POLS5003 National Security and Strategy Solved

What implications do horizontal nuclear proliferation and nuclear weapons modernization programs have for global strategy?

Concern over nuclear proliferation more frequently focuses on nuclear weapons spread to new nations. A single nuclear bomb will kill and ruin a city. Various nuclear blasts will destroy tens of millions of civilians across modern cities. Hundreds of millions of casualties will come from a global nuclear war between the US and Russia. Nuclear proliferation means a spread to countries other than those recognized as ‘Nuclear Weapon States’ by the Treaty on the Non-proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, widely called ‘Non-Proliferation Treaty,’ of nuclear weapons, fissionable and arms-related nuclear technologies, and intelligence. (Futter, 2021).  Many nations with and without nuclear weapons opposed proliferated, as policymakers fear that more nuclear weapons countries could increase the likelihood of nuclear warfare, destabilize foreign or regional ties, or breach the national sovereignty of nation-states (up to and including counter value targeting of nuclear-armed civilians). Nuclear proliferation, the distribution of nuclear arms, nuclear devices, or fissile material to non-EU countries. This term has also been used to refer to the potential possession by extremist or other militant forces of nuclear weapons.

Although there was less horizontal nuclear proliferation than was feared during the 1960s, it was nevertheless significant. Since the first nuclear arms were first filed and used by the U.S. in 1945, nine countries (China, France, India, Israel, North Korea, Pakistan, Russia, and the UK) produced nuclear weapons.

Nuclear weapons testing programs were launched in many other nations, including Iran, Iraq, Libya, Taiwan, South Korea, and Sweden, but they were scrapped on different lines. One (South Africa) government abolished nuclear weapons and, in the aftermath of a break-up of the Soviet Union, three countries (Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Ukraine) lost nuclear weapons remaining on its territory and returned them to Russia. Today nine countries have arsenals of nuclear missiles, and total nuclear warheads are expected to be 13,410. Russia and the United States, who together have about 6,000 nuclear warheads, control the vast majority of the arsenal. Both two arsenals are abnormally high. No other nuclear-powered state is convinced that more than a few hundred warheads are needed to prevent serious nuclear or conventional attacks. Each nuclear-armed country modernizes its and adapts its nuclear capability.

One of the main difficulties facing us as a global community is the control of the proliferation of nuclear weapons. Given that public health is what we do together to guarantee healthy living circumstances, regulating and ultimately eradicating the spread of nuclear weapons must be an important global health objective.

There are three key components of the threat posed by nuclear proliferation:

  • Develop the capacity of countries that now lack nuclear weapons to produce or acquire nuclear weapons (horizontal proliferation).
  • Increasing the arsenal of nuclear-armed countries, enhancing technological sophistication and dependability in these weapons, and developing new weapons like “mini-nukes” or nuclear weapons on the battlefield.
  • The acquisition of nuclear weapons or materials and expertise by people or non-statutory entities is frequently referred to as ‘terrorists’ (another form of horizontal proliferation).

The role of nuclear weapons in the modern world has contributed to the development of a large literature on the causes and effects of nuclear proliferation. Nuclear missiles play a major role in deterring possible opponents from attacking the USA, our allies, or our vital interests. Any objectives need nuclear weapons energy to be destroyed. But precision targeting will significantly decrease the nuclear output needed to kill those targets. The frequency, timing, length, and outcomes of wars can change, and the political influence of the state can be affected by nuclear weapons. Secondly, it is pointless whether or not states like nuclear weapons if they cannot have them. Our main point is that nuclear weapons increase the safety and diplomacy of their owners on average, through a large range of metrics and based on the tradition of true and safety-oriented approaches to nuclear proliferation and nuclear deterrence. Controlling nuclear proliferation is one of our greatest threats as a global society. That public health is “what we individually do as a company to maintain environments under which people will remain safer and monitor and effectively eliminate the spread of nuclear weapons must be a global goal for health. The distribution systems are another significant aspect of nuclear proliferation. Nations or other organizations require these weapons not only, they also need rockets or other means of supplying them to pose a nuclear danger.

