POLS5003 National Security and Strategy Solved

What implications do horizontal nuclear proliferation and nuclear weapons modernization programs have for global strategy?

Concern over nuclear proliferation more frequently focuses on nuclear weapons spread to new nations. A single nuclear bomb will kill and ruin a city. Various nuclear blasts will destroy tens of millions of civilians across modern cities. Hundreds of millions of casualties will come from a global nuclear war between the US and Russia. Nuclear proliferation means a spread to countries other than those recognized as ‘Nuclear Weapon States’ by the Treaty on the Non-proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, widely called ‘Non-Proliferation Treaty,’ of nuclear weapons, fissionable and arms-related nuclear technologies, and intelligence. (Futter, 2021).  Many nations with and without nuclear weapons opposed proliferated, as policymakers fear that more nuclear weapons countries could increase the likelihood of nuclear warfare, destabilize foreign or regional ties, or breach the national sovereignty of nation-states (up to and including counter value targeting of nuclear-armed civilians). Nuclear proliferation, the distribution of nuclear arms, nuclear devices, or fissile material to non-EU countries. This term has also been used to refer to the potential possession by extremist or other militant forces of nuclear weapons.

Although there was less horizontal nuclear proliferation than was feared during the 1960s, it was nevertheless significant. Since the first nuclear arms were first filed and used by the U.S. in 1945, nine countries (China, France, India, Israel, North Korea, Pakistan, Russia, and the UK) produced nuclear weapons.

Nuclear weapons testing programs were launched in many other nations, including Iran, Iraq, Libya, Taiwan, South Korea, and Sweden, but they were scrapped on different lines. One (South Africa) government abolished nuclear weapons and, in the aftermath of a break-up of the Soviet Union, three countries (Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Ukraine) lost nuclear weapons remaining on its territory and returned them to Russia. Today nine countries have arsenals of nuclear missiles, and total nuclear warheads are expected to be 13,410. Russia and the United States, who together have about 6,000 nuclear warheads, control the vast majority of the arsenal. Both two arsenals are abnormally high. No other nuclear-powered state is convinced that more than a few hundred warheads are needed to prevent serious nuclear or conventional attacks. Each nuclear-armed country modernizes its and adapts its nuclear capability.

One of the main difficulties facing us as a global community is the control of the proliferation of nuclear weapons. Given that public health is what we do together to guarantee healthy living circumstances, regulating and ultimately eradicating the spread of nuclear weapons must be an important global health objective.

There are three key components of the threat posed by nuclear proliferation:

  • Develop the capacity of countries that now lack nuclear weapons to produce or acquire nuclear weapons (horizontal proliferation).
  • Increasing the arsenal of nuclear-armed countries, enhancing technological sophistication and dependability in these weapons, and developing new weapons like “mini-nukes” or nuclear weapons on the battlefield.
  • The acquisition of nuclear weapons or materials and expertise by people or non-statutory entities is frequently referred to as ‘terrorists’ (another form of horizontal proliferation).

The role of nuclear weapons in the modern world has contributed to the development of a large literature on the causes and effects of nuclear proliferation. Nuclear missiles play a major role in deterring possible opponents from attacking the USA, our allies, or our vital interests. Any objectives need nuclear weapons energy to be destroyed. But precision targeting will significantly decrease the nuclear output needed to kill those targets. The frequency, timing, length, and outcomes of wars can change, and the political influence of the state can be affected by nuclear weapons. Secondly, it is pointless whether or not states like nuclear weapons if they cannot have them. Our main point is that nuclear weapons increase the safety and diplomacy of their owners on average, through a large range of metrics and based on the tradition of true and safety-oriented approaches to nuclear proliferation and nuclear deterrence. Controlling nuclear proliferation is one of our greatest threats as a global society. That public health is “what we individually do as a company to maintain environments under which people will remain safer and monitor and effectively eliminate the spread of nuclear weapons must be a global goal for health. The distribution systems are another significant aspect of nuclear proliferation. Nations or other organizations require these weapons not only, they also need rockets or other means of supplying them to pose a nuclear danger.

