POLS5003 National Security and Strategy Solved

What implications do horizontal nuclear proliferation and nuclear weapons modernization programs have for global strategy?

Concern over nuclear proliferation more frequently focuses on nuclear weapons spread to new nations. A single nuclear bomb will kill and ruin a city. Various nuclear blasts will destroy tens of millions of civilians across modern cities. Hundreds of millions of casualties will come from a global nuclear war between the US and Russia. Nuclear proliferation means a spread to countries other than those recognized as ‘Nuclear Weapon States’ by the Treaty on the Non-proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, widely called ‘Non-Proliferation Treaty,’ of nuclear weapons, fissionable and arms-related nuclear technologies, and intelligence. (Futter, 2021).  Many nations with and without nuclear weapons opposed proliferated, as policymakers fear that more nuclear weapons countries could increase the likelihood of nuclear warfare, destabilize foreign or regional ties, or breach the national sovereignty of nation-states (up to and including counter value targeting of nuclear-armed civilians). Nuclear proliferation, the distribution of nuclear arms, nuclear devices, or fissile material to non-EU countries. This term has also been used to refer to the potential possession by extremist or other militant forces of nuclear weapons.

Although there was less horizontal nuclear proliferation than was feared during the 1960s, it was nevertheless significant. Since the first nuclear arms were first filed and used by the U.S. in 1945, nine countries (China, France, India, Israel, North Korea, Pakistan, Russia, and the UK) produced nuclear weapons.

Nuclear weapons testing programs were launched in many other nations, including Iran, Iraq, Libya, Taiwan, South Korea, and Sweden, but they were scrapped on different lines. One (South Africa) government abolished nuclear weapons and, in the aftermath of a break-up of the Soviet Union, three countries (Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Ukraine) lost nuclear weapons remaining on its territory and returned them to Russia. Today nine countries have arsenals of nuclear missiles, and total nuclear warheads are expected to be 13,410. Russia and the United States, who together have about 6,000 nuclear warheads, control the vast majority of the arsenal. Both two arsenals are abnormally high. No other nuclear-powered state is convinced that more than a few hundred warheads are needed to prevent serious nuclear or conventional attacks. Each nuclear-armed country modernizes its and adapts its nuclear capability.

One of the main difficulties facing us as a global community is the control of the proliferation of nuclear weapons. Given that public health is what we do together to guarantee healthy living circumstances, regulating and ultimately eradicating the spread of nuclear weapons must be an important global health objective.

There are three key components of the threat posed by nuclear proliferation:

  • Develop the capacity of countries that now lack nuclear weapons to produce or acquire nuclear weapons (horizontal proliferation).
  • Increasing the arsenal of nuclear-armed countries, enhancing technological sophistication and dependability in these weapons, and developing new weapons like “mini-nukes” or nuclear weapons on the battlefield.
  • The acquisition of nuclear weapons or materials and expertise by people or non-statutory entities is frequently referred to as ‘terrorists’ (another form of horizontal proliferation).

The role of nuclear weapons in the modern world has contributed to the development of a large literature on the causes and effects of nuclear proliferation. Nuclear missiles play a major role in deterring possible opponents from attacking the USA, our allies, or our vital interests. Any objectives need nuclear weapons energy to be destroyed. But precision targeting will significantly decrease the nuclear output needed to kill those targets. The frequency, timing, length, and outcomes of wars can change, and the political influence of the state can be affected by nuclear weapons. Secondly, it is pointless whether or not states like nuclear weapons if they cannot have them. Our main point is that nuclear weapons increase the safety and diplomacy of their owners on average, through a large range of metrics and based on the tradition of true and safety-oriented approaches to nuclear proliferation and nuclear deterrence. Controlling nuclear proliferation is one of our greatest threats as a global society. That public health is “what we individually do as a company to maintain environments under which people will remain safer and monitor and effectively eliminate the spread of nuclear weapons must be a global goal for health. The distribution systems are another significant aspect of nuclear proliferation. Nations or other organizations require these weapons not only, they also need rockets or other means of supplying them to pose a nuclear danger.

