CYBERCRIME FORENSIC ANALYSIS – COCS71193

CYBERCRIME FORENSIC ANALYSIS – COCS71193

CYBERCRIME FORENSIC ANALYSIS – COCS71193

Assignment Specification Weighted at 100% of the module mark.

Learning Outcomes being assessed by this portfolio.

  • Critical understanding of the techniques and procedures used to identify, collect, and analyse digital evidence of computer crime.
  • Critically evaluate methods of evidence handling where digital evidence could be overlooked or misinterpreted.
  • The use of digital forensics tools in digital forensic analysis.

Submission Deadline:

Monday 6th May 2024, 1600Hrs.

Requirements & Marking Scheme

General Guidelines:

This is an individual assessment comprised of four parts and is weighted at 100% of the module mark. All Parts A, B, C and D are equally weighted at 25% of the overall module mark. Part A will assess your understanding of Windows File Systems and how they can be abused by perpetrators. Part B will assess your understanding of Digital Forensic Investigations through evidence collection and preservation. Part C will assess your understanding of Threat and Malware Analysis. Finally, Part D will assess your practical understanding of the digital forensic investigation tools.

You are expected to approach all parts of this assignment as small but comprehensive academic reports. Please DO NOT go more or less than 10% of the recommended word limit.

As such the following report structure is expected:

  1. Introduction, where you will discuss your plan for solving the problem introduced by the instructors.
  2. Main Body, where you will develop your arguments.
  3. Conclusions, where you will critically discuss your findings.
  4. References (At least 25 peer reviewed references in total)
  5. Appendixes (if needed)

You are expected to demonstrate an insight into the implications of the problem introduced in each task by using clear and concise arguments. The report should be well written (and word-processed), showing good skills in creativity and design. Sentences should be of an appropriate length and the writing style should be brief but informative. The report should have a consistent layout and be divided into enumerated sections, sub- sections, sub-sub sections, etc. For the references and bibliography, you are expected to use appropriate peer reviewed sources for developing your arguments, and an appropriate referencing style as per the University regulations.

A digital copy of the report should be submitted using blackboard/Turnitin (email submission will not be accepted), more instructions will be given for this by your instructor(s).

The deadline for this assignment is Monday 6th May 2024 (16:00, hard deadline).

Presentation of the Assignment Report

It is your responsibility to ensure that your work is neatly and accurately presented. The work must be:

  • Word processed.
    • Title Page, table of contents, table of figures, list of tables, etc.
    • 1.5 line spaced.
    • 2.5cm borders around the page (If you are using MS Word, this should be automatic)
    • 12-point font in Calibri, Arial, Times New Roman or Tahoma (choose one and use it consistently throughout the report)
    • Text aligned Justified.
    • Harvard Referenced.
    • Include a word count for every part of the assignment.
    • Word count should exclude, table of contents, table of figures, list of tables, references, and appendices.

Part A – FAT32 vs NTFS

Part A is weighted at 25% of the overall module mark. It is expected that this part of the portfolio will be in the region of 750 1000 words, discussing how a perpetrator can hide data in FAT32 and NTFS file systems by abusing their ‘features’. You are expected to comment on FAT32 and NTFS slack space, alternate data streams, and file deletion.

Part B, Assessment CriteriaMarks Available
Slack Space5
File Deletion5
Alternate Data Streams10
Report Structure and Referencing5
Total25

Part B – Digital Forensic Readiness

Part B is weighted at 25% of the overall module mark. It is expected that this part of the assignment will be in the region of 750 – 1000 words, discussing computer crime in modern society and Incident Response (IR). Additionally, you are required to discuss the concept of Forensic Readiness (FR) within a Small-to-Medium Enterprise (SME), aiming to identify and prevent computer crimes.

Part B, Assessment CriteriaMarks Available
Computer Crime in modern society Discussion5
IR Discussion5
FR within SME Discussion10
Report Structure and Referencing5
Total25

Part C – Threat and Malware Analysis

Part C is weighted at 25% of the overall mark. It is expected that this part of the portfolio will be in the region of 750 – 1000 words, critically discussing the different technologies that are available to a malware analyst. Thus, this section will assess your critical understanding of the methods of malware analysis and malware analysis environments. You are expected to develop your arguments and critically compare dynamic malware analysis to static malware analysis. You should also discuss the use of an isolated physical machine to the use of a virtual machine and briefly explain which environment suits which analysis method. You are also expected to comment on the malware analysis tools used in static and dynamic analysis.