Each nuclear-armed country modernizes its arsenals and adapts its nuclear capability. Cycles of nuclear modernization do not inherently inter-country overlap but rely on where and how long they last. In addition, various countries do not always have their nuclear powers in the same fashion; some tend to use completely new arms while some are focused on keeping and updating advanced ones. It is also inaccurate for us to argue that “we are behind” nuclear modernizations in other countries. As is now the case, nuclear modernization programs will become more important and useful in the signalizing and adding of increased strategic capability – additional or more warheads – to “strengthen deterrence,” as the deterioration in relations and military rivalry intensifies (Graham, & Mullins,2019).  Shortly before the present crisis, however, the Trump administration greatly expanded investment introduced new arms and adopted a more competitive and opposition approach. If nuclear disarmament is – and is – a very complex issue it is at least a threat to be addressed through human experience and wisdom. There is no need for a sea change around, for vanished rainforests or dead seas to come back to life, or for heavenly artifacts to be taken away from conflict with the Earth. It means shifting the minds of decision-makers and changing the sense of focus and what is in their overwhelming interest if long-term. In the light of fresh facts and logic, it is in the ability of intelligent human beings to change their beliefs.

On the one hand, the use of nuclear bombs is significantly different from that of anti-personnel mines and ammunition. These differences not only arise from their comparative disruptive quantities but also refer to their uses or use of their possessors’ sets, and circumstances in which speeches have been held concerning their utility, validity, and continuing presence. Nevertheless, the Ottawa and Oslo processes resulted in re-forming international speeches, which focused on the arguments about the planned uses of such arms. Although the components of the new nuclear arms control system, including the NPT, are essential, analysts have noted that they reflect a status quo that fits nuclear-armed states and infantilizes non-nuclear-weapons-NPT countries.

The latter regularly complain that the government legitimizes nuclear weapons, although political outliers such as the DCP and the Islamic Republic of Iran are dominated by non-proliferation and enforcement crises. It is a familiar dynamic of blocking and circular speech controlled by ownership states (Acheson, 2018). Efforts to remove nuclear weapons remain unaffected by its potential to delegitimize the international community. The nuclear weapons norm will inevitably be eroded. The application of nuclear weapons from a humanitarians perspective will also allow nations to eliminate accumulated ideological gaps or restrictive geographical caucuses, as in the case of landmines and cluster bombs, which prevent substantive collective change. And this lens could help to address the common view of nuclear weapons strategists as ‘peace enforcers’ a (mistaken) view which, amid numerous internal conceptual inconsistencies of nuclear disorder and the lack of solid evidence for supporting it, has still trickled public awareness in many countries. In short, recent humanitarian processes in counter-personnel mining and cluster bombs have revealed questions about these weapons and their legality. This was necessary for the context of a humanitarian objective and mechanism to pursue these questions in a realistic and meaningful manner.

Public health professionals have contributed in several ways and written in a wide variety of places to deter war and particularly to control nuclear proliferation. A large range of public health programs to deter war are covered by any contribution. 69 Any of them are unique to the elimination of nuclear weapons. Any concern blocking the production of nuclear weapons of fissionable material. Any people address local communities’ views of the dangers of the manufacture of nuclear weapons. The practices of health personnel employed in conflict zones are some of the most dangerous for public health care workers to deter war from going on. There are more threats than ever before faced by the proliferation of nuclear weapons. While those concerns can appear well removed from public policy practices at government or municipal health, healthcare, or public health practice settings daily, public health professionals have plenty to do to overcome the problems faced by the spread of nuclear weapons. These topics should be trained and disseminated by public health staff to peers, decision leaders, and the general public (Kristensen, 2019). They should promote stricter domestic and foreign nuclear arms control policies.

Since then there has also been a scientific investigation into evidence of the immediate and long-term effects of the use and testing of nuclear weapons. In a significant 1987 paper, the WHO outlined current studies into the effects of a nuclear detonation on health and health care.

