconsistent and inadequate use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas. Highly reliant on ephemeral websites. Does not use materials shared in class.Demonstrates consistent use of credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas. Mainly uses ephemeral websites. Does not use materials shared in class.Demonstrates consistent use of credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas. Uses texts and materials that have been used in classConsistently demonstrates expert use of good quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop appropriate arguments and statements. Uses texts and materials that have been used in class and shows evidence of reading beyond the key reading.Demonstrates expert use of high-quality credible and relevant research sources to support and develop arguments and position statements. Uses texts and materials that have been used in class and shows extensive evidence of reading beyond the key reading.
Correct citation of resources using APA style of referencing   6No use of in-text references, or no reference list at the close of the report. There are many mistakes in using the APA style including no page and para numbers, no DOIs or URLs.Little use of in-text referencing, or inadequate references consulted and added to references at the close of the report. There are some mistakes in using APA style including no page and para numbers, no DOIs or URLs.Good use of in-text referencing and appropriate number of references used and listed in the reference list. There are only minor errors in using the APA style including no page and para numbers, no DOIs or URLs.Very good use of in-text referencing. All in-text references match with references listed in the reference list. There are no mistakes in using the APA style. DOIs and URLs to sources are used, with minor errors, and page and para numbers are included.Excellent and meticulous use of in-text referencing with all in-text references matching with references listed in the reference list. There are no mistakes in using the APA style. DOIs and URLs to sources are expertly used, with no errors, and page and para numbers are accurately included
Order Now

Get expert help for MIS608 – Agile Project Management and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!

Universal Assignment (February 14, 2025) MIS608 – Agile Project Management. Retrieved from https://universalassignment.com/mis608-agile-project-management/.
"MIS608 – Agile Project Management." Universal Assignment - February 14, 2025, https://universalassignment.com/mis608-agile-project-management/
Universal Assignment August 22, 2022 MIS608 – Agile Project Management., viewed February 14, 2025,<https://universalassignment.com/mis608-agile-project-management/>
Universal Assignment - MIS608 – Agile Project Management. [Internet]. [Accessed February 14, 2025]. Available from: https://universalassignment.com/mis608-agile-project-management/
"MIS608 – Agile Project Management." Universal Assignment - Accessed February 14, 2025. https://universalassignment.com/mis608-agile-project-management/
"MIS608 – Agile Project Management." Universal Assignment [Online]. Available: https://universalassignment.com/mis608-agile-project-management/. [Accessed: February 14, 2025]

Please note along with our service, we will provide you with the following deliverables:

Please do not hesitate to put forward any queries regarding the service provision.

We look forward to having you on board with us.

Most Frequent Questions & Answers

Universal Assignment Services is the best place to get help in your all kind of assignment help. We have 172+ experts available, who can help you to get HD+ grades. We also provide Free Plag report, Free Revisions,Best Price in the industry guaranteed.

We provide all kinds of assignmednt help, Report writing, Essay Writing, Dissertations, Thesis writing, Research Proposal, Research Report, Home work help, Question Answers help, Case studies, mathematical and Statistical tasks, Website development, Android application, Resume/CV writing, SOP(Statement of Purpose) Writing, Blog/Article, Poster making and so on.

We are available round the clock, 24X7, 365 days. You can appach us to our Whatsapp number +1 (613)778 8542 or email to info@universalassignment.com . We provide Free revision policy, if you need and revisions to be done on the task, we will do the same for you as soon as possible.

We provide services mainly to all major institutes and Universities in Australia, Canada, China, Malaysia, India, South Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

We provide lucrative discounts from 28% to 70% as per the wordcount, Technicality, Deadline and the number of your previous assignments done with us.

After your assignment request our team will check and update you the best suitable service for you alongwith the charges for the task. After confirmation and payment team will start the work and provide the task as per the deadline.

Yes, we will provide Plagirism free task and a free turnitin report along with the task without any extra cost.

No, if the main requirement is same, you don’t have to pay any additional amount. But it there is a additional requirement, then you have to pay the balance amount in order to get the revised solution.

The Fees are as minimum as $10 per page(1 page=250 words) and in case of a big task, we provide huge discounts.

We accept all the major Credit and Debit Cards for the payment. We do accept Paypal also.

