PUBH6003 Health Systems and Economics

PUBH6003 Health Systems and Economics
ASSESSMENT 2 BRIEF
Subject Code and TitlePUBH6003 Health Systems and Economics
AssessmentWritten Debate
Individual/GroupGroup of Three
Length2,000 words total (+/–10%)
Learning OutcomesThe Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by the successful completion of the task below include: Critically examine the key characteristics of health systems and apply this knowledge to local and global contexts;   Investigate and inquire into the building blocks of health systems and interpret how they are translated globally;   Evaluate the principles of systems thinking and promote multi- sectoral collaboration for the successful implementation of public health programmes;   Analyse the key concepts and principles of health economics; and   Evaluate the factors that influence health service supply and demand with a focus on the equitable distribution of resources.
SubmissionIndividual Position Statement (400 words +/–10%) Available at the end of Module 7 (Week 7) on Sunday at 11.55 pm, and due for submission at the end of Module 10 (Week 10) as an appendix. Part A: Submission to Discussion Forum—Group Position Statement (1,000 words +/–10%) Due at the end of Module 8 (Week 8) on Sunday at 11.55 pm AEST/AEDT Part B: Submission—Group Position Statement and Group Rebuttal Statement (2,000 words +/–10%), attaching individual position statements as an appendix. A single PDF-file submission. Due at the end of Module 10 (Week 10) on Sunday at 11.55 pm AEST/AEDT
Weighting40%
Total Marks100 marks

Context

Healthcare financing incorporates how funds are mobilised (raising revenue), accumulated (pooling) and allocated (purchasing) to deliver health services to individuals and population groups.

Health systems cannot function without funding: reliable channels of funding are important to ensure that a health system is equitable, and that individual healthcare costs do not cause financial harm.

  • Revenue raising ensures that there is money and ensures sustainability.
  • Pooling spreads the financial risk across the population to ensure equity and efficacy.
  • Allocation mechanisms used to pay for health services ensures services/medicines and technology.

Health financing also ensures the appropriate setting of financial incentives for the payment of health providers. Ultimately, health financing helps health systems to achieve their goals, such as health outcomes/gains, equity in the provision of health services, system efficacy and responsiveness. These key indicators are used to monitor and evaluate the health financing mechanisms adopted by different countries. Thus, knowledge of health financing will help you to understand the extent to which health system goals are achievable (or not) in a given context.

This assessment is designed to encourage teamwork and collaboration. The assessment requires you to engage in extensive research and undertake a critical analysis to craft clear and strategic

evidence-based arguments to support your stance: a key skill in public health advocacy and policy development.

Assessment Task

Your group will be provided with a topic and the stance that you will be required to argue. Critically evaluate your topic for debate (in essence, writing a position paper), as assigned to you by your learning facilitator. Consider the pros and cons for the achievement of the health system’s goals: the health outcomes (health gain), equity in health and finance, financial protection and the responsiveness of the system.

Instructions

The table below summarises the schedule of activities and timelines for the assessment.

Allocation of Students to Groups Due: End of Module 5 (Week 5)Students will be assigned to groups (three students per group), depending on class size. Each group will be assigned a topic and team position by the learning facilitator.
  Draft Individual Position Statement Due: End of Module 7 (Week 7)Each student is to write a 1-page position statement (at least 400 words +/–10%) representing their argument on the assigned topic before working with one another on the group position statement.   Individual position statements will be attached as an appendix to the final submission.
  Part A: Submission—Group Position Statement (Discussion Forum) Due: End of Module 8 (Week 8)Groups to submit their group statement on the discussion forum dedicated to this activity. Each group is to provide three clear, logical, convincing and evidence-based arguments that support their side (1,000 words +/–10%). This submission will be marked once the entire task is submitted in Week 10.
Draft Group rebuttal statement Due: End of Module 10 (Week 10)Provide three clear, logical, convincing and evidence-based arguments to demolish or argue against the main points of the opposing team (1000 words +/–10%).
Part B: Final Submission–Group Position Statement and Group Rebuttal, attaching Individual Position Statements as an appendix Due: End of Module 10 (Week 10)  Group to submit their position statement, which should be the same as the one submitted to the discussion forum previously (1,000 words +/ 10%) and the group rebuttal (1,000 words +/–10%) and individual position statements (as an appendix). All documents to be submitted as a single PDF file.