Each nuclear-armed country modernizes its arsenals and adapts its nuclear capability. Cycles of nuclear modernization do not inherently inter-country overlap but rely on where and how long they last. In addition, various countries do not always have their nuclear powers in the same fashion; some tend to use completely new arms while some are focused on keeping and updating advanced ones. It is also inaccurate for us to argue that “we are behind” nuclear modernizations in other countries. As is now the case, nuclear modernization programs will become more important and useful in the signalizing and adding of increased strategic capability – additional or more warheads – to “strengthen deterrence,” as the deterioration in relations and military rivalry intensifies (Graham, & Mullins,2019).  Shortly before the present crisis, however, the Trump administration greatly expanded investment introduced new arms and adopted a more competitive and opposition approach. If nuclear disarmament is – and is – a very complex issue it is at least a threat to be addressed through human experience and wisdom. There is no need for a sea change around, for vanished rainforests or dead seas to come back to life, or for heavenly artifacts to be taken away from conflict with the Earth. It means shifting the minds of decision-makers and changing the sense of focus and what is in their overwhelming interest if long-term. In the light of fresh facts and logic, it is in the ability of intelligent human beings to change their beliefs.

On the one hand, the use of nuclear bombs is significantly different from that of anti-personnel mines and ammunition. These differences not only arise from their comparative disruptive quantities but also refer to their uses or use of their possessors’ sets, and circumstances in which speeches have been held concerning their utility, validity, and continuing presence. Nevertheless, the Ottawa and Oslo processes resulted in re-forming international speeches, which focused on the arguments about the planned uses of such arms. Although the components of the new nuclear arms control system, including the NPT, are essential, analysts have noted that they reflect a status quo that fits nuclear-armed states and infantilizes non-nuclear-weapons-NPT countries.

The latter regularly complain that the government legitimizes nuclear weapons, although political outliers such as the DCP and the Islamic Republic of Iran are dominated by non-proliferation and enforcement crises. It is a familiar dynamic of blocking and circular speech controlled by ownership states (Acheson, 2018). Efforts to remove nuclear weapons remain unaffected by its potential to delegitimize the international community. The nuclear weapons norm will inevitably be eroded. The application of nuclear weapons from a humanitarians perspective will also allow nations to eliminate accumulated ideological gaps or restrictive geographical caucuses, as in the case of landmines and cluster bombs, which prevent substantive collective change. And this lens could help to address the common view of nuclear weapons strategists as ‘peace enforcers’ a (mistaken) view which, amid numerous internal conceptual inconsistencies of nuclear disorder and the lack of solid evidence for supporting it, has still trickled public awareness in many countries. In short, recent humanitarian processes in counter-personnel mining and cluster bombs have revealed questions about these weapons and their legality. This was necessary for the context of a humanitarian objective and mechanism to pursue these questions in a realistic and meaningful manner.

Public health professionals have contributed in several ways and written in a wide variety of places to deter war and particularly to control nuclear proliferation. A large range of public health programs to deter war are covered by any contribution. 69 Any of them are unique to the elimination of nuclear weapons. Any concern blocking the production of nuclear weapons of fissionable material. Any people address local communities’ views of the dangers of the manufacture of nuclear weapons. The practices of health personnel employed in conflict zones are some of the most dangerous for public health care workers to deter war from going on. There are more threats than ever before faced by the proliferation of nuclear weapons. While those concerns can appear well removed from public policy practices at government or municipal health, healthcare, or public health practice settings daily, public health professionals have plenty to do to overcome the problems faced by the spread of nuclear weapons. These topics should be trained and disseminated by public health staff to peers, decision leaders, and the general public (Kristensen, 2019). They should promote stricter domestic and foreign nuclear arms control policies.

Since then there has also been a scientific investigation into evidence of the immediate and long-term effects of the use and testing of nuclear weapons. In a significant 1987 paper, the WHO outlined current studies into the effects of a nuclear detonation on health and health care.

 The study states, inter alia, that nuclear blasts have catastrophic short- and long-term impacts on human bodies due to the blast wave, thermal wave, radiation, and toxic impact, and that current health systems cannot significantly mitigate these effects. Nuclear weapons in or around the region can cause major deaths and damage, large-scale displacement, and cause long-lasting harm to people’s health or well-being and long-term damage to the atmosphere, facilities, societal growth, and a social environment by the explosion of the blast wave and heavy contamination and radiation, as well as radioactive fallout. Also, small-scale use of some 100 nuclear bombs against urban goals will, in addition to radiation spreading across the planet, lead to a freezing of the air, shortened seasons of development, food shortages, and global famine.

No national frontier can contain the effects of nuclear detonations, particularly the radioactive downwind impact. After a nuclear explosion in or near a residential place, the extent of damage and pollution can create serious social or political disturbances, since the infrastructure is reconstructed and economic operations are restored, business, communication, health services, and schools are regenerated for many decades.