Each nuclear-armed country modernizes its arsenals and adapts its nuclear capability. Cycles of nuclear modernization do not inherently inter-country overlap but rely on where and how long they last. In addition, various countries do not always have their nuclear powers in the same fashion; some tend to use completely new arms while some are focused on keeping and updating advanced ones. It is also inaccurate for us to argue that “we are behind” nuclear modernizations in other countries. As is now the case, nuclear modernization programs will become more important and useful in the signalizing and adding of increased strategic capability – additional or more warheads – to “strengthen deterrence,” as the deterioration in relations and military rivalry intensifies (Graham, & Mullins,2019).  Shortly before the present crisis, however, the Trump administration greatly expanded investment introduced new arms and adopted a more competitive and opposition approach. If nuclear disarmament is – and is – a very complex issue it is at least a threat to be addressed through human experience and wisdom. There is no need for a sea change around, for vanished rainforests or dead seas to come back to life, or for heavenly artifacts to be taken away from conflict with the Earth. It means shifting the minds of decision-makers and changing the sense of focus and what is in their overwhelming interest if long-term. In the light of fresh facts and logic, it is in the ability of intelligent human beings to change their beliefs.

On the one hand, the use of nuclear bombs is significantly different from that of anti-personnel mines and ammunition. These differences not only arise from their comparative disruptive quantities but also refer to their uses or use of their possessors’ sets, and circumstances in which speeches have been held concerning their utility, validity, and continuing presence. Nevertheless, the Ottawa and Oslo processes resulted in re-forming international speeches, which focused on the arguments about the planned uses of such arms. Although the components of the new nuclear arms control system, including the NPT, are essential, analysts have noted that they reflect a status quo that fits nuclear-armed states and infantilizes non-nuclear-weapons-NPT countries.

The latter regularly complain that the government legitimizes nuclear weapons, although political outliers such as the DCP and the Islamic Republic of Iran are dominated by non-proliferation and enforcement crises. It is a familiar dynamic of blocking and circular speech controlled by ownership states (Acheson, 2018). Efforts to remove nuclear weapons remain unaffected by its potential to delegitimize the international community. The nuclear weapons norm will inevitably be eroded. The application of nuclear weapons from a humanitarians perspective will also allow nations to eliminate accumulated ideological gaps or restrictive geographical caucuses, as in the case of landmines and cluster bombs, which prevent substantive collective change. And this lens could help to address the common view of nuclear weapons strategists as ‘peace enforcers’ a (mistaken) view which, amid numerous internal conceptual inconsistencies of nuclear disorder and the lack of solid evidence for supporting it, has still trickled public awareness in many countries. In short, recent humanitarian processes in counter-personnel mining and cluster bombs have revealed questions about these weapons and their legality. This was necessary for the context of a humanitarian objective and mechanism to pursue these questions in a realistic and meaningful manner.

Public health professionals have contributed in several ways and written in a wide variety of places to deter war and particularly to control nuclear proliferation. A large range of public health programs to deter war are covered by any contribution. 69 Any of them are unique to the elimination of nuclear weapons. Any concern blocking the production of nuclear weapons of fissionable material. Any people address local communities’ views of the dangers of the manufacture of nuclear weapons. The practices of health personnel employed in conflict zones are some of the most dangerous for public health care workers to deter war from going on. There are more threats than ever before faced by the proliferation of nuclear weapons. While those concerns can appear well removed from public policy practices at government or municipal health, healthcare, or public health practice settings daily, public health professionals have plenty to do to overcome the problems faced by the spread of nuclear weapons. These topics should be trained and disseminated by public health staff to peers, decision leaders, and the general public (Kristensen, 2019). They should promote stricter domestic and foreign nuclear arms control policies.

