School of ITEE CSSE2002/7023 — Semester 1, 2022

School of ITEE CSSE2002/7023 — Semester 1, 2022

Assignment 2

Due: 20 May 2022 16:00 AEST

Revision: 1.0.0

Abstract

The goal of this assignment is to implement and test a set of classes and interfaces1, extending on the classes implemented in the first assignment.

Languagerequirements: Java version 11, JUnit 4.12.

Preamble

All work on this assignment is to be your own individual work. As detailed in Lecture 1, code supplied by course staff (from this semester) is acceptable, but there are no other exceptions. You are expected to be familiar with “What not to do” from Lecture 1 and https://www.itee.uq. edu.au/itee-student-misconduct-including-plagiarism. If you have questions about what is acceptable, please ask course staff.

Please carefully read the Appendix A document. It outlines critical mistakes which you must avoid in order to avoid losing marks. This is being heavily emphasised here because these are critical mistakes which must be avoided. If at any point you are even slightly unsure, please check as soon as possible with course staff!

All times are given in AustralianEasternStandardTime. It is your responsibility to ensure that you adhere to this timezone for all assignment related matters. Please bear this in mind, especially if you are enrolled in the External offering and may be located in a different time zone.

Introduction

In this assignment, you will continue developing a simple simulation of an interactive scenario system, building on the core model of the system you implemented in assignment one.

In assignment two, entities will now be able to move around the scenario if they implement the Movable interface. Entities (such as Fauna) will move around the scenario according the a set algorithm given to you in a new class AnimalController .

The Coordinate class has had some additional helper methods added to facilitate the movement of entities.

The user or player in the simulation also must be implemented. A user is special in that it can collect other entities. The Colletable interface allows classes to specify behaviour that occurs on collection by the User.

1From now on, classes and interfaces will be shortened to simply “classes”

The keep track of these interactions a new Event subclass has been added (the CollectEvent). This class maintains a record of what a user has collected over time.

The Logger class provides a way to monitor various events in the scenario’s simulation. The Logger is similar to a database of all Event’s that occur within the simulation. On this ”database” certain calculations can be done to provide statistics such as how many entities have been collected or how many tiles have entities moved.

To facilitate saving and loading the state of the simulation to and from a file, the Encodable in- terface has been introduced. Any class implementing this interface must implement the encode() method, which encodes the current state of the class to a machine-readable string. To faciliate the loading of a scenario from a file the Scenario class has a load() method implementation to construct a scenario.

Many classes now override the default equals() and hashCode() method implementations inher- ited from Object, allowing instances to be checked for equality according to their internal state.

A Graphical User Interface (GUI) using JavaFX has been provided in the researchsim.display package. Note that the GUI will not work correctly until the other parts of the assignment it relies on have been implemented. The GUI consists of three classes: View is responsible for creating the visual elements displayed on screen, ScenarioCanvas handles the graphics and drawing of the scenario in the main canvas, while ViewModel manages interaction between the View and the core classes of the model (e.g. Scenario). The Launcher class in the researchsim package initialises the GUI and passes the save file to the ViewModel.

While most of the GUI code has been provided to you, several methods must be implemented to complete the GUI. These are the methods marked with “Implement this for assignment 2” in ViewModel – you do not (and should not) need to modify any code in View or ScenarioCanvas.

Some examples have been provided of the save files used by the GUI to load the saved sce- nario simulation. The files saves/default.txt represents the simplest possible save file and saves/test3.txt represents a full scenario with all possible entities.

Supplied Material

This task sheet.

Code specification document (Javadoc).2

Gradescope, a website where you will submit your assignment.3

A starting template for your assignment code, available for download on Blackboard. The files in this template provide a minimal framework for you to work from, and build upon. These files have been provided so that you can avoid (some of) the critical mistakes described in Appendix A. Each of these files:

  • is in the correct directory (do not change this!)
  • has the correct package declaration at the top of the file (do not change this!)
  • has the correct public class or public interface declaration. Note that you may still need to make classes abstract, extend classes, implement interfaces etc., as detailed in the Javadoc specification.