No state and/or foreign entity may adequately tackle a humanitarian urgent emergency, or offer adequate aid to those concerned, the long-term effects of the detonation of a nuclear weapon in a populated region. Due to the massive devastation and devastation of nuclear disaster, even if an effort to achieve coordinated readiness can also be of benefit in alleviating the consequences of an explosion of an improvised nuclear device, it would still not be feasible to detect such capabilities. vulnerability of human error and cyber-attacks in nuclear weapons command-and-control networks. maintain high-level alert nuclear arsenals that are ready for deployment in minutes thousands of missiles. The hazards of access by non-state parties to nuclear weapons and associated resources are some other replications associated with it.

Risk is the product of the probability of an adverse occurrence and is multiplied by the effects. The probability of one government or another using nuclear weapons intentionally has declined from the end of the Cold War although it would have huge implications. This chance has however by no means vanished. Particularly in a regional war, nuclear weapons may be used. In the past, the Nuclear non-proliferation Treaty (NPT), signed in 1968, restricted the possibility of proliferation of nuclear weapons among countries. Five nations are de facto owners of nuclear weapons, and the Convention acknowledges only five have nuclear weapons, while three others are non-partisan. As the ‘Non-Nuclear Weapons States’ all other nations in the world have entered into the Pact, but one country (North Korea) has withdrawn. Some nations, including Iran, and Iraq before Saddam Hussein has been expelled, are still striving to acquire nuclear weapons. Much more nations have sought, but have been forced to drop, nuclear weapons programs in the past.

The most dangerous, cruel, and indiscriminate weapons ever created are nuclear weapons. Nuclear weapons They are different from all other missiles, both in the scope of their destruction and in their uniquely enduring, spreading, genetically harmful radioactive fallout (Kmentt,  2015). A single nuclear bomb shoot could destroy millions of people over a large city. The use of tens or hundreds of nuclear weapons will disturb the global atmosphere and cause mass starvation. Nuclear bombs emit ionizing, killing or sickness exposed ones, contaminating the air and having long-term effects for wellbeing, including cancer and genetic damage and adversely Nuclear bombs emit ionizing, killing or sickness exposed ones, contaminating the air and having long-term effects for wellbeing, including cancer and genetic damage.

The NPT is a dynamic negotiation between countries and countries that do not have one. The countries have not agreed to not accept nuclear arms, materials, or material specific to them, although the States with Nuclear Weapons consent not to provide those articles (Warren & Baxter,2020). The countries with nuclear weapons are obliged to provide other countries with the peaceful use of nuclear technology to decrease the unequal character of the deal. Most important, Nuclear Weapons States have committed to reduce and operate in good faith for the abolition of the role of nuclear weapons in foreign affairs. The United States was most inadequate about this latter obligation. Indeed, the latest Nuclear Posture Review by the current Bush administration estimates that several thousand nuclear weapons are needed indefinitely, and also searches for new missions for them.

There is an increasing possibility that terrorists could acquire nuclear weapons. Deterrence kept the US and the former Soviet Union from directly conflicting armed forces for several years and now in so-called “states of concern” such as North Korea, deterrence maintains its control. But dissuasion would not restrict fanatical beliefs-driven (Panofsky, 2003). The avoidance of a jihadist nuclear disaster must therefore be either based on the interdiction or the prevention of hostile distribution of nuclear weapons of explosive materials necessary for nuclear weapons (in particular high-enriched uranium and plutonium). The threats faced by nuclear weapons could be the most dangerous outcome of scientific and technological interaction with human activities.

REFERENCES

Acheson, R. (2018). Impacts of the nuclear ban: how outlawing nuclear weapons is changing the world. Global Change, Peace & Security30(2), 243-250.

Futter, A. (2021). Horizontal Proliferation Challenges: The Nuclear Outliers. In The Politics of Nuclear Weapons (pp. 143-169). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.

Gibbons, R. D. (2018). The humanitarian turn in nuclear disarmament and the treaty on the prohibition of nuclear weapons. The Nonproliferation Review25(1-2), 11-36.

Graham, T. W., & Mullins, A. F. (2019). Arms Control, Military Strategy and Nuclear Proliferation. In Nuclear Deterrence and Global Security in Transition (pp. 157-170). Routledge.