Since then there has also been a scientific investigation into evidence of the immediate and long-term effects of the use and testing of nuclear weapons. In a significant 1987 paper, the WHO outlined current studies into the effects of a nuclear detonation on health and health care.

 The study states, inter alia, that nuclear blasts have catastrophic short- and long-term impacts on human bodies due to the blast wave, thermal wave, radiation, and toxic impact, and that current health systems cannot significantly mitigate these effects. Nuclear weapons in or around the region can cause major deaths and damage, large-scale displacement, and cause long-lasting harm to people’s health or well-being and long-term damage to the atmosphere, facilities, societal growth, and a social environment by the explosion of the blast wave and heavy contamination and radiation, as well as radioactive fallout. Also, small-scale use of some 100 nuclear bombs against urban goals will, in addition to radiation spreading across the planet, lead to a freezing of the air, shortened seasons of development, food shortages, and global famine.

No national frontier can contain the effects of nuclear detonations, particularly the radioactive downwind impact. After a nuclear explosion in or near a residential place, the extent of damage and pollution can create serious social or political disturbances, since the infrastructure is reconstructed and economic operations are restored, business, communication, health services, and schools are regenerated for many decades.

No state and/or foreign entity may adequately tackle a humanitarian urgent emergency, or offer adequate aid to those concerned, the long-term effects of the detonation of a nuclear weapon in a populated region. Due to the massive devastation and devastation of nuclear disaster, even if an effort to achieve coordinated readiness can also be of benefit in alleviating the consequences of an explosion of an improvised nuclear device, it would still not be feasible to detect such capabilities. vulnerability of human error and cyber-attacks in nuclear weapons command-and-control networks. maintain high-level alert nuclear arsenals that are ready for deployment in minutes thousands of missiles. The hazards of access by non-state parties to nuclear weapons and associated resources are some other replications associated with it.

Risk is the product of the probability of an adverse occurrence and is multiplied by the effects. The probability of one government or another using nuclear weapons intentionally has declined from the end of the Cold War although it would have huge implications. This chance has however by no means vanished. Particularly in a regional war, nuclear weapons may be used. In the past, the Nuclear non-proliferation Treaty (NPT), signed in 1968, restricted the possibility of proliferation of nuclear weapons among countries. Five nations are de facto owners of nuclear weapons, and the Convention acknowledges only five have nuclear weapons, while three others are non-partisan. As the ‘Non-Nuclear Weapons States’ all other nations in the world have entered into the Pact, but one country (North Korea) has withdrawn. Some nations, including Iran, and Iraq before Saddam Hussein has been expelled, are still striving to acquire nuclear weapons. Much more nations have sought, but have been forced to drop, nuclear weapons programs in the past.

The most dangerous, cruel, and indiscriminate weapons ever created are nuclear weapons. Nuclear weapons They are different from all other missiles, both in the scope of their destruction and in their uniquely enduring, spreading, genetically harmful radioactive fallout (Kmentt,  2015). A single nuclear bomb shoot could destroy millions of people over a large city. The use of tens or hundreds of nuclear weapons will disturb the global atmosphere and cause mass starvation. Nuclear bombs emit ionizing, killing or sickness exposed ones, contaminating the air and having long-term effects for wellbeing, including cancer and genetic damage and adversely Nuclear bombs emit ionizing, killing or sickness exposed ones, contaminating the air and having long-term effects for wellbeing, including cancer and genetic damage.

The NPT is a dynamic negotiation between countries and countries that do not have one. The countries have not agreed to not accept nuclear arms, materials, or material specific to them, although the States with Nuclear Weapons consent not to provide those articles (Warren & Baxter,2020). The countries with nuclear weapons are obliged to provide other countries with the peaceful use of nuclear technology to decrease the unequal character of the deal. Most important, Nuclear Weapons States have committed to reduce and operate in good faith for the abolition of the role of nuclear weapons in foreign affairs. The United States was most inadequate about this latter obligation. Indeed, the latest Nuclear Posture Review by the current Bush administration estimates that several thousand nuclear weapons are needed indefinitely, and also searches for new missions for them.