As the first step in the assignment (after reading through the specifications) you should download the template code from Blackboard. Once you have created a new project from the files you have downloaded, you should start implementing the specification.

2Detailed in the Javadoc section

3Detailed in the Submission section

Javadoc

Code specifications are an important tool for developing code in collaboration with other peo- ple. Although assignments in this course are individual, they still aim to prepare you for writing code to a strict specification by providing a specification document (in Java, this is called Javadoc).

You will need to implement the specification precisely as it is described in the specification docu- ment.

The Javadoc can be viewed in either of the two following ways:

  1. Open https://csse2002.uqcloud.net/assignment/2/ in your web browser. Note that this will only be the most recent version of the Javadoc.
  2. Navigate to the relevant assignment folder under Assessment on Blackboard and you will be able to download the Javadoc .zip file containing HTML documentation. Unzip the bundle somewhere, and open doc/index.html with your web browser.

Tasks

  1. Fully implement each of the classes and interfaces described in the Javadoc.
  2. Write JUnit 4 tests for all the methods in the following classes:

Coordinate

(in a class called CoordinateTest) Partially implemented in Assignment 1

User (in a class called UserTest)

To facilitate in the creation of Scenario’s in your tests a few utility methods (createSafeTestScenario()) have been implemented for your use.

Marking

The 100 marks available for the assignment will be divided as follows:

SymbolMarksMarkedDescription
FT45ElectronicallyFunctionality according to the specification
CF5ElectronicallyConformance to the specification
SL10ElectronicallyCode style: Structure and layout
CR20By course staffCode style: Design review
JU20ElectronicallyWhether JUnit tests identify and distinguish be- tween correct and incorrect implementations

The overall assignment mark will be A2 = FT+ CF+ SL+ CR+ JUwith the following adjustments:

  1. If FT is 0, then the manual code style review will not be marked. CR will be automatically 0.
  2. If SL is 0, then the manual code style review will not be marked. CR will be automatically 0.
  3. If SL+ CR>FT, then SL+ CRwill be capped at a maximum of FT.

For example: FT= 22,CF= 5,SL= 7,CR= 18,J= 13

A2 = 22 + 5 + (7 + 18) + 13.

A2 = 22 + 5 + (25) + 13. Limitation will now be applied.

A2 = 22 + 5 + (22) + 13.

The reasoning here is to place emphasis on good quality functional code.

Well styled code that does not implement the required functionality is of no value in a project, consequently marks will not be given to well styled code that is not functional.

Functionality Marking

The number of functionality marks given will be

· Unit Tests passed

FT= 45

Total number of Unit Tests

Conformance

Conformance is marked starting with a mark of 5.

Every single occurrence of a conformance violation in your solution then results in a 1 mark de- duction, down to a minimum of 0. Note that multiple conformance violations of the same type will each result in a 1 mark deduction.

Conformance violations include (but are not limited to):

Placing files in incorrect directories.

Incorrect package declarations at the top of files.

Using modifiers on classes, methods and member variables that are different to those specified in the Javadoc. Modifiers include private, protected, public, abstract, final, and static. For example, declaring a method as public when it should be private.

Adding extra public methods, constructors, member variables or classes that are not de- scribed in the Javadoc.

Incorrect parameters and exceptions declared as thrown for constructors.

Incorrect parameters, return type and exceptions declared as thrown for methods.

Incorrect types of public fields.

Code Style

Code Structure and Layout

The Code Structure and Layout category is marked starting with a mark of 10.

Every single occurrence of a style violation in your solution, as detected by Checkstyle using the course-provided configuration4, results in a 0.5 mark deduction, down to a minimum of 0. Note that multiple style violations of the same type will each result in a 0.5 mark deduction.

→ Note: There is a plugin available for IntelliJ which will highlight style violations in your code. Instructions for installing this plugin are available in the Java Programming Style Guide on Black- board (Learning Resources Guides). If you correctly use the plugin and follow the style require- ments, it should be relatively straightforward to get high marks for this section.