You are expected to use appropriate peer-reviewed sources for developing your arguments and an appropriate referencing style as per the University regulations.

Your report should include:

  • Discussion on malware analysis methods
    • Goals of malware analysis
    • Comparison discussion
    • Mapping to analysis environments
    • Discussion on the tools
Part C, Assessment CriteriaMarks Available
Malware Analysis Methods and Goals5
Comparison between Static and Dynamic Analysis (Include Tools Used)  12
Mapping to Analysis Environments5
Report Structure and Referencing3
Total25

Part D: Practical Digital Investigation

This section will assess your ability to analyse and present evidence in a mock courtroom environment. Part D is weighted at 25% of the overall module mark and has no word count. You will be given a raw image file (on Blackboard under the Assessment Content). You need to produce a report outlining the list of evidence identified, forensic analysis of each evidence and appropriate artefacts in order to resolve the alleged crime. This report should be included within your final portfolio report. For this part of the assignment, you are expected to use EnCase, however, you can use any of the available free/open-source digital forensics investigation tools (e.g., Autopsy – https://www.sleuthkit.org/autopsy/).

Part D, Assessment CriteriaMarks Available
Evidence Handling and Identification7
Evidence Analysis15
Report Structure3
Total25

Evidence Identification/Analysis

In your analysis you are to find the following pieces of evidence (but not limited to) and comment on:

  • Disk geometry analysis of the given exhibit (e.g., partitions present in the collected artefacts, recovery of deleted partitions etc.)
  • Time zone settings.
  • Installed Operating System.
  • Programs installed.
  • Devices and hardware volumes.
  • Steganographic Contents.
  • Encrypted Documents (PDF, text, word, etc.)
  • Binary files (executables)
  • The users’ information.
  • Emails.
  • Internet activities.
  • Cookies information.
  • File carving / recovery of deleted files.
  • When was the last recorded computer shutdown date/time?
  • Who was the last user to logon to the computer?
  • List the network cards used by this computer.
  • Find any IP address and the MAC address of the computer.

Findings/Conclusions

Your findings should be presented in a factual way and should include any relevant information that you have discovered during your investigation. You are expected to include your analysis and evaluation of the tasks in a reflective way.

Report Structure

Logical organisation of thoughts and arguments, clarity, effective presentation of deliverables, word processed report following the discussed guidelines, and appropriate style, punctuations, and spelling. The use of numbering format is highly recommended to make the presentation effective.

Best Wishes!

Marking Scheme

CriteriaFail (< 50)Reasonable (50 59)Good (6069)Excellent (>70)
      Part ANo understanding of the various data hiding techniques. No discussion of the slack space, ADSs or the various ‘deleting’ mechanisms.Clear understanding of data hiding techniques discussing file slack, disk slack, hiding executables in ADSs and other data types as well as file system deletion, directory deletion, and file deletion. May contain some errors. Some examples but very limited.A clear and useful theme is developed. Insight into implications. Clear and concise arguments that lead to appropriate conclusions and recommendations. Very good examples demonstrating all of the techniques. Contains very few errors.As before plus: Excellent understanding and exposition of data hiding issues that shows insight and draws together various investigative techniques. No errors.
      Part BSuperficial arguments. Very limited discussion of the issues presented by the assignment document.Reasonable evidence of adequate understanding of digital forensics. Appropriate discussion on computer Crimes and information security. IR and FR procedures are discussed but may contain errors.As before but correlations between crimes are clearly identified and discussed. The report demonstrates a good understanding of the processes, covering all key issues, and demonstrating a good critical understanding of the implications.High academic learning ability achieved. Exceptional quality of output demonstrating professionalism. The report can be seen as ‘best practice’ for IR and FR and it clearly argues how IR must be coupled with FR.
    Part CNo understanding of static and dynamic analysis. No insight into the analysis environment and tools used.Clear but underdeveloped arguments with inappropriate justification. Limited critical discussion of static analysis vs ‘dynamic analysis, analysis environment and tools used. Contains errors.A clear and useful theme is developed. Insight into the analysis methods and the environment. Clear comparative analysis and tools. Contains very few errors.As before but with excellent flow of ideas, with a sense of understanding containing no errors. Good report structure with relevant peer reviewed sources.
    Part DNo case and no clear evidence handling procedures. No evidence analysis. Very week report structure.Evidence    of    some                 insight                 into the investigative procedure. Very little analysis that covers only the system analysis. Some conclusions are given but contain errors. Some structure to the report is provided.Appropriate management of evidence. Report covers some of the key issues. Complete analysis of evidence that leads to findings. Contains very few errors.High academic learning ability achieved with excellent understanding of the various investigative techniques, demonstrating professionalism. Can participate in case work.
Order Now

Get expert help for CYBERCRIME FORENSIC ANALYSIS – COCS71193 and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!