Note: Each team member should fill out the evaluation form individually and confidentially and submit it using the ‘Team Member Evaluation Form Submission’ link. The Evaluation Form is available for download under the Assessment Information.

Details

Individual Position Statement

You are required to initially work individually on the topic assigned to your group by the learning facilitator. As a group you need to establish three arguments and each argument needs to be allocated to an individual group member. You will conduct some preliminary research relevant to the argument you are allocated and synthesise and analyse the researched material to build arguments to support your viewpoint. You are also required to demonstrate your ability to integrate knowledge about aspects and perspectives, which you may need to argue against the opposition team’s main arguments. Your Individual Position Statement will be integrated in the overall group statement.

Group Position Statement

Address each of the below points clearly and concisely in your group position statement to successfully complete the task.

  1. Present your overall argument in a clear statement.
  2. Provide background information on the topic to explain its importance. Define the issue if required.
  3. Provide the first supporting statement with evidence from credible/academic sources of information; paraphrase with parenthetical citations.
  4. Provide second supporting statement with evidence from credible/academic sources; paraphrase with parenthetical citations.
  5. Provide, the third supporting statement with evidence from credible/academic sources; paraphrase with parenthetical citations.
  6. Conclusion. Restate the main argument and synthesise the main key points to explain the significance of the issue. Do not introduce new information.

Group Rebuttal Statement

Here are some rebuttal strategies that you can use:

  1. Thesis statement. This statement should directly oppose the thesis statement of the original claim that you are countering.
  2. Address and counter each of the three supporting arguments point-by-point by providing an evidence-based analysis, explanation and specific examples that support your overall point.
  3. Write a conclusion synthesising the main points.

Assessment Components

By the end of Module 10 (Week 10), each group needs to submit the following as a single PDF file

  • Group Position Statement—1,000 words (+/–10%)
  • Group Rebuttal Statement—1,000 words (+/–10%)
  • Individual Position Statements (as an appendix).
  • Team Evaluation Form (Download from the Assessment 2 folder for this subject, complete individually and confidently, and submit using the submission link provided).

Refer to the table above for instructions on what these assessment components include.

Other Guidelines Referencing

It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. For more information on referencing

Submission Instructions

Group Position Statements are to be submitted via the main navigation menu for Assessments for PUBH6003 Health Systems and Economics under the link Assessment 2: Part A: Discussion Forum at the end of Module 8 (Week 8).

All components need to be submitted as a single PDF file under the Assessment 2: Part B link at the

end of Module 10 (Week 10). There should only be ONE submission per group.

The learning facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.

Breach of academic integrity should be reported using the AI form for further investigation, and the prescribed action will be taken when a breach is identified.

Academic Integrity Declaration

We declare that except where referenced, the work we are submitting for this assessment task is our own. We have read and are aware of the Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure

We are also aware that we need to keep a copy of all submitted material and their drafts, and we agree to do so.

