Assignment 2: Quality Improvement Project Proposal

Assignment 2: Quality Improvement Project Proposal

Weighting: 40%

Assessment: Group work

Time allocation: 5-minute presentation  ( For the question that I highlighted with the yellow highlighter)

Instructions:

The Task: Quality Improvement Project Proposal Presentation

Drawing on the Assessment 1 (Literature Review), the reading materials provided in this Unit, and other relevant evidence, develop a project proposal to prevent or minimise the nursing clinical quality and Medication Safety  you have identified in Assessment 1.

Your group is required to provide a project proposal, including an implementation and evaluation strategy for determining the success of your planned approach/intervention. You will take on the perspective that you are presenting your project proposal to the health service senior managers and quality team, therefore need to provide a persuasive and evidence-based presentation to ensure your project is accepted.

Medication Error induced by stress

This is the identify issues my group are doing.

Requirements

  • Project groups will be allocated in the first tutorial.
  • Your group will present your project proposal during the Week 6 tutorial.
  • Your presentation is required for online submission via Canvas on the day of your presentation to assist marking of references
  • Follow the instructions and marking rubric.
  • All students must present in the tutorial.

Once you have been allocated to your group, a communication strategy will need to be developed. For example, how will you all communicate with each other. Please see attached sheet to confirm contribution to the presentation. You will use your findings from assessment 1, literature review to inform your project proposal in assessment 2.

Structure your project proposal presentation as follows:

  • Title page (Assessment name, student IDs)
  • Introduction:
    • Include a statement of the nursing clinical quality and safety issue (as per Assessment 1)
    • Your nominated approach/intervention that addresses the quality and safety issue
    • Aim – a statement of what you expect to achieve
    • The related National Safety and Quality Health Service Standard (2nd Edition) you are addressing.
  • The rationale, to support your choice of approach/intervention that addresses the quality and safety issue  ( My part is ward)
  • Quality improvement approach/intervention using the Plan, Do Study, Act cycle to guide the implementation strategy  ( one this part I only need like 2 minutes presentation not need  that much info)
  • Facilitators and barriers to the quality improvement implementation strategy ( medication error medications)
  • Evaluation methods to assess quality improvement processes and outcomes related to the approach/intervention
  • Conclusion
  • APA 7th Edition style for reference list and citations in your presentation.

TIP: You need to discuss relevant clinical governance strategies and appropriate action plan that could potentially mitigate the nursing clinical risk from occurring in future. It is vital that you review your clinical governance principles and integrate this in your discussion. You also need to discuss how you are going to measure your interventions, its effectiveness and the processes you will likely undertake if these interventions were ineffective. The PDSA cycle is a good place to start, providing a straightforward framework.

Presentation Guidelines

  • Introduce each member of the team and their role.
  • You can use your notes however, you need to maintain eye-contact with the audience.
  • All members of the group need to actively participate in the creation of and delivery of the presentation.
  • Submit a signed declaration that identifies each team member’s contribution to the development of the presentation: Group Project Plan.docx  download  .
  • You will need to submit the following elements via upload to Canvas: Assessment Coversheet.pdf  downloadand presentation.