 The study states, inter alia, that nuclear blasts have catastrophic short- and long-term impacts on human bodies due to the blast wave, thermal wave, radiation, and toxic impact, and that current health systems cannot significantly mitigate these effects. Nuclear weapons in or around the region can cause major deaths and damage, large-scale displacement, and cause long-lasting harm to people’s health or well-being and long-term damage to the atmosphere, facilities, societal growth, and a social environment by the explosion of the blast wave and heavy contamination and radiation, as well as radioactive fallout. Also, small-scale use of some 100 nuclear bombs against urban goals will, in addition to radiation spreading across the planet, lead to a freezing of the air, shortened seasons of development, food shortages, and global famine.

No national frontier can contain the effects of nuclear detonations, particularly the radioactive downwind impact. After a nuclear explosion in or near a residential place, the extent of damage and pollution can create serious social or political disturbances, since the infrastructure is reconstructed and economic operations are restored, business, communication, health services, and schools are regenerated for many decades.

No state and/or foreign entity may adequately tackle a humanitarian urgent emergency, or offer adequate aid to those concerned, the long-term effects of the detonation of a nuclear weapon in a populated region. Due to the massive devastation and devastation of nuclear disaster, even if an effort to achieve coordinated readiness can also be of benefit in alleviating the consequences of an explosion of an improvised nuclear device, it would still not be feasible to detect such capabilities. vulnerability of human error and cyber-attacks in nuclear weapons command-and-control networks. maintain high-level alert nuclear arsenals that are ready for deployment in minutes thousands of missiles. The hazards of access by non-state parties to nuclear weapons and associated resources are some other replications associated with it.

Risk is the product of the probability of an adverse occurrence and is multiplied by the effects. The probability of one government or another using nuclear weapons intentionally has declined from the end of the Cold War although it would have huge implications. This chance has however by no means vanished. Particularly in a regional war, nuclear weapons may be used. In the past, the Nuclear non-proliferation Treaty (NPT), signed in 1968, restricted the possibility of proliferation of nuclear weapons among countries. Five nations are de facto owners of nuclear weapons, and the Convention acknowledges only five have nuclear weapons, while three others are non-partisan. As the ‘Non-Nuclear Weapons States’ all other nations in the world have entered into the Pact, but one country (North Korea) has withdrawn. Some nations, including Iran, and Iraq before Saddam Hussein has been expelled, are still striving to acquire nuclear weapons. Much more nations have sought, but have been forced to drop, nuclear weapons programs in the past.

The most dangerous, cruel, and indiscriminate weapons ever created are nuclear weapons. Nuclear weapons They are different from all other missiles, both in the scope of their destruction and in their uniquely enduring, spreading, genetically harmful radioactive fallout (Kmentt,  2015). A single nuclear bomb shoot could destroy millions of people over a large city. The use of tens or hundreds of nuclear weapons will disturb the global atmosphere and cause mass starvation. Nuclear bombs emit ionizing, killing or sickness exposed ones, contaminating the air and having long-term effects for wellbeing, including cancer and genetic damage and adversely Nuclear bombs emit ionizing, killing or sickness exposed ones, contaminating the air and having long-term effects for wellbeing, including cancer and genetic damage.

The NPT is a dynamic negotiation between countries and countries that do not have one. The countries have not agreed to not accept nuclear arms, materials, or material specific to them, although the States with Nuclear Weapons consent not to provide those articles (Warren & Baxter,2020). The countries with nuclear weapons are obliged to provide other countries with the peaceful use of nuclear technology to decrease the unequal character of the deal. Most important, Nuclear Weapons States have committed to reduce and operate in good faith for the abolition of the role of nuclear weapons in foreign affairs. The United States was most inadequate about this latter obligation. Indeed, the latest Nuclear Posture Review by the current Bush administration estimates that several thousand nuclear weapons are needed indefinitely, and also searches for new missions for them.