Assessment Rubric

  Assessment AttributesFail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0–49%Pass (Functional) 50–64%Credit (Proficient) 65–74%Distinction (Advanced) 75–84%High Distinction (Exceptional) 85–100%
Knowledge and understanding of health financing mechanisms; that is, raising revenue, pooling revenue and purchasing.   Ability to assess the quality of the mechanisms via their effects on health outcomes (health gain), equity in health and finance, financial protection and responsiveness.   30%Fails to show or shows a partially developed understanding of health financing for health system’s goals (pros and cons).   Limited evaluation and analysis of the quality of mechanisms against their effects on health outcomes, equity in health and finance, financial protection and responsiveness.   Confuses logic and emotion. Information taken from reliable sources but without coherent analysis or synthesis.Demonstrates functional knowledge of health financing for health system’s goals (pros and cons).   Demonstrates some analysis and evaluation of the quality of mechanisms against their effects on health outcomes, equity in health and finance, financial protection and responsiveness.     Analysis and evaluation do not reflect expert judgement, intellectual independence, rigor and adaptability.Demonstrates proficient knowledge of health financing for health system’s goals (pros and cons).   Well-developed analysis and evaluation of the quality of mechanisms against their effects on health outcomes, equity in health and finance, financial protection and responsiveness.   Identifies logical flaws. Analysis and evaluation reflect expert judgement, intellectual independence, rigor and adaptability.Demonstrates advanced knowledge of health financing for health system’s goals (pros and cons).   Thoroughly developed analysis and evaluation of the quality of mechanisms against their effects on health outcomes, equity in health and finance, financial protection and responsiveness.   Analysis and evaluation reflect growing judgement, intellectual independence, rigor and adaptability.Demonstrates exceptional knowledge of health financing for health system’s goals (pros and cons).   Highly sophisticated evaluation and analysis of the quality of mechanisms against their effects on health outcomes, equity in health and finance, financial protection and responsiveness.   Identifies gaps in knowledge. Exhibits intellectual independence, rigor, good judgement and adaptability.
  Assessment AttributesFail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0–49%Pass (Functional) 50–64%Credit (Proficient) 65–74%Distinction (Advanced) 75–84%High Distinction (Exceptional) 85–100%
Structure and presentation of group position statement.   20%No clear position taken; reasons undeveloped; no supporting facts are used. Position statement was not supported.Position not clearly stated; development is brief; unrelated, unsupported general statements, reasons, and details; minimal facts used. Counter arguments are not acknowledged. Position statement was well supported, but others were not.Clear position taken and defined; some reasons and some details are presented, but these are not fully developed. Counter arguments addressed. Position statement was supported with facts, statistics and/or examples, but the relevance of some was questionable.Clear position taken and defined; uses at least three appropriate reasons with some development. Counter arguments addressed in detail. Position statement was adequately supported with relevant facts, statistics and/or examples.Takes a strong, well defined position; uses three appropriate reasons with at least two supporting details for each reason. Counter arguments effectively addressed, without undercutting the other team’s position. Position statement was well supported with several relevant facts, statistics and/or examples.
Structure and presentation of rebuttal arguments.   15%Counterarguments were not accurate and/or relevant. Arguments were not tied to an idea at all. Absence of cross- examination or rebuttals, failure to point out problems in other team’s position; failure to defend its position statement.Some counterarguments were weak and irrelevant. Arguments were not tied well to an idea. Poor cross-examination or rebuttals; pointed out one or two problems in other team’s position; defended its position statement weakly.Most counterarguments were accurate and relevant, but several were weak. All arguments were clearly tied to an idea (premise) but the organisation was sometimes not clear or logical. Decent cross-examination and/or rebuttals, but some significant problems.Most counterarguments were accurate, relevant, and strong. Most arguments were clearly tied to an idea (premise) and organised in a tight, logical fashion. Good cross-examination and rebuttals with only minor slip-ups.All counterarguments were accurate, relevant and strong. All arguments were clearly tied to an idea (premise) and organised in a tight, logical fashion. Excellent cross-examination and rebuttal against the other team’s arguments/position statement.
  Assessment AttributesFail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0–49%Pass (Functional) 50–64%Credit (Proficient) 65–74%Distinction (Advanced) 75–84%High Distinction (Exceptional) 85–100%
Substantiation of information selected on health financing for health system’s goals to support the group’s arguments     15%Limited understanding of key concepts required to support the case study.   Viewpoints of experts are taken as fact and subject to little questioning.Resembles a recall or summary of key ideas. Often conflates/confuses the assertion of personal opinion with information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials.Demonstrates a capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts. Supports personal opinion; information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials. Questions viewpoints of experts.Well-demonstrated capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts. Discriminates between the assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading. Viewpoints of experts are subject to questioning.Information is taken from sources with a high level of interpretation/evaluation to develop a comprehensive critical analysis or synthesis. Systematically and critically discriminates between the assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading.
Team work     10%Does not participate effectively in a team environment. Places individual goals ahead of group responsibilities. Hinders the group process and upsets the schedule.Participates effectively in teams. Identifies team and individual goals, tasks, responsibilities and schedules. Contributes to group processes. Supports the team.Contributes to small group discussions to reach agreement on issues. Works together with others towards shared goals. Renegotiates responsibilities as necessary.Understands group dynamics and team roles. Facilitates team development. Renegotiates responsibilities, tasks and schedules as necessary.Builds team’s identity and commitment. Leads teams. Evaluates team outcomes. Implements strategies to enhance team effectiveness.
  Assessment AttributesFail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0–49%Pass (Functional) 50–64%Credit (Proficient) 65–74%Distinction (Advanced) 75–84%High Distinction (Exceptional) 85–100%
Correct citation of key resources and evidence.     Health financing for health system’s goals         10%Demonstrates inconsistent use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas.           Referencing is omitted or does not resemble APA.Uses credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas, but these are not always explicit or well developed.             Referencing resembles APA but contains frequent or repeated errors.Uses credible resources to support and develop ideas.                 Referencing resembles APA but contains occasional errors.Uses good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and statements.   Shows evidence of wide scope within the organisation for sourcing evidence.   APA referencing is free of errors.Uses high-quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and position statements.   Shows evidence of wide scope within and without the organisation for sourcing evidence. APA referencing is free of errors.
The following Subject Learning Outcomes are addressed in this assessment
SLO a)Critically examine the key characteristics of health systems and apply this knowledge to local and global contexts.
SLO b)Investigate and inquire into the building blocks of health systems and interpret how they are translated globally.
  SLO c)Evaluate the principles of systems thinking and promote multi-sectoral collaboration for the successful implementation of public health programmes.
SLO d)Analyse the key concepts and principles of health economics.
SLO e)Evaluate the factors that influence health service supply and demand with a focus on the equitable distribution of resources.
Order Now