Rubric

Oral poster Rubric

Oral poster Rubric
CriteriaRatingsPts
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: Title page;
Succinct summary from literature review
Identified your nominated nursing clinical issue.
The introduction engages the audience, creates interest and provides clear direction.
10 to >8.0 Pts High Distinction All elements of this criterion met with a very high standard. Occasional minor errors/gaps. 8 to >7.0 Pts Distinction All elements of this criterion met with a strong grasp of the subject matter. Several minor knowledge errors /gap. 7 to >5.0 Pts Credit Most elements of this criterion met competently but has many minor knowledge errors /gaps or one significant gap or error. 5 to >4.0 Pts Pass Meets most elements of the criterion but has more than one significant knowledge error/gaps. 4 to >0 Pts Fail Does not meet criterion.10 pts
RATIONALE Justified an approach/intervention that would minimise the risk of your nominated nursing clinical issue.
Is linked to the literature review (assessment 1)
20 to >16.0 Pts High Distinction All elements of this criterion met with a very high standard. Occasional minor errors/gaps. 16 to >14.0 Pts Distinction All elements of this criterion met with a strong grasp of the subject matter. Several minor knowledge errors /gap. 14 to >12.0 Pts Credit Most elements of this criterion met competently but has many minor knowledge errors /gaps or one significant gap or error. 12 to >10.0 Pts Pass Meets most elements of the criterion but has more than one significant knowledge error/gaps. 10 to >0 Pts Fail Does not meet criterion.20 pts
IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY The strategies required to implement the approach/intervention into practice are identified using the Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA) cycle.30 to >24.0 Pts High Distinction All elements of this criterion met with a very high standard. Occasional minor errors/gaps. 24 to >21.0 Pts Distinction All elements of this criterion met with a strong grasp of the subject matter. Several minor knowledge errors /gap. 21 to >18.0 Pts Credit Most elements of this criterion met competently but has many minor knowledge errors /gaps or one significant gap or error. 18 to >15.0 Pts Pass Meets most elements of the criterion but has more than one significant knowledge error/gaps. 15 to >0 Pts Fail Does not meet criterion.30 pts
FACILITATORS AND BARRIERS The facilitators and barriers for the quality improvement implementation strategy are identified.10 to >8.0 Pts High Distinction All elements of this criterion met with a very high standard. Occasional minor errors/gaps. 8 to >7.0 Pts Distinction All elements of this criterion met with a strong grasp of the subject matter. Several minor knowledge errors /gap. 7 to >6.0 Pts Credit Most elements of this criterion met competently but has many minor knowledge errors /gaps or one significant gap or error. 6 to >5.0 Pts Pass Meets most elements of the criterion but has more than one significant knowledge error/gaps. 5 to >0 Pts Fail Does not meet criterion.10 pts
EVALUATION Identified how you would assess quality improvement processes and outcomes related to the approach/intervention10 to >8.0 Pts High Distinction All elements of this criterion met with a very high standard. Occasional minor errors/gaps. 8 to >7.0 Pts Distinction All elements of this criterion met with a strong grasp of the subject matter. Several minor knowledge errors /gap. 7 to >6.0 Pts Credit Most elements of this criterion met competently but has many minor knowledge errors /gaps or one significant gap or error. 6 to >5.0 Pts Pass Meets most elements of the criterion but has more than one significant knowledge error/gaps. 5 to >0 Pts Fail Does not meet criterion.10 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeCONCLUSION A summary of key points is provided10 to >8.0 Pts High Distinction All elements of this criterion met with a very high standard. Occasional minor errors/gaps. 8 to >7.0 Pts Distinction All elements of this criterion met with a strong grasp of the subject matter. Several minor knowledge errors /gap. 7 to >6.0 Pts Credit Most elements of this criterion met competently but has many minor knowledge errors /gaps or one significant gap or error. 6 to >5.0 Pts Pass Meets most elements of the criterion but has more than one significant knowledge error/gaps. 5 to >0 Pts Fail Does not meet criterion.10 pts
PRESENTATION REQUIREMENTS Provides a persuasive presentation
Has a Logical flow 
Viewable presentation
Time limits adhered to
Grammar, spelling & expression are clear
References provided in 7th APA
10 to >8.0 Pts High Distinction All elements of this criterion met with a very high standard. Occasional minor errors/gaps. 8 to >7.0 Pts Distinction All elements of this criterion met with a strong grasp of the subject matter. Several minor knowledge errors /gap. 7 to >6.0 Pts Credit Most elements of this criterion met competently but has many minor knowledge errors /gaps or one significant gap or error. 6 to >5.0 Pts Pass Meets most elements of the criterion but has more than one significant knowledge error/gaps. 5 to >0 Pts Fail Does not meet criterion.10 pts
Total points: 100
Order Now
No Fields Found.
Universal Assignment (May 22, 2025) Assignment 2: Quality Improvement Project Proposal. Retrieved from https://universalassignment.com/assignment-2-quality-improvement-project-proposal/.
"Assignment 2: Quality Improvement Project Proposal." Universal Assignment - May 22, 2025, https://universalassignment.com/assignment-2-quality-improvement-project-proposal/
Universal Assignment July 6, 2022 Assignment 2: Quality Improvement Project Proposal., viewed May 22, 2025,<https://universalassignment.com/assignment-2-quality-improvement-project-proposal/>
Universal Assignment - Assignment 2: Quality Improvement Project Proposal. [Internet]. [Accessed May 22, 2025]. Available from: https://universalassignment.com/assignment-2-quality-improvement-project-proposal/
"Assignment 2: Quality Improvement Project Proposal." Universal Assignment - Accessed May 22, 2025. https://universalassignment.com/assignment-2-quality-improvement-project-proposal/
"Assignment 2: Quality Improvement Project Proposal." Universal Assignment [Online]. Available: https://universalassignment.com/assignment-2-quality-improvement-project-proposal/. [Accessed: May 22, 2025]