There is an increasing possibility that terrorists could acquire nuclear weapons. Deterrence kept the US and the former Soviet Union from directly conflicting armed forces for several years and now in so-called “states of concern” such as North Korea, deterrence maintains its control. But dissuasion would not restrict fanatical beliefs-driven (Panofsky, 2003). The avoidance of a jihadist nuclear disaster must therefore be either based on the interdiction or the prevention of hostile distribution of nuclear weapons of explosive materials necessary for nuclear weapons (in particular high-enriched uranium and plutonium). The threats faced by nuclear weapons could be the most dangerous outcome of scientific and technological interaction with human activities.


Acheson, R. (2018). Impacts of the nuclear ban: how outlawing nuclear weapons is changing the world. Global Change, Peace & Security30(2), 243-250.

Futter, A. (2021). Horizontal Proliferation Challenges: The Nuclear Outliers. In The Politics of Nuclear Weapons (pp. 143-169). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.

Gibbons, R. D. (2018). The humanitarian turn in nuclear disarmament and the treaty on the prohibition of nuclear weapons. The Nonproliferation Review25(1-2), 11-36.

Graham, T. W., & Mullins, A. F. (2019). Arms Control, Military Strategy and Nuclear Proliferation. In Nuclear Deterrence and Global Security in Transition (pp. 157-170). Routledge.

Hanson, M. (2018). Normalizing zero nuclear weapons: The humanitarian road to the Prohibition Treaty. Contemporary Security Policy39(3), 464-486.

Hymans, J. E. (2019). Do nuclear crises vaccinate against nuclear war? When Proliferation Causes Peace: The Psychology of Nuclear Crises, Michael D. Cohen (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2017), 304 pages, $34.95.

Kmentt, A. (2015). The development of the international initiative on the humanitarian impact of nuclear weapons and its effect on the nuclear weapons debate. Int’l Rev. Red Cross97, 681.

Lieber, K. A., & Press, D. G. (2013). The new era of nuclear weapons, deterrence, and conflict. Strategic Studies Quarterly7(1), 3-14.

Panofsky, W. K. (2003). Nuclear proliferation risks, new and old. Issues in Science and Technology19(4), 73-75.

Warren, A., & Baxter, P. M. (Eds.). (2020). Nuclear Modernization in the 21st Century: A Technical, Policy, and Strategic Review.

Williams, H. (2018). A nuclear babel: narratives around the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. The Nonproliferation Review25(1-2), 51-63.

Kristensen, H. M. (2019). Global nuclear arsenals, 1990–2018. In Nuclear Safeguards, Security, and Nonproliferation (pp. 3-35). Butterworth-Heinemann.

KRISTENSEN, H. M. Nuclear Weapons Modernization, And Nuclear Proliferation Triggers. THE NEXT FIFTY YEARS OF NUCLEAR PROLIFERATION, 21.

Order Now

Download the complete solution for POLS5003 National Security and Strategy and many more, or order a fresh one. Order Online Now!

Universal Assignment (November 29, 2023) POLS5003 National Security and Strategy Solved. Retrieved from https://universalassignment.com/pols5003-national-security-and-strategy-solved/.
"POLS5003 National Security and Strategy Solved." Universal Assignment - November 29, 2023, https://universalassignment.com/pols5003-national-security-and-strategy-solved/
Universal Assignment July 17, 2022 POLS5003 National Security and Strategy Solved., viewed November 29, 2023,<https://universalassignment.com/pols5003-national-security-and-strategy-solved/>
Universal Assignment - POLS5003 National Security and Strategy Solved. [Internet]. [Accessed November 29, 2023]. Available from: https://universalassignment.com/pols5003-national-security-and-strategy-solved/
"POLS5003 National Security and Strategy Solved." Universal Assignment - Accessed November 29, 2023. https://universalassignment.com/pols5003-national-security-and-strategy-solved/
"POLS5003 National Security and Strategy Solved." Universal Assignment [Online]. Available: https://universalassignment.com/pols5003-national-security-and-strategy-solved/. [Accessed: November 29, 2023]

Please note along with our service, we will provide you with the following deliverables:

Please do not hesitate to put forward any queries regarding the service provision.