Get expert help for PUBH6003 Health Systems and Economics and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!

Universal Assignment (July 17, 2025) PUBH6003 Health Systems and Economics. Retrieved from https://universalassignment.com/pubh6003-health-systems-and-economics-3/.
"PUBH6003 Health Systems and Economics." Universal Assignment - July 17, 2025, https://universalassignment.com/pubh6003-health-systems-and-economics-3/
Universal Assignment May 19, 2023 PUBH6003 Health Systems and Economics., viewed July 17, 2025,<https://universalassignment.com/pubh6003-health-systems-and-economics-3/>
Universal Assignment - PUBH6003 Health Systems and Economics. [Internet]. [Accessed July 17, 2025]. Available from: https://universalassignment.com/pubh6003-health-systems-and-economics-3/
"PUBH6003 Health Systems and Economics." Universal Assignment - Accessed July 17, 2025. https://universalassignment.com/pubh6003-health-systems-and-economics-3/
"PUBH6003 Health Systems and Economics." Universal Assignment [Online]. Available: https://universalassignment.com/pubh6003-health-systems-and-economics-3/. [Accessed: July 17, 2025]

Please note along with our service, we will provide you with the following deliverables:

Please do not hesitate to put forward any queries regarding the service provision.

We look forward to having you on board with us.

Categories

Get 90%* Discount on Assignment Help

Most Frequent Questions & Answers

Universal Assignment Services is the best place to get help in your all kind of assignment help. We have 172+ experts available, who can help you to get HD+ grades. We also provide Free Plag report, Free Revisions,Best Price in the industry guaranteed.

We provide all kinds of assignmednt help, Report writing, Essay Writing, Dissertations, Thesis writing, Research Proposal, Research Report, Home work help, Question Answers help, Case studies, mathematical and Statistical tasks, Website development, Android application, Resume/CV writing, SOP(Statement of Purpose) Writing, Blog/Article, Poster making and so on.

We are available round the clock, 24X7, 365 days. You can appach us to our Whatsapp number +1 (613)778 8542 or email to info@universalassignment.com . We provide Free revision policy, if you need and revisions to be done on the task, we will do the same for you as soon as possible.

We provide services mainly to all major institutes and Universities in Australia, Canada, China, Malaysia, India, South Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

We provide lucrative discounts from 28% to 70% as per the wordcount, Technicality, Deadline and the number of your previous assignments done with us.

After your assignment request our team will check and update you the best suitable service for you alongwith the charges for the task. After confirmation and payment team will start the work and provide the task as per the deadline.

Yes, we will provide Plagirism free task and a free turnitin report along with the task without any extra cost.

No, if the main requirement is same, you don’t have to pay any additional amount. But it there is a additional requirement, then you have to pay the balance amount in order to get the revised solution.

