NSB336: Integrated Nursing Practice Capstone

NSB336: Integrated Nursing Practice Capstone

ASSESSMENT TASK 1

Assessment name:Case Study: Failure to recognise and respond to clinical deterioration
Task description:For this essay you are required to review the case study located on Blackboard   The assessment task requires you to write an academic essay that addresses the following tasks: Analyse the Coroner’s case to identify the issues (what happened and why it happened) in care delivery that contributed to a failure to recognise and respond to clinical deterioration. Discuss how the issues identified, in conjunction with the patient presentation, medical history, and underlying pathophysiological processes led to the clinical deterioration.Based on contemporary evidence analyse the clinical actions that the registered nurse(s) implemented, how this contributed to the patient’s clinical deterioration, and discuss what action should have been undertaken to potentially prevent the clinical deterioration.Based on issues identified in the Coroner’s report apply contemporary research to discuss the communication barriers in the escalation of care and how these may be addressed to improve future care.   References:The reference list is to be presented in accordance with QUT APA 7th edition requirements.References are to be contemporary (i.e. no older than 7 years). Only peer reviewed evidence-based literature is to be cited for this assessment.
What you need to do:In order to undertake this essay, you will need to research the case using current and relevant peer reviewed literature, in conjunction with reviewing:   The lecture, tutorial and support materials associated with the relevant topic located on blackboard.Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care; Recognising and Responding to Acute Deterioration Standard (https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/standards/nsqhs- standards/recognising-and-responding-acute-deterioration- standard)Registered nurses’ standards for practice (https://www.nursingmidwiferyboard.gov.au/codesguidelines- statements/professional-standards/registered-nurse-standards- for-practice.aspx)Your knowledge and understanding related to:Anatomy, physiology and pathophysiology of the primary diagnosis, medical history and associated clinical data identified within the coroner’s report.The physiological assessments relevant to the features within the case study.   This assessment task is an individual assessment item and should be reflective of your own independent work.
Length:1500 words +/-10% (word length includes in-text referencing and excludes your reference list)
Estimated time to complete task:Approximately 40 hours
Weighting:50%
How will I be assessed:+/- 7 point grading scale using the rubric attached within this document
          Due date:Group 2 (those in classes running weeks 1 to week 5 ) Week 5 Friday April 8th 2022: submitted via Turnitin in your NSB236 Blackboard site by 23:59 hours. More information about Turnitin is available on the FAQs about Turnitin page.     Group 1 (those in classes running weeks 6 to week 10) Week 10 Friday May 20th 2022: submitted via Turnitin in your NSB236 Blackboard site by 23:59 hours. More information about Turnitin is available on the FAQs about Turnitin page.     See Blackboard site for details of due date and submission requirements.
Presentation requirements:This assessment task must: Be a formal written academic essay containing an introduction, body and conclusion, addressing the task, specified requirements and adhering to the prescribed word limit.Use QUT CiteWrite APA 7th edition referencing for citing academic literature, inclusive of page numbers (see http://www.citewrite.qut.edu.au/).Assessment cover page should include, student name, ID number, tutorial day and time, tutorial leaders name, case study title, and word count.Be submitted in electronic form via Turnitin as a word document only. Submission made in any other form will not be accepted and a zero grade will be awarded.Integrate contemporary literature in the form of published articles within journals, no older than 7 years.Include a footer on each page with your name, student number, unit code and page number.3 cm margins on all sides, double-spaced textUse font, such as Times New Roman, Arial or Calibri; font size 12Anticipated references required is 1 per 100-150 words (e.g 10 -15 references for the assessment)   Please note: If using web pages they must be current and evidence based. Sponsored sites and review sites such as StatPearls should be avoided. Your textbooks can be used but should not make up the majority of supporting evidence.The submitted essay should NOT contain tables, figures or appendices.
  
What you need to submit:One (1) word document that contains the following items: A cover page with the items outlined in the presentation requirements provided.Where an extension has been formally granted – evidence of the granted extension must be submitted in the form of the approval email added to the beginning of the submitted document. In the absence of this information the submission will not be graded. All assessments must be submitted in electronic form via Turnitin by the due date. Emailed submissions will not be accepted.