We look forward to having you on board with us.


Get 90%* Discount on Assignment Help

Most Frequent Questions & Answers

Universal Assignment Services is the best place to get help in your all kind of assignment help. We have 172+ experts available, who can help you to get HD+ grades. We also provide Free Plag report, Free Revisions,Best Price in the industry guaranteed.

We provide all kinds of assignmednt help, Report writing, Essay Writing, Dissertations, Thesis writing, Research Proposal, Research Report, Home work help, Question Answers help, Case studies, mathematical and Statistical tasks, Website development, Android application, Resume/CV writing, SOP(Statement of Purpose) Writing, Blog/Article, Poster making and so on.

We are available round the clock, 24X7, 365 days. You can appach us to our Whatsapp number +1 (613)778 8542 or email to info@universalassignment.com . We provide Free revision policy, if you need and revisions to be done on the task, we will do the same for you as soon as possible.

We provide services mainly to all major institutes and Universities in Australia, Canada, China, Malaysia, India, South Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

We provide lucrative discounts from 28% to 70% as per the wordcount, Technicality, Deadline and the number of your previous assignments done with us.

After your assignment request our team will check and update you the best suitable service for you alongwith the charges for the task. After confirmation and payment team will start the work and provide the task as per the deadline.

Yes, we will provide Plagirism free task and a free turnitin report along with the task without any extra cost.

No, if the main requirement is same, you don’t have to pay any additional amount. But it there is a additional requirement, then you have to pay the balance amount in order to get the revised solution.

The Fees are as minimum as $10 per page(1 page=250 words) and in case of a big task, we provide huge discounts.

We accept all the major Credit and Debit Cards for the payment. We do accept Paypal also.

Popular Assignments

5 Places you must visit in Busan, South Korea

Write 2 articles 1st Topic: 5 Places you must visit in Busan, South Korea 2nd topic: Korean language: various tips and resources to learn Deadline: 10th October 2023 12:00 AM Instructions: Article Structure is given below Meta Description: First, you will start with a meta description of your article in

Read More »

2002HSV Human Services Research

Assessment 2: Written research proposal Worth 45% of final grade Complete your answers in this assignment template Name: xxxxxxx Student ID: xxxxxxx Title: xxxxxxx Exact word count (exc. cover sheets and reference list; max. 2,000 words): x,xxx Please specify the research methodology are you proposing to use: ☐ Quantitative                                    ☐

Read More »

COIT29226 Introduction to IoT

Assessment item 3 – Project Due date: Week 12 (8 October 2023) 11:55 pm AEST Weighting: Length: Submission: 50% There is no word limit for this report Group work (submit via Moodle) Objectives This assessment item relates to the following unit learning outcomes: Learning Outcomes Assessed: Enabling objectives What do

Read More »

BUSM1008 Assessment 2 Brief Spring 2023

Assessment 2: Individual Report (20%) and Presentation (20%) Background You are appointed as a business consultant, recruited by the company allocated to you in week 6 by your tutor.  Your role is to undertake research on the company, the allocated topic and an issue identified in the media in relation to your company and

Read More »


INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT Total Marks 100 | Weighting 25% DUE: 29/09/2023, 11:55pm IMPORTANT INFORMATION: READ BEFORE YOU START SUBMISSION 11.55 pm. A 1-hour grace period is provided to students who experience a technical concern. DOCUMENT PREPARATION REFERENCING UNACCEPTABLE ACADEMIC ACTIVITIES MARKING Question 1 | [12 marks] Download the spreadsheet data that

Read More »


Assessment task 3 Individual Case Study This task is the result of your individual effort, so students must not discuss their work with anyone else, otherwise it may lead to an allegation of collusion. Weight: 15% Due: Before 5 pm on Wednesday 27th September. Late submissions will incur a penalty

Read More »