Please note along with our service, we will provide you with the following deliverables:

Please do not hesitate to put forward any queries regarding the service provision.

We look forward to having you on board with us.

Most Frequent Questions & Answers

Universal Assignment Services is the best place to get help in your all kind of assignment help. We have 172+ experts available, who can help you to get HD+ grades. We also provide Free Plag report, Free Revisions,Best Price in the industry guaranteed.

We provide all kinds of assignmednt help, Report writing, Essay Writing, Dissertations, Thesis writing, Research Proposal, Research Report, Home work help, Question Answers help, Case studies, mathematical and Statistical tasks, Website development, Android application, Resume/CV writing, SOP(Statement of Purpose) Writing, Blog/Article, Poster making and so on.

We are available round the clock, 24X7, 365 days. You can appach us to our Whatsapp number +1 (613)778 8542 or email to info@universalassignment.com . We provide Free revision policy, if you need and revisions to be done on the task, we will do the same for you as soon as possible.

We provide services mainly to all major institutes and Universities in Australia, Canada, China, Malaysia, India, South Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

We provide lucrative discounts from 28% to 70% as per the wordcount, Technicality, Deadline and the number of your previous assignments done with us.

After your assignment request our team will check and update you the best suitable service for you alongwith the charges for the task. After confirmation and payment team will start the work and provide the task as per the deadline.

Yes, we will provide Plagirism free task and a free turnitin report along with the task without any extra cost.

No, if the main requirement is same, you don’t have to pay any additional amount. But it there is a additional requirement, then you have to pay the balance amount in order to get the revised solution.

The Fees are as minimum as $10 per page(1 page=250 words) and in case of a big task, we provide huge discounts.

We accept all the major Credit and Debit Cards for the payment. We do accept Paypal also.

Popular Assignments

Assessment Task 1– SQL Report – Individual Assessment

MIS202 –Managing Data and Information – Trimester 1 2025Assessment Task 1– SQL Report – Individual AssessmentDUE DATE: Friday, 4 April, by 8:00pm (Melbourne time)PERCENTAGE OF FINAL GRADE: 30%WORD COUNT: Maximum 2000 wordsDescriptionPurposeThis task provides you with opportunities to learn the knowledge (GLO1 & ULO1) and skills (GLO 3 & ULO2;GLO4

Read More »

Assessment Category Infographic

Assessment # Title Assessment 1Assessment Category InfographicWeight 50%Length / Duration 500 words (excluding reference list)Individual / Group IndividualLearning OutcomesThis assessment evaluates your achievement of the following Unit Learning Outcomes:

Read More »

STM1001: Assignment 3 for Science/Health Stream Students

STM1001: Assignment 3 Science/Health Stream Students Only Academic Integrity Information In submitting your work, you are consenting that it may be copied and transmitted by the University for the detection of plagiarism. If you are unsure of your academic integrity responsibilities, please check the information provided in the Assessment Overview

Read More »

ACCG1000 Accounting for Decision Making Xero Assignment

1ACCG1000Accounting for Decision MakingXero AssignmentInformation packSession 2 2024Due Date: Friday 18th October 2024 at 11.55pm2Xero AssignmentIntroductionThe Xero assignment is designed to provide introductory accounting students with an overview of the Xero Accounting Software by completing a one-month accounting cycle for a fictional business. This is an online assignment worth 20%