There is an increasing possibility that terrorists could acquire nuclear weapons. Deterrence kept the US and the former Soviet Union from directly conflicting armed forces for several years and now in so-called “states of concern” such as North Korea, deterrence maintains its control. But dissuasion would not restrict fanatical beliefs-driven (Panofsky, 2003). The avoidance of a jihadist nuclear disaster must therefore be either based on the interdiction or the prevention of hostile distribution of nuclear weapons of explosive materials necessary for nuclear weapons (in particular high-enriched uranium and plutonium). The threats faced by nuclear weapons could be the most dangerous outcome of scientific and technological interaction with human activities.


Acheson, R. (2018). Impacts of the nuclear ban: how outlawing nuclear weapons is changing the world. Global Change, Peace & Security30(2), 243-250.

Futter, A. (2021). Horizontal Proliferation Challenges: The Nuclear Outliers. In The Politics of Nuclear Weapons (pp. 143-169). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.

Gibbons, R. D. (2018). The humanitarian turn in nuclear disarmament and the treaty on the prohibition of nuclear weapons. The Nonproliferation Review25(1-2), 11-36.

Graham, T. W., & Mullins, A. F. (2019). Arms Control, Military Strategy and Nuclear Proliferation. In Nuclear Deterrence and Global Security in Transition (pp. 157-170). Routledge.

Hanson, M. (2018). Normalizing zero nuclear weapons: The humanitarian road to the Prohibition Treaty. Contemporary Security Policy39(3), 464-486.

Hymans, J. E. (2019). Do nuclear crises vaccinate against nuclear war? When Proliferation Causes Peace: The Psychology of Nuclear Crises, Michael D. Cohen (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2017), 304 pages, $34.95.

Kmentt, A. (2015). The development of the international initiative on the humanitarian impact of nuclear weapons and its effect on the nuclear weapons debate. Int’l Rev. Red Cross97, 681.

Lieber, K. A., & Press, D. G. (2013). The new era of nuclear weapons, deterrence, and conflict. Strategic Studies Quarterly7(1), 3-14.

Panofsky, W. K. (2003). Nuclear proliferation risks, new and old. Issues in Science and Technology19(4), 73-75.

Warren, A., & Baxter, P. M. (Eds.). (2020). Nuclear Modernization in the 21st Century: A Technical, Policy, and Strategic Review.

Williams, H. (2018). A nuclear babel: narratives around the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. The Nonproliferation Review25(1-2), 51-63.

Kristensen, H. M. (2019). Global nuclear arsenals, 1990–2018. In Nuclear Safeguards, Security, and Nonproliferation (pp. 3-35). Butterworth-Heinemann.

KRISTENSEN, H. M. Nuclear Weapons Modernization, And Nuclear Proliferation Triggers. THE NEXT FIFTY YEARS OF NUCLEAR PROLIFERATION, 21.

Order Now

Download the complete solution for POLS5003 National Security and Strategy and many more, or order a fresh one. Order Online Now!

Universal Assignment (June 9, 2023) POLS5003 National Security and Strategy Solved. Retrieved from https://universalassignment.com/pols5003-national-security-and-strategy-solved/.
"POLS5003 National Security and Strategy Solved." Universal Assignment - June 9, 2023, https://universalassignment.com/pols5003-national-security-and-strategy-solved/
Universal Assignment July 17, 2022 POLS5003 National Security and Strategy Solved., viewed June 9, 2023,<https://universalassignment.com/pols5003-national-security-and-strategy-solved/>
Universal Assignment - POLS5003 National Security and Strategy Solved. [Internet]. [Accessed June 9, 2023]. Available from: https://universalassignment.com/pols5003-national-security-and-strategy-solved/
"POLS5003 National Security and Strategy Solved." Universal Assignment - Accessed June 9, 2023. https://universalassignment.com/pols5003-national-security-and-strategy-solved/
"POLS5003 National Security and Strategy Solved." Universal Assignment [Online]. Available: https://universalassignment.com/pols5003-national-security-and-strategy-solved/. [Accessed: June 9, 2023]

Please note along with our service, we will provide you with the following deliverables:

Please do not hesitate to put forward any queries regarding the service provision.