Hanson, M. (2018). Normalizing zero nuclear weapons: The humanitarian road to the Prohibition Treaty. Contemporary Security Policy39(3), 464-486.

Hymans, J. E. (2019). Do nuclear crises vaccinate against nuclear war? When Proliferation Causes Peace: The Psychology of Nuclear Crises, Michael D. Cohen (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2017), 304 pages, $34.95.

Kmentt, A. (2015). The development of the international initiative on the humanitarian impact of nuclear weapons and its effect on the nuclear weapons debate. Int’l Rev. Red Cross97, 681.

Lieber, K. A., & Press, D. G. (2013). The new era of nuclear weapons, deterrence, and conflict. Strategic Studies Quarterly7(1), 3-14.

Panofsky, W. K. (2003). Nuclear proliferation risks, new and old. Issues in Science and Technology19(4), 73-75.

Warren, A., & Baxter, P. M. (Eds.). (2020). Nuclear Modernization in the 21st Century: A Technical, Policy, and Strategic Review.

Williams, H. (2018). A nuclear babel: narratives around the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. The Nonproliferation Review25(1-2), 51-63.

Kristensen, H. M. (2019). Global nuclear arsenals, 1990–2018. In Nuclear Safeguards, Security, and Nonproliferation (pp. 3-35). Butterworth-Heinemann.

KRISTENSEN, H. M. Nuclear Weapons Modernization, And Nuclear Proliferation Triggers. THE NEXT FIFTY YEARS OF NUCLEAR PROLIFERATION, 21.

Order Now

Download the complete solution for POLS5003 National Security and Strategy and many more, or order a fresh one. Order Online Now!

Universal Assignment (February 9, 2023) POLS5003 National Security and Strategy Solved. Retrieved from https://universalassignment.com/pols5003-national-security-and-strategy-solved/.
"POLS5003 National Security and Strategy Solved." Universal Assignment - February 9, 2023, https://universalassignment.com/pols5003-national-security-and-strategy-solved/
Universal Assignment July 17, 2022 POLS5003 National Security and Strategy Solved., viewed February 9, 2023,<https://universalassignment.com/pols5003-national-security-and-strategy-solved/>
Universal Assignment - POLS5003 National Security and Strategy Solved. [Internet]. [Accessed February 9, 2023]. Available from: https://universalassignment.com/pols5003-national-security-and-strategy-solved/
"POLS5003 National Security and Strategy Solved." Universal Assignment - Accessed February 9, 2023. https://universalassignment.com/pols5003-national-security-and-strategy-solved/
"POLS5003 National Security and Strategy Solved." Universal Assignment [Online]. Available: https://universalassignment.com/pols5003-national-security-and-strategy-solved/. [Accessed: February 9, 2023]

Please note along with our service, we will provide you with the following deliverables:

Please do not hesitate to put forward any queries regarding the service provision.

We look forward to having you on board with us.

Get 90%* Discount on Assignment Help

Most Frequent Questions & Answers

Universal Assignment Services is the best place to get help in your all kind of assignment help. We have 172+ experts available, who can help you to get HD+ grades. We also provide Free Plag report, Free Revisions,Best Price in the industry guaranteed.

We provide all kinds of assignmednt help, Report writing, Essay Writing, Dissertations, Thesis writing, Research Proposal, Research Report, Home work help, Question Answers help, Case studies, mathematical and Statistical tasks, Website development, Android application, Resume/CV writing, SOP(Statement of Purpose) Writing, Blog/Article, Poster making and so on.

We are available round the clock, 24X7, 365 days. You can appach us to our Whatsapp number +1 (613)778 8542 or email to info@universalassignment.com . We provide Free revision policy, if you need and revisions to be done on the task, we will do the same for you as soon as possible.

We provide services mainly to all major institutes and Universities in Australia, Canada, China, Malaysia, India, South Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

We provide lucrative discounts from 28% to 70% as per the wordcount, Technicality, Deadline and the number of your previous assignments done with us.

After your assignment request our team will check and update you the best suitable service for you alongwith the charges for the task. After confirmation and payment team will start the work and provide the task as per the deadline.

Yes, we will provide Plagirism free task and a free turnitin report along with the task without any extra cost.

No, if the main requirement is same, you don’t have to pay any additional amount. But it there is a additional requirement, then you have to pay the balance amount in order to get the revised solution.

The Fees are as minimum as $10 per page(1 page=250 words) and in case of a big task, we provide huge discounts.

We accept all the major Credit and Debit Cards for the payment. We do accept Paypal also.