Popular Assignments

STM1001: Assignment 3 for Science/Health Stream Students

STM1001: Assignment 3 Science/Health Stream Students Only Academic Integrity Information In submitting your work, you are consenting that it may be copied and transmitted by the University for the detection of plagiarism. If you are unsure of your academic integrity responsibilities, please check the information provided in the Assessment Overview

Read More »

ACCG1000 Accounting for Decision Making Xero Assignment

1ACCG1000Accounting for Decision MakingXero AssignmentInformation packSession 2 2024Due Date: Friday 18th October 2024 at 11.55pm2Xero AssignmentIntroductionThe Xero assignment is designed to provide introductory accounting students with an overview of the Xero Accounting Software by completing a one-month accounting cycle for a fictional business. This is an online assignment worth 20%

Read More »

WRIT1001 Assessment Notification 2

6Final Essay: Rhetorical analysisDue: Friday 18 October 2024 at 23:59 (Sydney time)Length: 1500 words, worth 40% of the overall grade for the unitSubmit: as a Word document or PDF, via Canvas AssignmentMain question:● Present a scholarly essay that analyses the rhetoric used in arguments about thecontentious topic you have been

Read More »

WRIT1000 Assessment Four

Title: Self-ReflectionDue: Friday October 18 by 11:59PM.Length: 500 words (+/- 10%)Weight: 10% of the total gradeFormat: Times New Roman, double-spaced, 12pt. Your project should have the title“WRIT1000 Assessment Four – Self Reflection for xxxxxxx” where “xxxxxxxx” is yourstudent number. Please only submit Word documents (.doc or .docx). Turnitin doesnot recognise

Read More »

Written Assessment – Psychosocial Research Perspectives

Written Assessment – Psychosocial Research Perspectives TRIGGER WARNING: This is a case study of a real person. Katherine Knight was the first woman in Australia to receive a life sentence without parole after she decapitated and cooked her lover. If you think that you will have problems reading about this

Read More »

RES800 Assessment 1 – Research Question and Literature Review

Subject Title Business Research Subject Code RES800 Assessment Title Assessment 1 – Research Question and Literature Review Learning Outcome/s     Utilise critical thinking to analyse managerial problems and formulate relevant research questions and a research design   Apply research theories and methodologies to assist in developing a business research

Read More »

Assessment Task 2 Health advocacy and communication plan

Assessment Task 2 Health advocacy and communication plan Rationale and multimedia plan presentation Submission requirements Due date and time:         Rationale: 8pm AEST Monday 23 September 2024 (Week 11) Multimedia plan presentation: 8pm AEST Monday 30 September 2024 (Study Period) % of final grade:         50% of overall grade Word limit: Time

Read More »

MLI500 Leadership and innovation Assessment 1

Subject Title Leadership and innovation Subject Code MLI500 Assessment Assessment 1: Leadership development plan Individual/Group Individual Length 1500 words Learning Outcomes LO1 Examine the role of leaders in fostering creativity and innovation LO5 Reflect on and take responsibility for their own learning and leadership development processes Submission   Weighting 30%

Read More »

FPC006 Taxation for Financial Planning

Assignment 2 Instructions Assignment marks: 95 | Referencing and presentation: 5 Total marks: 100 Total word limit: 3,000 words Weighting: 40% Download and use the Assignment 2 Answer Template provided in KapLearn to complete your assignment. Your assignment should be loaded into KapLearn by 11.30 pm AEST/AEDT on the wdue

Read More »

TCHR5001 Assessment Brief 1

TCHR5001 Assessment Brief 1 Assessment Details Item Assessment 1: Pitch your pedagogy Type Digital Presentation (Recorded) Due Monday, 16th September 2024, 11:59 pm AEST (start of Week 4) Group type Individual Length 10 minutes (equivalent to 1500 words) Weight 50% Gen AI use Permitted, restrictions apply Aligned ULOS ULO1, ULO2,

Read More »

HSH725 Assessment Task 2

turquoise By changing the Heading 3 above with the following teal, turquoise, orange or pink you can change the colour theme of your CloudFirst CloudDeakin template page. When this page is published the Heading 3 above will be removed, but it will still be here in edit mode if you wish to change the colour theme.

Read More »

Evidence in Health Assessment 2: Evidence Selection

Evidence in Health Assessment 2: Evidence Selection Student name:                                                                    Student ID: Section 1: PICO and search strategy Evidence Question: Insert evidence question from chosen scenario here including all key PICO terms.       PICO Search Terms                                                                                                                                                                                                          Complete the following table.   Subject headings Keywords Synonyms Population  

Read More »

Assessment 1 – Lesson Plan and annotation

ASSESSMENT TASK INFORMATION: XNB390 Assessment 1 – Lesson Plan and annotation This document provides you with information about the requirements for your assessment. Detailed instructions and resources are included for completing the task. The Criterion Reference Assessment (CRA) Marking Matrix that XNB390 markers will use to grade the assessment task

Read More »