Universal Assignment (November 2, 2024) CYBERCRIME FORENSIC ANALYSIS – COCS71193. Retrieved from https://universalassignment.com/cybercrime-forensic-analysis-cocs71193/.
"CYBERCRIME FORENSIC ANALYSIS – COCS71193." Universal Assignment - November 2, 2024, https://universalassignment.com/cybercrime-forensic-analysis-cocs71193/
Universal Assignment March 13, 2024 CYBERCRIME FORENSIC ANALYSIS – COCS71193., viewed November 2, 2024,<https://universalassignment.com/cybercrime-forensic-analysis-cocs71193/>
Universal Assignment - CYBERCRIME FORENSIC ANALYSIS – COCS71193. [Internet]. [Accessed November 2, 2024]. Available from: https://universalassignment.com/cybercrime-forensic-analysis-cocs71193/
"CYBERCRIME FORENSIC ANALYSIS – COCS71193." Universal Assignment - Accessed November 2, 2024. https://universalassignment.com/cybercrime-forensic-analysis-cocs71193/
"CYBERCRIME FORENSIC ANALYSIS – COCS71193." Universal Assignment [Online]. Available: https://universalassignment.com/cybercrime-forensic-analysis-cocs71193/. [Accessed: November 2, 2024]

Please note along with our service, we will provide you with the following deliverables:

Please do not hesitate to put forward any queries regarding the service provision.

We look forward to having you on board with us.

Most Frequent Questions & Answers

Universal Assignment Services is the best place to get help in your all kind of assignment help. We have 172+ experts available, who can help you to get HD+ grades. We also provide Free Plag report, Free Revisions,Best Price in the industry guaranteed.

We provide all kinds of assignmednt help, Report writing, Essay Writing, Dissertations, Thesis writing, Research Proposal, Research Report, Home work help, Question Answers help, Case studies, mathematical and Statistical tasks, Website development, Android application, Resume/CV writing, SOP(Statement of Purpose) Writing, Blog/Article, Poster making and so on.

We are available round the clock, 24X7, 365 days. You can appach us to our Whatsapp number +1 (613)778 8542 or email to info@universalassignment.com . We provide Free revision policy, if you need and revisions to be done on the task, we will do the same for you as soon as possible.

We provide services mainly to all major institutes and Universities in Australia, Canada, China, Malaysia, India, South Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

We provide lucrative discounts from 28% to 70% as per the wordcount, Technicality, Deadline and the number of your previous assignments done with us.

After your assignment request our team will check and update you the best suitable service for you alongwith the charges for the task. After confirmation and payment team will start the work and provide the task as per the deadline.

Yes, we will provide Plagirism free task and a free turnitin report along with the task without any extra cost.

No, if the main requirement is same, you don’t have to pay any additional amount. But it there is a additional requirement, then you have to pay the balance amount in order to get the revised solution.

The Fees are as minimum as $10 per page(1 page=250 words) and in case of a big task, we provide huge discounts.

We accept all the major Credit and Debit Cards for the payment. We do accept Paypal also.

Popular Assignments

ECON20001 Assignment #2

Assignment #2 Due Monday September 30th 2pm AEST The assignment is marked out of 25 points. The weight for each part is indicated following the question text. Style requirements: This assignment requires the submission of a spreadsheet. Please keep THREE decimal places in your answers and include your spreadsheet as

Read More »

RES800 Assessment 1 – Research Question and Literature Review

Subject Title Business Research Subject Code RES800 Assessment Title Assessment 1 – Research Question and Literature Review Learning Outcome/s     Utilise critical thinking to analyse managerial problems and formulate relevant research questions and a research design   Apply research theories and methodologies to assist in developing a business research

Read More »

Assessment Task 2 Health advocacy and communication plan

Assessment Task 2 Health advocacy and communication plan Rationale and multimedia plan presentation Submission requirements Due date and time:         Rationale: 8pm AEST Monday 23 September 2024 (Week 11) Multimedia plan presentation: 8pm AEST Monday 30 September 2024 (Study Period) % of final grade:         50% of overall grade Word limit: Time