4The latest version of the course Checkstyle configuration can be found at http://csse2002.uqcloud.net/ checkstyle.xml. See the Style Guide for instructions.

Code Review

Your assignment will be style marked with respect to the course style guide, located under Learn- ing Resources → Guides. The marks are broadly divided as follows:

MetricMarks Allocated
Naming6
Commenting6
Readability3
Code Design5

Notethatstylemarkingdoesinvolvesomeaestheticjudgement(andthemarker’saestheticjudge-mentisfinal).

Note that the plugin available for IntelliJ mentioned in the Code Structure and Layout section cannot tell you whether your code violates style guidelines for this section. You will need to man- ually check your code against the style guide.

The Code Review is marked starting with a mark of 20. Penalities are then applied where appli- cable, to a minimum of 0.

MetricHow it is marked
NamingMisnamed variables e.g. → Non-meaningful or one-letter names String temp; // bad naming char a; // bad naming int myVar, var, myVariable; // all bad naming → Variable names using Hungarian notation int roomInteger; // bad naming List<Gate> shipList; // bad naming (‘ships’ is better)
CommentingJavadoc comments lacking sufficient detail e.g. → Insufficient detail or non-meaningful Javadoc comments on classes, methods, constructors or class variables, etc. Lack of inline comments, or comments not meaningful e.g. → There needs to be sufficient comments which explain your code so that someone else can readily understand what is going. Someone should not need to guess or make assumptions. → Lack of inline comments, or comments not meaningful in methods, construc- tors, variables, etc.
ReadabilityReadability issues e.g. → Class content is laid out in a way which is not straightforward to follow → Methods are laid out in Classes or Interfaces in a way which is not straight- forward to follow → Method content is laid out in a way which is not straightforward to follow → Variables are not placed in logical locations → etc.
Code DesignCode design issues e.g. → Using class member variables where local variables could be used → Duplicating sections of code instead of extracting into a private helper method → Using magic numbers without explanatory comments object.someMethod(50); // what does 50 mean? What is the unit/metric?

JUnit Test Marking

See Appendix B for more details.

The JUnit tests that you provide in CoordinateTest and UserTest will be used to test both cor- rect andincorrect implementations of the Coordinate and User classes. Marks will be awarded for test sets which distinguish between correct and incorrect implementations5. A test class which passes every implementation (or fails every implementation) will likely get a low mark. Marks will be rewarded for tests which pass or fail correctly.

There will be some limitations on your tests:

  1. If your tests take more than 10 minutes to run, or
  2. If your tests consume more memory than is reasonable or are otherwise malicious,

then your tests will be stopped and a mark of zero given. These limits are very generous (e.g. your tests should not take anywhere near 10 minutes to run).

5And get them the right way around

Electronic Marking

The electronic aspects of the marking will be carried out in a Linux environment. The environment will not be running Windows, and neither IntelliJ nor Eclipse (or any other IDE) will be involved. OpenJDK 11 will be used to compile and execute your code and tests.

It is critical that your code compiles.

If your submission does not compile, youwillreceivezerofor Functionality (FT).

Submission

How/Where to Submit

Submission is via Gradescope.

→ Instructions for submitting to Gradescope will be made available on Blackboard (under Assessment Assignment 2) within one to two weeks after the assignment specification has been released.

You will not be able to submit your assignment before then.

You must ensure that you have submitted your code to Gradescope beforethe submission deadline. Code that is submitted after the deadline will notbe marked (1 nanosecond late is still late).

You may submit your assignment to Gradescope as many times as you wish before the due date, however only your last submission made before the due date will be marked.