Read More »

WRIT1001 Assessment Notification 2

6Final Essay: Rhetorical analysisDue: Friday 18 October 2024 at 23:59 (Sydney time)Length: 1500 words, worth 40% of the overall grade for the unitSubmit: as a Word document or PDF, via Canvas AssignmentMain question:● Present a scholarly essay that analyses the rhetoric used in arguments about thecontentious topic you have been

Read More »

WRIT1000 Assessment Four

Title: Self-ReflectionDue: Friday October 18 by 11:59PM.Length: 500 words (+/- 10%)Weight: 10% of the total gradeFormat: Times New Roman, double-spaced, 12pt. Your project should have the title“WRIT1000 Assessment Four – Self Reflection for xxxxxxx” where “xxxxxxxx” is yourstudent number. Please only submit Word documents (.doc or .docx). Turnitin doesnot recognise

Read More »

Written Assessment – Psychosocial Research Perspectives

Written Assessment – Psychosocial Research Perspectives TRIGGER WARNING: This is a case study of a real person. Katherine Knight was the first woman in Australia to receive a life sentence without parole after she decapitated and cooked her lover. If you think that you will have problems reading about this

Read More »

RES800 Assessment 1 – Research Question and Literature Review

Subject Title Business Research Subject Code RES800 Assessment Title Assessment 1 – Research Question and Literature Review Learning Outcome/s     Utilise critical thinking to analyse managerial problems and formulate relevant research questions and a research design   Apply research theories and methodologies to assist in developing a business research

Read More »

Assessment Task 2 Health advocacy and communication plan

Assessment Task 2 Health advocacy and communication plan Rationale and multimedia plan presentation Submission requirements Due date and time:         Rationale: 8pm AEST Monday 23 September 2024 (Week 11) Multimedia plan presentation: 8pm AEST Monday 30 September 2024 (Study Period) % of final grade:         50% of overall grade Word limit: Time

Read More »

MLI500 Leadership and innovation Assessment 1

Subject Title Leadership and innovation Subject Code MLI500 Assessment Assessment 1: Leadership development plan Individual/Group Individual Length 1500 words Learning Outcomes LO1 Examine the role of leaders in fostering creativity and innovation LO5 Reflect on and take responsibility for their own learning and leadership development processes Submission   Weighting 30%

Read More »

FPC006 Taxation for Financial Planning

Assignment 2 Instructions Assignment marks: 95 | Referencing and presentation: 5 Total marks: 100 Total word limit: 3,000 words Weighting: 40% Download and use the Assignment 2 Answer Template provided in KapLearn to complete your assignment. Your assignment should be loaded into KapLearn by 11.30 pm AEST/AEDT on the wdue

Read More »

TCHR5001 Assessment Brief 1

TCHR5001 Assessment Brief 1 Assessment Details Item Assessment 1: Pitch your pedagogy Type Digital Presentation (Recorded) Due Monday, 16th September 2024, 11:59 pm AEST (start of Week 4) Group type Individual Length 10 minutes (equivalent to 1500 words) Weight 50% Gen AI use Permitted, restrictions apply Aligned ULOS ULO1, ULO2,

Read More »

HSH725 Assessment Task 2

turquoise By changing the Heading 3 above with the following teal, turquoise, orange or pink you can change the colour theme of your CloudFirst CloudDeakin template page. When this page is published the Heading 3 above will be removed, but it will still be here in edit mode if you wish to change the colour theme.

