HI60325 IS Governance and Risk
Reading Critique: Individual Assessment
This assessment item relates to the unit learning outcomes as in the unit descriptor. This assessment is designed to improve student presentation and writing skills in developing short succinct overviews to some aspect of assigned reading for the week.
A set of readings and/or videos will be available to students in the Assessment 1 folder for each session. Each student is required to complete a one-page overview of some aspect of the reading. This could be a summary or a general discussion of key points. The ‘one-pager’ should be submitted by the end of each week. Every report has 1.5 marks allocated and the total will be 10 reports for a possible total of 15 marks overall for this assessment. Late submissions penalties will apply for overdue submissions.
The day and due time that the assessment must be submitted will be announced by your subject coordinator.
- Introduction – State an introduction of the case.
- Discussion – A summary or a general discussion of key points and the reading’s highlights.
- Conclusion – Summarize your findings, consolidating and drawing attention to the main points of the report.
- References. (cite here the references you have used in your report)
DO NOT SHARE YOUR ASSIGNMENT WITH OTHER STUDENTS under any
circumstances even after the deadline and after you submitted it in the Blackboard or even after you have received your grade. If there any similarity is detected by SafeAssign or the marker, it is an academic misconduct case and BOTH of the students will receive a zero grade and will be referred to Academic Integrity
All references must be in Harvard format including the in-text citations. For each reference you
must include a link to the full text of the reference. This link must be working and cannot be to just an abstract and title, or only a section of the paper you are referencing. This must be a direct link, we will not follow multiple links trying to find the paper.
You are required to use an adapted Harvard referencing scheme for the in-text citations. This adapted Harvard citation requires you to provide the page and paragraph number in the reference that the content you are referencing can be found. For example, the reference may be listed as
P Hawking, B McCarthy, A Stein (2004), Second Wave ERP Education, JournalofInfor-mationSystemsEducation, Fall, http://jise.org/Volume15/n3/JISEv15n3p327.pdf
The in-text citations would then be
The company decided to implement an enterprise wide data warehouse business intelligence strategies (Hawking et al, 2004, p3(4)).
In the above example with p3(4), the p3 refers to the page number within the reference, and the (4) refers to the paragraph number within that page where the content can be found. These referencing markers will be checked for accuracy and authenticity as part of the assessment grading process.
Where students do not follow the above referencing guidelines:
- Students who submit assignments which do not comply with the guidelines will be asked to resubmit their assignments.
- Late penalties will apply, as per the Student Handbook each day, after the student/s have been notified of the re-submission requirements.
- Students who provide false referencing information (including the page and paragraph markers) will be referred to the Academic Integrity Unit.
Your document should be a single MS Word or OpenOffice document containing your report. Do not use PDF as a submission format,
All submissions will be submitted through the safeAssign facility in Blackboard. Submission boxes linked to SafeAssign will be set up in the Units Blackboard Shell. Assignments not submitted through these submission links will not be considered.
Submissions must be made by the due date and time (which will be in the session detailed above) and determined by your Unit coordinator. Submissions made after the due date and time will be penalized per day late (including weekend days) according to Holmes Institute policies.
The SafeAssign similarity score will be used in determining the level, if any, of plagiarism. SafeAssignwillcheckconferenceweb-sites,Journalarticles,theWebandyourownclassmembers submissions for plagiarism. You can see your SafeAssign similarity score (or match) when you submit your assignment to the appropriate drop-box. If this is a concern you will have a chance to change your assignment and resubmit. However, re-submission is only allowed prior to the submission due date and time. After the due date and time have elapsed your assignment will be graded as late. Submitted assignments that indicate a high level of plagiarism will be penalizedaccording to the Holmes Academic Misconduct policy, there will be no exceptions. Thus, plan early and submit early to take advantage of the re-submission feature. You can make multiple submissions, but please remember we grade only the last submission, and the date and time you submitted will be taken from that submission.
Holmes Institute is committed to ensuring and upholding Academic Integrity, as Academic Integrity is integral to maintaining academic quality and the reputation of Holmes’ graduates. Accordingly, all assessment tasks need to comply with academic integrity guidelines. Table 1 identifies the six categories of Academic Integrity breaches. If you have any questions about Academic Integrity issues related to your assessment tasks, please consult your lecturer or tutor for relevant referencing guidelines and support resources. Many of these resources can also be found through the Study Sills link on Blackboard.
Academic Integrity breaches are a serious offence punishable by penalties that may range from deduction of marks, failure of the assessment task or unit involved, suspension of course enrolment, or cancellation of course enrolment.
|Plagiarism||Reproducing the work of someone else without attribution. When a student submits their own work on multiple occasions this is known as self-plagiarism.|
|Collusion||Working with one or more other individuals to complete an assignment, in a way that is not authorised.|
|Copying||Reproducing and submitting the work of another student, with or without their knowledge. If a student fails to take reasonable precautions to prevent their own original work from being copied, this may also be considered an offence.|
|Impersonation||Falsely presenting oneself, or engaging someone else to present as oneself, in an in-person examination.|
|Contract cheating||Contracting a third party to complete an assessment task, generally in exchange for money or other manner of payment.|
|Data fabrication and falsification||Manipulating or inventing data with the intent of supporting false conclusions, including manipulating images.|
Source: INQAAHE, 2020
Our team can easily solve all the assignments in HI60325 IS Governance and Risk (Holmes University) and many more. Place your order now!