What to Submit

Your submission should have the following internal structure:

src/ folders (packages) and .java files for classes described in the Javadoc

test/ folders (packages) and .java files for the JUnit test classes A complete submission would look like:

src/researchsim/Launcher.java

src/researchsim/display/ScenarioCanvas.java src/researchsim/display/View.java src/researchsim/display/ViewModel.java

src/researchsim/entities/Entity.java src/researchsim/entities/Fauna.java src/researchsim/entities/Flora.java src/researchsim/entities/Size.java src/researchsim/entities/User.java

src/researchsim/logging/CollectEvent.java src/researchsim/logging/Event.java src/researchsim/logging/Logger.java src/researchsim/logging/MoveEvent.java

src/researchsim/map/Coordinate.java src/researchsim/map/Tile.java src/researchsim/map/TileType.java

src/researchsim/scenario/AnimalController.java src/researchsim/scenario/Scenario.java src/researchsim/scenario/ScenarioManager.java

src/researchsim/util/Collectable.java src/researchsim/util/Encodable.java src/researchsim/util/Movable.java src/researchsim/util/BadSaveException.java src/researchsim/util/CoordinateOutOfBoundsException.java src/researchsim/util/NoSuchEntityException.java

test/researchsim/map/CoordinateTest.java (must be test directory, not src!) test/researchsim/entities/UserTest.java (must be test directory, not src!)

Ensure that your classes and interfaces correctly declare the package they are within. For example,

User.java should declare package researchsim.entities.

Donotsubmit any other files (e.g. no .class files).

Note that CoordinateTest and UserTest will be compiled individually against a sample solution without the rest of your test files.

Provided set of unit tests

A small number of the unit tests (about 10-20%) used for assessing Functionality (FT) (not con- formance, style, or JUnit tests) will be provided in Gradescope prior to the submission deadline, which you will be able to test your submission against. In addition, a small number of the JUnit faulty solutions used for assessing JUnit will be provided in Gradescope prior to the submission deadline.

The purpose of this is to provide you with an opportunity to receive feedback on whether the basic functionality of your classes and tests is correct or not. Passing all the provided unit tests does notguarantee that you will pass all of the full set of unit tests used for functionality marking.

→ Instructions about the provided set of unit tests will be made available on Blackboard (under Assessment Assignment 2) one or two weeks after the assignment specification has been released. Instructions will not be provided before then. This will still give you over two weeks to submit and check your work before the assignment is due.

Late Submission

Assignments submitted after the submission deadline of 16:00 on 20 May 2022 (by any amount of time), will receive a mark of zero unless an extension is granted as outlined in the Electronic Course Profile — see the Electronic Course Profile for details.

Do not wait until the last minute to submit the final version of your assignment. A submission that starts before 16:00 but finishes after 16:00 will not be marked. Exceptions cannot be made for individual students, as this would not be fair to all other students.

Assignment Extensions

All requests for extensions must be made via my.UQ as outlined in section 5.3 of the respective Electronic Course Profile. Please not directly email the course coordinator seeking an extension (you will be redirected to my.UQ).

Remark Requests

To submit a remark of this assignment please follow the information presented here: https://my.uq.edu.au/information-and-services/manage-my-program/exams-and-assessment/ querying-result.

Revisions

If it becomes necessary to correct or clarify the task sheet or Javadoc, a new version will be issued and an announcement will be made on the Blackboard course site.

Appendix A: Critical Mistakes which can cause loss in marks. Things you need to avoid!

This is being heavily emphasised here because these are critical mistakes which must be avoided.

The way assignments are marked has been heavily revised this semester to address many of these issues where possible, but there are still issues which can only be avoided by making sure the specification is followed correctly.

Code may run fine locally on your own computer in IntelliJ, but it is required that it also builds and runs correctly when it is marked with the electronic marking tool in Gradescope. Your solution needs to conform to the specification for this to occur.

Correctly reading specification requirements is a key objective for the course.

Files must be in the exact correct directories specified by the Javadoc. If files are in incorrect directories (even slightly wrong), you may lose marks for functionality in these files because the implementation does not conform to the specification.

Files must have the exact correct package declaration at the top of the file. If files have incorrect package declarations (even slightly wrong), you may lose marks for functionality in these files because the implementation does not conform to the specification.