NSB336 ASSESSMENT TASK 1 RUBRIC

Learning Outcomes Assessed:1,2,3 & 5Weighting:50%
Criteria+/- 7+/- 6+/- 5+/- 4+/- 3+/- 2 – 1
Case analysis – identification of key issues that contributed to failure to recognise and respond to clinical deterioration Weighting 20%You present an insightful analysis of the case study. Thorough analysis of patient history and critique of clinical care provided; you correctly identify all key indicators of, and reasons for, clinical deterioration that were not recognised and/or adequately explored by the team.   Analysis is seamlessly justified throughout using evidence from a wide range of peer reviewed, current, and highly relevant literature.You present an analysis of the case study. You have accurately identified key aspects of the patient history and clinical care that may have caused the signs or symptoms of clinical deterioration that were not recognised and/or adequately explored by the team. Occasional areas would benefit from more detail.   Analysis is clearly justified using evidence from a range of peer reviewed, current and relevant literature.You present some analysis of the case study though this may be descriptive in parts. You have identified most relevant patient history. You discuss clinical actions, and make some links between these and signs or symptoms of clinical deterioration relevant to the case study.   Analysis is mostly correct though some points may need further explanation. Most assertions justified by evidence from peer reviewed, current and mostly relevant literature.You present a key summary of the case study. You identify key patient history and draw mainly accurate conclusions in relation to the contributing factors that resulted in clinical deterioration.   Majority of analysis /points are supported by peer reviewed, current and relevant evidence Some points needed further development. Some areas are descriptive and comparison with relevant evidence in these areas is lacking.You present a description of the case study. Signs or symptoms of clinical deterioration and contributing factors are inaccurate and/or poorly discussed.   Limited supporting evidence. Majority of submission is descriptive and comparison with relevant evidence is lacking in many areas.You present a description of the case study that lacks cohesion for the reader. Limited understanding evident of contributing factors that contribute/suggest clinical deterioration is present.   Limited/no or poor-quality supporting evidence applied.
Case analysis – analysis of clinical information/data and applied knowledge of anatomy, physiology and pathophysiology Weighting 20%You accurately identify and analysed relevant historical and at-time-of- hospitalisation clinical information/data that supports your assessment. You have integrated underlying anatomy, physiology and pathophysiology to support your assertions, demonstrating in-depth clinical reasoning and analytical thinking.   You have analysed and applied a wide range of peer reviewed, current and highly relevant evidence toYou have accurately identified relevant clinical information/data to support your assessment. You have integrated relevant concepts of anatomy, physiology, and pathophysiology to demonstrate a high level of clinical reasoning and analytical thinking to guide your interpretation.   You have applied a range of peer reviewed, current and relevant evidence to build a convincing argument. Occasional areas would benefit fromYou make relevant and important links underlying pathophysiology inclusive of physiology and anatomy to guide your initial assessment demonstrating a sound understanding of the clinical issues and contributing factors.   You have applied peer reviewed, current and relevant evidence to build an argument. Some points needed further development.You identified clinical information/data that supports your assessment. You use pathophysiology and endeavour to consider anatomy and physiology, to support the ideas and demonstrate a satisfactory understanding of the primary concepts. Some omissions of key points are present.   The majority of points are supported by peer reviewed, current and relevant evidence although mainly descriptive.You show some understanding of pathophysiology, anatomy and physiology however many points are not are not relevant clinical deterioration in the case/s.   Limited supporting evidence.You show little understanding of anatomy, physiology and pathophysiology.   Limited/no or poor-quality supporting evidence applied.
 support your argument.more detail.    
Clinical actions – Analysis the clinical actions that may have mitigated clinical deterioration and improved the patient outcome.         Weighting 25%You present a well-thought out and logical analysis of the clinical assessments/interventions that could have been implemented to reduce the potential for clinical deterioration. This includes when and why suggested additional assessment/s and/or intervention/s should have occurred.   You have analysed and applied contemporary literature to make a compelling justification for the clinical actions.You present a logical and relevant discussion of the clinical assessments/interventions that could have been implemented to reduce the potential for clinical deterioration.   You have applied contemporary literature with relevant connections to the case to make a convincing argument for clinical actions.You present a clearly identified contributing assessments/interventions that may have been implemented to reduce the potential for clinical deterioration. You have made a good attempt to justify the approaches proposed through the use of contemporary literature and integrating links between the case and the research.You identify relevant clinical assessments/intervention required in relation to the clinical case that may have aided in the earlier recognition of clinical deterioration   You have made a satisfactory attempt to justify your approaches using contemporary literature and integrating links between the suggested assessments/intervention and the research.Your discussion of the case has limited application to safely and effectively intervene and reduce the potential for clinical deterioration. The justification for the actions required further development and integration of compelling evidence.   Integrated literature is lacking to support the discussion.Your discussion of the clinical action to prevent clinical deterioration and support early recognition of changes in the patient health status is poorly related to the case study and is underdeveloped in its justification.   There is limited/absent discussion of evidence- based approach to assessment/interventions to support your approach.   Integrated literature to support the discussion is inadequate or of a poorly scholarly source.
Communication Based on issues identified in the case apply contemporary research to discuss the communication barriers in the escalation of care and how these may be addressed.   Weighting 15%You provide a proficient discussion of contemporary issues that may have contributed to poor communication and lack of escalation of care. Using an evidence-based approach, you suggest relevant ways to improve escalation of care and communication approaches to achieve safer practice in the future.   You provide appropriate, clear and accurate recommendations for addressing the identified communication barriers and blocks for escalation of care that are fully justified and supported by peer-reviewed, current and highly relevant literature.You identify critical points in the case study where clearer communication and escalation of care should have occurred. Discussion contains a well-considered and balanced overview of the communication and industry barriers in the context of clinical deterioration. Proposed improved practices are well supported and reflect contemporary evidence.   You provide an effective approach to address communication and escalation of care deficits that are evidence-based and informed by best practice that addresses the priority problem.You identify deficiencies in effective communication and escalation of care related to clinical deterioration in the case. and considered relevant clinical barriers.   Supporting evidence is applied and has some links made to communication and escalation of care practices that inform future nursing. The discussion is justified using mainly peer reviewed, current and highly relevant evidence.You have identified some key points where escalation of care should have occurred. You identify some communication errors/barriers in the case. Some basic links to failures in the case and how future practice may be improved are made.   An attempt to justify the approaches has been made although limited peer reviewed, current and relevant evidence used.You have not adequately identified key points where escalation of care and/or clearer communication should have occurred. Many key points missed.   Limited or no discussion of how future practice could be improved and/or discussion is not supported by peer-reviewed literature.You did not correctly identify key points where clearer communication and escalation of care should have occurred.   If present communication approaches lack discussion to support impact on clinical practice and are inappropriate or ineffective.   Limited or poorly quality literature applied to presented discussion.
       