We look forward to having you on board with us.

Get 90%* Discount on Assignment Help

Most Frequent Questions & Answers

Universal Assignment Services is the best place to get help in your all kind of assignment help. We have 172+ experts available, who can help you to get HD+ grades. We also provide Free Plag report, Free Revisions,Best Price in the industry guaranteed.

We provide all kinds of assignmednt help, Report writing, Essay Writing, Dissertations, Thesis writing, Research Proposal, Research Report, Home work help, Question Answers help, Case studies, mathematical and Statistical tasks, Website development, Android application, Resume/CV writing, SOP(Statement of Purpose) Writing, Blog/Article, Poster making and so on.

We are available round the clock, 24X7, 365 days. You can appach us to our Whatsapp number +1 (613)778 8542 or email to info@universalassignment.com . We provide Free revision policy, if you need and revisions to be done on the task, we will do the same for you as soon as possible.

We provide services mainly to all major institutes and Universities in Australia, Canada, China, Malaysia, India, South Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

We provide lucrative discounts from 28% to 70% as per the wordcount, Technicality, Deadline and the number of your previous assignments done with us.

After your assignment request our team will check and update you the best suitable service for you alongwith the charges for the task. After confirmation and payment team will start the work and provide the task as per the deadline.

Yes, we will provide Plagirism free task and a free turnitin report along with the task without any extra cost.

No, if the main requirement is same, you don’t have to pay any additional amount. But it there is a additional requirement, then you have to pay the balance amount in order to get the revised solution.

The Fees are as minimum as $10 per page(1 page=250 words) and in case of a big task, we provide huge discounts.

We accept all the major Credit and Debit Cards for the payment. We do accept Paypal also.

Popular Assignments

MGMT90280 Managerial Decision Analytics Assignment

MGMT90280 Managerial Decision Analytics Assignment 2 – Group Assignment (4,000 words) Assignment 2 Specifications – 30% Many organisations use Business Analytics to explore data, discover patterns and solve critical business problems. This assignment is designed to allow you to demonstrate that you can effectively analyse and solve a business problem

Read More »

Visualization and data processing

Visualization and data processing Total Marks – 50 09 Apr 2023 Assessment 2 The following exercises are designed to assess your understanding of concepts, implementation, and interpretation of topics in Visualization and Data Processing. Some questions may require you to search and use R functions that we have not used

Read More »

B9DA110 Advanced Data and Network Mining

Dublin Business School Assessment Brief Assessment Details Unit Title Advanced Data and Network Mining Unit Code B9DA110 Unit Leader Level: 9 Assessment Title Big Data Mining Process and Application Assessment Number 1 Assessment Type: Individual Assessment Weighting 30% Issue Date: Week of 23 January 2023 Hand in Date: Sunday 11

Read More »

Individual Assignment – Building Your E-Commerce Store

Individual Assignment – Building Your E-Commerce Store (20%) Students will create their own e-commerce store through first completing a situational analysis to determine a GAP in the market and an opportunity to launch and e-commerce store. Students will work with either, Shopify, WIX, BigCommerce or any other Software as Service

Read More »

Coursework (Project) Help

        Deadline: 04 June 2023, 11:59 am The coursework will consist of a report based on a group project (2,500 ± 5% words no leeway). You have a choice of two group projects, select ONE. Topic 1: Perfumes Part A: Discuss the different motivations identified in the literature for the

Read More »

Nursing Informatics Assignment Help

Note: The Learning Objective for the module is for the student to Demonstrate competency in the transformation of data into information and use the acquired knowledge in decision-making and the delivery of health care services. (AACN 7,8) The learning objective has been derived from the AACN Essentials. To achieve the learning objective,