You must implement the public and protected members exactly as described in the supplied documentation (no extra public/protected members or classes ). Creating public or protected data members in a class when it is not required will result in loss of marks, because the implementation does not conform to the specification.

– Private members may be added at your own discretion.

Never import the org.junit.jupiter.api package. This is from JUnit 5. This will auto- matically cause the marks for the JUnit section to be 0 because JUnit 5 functionality is not supported.

Do NOT use any version of Java newer than 11 when writing your solution! If you accidentally use Java features which are only present in a version newer than 11, then your submission may fail to compile when marked. This will automatically cause the marks for associated files with this functionality to be 0.

Appendix B: How your JUnit unit tests are marked.

The JUnit tests you write for a class (e.g. UserTest.java) are evaluated by checking whether they can distinguish between a correct implementation of the respective class (e.g. User.java) (made by the teaching staff), and incorrect implementations of the respective class (delib- erately made by the teaching staff).

First, we run your unit tests (e.g. UserTest.java) against the correct implementation of the respec- tive classes (e.g. User.java).

We look at how many unit tests you have, and how many have passed. Let us imagine that you have 7 unit tests in UserTest.java and 4 unit tests in CoordinateTest.java, and they all pass (i.e. none result in Assert.fail() in JUnit4).

We will then run your unit tests in both classes (UserTest.java, CoordinateTest.java) against an incorrect implementation of the respective class (e.g. User.java). For example, the canMove() method in the User.java file is incorrect.

We then look at how many of your unit tests pass.

CoordinateTest.java should still pass 4 unit tests. However, we would expect that UserTest.java would pass fewerthan7 unit tests.

If this is the case, we know that your unit tests can identify that there is a problem with this specific implementation of User.java.

This would get you one identified faulty implementation towards your JUnit mark.

The total marks you receive for JUnit are the correct number of identified faulty implementations, out of the total number of faulty implementations which the teaching staff create.

For example, if your unit tests identified 60% of the faulty implementations, you would receive a mark of 60% of 15 → 9/15.

Universal Assignment (June 22, 2025) School of ITEE CSSE2002/7023 — Semester 1, 2022. Retrieved from https://universalassignment.com/school-of-itee-csse2002-7023-semester-1-2022/.
"School of ITEE CSSE2002/7023 — Semester 1, 2022." Universal Assignment - June 22, 2025, https://universalassignment.com/school-of-itee-csse2002-7023-semester-1-2022/
Universal Assignment June 7, 2022 School of ITEE CSSE2002/7023 — Semester 1, 2022., viewed June 22, 2025,<https://universalassignment.com/school-of-itee-csse2002-7023-semester-1-2022/>
Universal Assignment - School of ITEE CSSE2002/7023 — Semester 1, 2022. [Internet]. [Accessed June 22, 2025]. Available from: https://universalassignment.com/school-of-itee-csse2002-7023-semester-1-2022/
"School of ITEE CSSE2002/7023 — Semester 1, 2022." Universal Assignment - Accessed June 22, 2025. https://universalassignment.com/school-of-itee-csse2002-7023-semester-1-2022/
"School of ITEE CSSE2002/7023 — Semester 1, 2022." Universal Assignment [Online]. Available: https://universalassignment.com/school-of-itee-csse2002-7023-semester-1-2022/. [Accessed: June 22, 2025]

Please note along with our service, we will provide you with the following deliverables:

Please do not hesitate to put forward any queries regarding the service provision.

We look forward to having you on board with us.

Most Frequent Questions & Answers

Universal Assignment Services is the best place to get help in your all kind of assignment help. We have 172+ experts available, who can help you to get HD+ grades. We also provide Free Plag report, Free Revisions,Best Price in the industry guaranteed.

We provide all kinds of assignmednt help, Report writing, Essay Writing, Dissertations, Thesis writing, Research Proposal, Research Report, Home work help, Question Answers help, Case studies, mathematical and Statistical tasks, Website development, Android application, Resume/CV writing, SOP(Statement of Purpose) Writing, Blog/Article, Poster making and so on.