Popular Assignments

BSBWOR502 – Lead and manage team effectiveness

BSBWOR502 – Lead and manage team effectiveness The BSBWOR502 – Lead and manage team effectiveness is a unit of the resource training. Also, it is competency training that helps aspiring team leaders build the necessary skills. Since team leadership in the workplace requires many abilities, this unit provides an approach

Read More »

BUSN 732 Writing Assignment 2

Description This assignment gives you an opportunity to read, summarize, and analyze material to be presented in a short report. Specifically, you are asked to read the five assigned articles on the Canadian Pension Plan (CPP) and make notes on the pros and cons of pension adoption discussed in each

Read More »

Assignment 2: Recorded Presentation

Weighting Percentage: 45% The purpose of this assessment task is to link an Aboriginal and / or Torres Strait Islander artwork with an issue that relates to health and wellbeing of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and explore the associated cultural and historical factors.  Each student is required to plan, create and submit

Read More »

Assignment 2 Research Proposal

ASSIGNMENT TWO GUIDE The Research Proposal This document contains everything you need to know for your second assignment. Please make sure to read this in full prior to asking any questions on Moodle. Below are the key things covered and the corresponding page numbers for easy access. Assignment 2 Research

Read More »

NUR133 ASSESSMENT 2 – Digital Presentation

NUR133 ASSESSMENT 2 – Digital Presentation (500 words + 10-minute presentation) TASK Select a service or program designed to improve the health outcomes of Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander people and prepare a poster presentation that could be used to develop a brief, engaging education session for your peers. In

Read More »

MGMT2007 Organisational Behaviour

2021, MGMT2007 Organisational Behaviour 3,000-word Major Essay Pick ONE of these major essay questions to write an essay: Topic 1: Dealing with problems in an organisation under organisational change Example Scenario: Organisation X has implemented some drastic organisational changes recently. As a result, some of its employees have been laid

Read More »

NSB204 MENTAL HEALTH: Self and Others

Assessment Task 2 Assessment name: Case Study Task description: This assignment aims to help you to begin to use your professional and clinical judgement to think like nurses working in a mental health setting and/or in relation to the mental health needs of people regardless of the setting.   Choose

Read More »

MBA600 Business Report Individual written analysis

Assessment 2 Information Subject Code: MBA600 Subject Name: Capstone: Strategy Assessment Title: Assessment Type: Length: Business Report Individual written analysis 2000 words (+/- 10% allowable range) Weighting: 35% Total Marks: Submission: 100 Online Due Date: Week 10 Your task Using the same organisation from the first assessment, individually, you are

Read More »

HNN300 Child and Adolescent Health Assessment

Task 1: Written Assignment 1500 words (40%) Purpose of assessment task Childhood immunisation is a critical public health intervention that helps protect health and support normal development in infants, children, and young people. This assignment is designed to help you to analyse data, assess risk, and to develop skills to

Read More »

Importance of Aboriginal language

Due Date: 12 hrs   Format/Length: 800 words written Purpose: To explore, deconstruct and analyses the importance of Aboriginal language(s) in a contemporary context.  Task: You are to select an Aboriginal language initiative to research and develop your knowledge and understanding on the importance of keeping languages alive. This can

Read More »

Diverse Populations and Nursing Practice Reports

WORD LIMIT – 2500 – no introduction and conclusion required 7 headings required – headings, text-citations,                1200 words 1) Social determinants of health – 300 words 2) Health inequalities – 300 words 3) Health inequities – 300 words 4) Health outcomes – 300 words 1200 words 5) Application of

Read More »

Chronic Diseases

Introduction: The term “chronic disease” is increasingly often used by patients, healthcare professionals, researchers, etc. This term is defined differently by each person, and each definition encompasses a different set of medical disorders. Last but not least, the World Health Organization asserts that chronic illnesses are not contagious. They progress

Read More »

3. REPORT – Essay

STUDENT INSTRUCTIONS You are required to write a report as outlined in the assessment instruction and criteria listed below. It is important to ensure you read all aspects of the assessment topics and discuss any areas that require clarification with your assessor. Where there is a word limit it is

Read More »

Quality Areas 2 and 5 of the National Quality Standard

Access and review each of the Quality Areas in the ACECQA website, and for each of the given elements, provide one requirement that the element requires from an early years learning centre. You can access the page on the Quality Areas of the NQS using the link below: Quality Area

Read More »