Read More »

Marketing Analysis Assignment Help

NOTE: Review the class discussion on marketing and complete the required readings/viewings before beginning this assignment.  Identify two organizations (one can be yours, but only if you can view it without bias) that compete for the same business.  First, for each organization, provide the information requested below: Second,  compare and

Read More »

MBA502 Company Diversity Award Presentation

Assessment 1 Information Subject Code: MBA502 Subject Name: Emotional Intelligence, Cultural Intelligence and Diversity Assessment Title: Company Diversity Award Presentation Assessment Type: Video and PowerPoint Slides Word Count: 5–7 minutes Weighting: 40% Total Marks: 40 Submission: MyKBS Due Date: Tuesday 11.55pm Week 13 Your Task The Australian HR Institute (AHRI)

Read More »

MBA 402 Assessment 3 Case Study

MBA 402 Assessment 3 Case Study You are an independent consultant, counselling companies on corporate governance issues. You have been engaged by JKM Renew Pty Ltd (JKM) to advise them on their corporate governance structures. JKM is a land remediation business. You are unfamiliar with this industry, and decide to

Read More »

DATA4500 Social Media Analytics

Assessment 4: Information Subject Code: DATA4500 Subject Name: Social Media Analytics Assessment Title: Write a report about SMA and crisis management; Present a comprehensive Social Media Strategy to the Board Assessment Type: Creation and presentation of the strategy using PowerPoint or a similar application Word Count: 500-word report and 3

Read More »

BAFI 3257 – Corporate Financial Management

School of Economics, Finance and Marketing Master of Finance BAFI 3257 – Corporate Financial Management ASSESSMENT TASK 3 – INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT Semester 1 – 2021 Marks Due Date Submission Instructions Objective In this assignment, you are required to apply techniques and concepts acquired in this course to analyse and provide

Read More »

MMP742 – Investment Valuation

MMP742 – Investment Valuation Trimester 1, 2021 Assessment Task 2 DUE DATE AND TIME:                        Week 10, 17/05/2021, 8PM (AEST) PERCENTAGE OF FINAL GRADE:        25% WORD COUNT:                                   2,500 words Learning Outcome Details Unit Learning Outcome (ULO) Graduate Learning Outcome (GLO) ULO 1: Collect, evaluate and interpret market data relevant to property

Read More »

Initial Instructions: Research Report

General Information For this assignment, the class will participate in a simple research project which you will write up as a research report with the following sections: Abstract, Introduction, Method, Results, Discussion and References. In order to successfully complete this assignment, you will need to I encourage you to work

Read More »

LST3LPC Policy Proposal

Due: Tuesday October 26 (11:59pm) Size: 1500 words Worth: 40% Submission: Turnitin Description Students are required to produce a policy proposal, including the discussion of a social issue, policy options and recommendations. To support students to complete this task comprehensively and in accordance with expectations for policy proposals produced outside

Read More »

HLT54115 Diploma of Nursing

Assessment 2: Literature Review- Evidence-Based Practice HLT54115 Diploma of Nursing CHCPOL003 Research and apply evidence to practice Instructions for Student Instructions Select one of the topics below and undertake a literature review using evidence-based Practice (EBP).   Topics The impacts of effective hand hygiene practices in nursing.Improvements in nursing interventions

Read More »

Assessment 2 – Narrated Presentation

Assessment 2 – Narrated Presentation Assessment Type Narrated Presentation of an Educational Resource Description: Teaching and Learning Outline.  In this assessment item you are required to: 1. Topic is: Blood Glucose level management and subcutaneous insulin application for patients with type 2 diabetes. 2. Conceptualise an educational resource that will

Read More »