We are available round the clock, 24X7, 365 days. You can appach us to our Whatsapp number +1 (613)778 8542 or email to info@universalassignment.com . We provide Free revision policy, if you need and revisions to be done on the task, we will do the same for you as soon as possible.

We provide services mainly to all major institutes and Universities in Australia, Canada, China, Malaysia, India, South Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

We provide lucrative discounts from 28% to 70% as per the wordcount, Technicality, Deadline and the number of your previous assignments done with us.

After your assignment request our team will check and update you the best suitable service for you alongwith the charges for the task. After confirmation and payment team will start the work and provide the task as per the deadline.

Yes, we will provide Plagirism free task and a free turnitin report along with the task without any extra cost.

No, if the main requirement is same, you don’t have to pay any additional amount. But it there is a additional requirement, then you have to pay the balance amount in order to get the revised solution.

The Fees are as minimum as $10 per page(1 page=250 words) and in case of a big task, we provide huge discounts.

We accept all the major Credit and Debit Cards for the payment. We do accept Paypal also.

Popular Assignments

Nursing Ethics and Law – Henry Pearson Case Study

Nursing Ethics and Law – Henry Pearson Case Study Course Code & NameNUR1103 |Context of Professional PracticeAssessment Item and NameAssessment THREE | Case StudyAssessment Item TypeEssay/ Case studyDue Date & TimeWeek 10 | 15th March 23:59 hrsLengthEssay is 1200 words + or – 10%Marks and WeightingOverall mark is out of

Read More »

NUR3397 – Complex Care Case Study Presentation

Course Code & NameNUR3397 |Complex Care AAssessment Item and NameAssessment TWO | PresentationAssessment Item TypeIndividual oral presentationDue Date & TimeWeek 10 | 22nd April 23:59 hrsResults data will be returned to you three weeks after your submission dateLength12-15 minute oral presentation recorded to ZOOM cloud + or – 10%Marks and

Read More »

AI in Recruitment: Legal and Ethical Implications for Harmony Haven

PurposeThis assessment helps you demonstrate report-writing skills essential for HR and other professional roles. It develops your research abilities, including sourcing, reviewing, and synthesizing academic and non-academic literature. Strong report-writing skills support informed business decisions, enhancing your ability to assist managers and advance your career. AI in Recruitment: Legal and

Read More »

Youth Justice Crisis: Indigenous Incarceration in Australia

issues During Impact Root  cause Youth justice crisis ongoing Disproportionate indigenous youth incarcerations reports of abuse eg Don Dale Low age of criminal responsibility (10) – Systemic racism and overpolicing – Lack of diversion and rehabilitation pathways Word: 1000 Topic selected: Youth Justic Crisis, Assessment 1: Conflict Analysis Exercise –

Read More »

PV System Design and Energy Analysis for Residential Use

Executive Summary Provide a brief summary of the key methods and key results, max 500 words. 1.         Introduction (aims and objectives and brief description of the system studied and methods of the next sections) approximately half a page 2.         Solar irradiation analysis Provide location and data used. Provide hourly GHI,

Read More »

Assignment 3: Statistical Analysis and Recommendations for Enhancing HDI

Student Name:               Your full name Student ID:                     Your Student ID Make sure to delete the instructions!! Introduction: Include a succinct introduction at the start of your report. You may write a few sentences about purpose of this report, the type of analysis, or any other relevant information (about 50 words).

Read More »

Brian Old Age Case study Assignment

Assessment 1 – Written AssessmentAssessment TypePurposeDescriptionWritten AssignmentThe purpose of this assessment is to broaden each student’s understanding of the modulecontent using a case study and assessment toolsCase Study: Brian is an 84-year-old retired farmer in a rural area in Northern Territory. Hewas recently assessed following a minor motor vehicle accident

Read More »

Assessment name: Portfolio of planning cycle

Assessment name: Portfolio of planning cycleDue Date: Friday 13 June 11:59pmWeighting: 50%Length: 2000 wordsTask Description: This Portfolio is comprised of two tasks. You must submit your assessment as onedocument. Task 1: Anecdotal record and learning experienceAnecdotal recordView the video of pre-schoolers provided under the link “Video for Assessment 2” andcomplete