International Business INBU01-7

Module International Business INBU01-7 (NQF LEVEL 7) FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT – ASSIGNMENT C Assignment C (INBU01-7/DLO4 10/2023) Exam Date 20 October 2023 Marks 50 Assignment C (INBU01-7/DLO4 10/2023)   Total: 20 marks SECTION A (10 MARKS) – PARAGRAPH QUESTION Question 1 (10 marks) Coca-Cola is marking its 70th year in Nigeria

Read More »

Summative Assessment Help

Summative Assessment Brief: Learning Outcomes: LO1: Construct a problem/issue/need identified from practice that impacts on individual outcomes LO2: Formulate a focus-based enquiry on the identified problem/issue/need utilising an area of individual learner interest LO3: Critically evaluate the evidence base to support the proposal of the solution focused initiative LO4: Develop

Read More »

EDU30067 Teaching English

Assignment 2: Folio Template INTRODUCTION:         LESSON 1 Lesson title:   Year level: Topic:   Duration of lesson: Curriculum links: Strands & sub-strands Content descriptions       Students background knowledge: What is your starting point – what do the students already know, what have they done

Read More »

Edge Computing Security and Privacy

Proposal Background Title: Edge Computing Security and Privacy Proposal The new computing paradigm in the Internet of Things domain is known as IoT edge computing which functions by processing calculations at the edge of the network (Alli & Alam, 2020). The current technology aided by cloud and fog computing has created

Read More »

Foundations of Communication Assessment 2 Instructions

Discussion task (Total grade – 10%)   Process Work (Steps to complete the task) Answer on the Assessment 2 Submission Document – Do not upload this instruction document. Requirements (important elements to include) lastname_firstname_studentID_COMS_Assess 2_semester_year. Process for Assessment discussion tasks NOTE: If you do not participate in the class discussions then

Read More »

Assessment Two Dos and Don’ts (Internal)

Do: Read the assessment instructions carefully Read the marking rubric carefully Understand the question – break it down Conduct research – record the reference details Read the topic materials about communication theories, forms and factors and refer to them Contribute to the discussions in class or no marks for the

Read More »

Unpacking the Question: Assessment Two

Studying at university requires you to become familiar with strategies to un-pack or breakdown a variety of assessment questions/tasks throughout your studies.  Task Example of integrating the discussion, research and theories. In the group discussion my group members (name them) stated that an advertisement for a beauty product would most

Read More »

MGMT0001 Introduction to Commerce Assessment

MGMT0001 Introduction to Commerce Assessment 2 (worth 30%) Due date:                  2:00pm (AWST) Friday 15th September 2023 Submission:              Via Turnitin assessment submission link (see ‘Assessment 2’ folder in ‘Assessments’ section of Blackboard). Additional Instructions: Part A (42 marks) Nathan is a well-known chef with years of experience cooking various cuisines. After

Read More »

ACCT5011: Accounting Systems in the Digital Age

Practical Assignment Guide, Semester 2, 2023 Due Date for Submission: Monday 11th September 2023 at 5.00 PM Please note that the Folio Assignment for ACCT5011 Accounting Systems in the Digital Age is an individual assessment task worth 30% of your total marks in the unit. Please refer to the online

Read More »

EC229- Review session

Assume two cities, A and B, that can’t trade between them. Each city produces its own coconuts for its local market. If suddenly trade is possible then: D) As we saw in class, the new price will be somewhere between the original price 𝑃_𝐴,𝑃_𝐵. Hence it is impossible for consumers

Read More »

Computing Theory COSC

Computing Theory COSC 1107/1105 Assignment 1: Fundamentals Assessment Type Individual assignment. Submit online via Canvas → As- signments → Assignment 1. Marks awarded for meeting re- quirements as closely as possible. Clarifications/updates may be made via announcements/relevant discussion forums. Due Date Week 6, Sunday 27th August 2023, 11:59pm Marks 125

Read More »

BE279 Applied Statistics and Forecasting

Strategy, Operations, & Entrepreneurship Group Essex Business School Module Code BE279 Module Title Applied Statistics and Forecasting Assessment Type Individual Report (2,000 word) Academic Year 2022/23, Spring Term Submission Deadline Refer to FASER Task Specific Guidance Please note that: Module Learning Outcomes On successful completion of the module, students will