Academic writing and integrity     Weighting 20%Logically and succinctly structured essay with a clear introduction, body and conclusion. Makes no significant grammatical, spelling or communication errors. Full adherence to task requirements including word limit (+/-10%). QUT APA guidelines are followed without errorLogically structured essay with a clear introduction, body and conclusion. Few grammatical, spelling or communication errors. Adherence to task requirements including word limit (+/-10%). QUT APA guidelines are followed with minor errors when applying convention.Well-structured essay with an introduction, body and conclusion. Minor grammatical, spelling or communication errors. Consistent adherence to task requirements including word limit (+/-10%). QUT APA guidelines are followed with minor errors when applying convention.Used some structure to provide some clarity to your response. Introduction, body and conclusion evident. Some problems with spelling, grammar, expression that do not detract from meaning. You have complied with many task requirements, including word limit (+/- 10%). QUT APA guidelines are followed. Some errors when applying convention.Some essay structure present but meaning is often unclear. Spelling, grammar, expression are below an acceptable standard for an academic essay. Lacks adherence to task requirements, including word limit (+/-10%). Referencing is not compliant with QUT APA guidelines.Lack of essay structure present e.g. no clear introduction, body, conclusion. Poor spelling, grammar, and expression that make meaning unclear. Little to no adherence to task requirements, including word limit (+/- 10%). Referencing is not compliant with QUT APA guidelines.