Read More »

NUR5327 Assessment 3 Assignment Help

Name NUR5327 Assessment 3 (Essay)Purpose The purpose of this assessment is to demonstrate your understanding of therolesof leadership and management in healthcare by identifying and analysinga change you have actively participated in, and how it relates to key topicssuch as interprofessional communication, evidence-based practice, and staffdevelopment.LearningOutcomes NUR5327 Assessment 3 Assignment

Read More »

Mathematics Investigation and Reflection Assignment Help

Submission: Mathematics Investigation and Reflection Assignment Help TurnitinFormat:Individual written document.Uses the current APA referencing style correctly.Length:2,000 wordsThreshold Detail:For this assessment task you must obtain at least 50% of the overall result (i.e. 25 points). If the total result for this unit is at least 50 points but you scored less

Read More »

FASS Research Proposal Template Assignment

FASS Research Proposal Template Word length2000 to 3000 wordsTitleUse a concise and descriptive title that accurately reflects the content of the proposal.Background context and significanceThis section should explain the background and context of the proposed research work,indicating the main contribution to knowledge you wish to make.Aims and objectivesInclude a clear

Read More »

Evidence to Inform Nursing Practice Assignment Help

Unit Code:   NURS12165 Unit Title:    Evidence to Inform Nursing Practice Assessment Three Type:                               Written Assessment Due date:                         Week 11: Wednesday, 28 May 2025 at 1600 (AEST) Extensions:                     Available as per policy Return date:                    Results for this assessment will be made available on Wednesday, 18 June 2025 Weighting:                       50% Length:                           

Read More »

NUR1120 | Burden of Disease and Health Equity

Assessment Item Task SheetCourse code andnameNUR1120 | Burden of Disease and Health Equity Assessment itemand nameAssessment Three | ReportDue date and time Week 11 | 22/04/2025 at 2359 hours AESTLength 1400 words (+/- 10% in each section) – includes in-text references, but not reference list.Marks out of:Weighting:80 Marks50%Assessed CourseLearning Outcomes(CLO)CLO1,

Read More »

PSY1040 Portfolio: Cultural Responsiveness & Self-Awareness

Course Code and NamePSY1040: An Introduction to Cultural Safety in PracticeAssessment Item Number and NameAssessment 2: PortfolioAssessment Item TypePortfolio PSY1040 Portfolio: Cultural Responsiveness & Self-AwarenessDue Date & TimeTuesday, 29 April 2025 (Week 12), 11:59pmLength2000 words – an average of 400 words per task.Marks and WeightingMarked out of: 100Weighting: 50%Assessed Course

Read More »

Innovative Digital App Development Report

OVERALL DESCRIPTION OF TYPE OF ASSIGNMENT Assessment 1- Type of Assignment Individual Written Report Details Individual Written Report 3,000 words (500 words of the Report is Contextualisation) Weighting of Assessment : 70% INDIVIDUAL MARK Learning outcomes assessed by Assessment: 1, 2, 3 and 4 – See Module Listings of Learning

Read More »

Tourism Trends and Investment Decisions: A Comparative Study

Assignment TaskYou are a strategist working for a major hospitality group based in Australia. The company is planninginternational expansion, and the board has asked you to compile a report to identify the most suitablelocation for the project. The board has shortlisted two international locations (which will be allocatedto you by

Read More »

EC502 Language and Literacy in the Early Years

EC502 Language and Literacy in the Early Years Unit Code/Description EC502 Language and Literacy in the Early Years Course/Subject Bachelor of Early Childhood Education Semester March 2025 Assessment Overview   Unit Learning Outcomes Addressed 1, 2, 3 Assessment Objective Assessment 1: Poster Including an Invigilated stage in Week 3. Due

Read More »