The Fees are as minimum as $10 per page(1 page=250 words) and in case of a big task, we provide huge discounts.

We accept all the major Credit and Debit Cards for the payment. We do accept Paypal also.

Popular Assignments

Assignment Help in India – 100% Plagiarism-Free & AI-Powered Academic Support

Are you a student in India struggling with academic pressure, tight deadlines, or complex topics? Whether you’re in Delhi, Mumbai, Bangalore, Hyderabad, Kolkata, or pursuing online education, Universal Assignment offers expert-written, AI-enhanced, and plagiarism-free assignment help in India for every subject and level. We provide affordable, fast, and high-quality assignment

Read More »

Maria and Akim Case Study 

Case Study  Presentation Assignment Type:  Presentation (Panopto) Assignment Description: Case Study  Weighting: 25% Team or Individual: Individual Assignment submission: Submit through the Canvas following the prompts for Assignment submission  Due Date: Thursday 24th April  2025 at 10:00  Presentation length: 10 (-/+ 10%) minutes Unit Learning Outcomes: This assignment will help you to understand and demonstrate the following

Read More »

Assignment Help in Karnataka – 100% Plagiarism-Free & AI-Powered Academic Writing

Are you a student in Karnataka facing challenges with tough assignments, projects, or academic writing? Whether you’re studying in Bengaluru, Mysuru, Mangaluru, Hubballi, or Dharwad, Universal Assignment offers fast, affordable, and plagiarism-free assignment help in Karnataka. Our combination of expert writers and AI-enhanced tools ensures that you receive high-quality, university-compliant

Read More »

Score good marks on Assignment Master of Science (M.Sc) in Physics

Universal Assignment Solutions: Your Premier Physics Assignment Help Service Globally Are you struggling with your Master of Science (M.Sc) in Physics assignments? Look no further than Universal Assignment Solutions, the top assignment help service globally. Our dedicated team of experts is here to support you through your academic journey, ensuring

Read More »

Score good marks on Assignment Master of Science (M.Sc) in Chemistry

Universal Assignment Solutions: Your Premier Chemistry Assignment Help Service Globally Are you struggling with your Master of Science (M.Sc) in Chemistry assignments? Look no further than Universal Assignment Solutions, the top assignment help service globally. Our dedicated team of experts is here to support you through your academic journey, ensuring

Read More »

Score good marks on Assignment Master of Public Administration (MPA)

Universal Assignment Solutions: Your Premier Public Administration Assignment Help Service Globally Are you struggling with your Master of Public Administration (MPA) assignments? Look no further than Universal Assignment Solutions, the top assignment help service globally. Our dedicated team of experts is here to support you through your academic journey, ensuring

Read More »

Score good marks on Assignment Master of Law (LLM)

Conquering the Complexities of Law: Your Guide to Mastering Your LLM Assignment The Master of Law (LLM) program equips you to delve deeper into a specialized area of law, sharpening your legal expertise and preparing you for a thriving legal career. But navigating intricate legal doctrines, complex case studies, and

Read More »

Assignment Help in Maharashtra – AI-Powered & 100% Plagiarism-Free Academic Assistance

Are you a student in Maharashtra overwhelmed by assignments, projects, or dissertations? Whether you’re studying in Mumbai, Pune, Nagpur, Nashik, or Aurangabad, Universal Assignment is your one-stop solution for assignment help in Maharashtra. We provide AI-powered, plagiarism-free, and expert-written academic content tailored to your university’s guidelines and submission requirements. ✅

Read More »

Score good marks on Assignment Master of Social Work (MSW)

Universal Assignment Solutions: Your Premier Social Work Assignment Help Service Globally Are you struggling with your Master of Social Work (MSW) assignments? Look no further than Universal Assignment Solutions, the top assignment help service globally. Our dedicated team of experts is here to support you through your academic journey, ensuring

Read More »

Score good marks on Assignment Master of Fine Arts (MFA)

Universal Assignment Solutions: Your Premier Fine Arts Assignment Help Service Globally Are you struggling with your Master of Fine Arts (MFA) assignments? Look no further than Universal Assignment Solutions, the top assignment help service globally. Our dedicated team of experts is here to support you through your academic journey, ensuring

Read More »

Can't Find Your Assignment?