Read More »

MLI500 Leadership and innovation Assessment 1

Subject Title Leadership and innovation Subject Code MLI500 Assessment Assessment 1: Leadership development plan Individual/Group Individual Length 1500 words Learning Outcomes LO1 Examine the role of leaders in fostering creativity and innovation LO5 Reflect on and take responsibility for their own learning and leadership development processes Submission   Weighting 30%

Read More »

FPC006 Taxation for Financial Planning

Assignment 2 Instructions Assignment marks: 95 | Referencing and presentation: 5 Total marks: 100 Total word limit: 3,000 words Weighting: 40% Download and use the Assignment 2 Answer Template provided in KapLearn to complete your assignment. Your assignment should be loaded into KapLearn by 11.30 pm AEST/AEDT on the wdue

Read More »

TCHR5001 Assessment Brief 1

TCHR5001 Assessment Brief 1 Assessment Details Item Assessment 1: Pitch your pedagogy Type Digital Presentation (Recorded) Due Monday, 16th September 2024, 11:59 pm AEST (start of Week 4) Group type Individual Length 10 minutes (equivalent to 1500 words) Weight 50% Gen AI use Permitted, restrictions apply Aligned ULOS ULO1, ULO2,

Read More »

HSH725 Assessment Task 2

turquoise By changing the Heading 3 above with the following teal, turquoise, orange or pink you can change the colour theme of your CloudFirst CloudDeakin template page. When this page is published the Heading 3 above will be removed, but it will still be here in edit mode if you wish to change the colour theme.

Read More »

Evidence in Health Assessment 2: Evidence Selection

Evidence in Health Assessment 2: Evidence Selection Student name:                                                                    Student ID: Section 1: PICO and search strategy Evidence Question: Insert evidence question from chosen scenario here including all key PICO terms.       PICO Search Terms                                                                                                                                                                                                          Complete the following table.   Subject headings Keywords Synonyms Population  

Read More »

Assessment 1 – Lesson Plan and annotation

ASSESSMENT TASK INFORMATION: XNB390 Assessment 1 – Lesson Plan and annotation This document provides you with information about the requirements for your assessment. Detailed instructions and resources are included for completing the task. The Criterion Reference Assessment (CRA) Marking Matrix that XNB390 markers will use to grade the assessment task

Read More »

XNB390 Task 1 – Professional Lesson Plan

XNB390 Template for Task 1 – Professional Lesson Plan CONTEXT FOR LESSON: SOCIAL JUSTICE CONSIDERATIONS: Equity Diversity Supportive Environment UNIT TITLE:    TERM WEEK DAY TIME 1   5           YEAR/CLASS STUDENT NUMBERS/CONTEXT LOCATION LESSON DURATION         28 Children (chl): 16 boys; 12

Read More »

A2 Critical Review Assignment

YouthSolutions Summary The summary should summarise the key points of the critical review. It should state the aims/purpose of the program and give an overview of the program or strategy you have chosen. This should be 200 words – included in the word count. Critical analysis and evaluation Your critical

Read More »

PUN364 – Workplace activity Assignment

Assessment 1 – DetailsOverviewFor those of you attending the on-campus workshop, you will prepare a report on the simulated simulated inspection below. For those of you who are not attending, you will be required to carry out your own food business inspection under the supervision of a suitably qualified Environmental

Read More »

FPC006 Taxation for Financial Planning

Assignment 1 Instructions Assignment marks: 95 | Referencing and presentation: 5 Total marks: 100 Total word limit: 3,600 words Weighting: 40% Download and use the Assignment 1 Answer Template provided in KapLearn to complete your assignment. Your assignment should be loaded into KapLearn by 11.30 pm AEST/AEDT on the due

Read More »

Mental health Nursing assignment

Due Aug 31 This is based on a Mental health Nursing assignment Used Microsoft word The family genogram is a useful tool for the assessment of individuals, couples, and families.  It can yield significant data and lead to important, new patient understandings and insights as multigenerational patterns take shape and

Read More »

Assessment 2: Research and Policy Review

Length: 2000 words +/- 10% (excluding references)For this assessment, you must choose eight sources (academic readings and policy documents) as the basis of your Research and Policy Review. You must choose your set of sources from the ‘REFERENCES MENU’ on the moodle site, noting the minimum number of sources required