EC501 Early Childhood Learning and Development

Unit Code/Description EC501 Early Childhood Learning and Development Course/Subject Graduate Diploma in Education (early childhood) Semester S 1, 2025 Assessment Overview   Unit Learning Outcomes Addressed 1, 2, 3 Assessment Objective In this assessment, student are required to select one of the case studies provided and critically analyze the child’s

Read More »

JSB172: Professional Academic Skills

JSB172: Professional Academic SkillsAssessment: Workplace Report and Presentation Weight: 50%Due date: Friday 30th May 11:59pm Length: 1,750 words (+/- 10 %) / 5minutesPurpose/Learning Objectives:This assessment relates to Learning Outcomes 1, 2, 3, and 4: Task:Your task is to write a Workplace Report identifying how to address the topic/issue chosen or

Read More »

2015PSY Developmental Psychology Assignment

2015PSY Developmental Psychology Assignment 2025 2015PSY Developmental Psychology Assignment Assignment MaterialsAssignment Information Sheet & Marking Criteria.pdf (this document)Assignment Template.docx (template)Example Assignment.pdf (HD exemplar)Due Date: Friday 16 May, 11:59PM (Week 10)Weighting: Marked out of 100 (worth 30% of course grade)Word Count: 1,500 words maximum(inclusive of main text, headings, in-text citations; excluding

Read More »

Principles of Economics Federal Budget

Principles of Economics Short-answer Assignment V1 (20% of final mark) The assignment consists of four questions.  You should allocate at least half a page (or 250 words) to each answer or 1000 words for all four answers depending on the nature of and/or marks allocated for the question/s. You may

Read More »

LML6003 – AUSTRALIA’S VISA SYSTEM 1 (FAMILY AND OTHERVISAS)

Graduate Diploma in Migration Law LML6003 – AUSTRALIA’S VISA SYSTEM 1 (FAMILY AND OTHER VISAS) Assessment Task 2 – Semester 1, 2025 LML6003 – AUSTRALIA’S VISA SYSTEM 1 (FAMILY AND OTHERVISAS) Instructions: 1. Students must answer all questions as indicated. Make certain all answers are clearly labelled. 2. Make certain

Read More »

Construction Cadetships in the Australian Construction Industry

REPORT TOPICPrepare an Academic Report on the following:‘Construction Cadetships in the Australian Construction Industry’.The report should encompass the following: Your personal evaluation and critique of the key findings in your report including your evaluation of construction cadetships, yourfindings in relation to potential issues/problems with cadetships and your recommendations to improve

Read More »

Assessing Corporate Governance and its Significance

Assessing Corporate Governance and its Significance: A Case Study Analysis Overview: Accounting irregularities have cost investors millions of dollars and, most importantly, adversely impacted their confidence in the financial system. While there have been remarkable improvements in regulatory supervision, auditing framework and reporting transparency, young graduates must assess major corporate

Read More »

Master of Professional Accounting and Accounting Advanced

Assessment 2 – Business Case (CVP) AnalysisUnit Code/Description ACC901 Accounting for Managerial DecisionsCourse/Subject Master of Professional Accounting and Master of Professional Accounting AdvancedSemester S1 2025 Assessment Overview Unit Learning OutcomesAddressed1,2,3,4 and 5Assessment Objective The primary objective of this assessment is to assess the students’ ability to apply CVPanalysis and relevant

Read More »

Urban Design Theory Essay writing

Essays are a major form of assessment at university. Through essays, you develop your understanding of discipline-specific content, strengthen your critical thinking, and develop your ability to translate that thinking into a persuasive written form. This assignment assesses your understanding of the following Unit Learning Outcomes: 1) understand the historic

Read More »

Statutory Interpretation of Disability Discrimination in NSW Law

Foundations of Law 70102 – Assessment Task 3 – Autumn 2025Statutory Interpretation and Research ExerciseDue: Thursday 22 May 2025 by 23.59Length: 2000 words (excluding the headings Part A, Part B and Part C, footnotes andbibliography. Any additional headings that you decide to use will be included in the wordcount)Weighting: 40%Task

Read More »

Can't Find Your Assignment?