Read More »

Learning Design Tool: Little Learners Level 1 sounds

Learning Design Tool: Little Learners Level 1 sounds. Prepared by Sara Hart Date 30th August, 2023 (feel free to leave this date as it is the AT2 due date) Brief description of Learning Design   Chooseit Maker: Create, edit and play personalised learning activities that can be used in your

Read More »


HUMN1041 PEOPLE, PLACE AND SOCIAL DIFFERENCE ASSIGNMENT 1 TEMPLATE This assignment is made up of three (3) parts, plus a reference list and appendix. Marks are allocated for each section, as follows: – 1 mark Please ensure that you provide your answers in this template, and provide a Reference list

Read More »

Model 3 Launch in Australia

Client Information Company Name Tesla Contact Name   Email   Phone Number   Address Level 14, 15 Blue St. North Sydney, NSW 2060 Australia Ad link & image Project Information Project Title Model 3 Launch in Australia Project Description (100 words) Highlight the uniqueness of the car. Show the superior

Read More »

MKT10009 Marketing and the Consumer Experience

School of Business, Law and Entrepreneurship Assessment Task – Assignment 2  MKT10009 Marketing and the Consumer Experience Semester 2, 2023. Assessment Type Analytical Report Associated Unit Learning Outcomes (ULO’s) 2, 3, 4 Group or Individual task Individual Value (%) 25% Due Date Monday 20th September at 10:00 AET – Enterthis

Read More »

ASSIGNMENT – 1st Evaluation

ASSIGNMENT – 1st Evaluation Date of Submission- 4TH SEP 2023 25 MARKS COMPARATIVE PUBLIC LAW Q. You are the new Central Minister for Urban Development who is keen to make major Indian cities as smart cities. You visit different countries like USA, UK, European Countries, Japan and other developed countries

Read More »

Corporate & Financial Due Diligence Report

[Name of the company] Note: Students should keep in mind that application of legal provisions (including Securities Regulations) and analysis of the same is important. Merely putting the facts and figures won’t fetch even a decent mark. Note: Students should only mention the broad area of business. This part should

Read More »

ECON1000 S2 2023 – Marking Guidance and FAQs on GTP

Students will be marked on the extent to which they specifically answer the question and provide clear, logical, well-reasoned and sufficient explanations. Here is a summary breakdown of how marks are allocated in this GTP: Part 1 [15 marks] §  Providing relevant observations from the information provided in the articles

Read More »

ECON1000 S2 2023 – GTP Brief

ECON1000 S2 2023 – GTP Brief A.  Context and Overview The Game Theory Presentation (GTP) is worth 30% of the final mark. GTP is a ‘take-home’ exercise with a set of tasks to do. The GTP is based on Lecture Topics: L1 and L2. You will have twenty (21) days

Read More »

Order #35042 Human Rights Research Essay

Draft due 26th Aug 2,500 words (excluding references and bibliography) Instructions: Structure: Title – The Tigray War: A Critical Analysis of What the Future Holds for Human Rights in the Region What can be done to ensure human rights violations will cease and be prosecuted? Expand on different actors and

Read More »

PMC1000: Applied Pathology

Assessment Task Sheet: Poster Presentation Date: Thursday 31st August 2023 | Weighting: 30% Assessment Task 2 You are required to develop a handout style resource (pamphlet or brochure) on a selected pathological condition which is aimed at first year student paramedics. You will need to use high quality peer reviewed

Read More »

Detailed Information: Reflective Assignment

Indigenous Peoples, Law and Justice Detailed Information: Reflective Assignment Due Date:                   Tuesday 5th September 2023 at 4:00 pm (AWST). Marks:                       30% of the total marks for this unit. Assignment:              The assignment will comprise two questions. Students must answer all parts of both questions. Examinable topics: The cultural immersion exercise and/or

Read More »

Can't Find Your Assignment?

Open chat
Free Assistance
Universal Assignment
Hello 👋
How can we help you?