Read More »

HSN702 – Lifespan Nutrition

Assessment Task: 2 Assignment title: Population Nutrition Report and Reflection Assignment task type: Written report, reflection, and short oral presentation Task details The primary focus of this assignment is on population nutrition. Nutritionists play an important role in promoting population health through optimal nutritional intake. You will be asked to

Read More »

Written Assessment 1: Case Study

Billy a 32-year-old male was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with a suspected overdose of tricyclic antidepressants. He is obese (weight 160kg, height 172cm) and has a history of depression and chronic back pain for which he takes oxycodone. On admission to the emergency department, Paramedics were maintaining

Read More »

Assessment Task 8 – Plan and prepare to assess competence

Assessment Task 8 – Plan and prepare to assess competence Assessment Task 8 consists of the following sections: Section 1:      Short answer questions Section 2:      Analyse an assessment tool Section 3:      Determine reasonable adjustment and customisation of assessment process Section 4:      Develop an assessment plan Student Instructions To complete this

Read More »

Nutrition Reviews Assignment 2 – Part A and Part B

This assignment provides you with the opportunity to determine an important research question that is crucial to address based on your reading of one of the two systematic reviews below (Part A). You will then develop a research proposal outlining the study design and methodology needed to answer that question

Read More »

NUR332 – TASK 3 – WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT

NUR332 – TASK 3 – WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT for S2 2024. DESCRIPTION (For this Task 3, the word ‘Indigenous Australians’, refers to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples of Australia) NUR332 Task 3 – Written Assignment – Due – WEEK 12 – via CANVAS on Wednesday, Midday (1200hrs) 16/10/2024. The

Read More »

NUR100 Task 3 – Case study

NUR100 Task 3 – Case study To identify a key child health issue and discuss this issue in the Australian context. You will demonstrate understanding of contemporary families in Australia. You will discuss the role of the family and reflect on how the family can influence the overall health outcomes

Read More »

NUR 100 Task 2 Health Promotion Poster

NUR 100 Task 2 Health Promotion Poster The weighting for this assessment is 40%. Task instructions You are not permitted to use generative AI tools in this task. Use of AI in this task constitutes student misconduct and is considered contract cheating. This assessment requires you to develop scholarship and

Read More »

BMS 291 Pathophysiology and Pharmacology CASE STUDY

BMS 291 Pathophysiology and Pharmacology CASE STUDY Assessment No: 1 Weighting: 40% Due date Part A: midnight Friday 2nd August 2024 Due date Part B: midnight Sunday 29th September 2024 General information In this assessment, you will develop your skills for analysing, integrating and presenting information for effective evidence-based communication.

Read More »

Assessment Task: Health service delivery

Assessment Task Health service delivery is inherently unpredictable. This unpredictability can arise from, for example, the assortment of patient presentations, environmental factors, changing technologies, shifts in health policy and changes in division leadership. It can also arise from changes in policy within an organisation and/or associated health services that impact

Read More »

LNDN08002 Business Cultures Resit Assessment

LNDN08002 Business Cultures Resit Assessment Briefing 2023–2024 (Resit for Term 1) Contents Before starting this resit, please: 1 Assessment Element 1: Individual Report 1 Case Report Marking Criteria. 3 Assessment Element 2: Continuing Personal Development (CPD) 4 Guidance for Assessment 2: Reflection and Reflective Practice. 5 Student Marking Criteria –

Read More »

Assessment Task 2 – NAPLAN Exercise

Assessment Task 2 (35%) – Evaluation and discussion of test items Assessment Task 2 (35%) – Evaluation and discussion of test items AITSL Standards: This assessmeAITSL Standards: This assessment provides the opportunity to develop evidence that demonstrates these Standards: 1.2        Understand how students learn 1.5        Differentiate teaching to meet with

Read More »

EBY014 Degree Tutor Group 2 Assignment

  Assignment Brief Module Degree Tutor Group 2 Module Code EBY014 Programme BA (Hons) Business and Management with   Foundation Year Academic Year 2024/2025 Issue Date 6th May 2024 Semester Component Magnitude Weighting Deadline Learning outcomes assessed 2 1 2000 words Capstone Assessment 100% 26th July, 2024 1/2/3/4 Module Curriculum

Read More »

Can't Find Your Assignment?

Open chat
1
Free Assistance
Universal Assignment
Hello 👋
How can we help you?