Satisfactorily complied with the Academic Integrity standards outlined in the MOPP C/5.3 Academic Integrity.

Order Now

Get expert help for NSB336: Integrated Nursing Practice Capstone and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!

Universal Assignment (September 27, 2022) NSB336: Integrated Nursing Practice Capstone. Retrieved from https://universalassignment.com/nsb336-integrated-nursing-practice-capstone/.
"NSB336: Integrated Nursing Practice Capstone." Universal Assignment - September 27, 2022, https://universalassignment.com/nsb336-integrated-nursing-practice-capstone/
Universal Assignment September 6, 2022 NSB336: Integrated Nursing Practice Capstone., viewed September 27, 2022,<https://universalassignment.com/nsb336-integrated-nursing-practice-capstone/>
Universal Assignment - NSB336: Integrated Nursing Practice Capstone. [Internet]. [Accessed September 27, 2022]. Available from: https://universalassignment.com/nsb336-integrated-nursing-practice-capstone/
"NSB336: Integrated Nursing Practice Capstone." Universal Assignment - Accessed September 27, 2022. https://universalassignment.com/nsb336-integrated-nursing-practice-capstone/
"NSB336: Integrated Nursing Practice Capstone." Universal Assignment [Online]. Available: https://universalassignment.com/nsb336-integrated-nursing-practice-capstone/. [Accessed: September 27, 2022]

Please note along with our service, we will provide you with the following deliverables:

Please do not hesitate to put forward any queries regarding the service provision.

We look forward to having you on board with us.

Get 45%* OFF on Assignment Help

Popular Assignments

VU22977 – Practice in a Legal Environment

Advanced Diploma of Legal Practice – 22565VIC PORTFOLIO- CLIENT MATTER FILE Assessment task 1 Prepare a comprehensive portfolio of documents to create a Client Matter File which must include: Element 1 Area of law Cover sheet stating client name and short description of legal matter Client Instruction Sheet, Costs Agreement

Read More »

KIT714 ICT Research Principles: Assignment 1

Practical Qualitative Research Exercise                                                                                                                                         Type:                 In-Semester, Individual Assignment Task Length:   minimum 2,000 words Weighting:     20% of total assessment for this unit Due Date:       Friday 5 August 2022 – 11:55 pm (Week05) Submission:    electronic submission on MyLO (WORD or PDF) Description:    This practical exercise will engage students in a qualitative research

Read More »

MODULE 44-704463 Dissertation Help

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA Dissertation (12,500 words) Deadline: JULY 29th 2022, 3pm Introduction and abstract  Situates the research question within the, theory, and concepts Explains the value of the study.  Relevance of the research question, to the field of study is fully justified. Leads logically into the Literature Review. Abstract of professional

Read More »

ITECH1103-Assignment: Assignment 2: Analytics Report

Overview The purpose of this task is to provide students with practical experience in writing a data analytical report to provide useful insights, patterns, and trends in a chosen dataset in the light of a set of tasks required within this document. This dataset will be chosen from the UC

Read More »

PBHL20001 Term 1, 2022 – Supplementary Assessment

PBHL20001 Term 1, 2022 Supplementary Assessment The influenza pandemic that followed World War I and took place over the period from 1918-1920 resulted in an estimated 100 million deaths worldwide and 500 million infections. In addition, this pandemic had a significant impact on public health practice throughout the 20th century

Read More »

Community Health Project 1 (HLTH 3058): Assessment 2: Portfolio Task 2

Community Health Project 1 (HLTH 3058) Assessment 2: Portfolio Task 2 – Evaluative Framework Marking Guide Weighting: 15% the total grade for the course   Criteria Outstanding performance (75-100%) Exceeds core requirements (65-74%) Meets core requirements (50-64%) Does not meet requirements (<50%) Comments Content (70%) Demonstrates adequate knowledge of integrating

Read More »

Community Health Project 1 (HLTH 3058): Assessment 2: Portfolio Task 1

Community Health Project 1 (HLTH 3058)Assessment 2: Portfolio Task 1 – Ethical Considerations Marking GuideWeighting of 15% the total grade for the course Criteria Outstanding performance (75-100%) Exceeds core requirements (65-74%)   Meets core requirements (50-64%) Does not meet requirements (<50%) Comments CONTENT (80%) Ethical Considerations   Demonstrates adequate knowledge