Read More »

Evidence in Health Assessment 2: Evidence Selection

Evidence in Health Assessment 2: Evidence Selection Student name:                                                                    Student ID: Section 1: PICO and search strategy Evidence Question: Insert evidence question from chosen scenario here including all key PICO terms.       PICO Search Terms                                                                                                                                                                                                          Complete the following table.   Subject headings Keywords Synonyms Population  

Read More »

Assessment 1 – Lesson Plan and annotation

ASSESSMENT TASK INFORMATION: XNB390 Assessment 1 – Lesson Plan and annotation This document provides you with information about the requirements for your assessment. Detailed instructions and resources are included for completing the task. The Criterion Reference Assessment (CRA) Marking Matrix that XNB390 markers will use to grade the assessment task

Read More »

XNB390 Task 1 – Professional Lesson Plan

XNB390 Template for Task 1 – Professional Lesson Plan CONTEXT FOR LESSON: SOCIAL JUSTICE CONSIDERATIONS: Equity Diversity Supportive Environment UNIT TITLE:    TERM WEEK DAY TIME 1   5           YEAR/CLASS STUDENT NUMBERS/CONTEXT LOCATION LESSON DURATION         28 Children (chl): 16 boys; 12

Read More »

A2 Critical Review Assignment

YouthSolutions Summary The summary should summarise the key points of the critical review. It should state the aims/purpose of the program and give an overview of the program or strategy you have chosen. This should be 200 words – included in the word count. Critical analysis and evaluation Your critical

Read More »

PUN364 – Workplace activity Assignment

Assessment 1 – DetailsOverviewFor those of you attending the on-campus workshop, you will prepare a report on the simulated simulated inspection below. For those of you who are not attending, you will be required to carry out your own food business inspection under the supervision of a suitably qualified Environmental

Read More »

FPC006 Taxation for Financial Planning

Assignment 1 Instructions Assignment marks: 95 | Referencing and presentation: 5 Total marks: 100 Total word limit: 3,600 words Weighting: 40% Download and use the Assignment 1 Answer Template provided in KapLearn to complete your assignment. Your assignment should be loaded into KapLearn by 11.30 pm AEST/AEDT on the due

Read More »

Mental health Nursing assignment

Due Aug 31 This is based on a Mental health Nursing assignment Used Microsoft word The family genogram is a useful tool for the assessment of individuals, couples, and families.  It can yield significant data and lead to important, new patient understandings and insights as multigenerational patterns take shape and

Read More »

Assessment 2: Research and Policy Review

Length: 2000 words +/- 10% (excluding references)For this assessment, you must choose eight sources (academic readings and policy documents) as the basis of your Research and Policy Review. You must choose your set of sources from the ‘REFERENCES MENU’ on the moodle site, noting the minimum number of sources required

Read More »

HSN702 – Lifespan Nutrition

Assessment Task: 2 Assignment title: Population Nutrition Report and Reflection Assignment task type: Written report, reflection, and short oral presentation Task details The primary focus of this assignment is on population nutrition. Nutritionists play an important role in promoting population health through optimal nutritional intake. You will be asked to

Read More »

Written Assessment 1: Case Study

Billy a 32-year-old male was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with a suspected overdose of tricyclic antidepressants. He is obese (weight 160kg, height 172cm) and has a history of depression and chronic back pain for which he takes oxycodone. On admission to the emergency department, Paramedics were maintaining

Read More »

Assessment Task 8 – Plan and prepare to assess competence

Assessment Task 8 – Plan and prepare to assess competence Assessment Task 8 consists of the following sections: Section 1:      Short answer questions Section 2:      Analyse an assessment tool Section 3:      Determine reasonable adjustment and customisation of assessment process Section 4:      Develop an assessment plan Student Instructions To complete this

Read More »

Nutrition Reviews Assignment 2 – Part A and Part B

This assignment provides you with the opportunity to determine an important research question that is crucial to address based on your reading of one of the two systematic reviews below (Part A). You will then develop a research proposal outlining the study design and methodology needed to answer that question

Read More »

NUR332 – TASK 3 – WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT

NUR332 – TASK 3 – WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT for S2 2024. DESCRIPTION (For this Task 3, the word ‘Indigenous Australians’, refers to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples of Australia) NUR332 Task 3 – Written Assignment – Due – WEEK 12 – via CANVAS on Wednesday, Midday (1200hrs) 16/10/2024. The

Read More »

NUR100 Task 3 – Case study

NUR100 Task 3 – Case study To identify a key child health issue and discuss this issue in the Australian context. You will demonstrate understanding of contemporary families in Australia. You will discuss the role of the family and reflect on how the family can influence the overall health outcomes

Read More »

Can't Find Your Assignment?