XNB390 Task 1 – Professional Lesson Plan

XNB390 Template for Task 1 – Professional Lesson Plan CONTEXT FOR LESSON: SOCIAL JUSTICE CONSIDERATIONS: Equity Diversity Supportive Environment UNIT TITLE:    TERM WEEK DAY TIME 1   5           YEAR/CLASS STUDENT NUMBERS/CONTEXT LOCATION LESSON DURATION         28 Children (chl): 16 boys; 12

Read More »

A2 Critical Review Assignment

YouthSolutions Summary The summary should summarise the key points of the critical review. It should state the aims/purpose of the program and give an overview of the program or strategy you have chosen. This should be 200 words – included in the word count. Critical analysis and evaluation Your critical

Read More »

PUN364 – Workplace activity Assignment

Assessment 1 – DetailsOverviewFor those of you attending the on-campus workshop, you will prepare a report on the simulated simulated inspection below. For those of you who are not attending, you will be required to carry out your own food business inspection under the supervision of a suitably qualified Environmental

Read More »

FPC006 Taxation for Financial Planning

Assignment 1 Instructions Assignment marks: 95 | Referencing and presentation: 5 Total marks: 100 Total word limit: 3,600 words Weighting: 40% Download and use the Assignment 1 Answer Template provided in KapLearn to complete your assignment. Your assignment should be loaded into KapLearn by 11.30 pm AEST/AEDT on the due

Read More »

Mental health Nursing assignment

Due Aug 31 This is based on a Mental health Nursing assignment Used Microsoft word The family genogram is a useful tool for the assessment of individuals, couples, and families.  It can yield significant data and lead to important, new patient understandings and insights as multigenerational patterns take shape and

Read More »

Assessment 2: Research and Policy Review

Length: 2000 words +/- 10% (excluding references)For this assessment, you must choose eight sources (academic readings and policy documents) as the basis of your Research and Policy Review. You must choose your set of sources from the ‘REFERENCES MENU’ on the moodle site, noting the minimum number of sources required

Read More »

HSN702 – Lifespan Nutrition

Assessment Task: 2 Assignment title: Population Nutrition Report and Reflection Assignment task type: Written report, reflection, and short oral presentation Task details The primary focus of this assignment is on population nutrition. Nutritionists play an important role in promoting population health through optimal nutritional intake. You will be asked to

Read More »

Written Assessment 1: Case Study

Billy a 32-year-old male was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with a suspected overdose of tricyclic antidepressants. He is obese (weight 160kg, height 172cm) and has a history of depression and chronic back pain for which he takes oxycodone. On admission to the emergency department, Paramedics were maintaining

Read More »

Assessment Task 8 – Plan and prepare to assess competence

Assessment Task 8 – Plan and prepare to assess competence Assessment Task 8 consists of the following sections: Section 1:      Short answer questions Section 2:      Analyse an assessment tool Section 3:      Determine reasonable adjustment and customisation of assessment process Section 4:      Develop an assessment plan Student Instructions To complete this

Read More »

Nutrition Reviews Assignment 2 – Part A and Part B

This assignment provides you with the opportunity to determine an important research question that is crucial to address based on your reading of one of the two systematic reviews below (Part A). You will then develop a research proposal outlining the study design and methodology needed to answer that question

Read More »

NUR332 – TASK 3 – WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT

NUR332 – TASK 3 – WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT for S2 2024. DESCRIPTION (For this Task 3, the word ‘Indigenous Australians’, refers to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples of Australia) NUR332 Task 3 – Written Assignment – Due – WEEK 12 – via CANVAS on Wednesday, Midday (1200hrs) 16/10/2024. The

Read More »

NUR100 Task 3 – Case study

NUR100 Task 3 – Case study To identify a key child health issue and discuss this issue in the Australian context. You will demonstrate understanding of contemporary families in Australia. You will discuss the role of the family and reflect on how the family can influence the overall health outcomes

Read More »

NUR 100 Task 2 Health Promotion Poster

NUR 100 Task 2 Health Promotion Poster The weighting for this assessment is 40%. Task instructions You are not permitted to use generative AI tools in this task. Use of AI in this task constitutes student misconduct and is considered contract cheating. This assessment requires you to develop scholarship and

Read More »

BMS 291 Pathophysiology and Pharmacology CASE STUDY

BMS 291 Pathophysiology and Pharmacology CASE STUDY Assessment No: 1 Weighting: 40% Due date Part A: midnight Friday 2nd August 2024 Due date Part B: midnight Sunday 29th September 2024 General information In this assessment, you will develop your skills for analysing, integrating and presenting information for effective evidence-based communication.

Read More »

Can't Find Your Assignment?

Open chat
1
Free Assistance
Universal Assignment
Hello 👋
How can we help you?