Read More »

SAM 11486/SAM G 6677: Assignment 1 – Individual

Assignment 1 – Individual (25%) Report Due: 11:59pm Sunday Week 5 04/09/2022 This assignment will be marked out of 25 marks and is worth 25% of the overall mark for the unit. Please check the unit outline for late penalties and restrictions on late submissions. This assignment is an individual

Read More »

11486 Systems Analysis and Modelling

Assignment Case Study C – Feed Me Now Disclaimer: The situation described in the following case study is fictional, and bears no resemblance to any persons, businesses, or organisations, living or dead. Any such resemblance, if exists, is merely co-incidental in nature, and is not intentional. Feed Me Now is

Read More »

MAA703 – Accounting for Management

Trimester 2 2022 Assessment Task 2 Part B – Teamwork Reflection (Individual) DUE DATE AND TIME:                        Wednesday, 7 September 2022 by 8:00pm (AEST) PERCENTAGE OF FINAL GRADE:    10% WORD COUNT:                                   750 – 800 words Description Teamwork is one of the vital components of many workplaces and the ability to demonstrate

Read More »

Research project assessment proforma and marking schemes

BSc Biomedical Sciences with Health, Exercise and Nutrition (HEN6004) and BSc Biomedical Science (APS6022) Instructions for use All forms must be completed electronically and uploaded to the student submission point in  turnitin. Please note the literature review assessment will be completed in January whereas the assessment of the paper/poster and

Read More »

XERO and Spotlight reporting software Report Assignment

Case facts – Read me carefully please City Infrastructure Holdings Ltd (CIH) and Network Maintenance Services Ltd (NMS) City Infrastructure Holdings Ltd (CIH) acquired 100% of the 300,000 issued shares in Network Maintenance Services (NMS) on 1 July 2021.  The consideration provided to shareholders of NMS consisted of $1.20 in cash plus 1

Read More »

KIT103 Computational Science

School of Information and Communication Technology College of Sciences and Engineering Unit Outline KIT103 Computational Science Semester 2, 2022 Sandy Bay Campus, Hobart Newnham Campus, Launceston COVID-19 (Coronavirus Information) For information on how you can help keep us all safe, please review the Coronavirus updates page here: https://www.utas.edu.au/about/safety-security-and-wellbeing/coronavirus Sections that

Read More »

SEN725 Urban Stormwater Asset Design

Assessment Task -4 Final Report – Analysis of CoGG Stormwater Network Weight 50% This is an individual assessment task. Plagiarism and collusion is unacceptable practice at Deakin University. You must appropriately reference your work. Failure to do so will result in disciplinary action. For more information on plagiarism and collusion,

Read More »

PSY3PRP 2022 Assignment 2: Research Project Report

PSY3PRP 2022 Assignment 2: Research Project Report Guidelines and Marking Rubric Individual Research Report due Wednesday 19th October 11.59pm (50% of total grade) For this assignment—with support through structured tutorial work across much of the semester— you will produce an individually-written report on the broad topic of feeding difficulties in

Read More »

Increasing Demand for assignment help in Namibia

With the growing population, the demand for clean energy, advanced technology, new structures, and better healthcare is escalating day by day which makes engineering the most popular degree for the youth. As more people pursue engineering nowadays, it also makes it one of the most difficult and competitive degrees also.

Read More »

Online Assignment Help in Germany

How Could You Do Exam Preparation Effectively? Exam time is full of challenges and difficulties. You have to juggle exams even in high school, college, or higher education. It defines your knowledge of a specific subject and how well you know the curriculum. The exam also tests how much you

Read More »

Get Excellent Human Values Assignment Help Immediately

Get Excellent Human Values Assignment Help Immediately: Expert Solutions to all your Queries Instant Human Values Assignment Help Online Students can get Human Values assignment help online in a fast and simple way from the experts at Universal Assignment Help Service. Their team of over 172+ subject experts works every

Read More »

Get Top Modern History Assignment Help Online

Order Modern History Assignment Help immediately Students often need modern history assignment help for many reasons. Getting immediate online help for assignments helps students boost their academics in incredible ways. Sometimes, the pressure of studies is too much to take for students. This causes them to score poor grades and