National Health and Medical Research Council

Element Underpinning regulation from National Regulations Requirement of the regulation Underpinning section from the ECSNL Requirements of the section Element 2.1.1: Wellbeing and comfort         Element 2.2.1: Supervision         Element 5.1.1: Positive educator to child interactions         Element 5.2.2: Self-regulation  

Read More »

International Health and Development

Assessment Brief Module title: International Health and Development Assessment Point: First assessment point Assessment task: PART A: PowerPoint Presentation: 15 slides PART B: Word document: 1000-word count limit script for the slides Submission deadline: Please consult the VLE. Submission procedure: Please submit via the submission link on the VLE. Submission

Read More »

Outline the historical development of the policy

Outline the historical development of the policy including other linked policies highlighting key changes The Disability Support Pension is Australia’s universal health insurance scheme that guarantees all people who are unable to work due to a physical, mental, or intellectual disability financial help, which is a payment administered by Centrelink (Legal Services

Read More »

 SITHCCC027 – Prepare dishes using basic methods of cookery

Student Name  Student ID  Unit Name   SITHCCC027 – Prepare dishes using basic methods of cookery Practical Date  Submission Date  Student Declaration ☐ Student Plagiarism Declaration: By submitting this assessment to the college, I declare that this assessment task is original and has not been copied or taken from another source

Read More »

SITHCCC027 – Prepare dishes using basic methods of cookery

Student Name    Student ID   Blc01102 Unit Name   SITHCCC027 – Prepare dishes using basic methods of cookery Practical Date   07/02/2023 Submission Date    Student Declaration ☒ Student Plagiarism Declaration: By submitting this assessment to the college, I declare that this assessment task is original and has not been copied or

Read More »

Resource – Health promotion resource

ASSESSMENT:-             Resource – Health promotion resource Due date: – 10th August 2021   Length: – N/A Type of Collaboration:-                Individual Assessment Details It is the nurse’s role to provide information and education to enhance people’s control over their health (NMBA, 2016). The purpose of this assessment is to produce a

Read More »

The Aged Care Royal Commission Final Report

Discussion PAPER Assignment References 8 Australian Harvard 800 words  due 10th august The Aged Care Royal Commission Final Report titled Care, Dignity and Respect has now been released. The report calls for significant reforms to Australia’s aged care system. The final report also makes 148 recommendations for reform. In this

Read More »

HC3131 Business Research Project

Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines Trimester T2 2021 Unit Code HC3131 Unit Title Business Research Project Assessment Type 1, Topic Approval, Presentation Assessment Title Topic Approval Purpose of the assessment (with ULO Mapping) 1.Clearly identify your chosen topic, having carried out some basic review of available secondary data to secure

Read More »

Cases: Assessment Task 2

Case 1 Tina Tina is 18 years old and lives with her grandmother, older brother and two younger sisters. At present no one has a full-time job with both the grandmother and older brother currently on welfare. The two younger sisters currently enrolled in high school. Tina’s mother lives in

Read More »

NURBN3030 Supplementary Assessment

Written Case Study Report Application of health assessment, planning, implementation and evaluation of professional nursing care to a clinical deterioration patient scenario Due date:         As specified by the Course Coordinator Weighting:       Students must achieve a Pass grade (50%) for the Supplementary Assessment to achieve a Pass grade overall for the

Read More »

Competitive Advantage Video Project

Assessment 1 Information Subject Code: MBA600 Subject Name: Capstone: Strategy Assessment Title: Assessment Type: Length: Competitive Advantage Video Project Individual video recording 10 minutes (no more) Weighting: 25% Total Marks: Submission: 100 Online Due Date: Week 6 Your task Individually, you are required to record a 10-minute video, in which

Read More »

Analysis of Foundational Theory of Management

Class: Day and Time   Lecturer name   Student name / ID   ASSESSMENT 1 (30%) Written – Individual   Due:  Week 4 – Sunday, 15 August 2021 @ 23:59 Analysis of Foundational Study of Management – in the context of contemporary multidisciplinary business This assessment task is designed to address

Read More »

Relating the Class to World Events

Submit your assignment soon Even though your assignment is due on Aug 23, 4:59 PM AEST, try to submit it 1 or 2 days early if you can. Submitting early gives you a better chance of getting the peer reviews you need in time. Topic: Relating the Class to World

Read More »

Can't Find Your Assignment?

Open chat
1
Free Assistance
Universal Assignment
Hello 👋
How can we help you?