FOOD PANDA Question 2 – Delivery performance measure Delivery Performance is the level at which an organization’s provision of products and services meets the criteria anticipated by its consumers. To achieve maximum client happiness, service providers must focus on quality. The top 2 approaches performance measure to evaluate their food

Read More »

BUSN3003 Exam – Session 2, 2021

BUSN3003 Exam – Session 2, 2021 Instructions: Please save this document onto your computer. Type your answers into the document, saving the document as you go – you don’t want to lose any answers! Once complete, upload the final document via the Turnitin Exam Submission Link on the Blackboard site

Read More »

Hospitality Services Management

Hospitality Services Management Group members: each doing 7 marks worth Chloe Kate Tori Gideon Assessment 2 Group Task – (using a Wiki) A Group Task, using a Wiki, to create a new service organisation Related Topics: 3, 4, 5 & 6. You have been assigned to a group drawn from

Read More »

Development and Construction – Assignment 3

Development and Construction – Assignment 3 Marking Guide This is a guide to help you with the structuring of your report and highlighting what specific information should be included in your report. You should use information from your previous assignments, including designs and the feasibility study, as the basis for

Read More »

Case Analysis Sarita

Sarita due Sunday 12 September 2021 2500 words ± 10% You will be marked against the criteria in the marking rubric for Case analysis. Theme  5 Stress response in health and illness and theme 6 Immunology concepts Weighting: 50% referenced using APA style. • ll written assessments are to be

Read More »

Assignment 1: Argumentative Essay

Assignment 1: Argumentative Essay Topic Healthcare professionals have an ethical responsibility to always advocate for the introduction of new treatments and technologies into healthcare. Instructions In relation to your selected topic: • Consider the application of the bioethical principles. • Consider the application of ethical theories and other ethical concepts.

Read More »

Healthcare Ethics Argumentative essay

ASSESSMENT INFORMATION   Assessment Title   Argumentative essay     Purpose The purpose of this assessment is for students to demonstrate the capacity to develop an ethical argument/s based around the four bio-ethical principles: autonomy, justice, beneficence, and non-maleficence. Students will use their chosen topic to develop a sound ethical

Read More »

Marking Guide for Assessment 1 Part B: Reflection

Marking Guide for Assessment 1 Part B: Reflection Reflection (Total of 30 marks) – Due 31st October 2021 Reflect on the desirable qualities of counselling and how these qualities shape your approach and values to counselling and/or developing a therapeutic professional relationship. Reflect on your PART A reflection and consider

Read More »

Critical Reflection scenario-based essay

Purpose: The purpose of this assessment is to deepen student’s understanding of the characteristics of leadership styles and the dynamic relationship of leadership with workplace communication and culture. Aim: This assessment provides the student the opportunity to apply and evaluate leadership styles in a scenario involving making changes to improve workplace

Read More »

MBA621 Healthcare Systems

Assessment 2 Information Subject Code: MBA621 Subject Name: Assessment Title: Assessment Type: Length: Case Study Slide Deck Individual PowerPoint presentation slides with notes 2000 words (+/- 10% allowable range) 20 slides with 100 words per slide Weighting: 35% Total Marks: Submission: 100 Online Due Date: Weeks 7 Your task Develop

Read More »

MATH7017: Probabilistic Models and Inference

MATH7017: Probabilistic Models and Inference, Project 2023                    (total: 40 points) Conditional Generation with Variational Autoencoders and Generative Adversarial Networks Overview In this project, you will work with Variational Autoencoders (VAEs) and Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs). You will build and train conditional versions of these models to generate MNIST digits given

Read More »

Surveying Plan Assignment Help

Submission Component and Marks Awarded Marks   PLAN:     Find Scale of plan and explain 4   9 Bearing and Distances of three lines 3 Plan Presentation 2 HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT     Deflection Angles 4   18 Curve Elements 4 Chainages along the Road 10 VERTICAL ALIGNMENT:    

Read More »

Can't Find Your Assignment?

Open chat
Free Assistance
Universal Assignment
Hello 👋
How can we help you?