Read More »

Get Instant Assignment Help in the United Arab Emirates

How Can Assignments Help Students? Whatever the definition of homework is, one thing is certain: it helps students thoroughly learn the concepts they have studied in class. The number of such assignments may cause stress or a burden. It means students and tutors are both correct in their type of

Read More »

Assignment Help in Mexico

How to Gain Awesome Grades in Your Chemistry Subject? Whether you are pursuing a technical degree or studying in the science stream, chemistry is always at the forefront. If you love to observe reactions, molecules, acids, condensation, evaporation, and dilution, chemistry will prove a resource for getting outstanding academic marks.

Read More »

Assignment Help in Kenya

How Could You Find the Best Biology Homework Website? Getting online homework help from an expert is neither embarrassing nor unauthentic. The vast majority of students around the world believe that doing online assignments and tutoring is beneficial. The Standard Graduate School of Education revealed that 56% of students suffer

Read More »

Assignment Help in Bangladesh

The Best 6 Hacks to Shortlist the Top Civil Engineering Assignment Tutor? Finding a homework expert for civil engineering assignments is a hectic task. As civil engineering has several fields, getting expertise is difficult for tutors. You may struggle to receive civil engineering assignment help in Bangladesh due to this

Read More »

Assignment Help in Pakistan

What Will Unethical Occur from Getting Homework? Homework looks like a mode of learning in most cases. But what happens to its quantity? Its quantity should be more than enough for students. Such circumstances may be detrimental to the health of the pupils. Sometimes, college faculties or teachers forget to

Read More »

Assignment Help in Malaysia

The Best 4 Skills You Should Learn For Making Your Career in 2022 As technological innovations leap forward daily, new skills are entering our market. Sticking to one skill set enables you to lose lucrative job opportunities. That is why it gives importance to having diverse skills, which should be

Read More »

MKT200 Marketing Principles: Infographic

Assessment 2 Information Subject Code: MKT200 Subject Name: Marketing Principles Assessment Title: Infographic Assessment Type: Individual infographic Length: Two pages Weighting: 30% Total Marks: 100 Submission: Online Due Date: Week 9 Your task Individually, you are required to create a two-page infographic outlining the communications process of two competitor brands.

Read More »

MMP-223, Property and Real Estate Law and Practice

MMP-223, Property and Real Estate Law and Practice, Trimester 2, 2022 Assignment 2, Client Report, Individual Assignment 25% of Unit Assessment (1,250 words*) Due Date: September 16, 2022, 8-pm AEST Assignment Brief: Clyde, being a real estate agent, loves property. With his share of the sale of the Sorrento property

Read More »

NUR1398 – Foundations of Nursing Practice Theory

Assessment: Care Plan Report Task overview Course NUR1398 – Foundations of Nursing Practice Theory Brief task description Written care plan addressing nursing care requirements for older patients with degenerative conditions. Rationale for assessment task Registered Nurses are required to think through the different aspects of patient care to arrive at

Read More »

MBA641 Project Strategy Framework

Assessment 1 Information Subject Code: MBA641 Subject Name: Strategic Project Management Assessment Title: Project Strategy Framework Assessment Type: Length: Individual video recording and supporting Infographic Video: 10-minute (no more) Supporting infographic: 1 page (no more) Weighting: 30% Total Marks: Submission: 100 Online Due Date: Week 4 Your task You are

Read More »

SEJ201 Structural Design Assessment

SEJ201 Structural Design Assessment Task 5 FINAL PROJECT REPORT Summary The Final Project Report is an individual task which builds on teamwork completed earlier in the trimester. This report shall clearly explain and justify the design solution proposed. In this report students you should identify project scope, inputs and constraints,

Read More »

42907 Design for Durability

Introduction Overall, explain what readers will find in the report, general information about the structure, location, climatic conditions, detail which specific parts of the structure will be designed according to which Australian standard. Which type of foundation, why? You can use figures in this section. Provide the scope of the

Read More »

Can't Find Your Assignment?

Open chat
1
Free Assistance
Universal Assignment
Hello 👋
How can we help you?